=260. Petrographic Examination of Silt Particles.=—The larger silt

particles and the minute fragments of minerals in the soil can best be

studied in thin sections. For this purpose the following plan, proposed

by Thoulet, may be used. Mix the soil minerals in considerable

proportion—Thoulet recommends ten per cent, but a greater percentage is

often better—with zinc oxid and make into a paste with sodium silicate.

The paste should be worked to the consistence of putty and then rolled

into little tablets about one-eighth of an inch thick and an inch in

diameter. After drying a day or two without heating, the tablets become

hard enough to mount and grind like rock sections. These tablets are

mounted in Canada balsam on glass slides and ground as thin as possible

with fine emery on the turn-table or glass plate, as rock sections are

treated. As these tablets are not as strong as rock sections usually

are, they require care in this treatment. Some of the grains also are

apt to be torn out in the process of grinding and to compensate for this

loss a number of slides should be prepared with each lot of soil

minerals. When this operation has been successful, the optical

properties of the various minerals can be studied as in rock sections.

As the iron oxid contained in the soils obscures the transparency of the

minerals, it is well to treat a portion of the material under

examination with hot hydrochloric acid for a short time to remove this

oxid and then prepare slides with the cleansed material and compare

results with the untreated. As the acid will dissolve phosphates and

carbonates, and will partly or wholly decompose some other minerals, the

operator must be guided by his judgment in its use.

=261. Machine for Making Mineral Sections.=—A convenient apparatus for

this purpose has been described by Williams[167] and is represented in

Fig. 57. It is supported on a substantial table provided underneath with

electric batteries and a motor for driving the cutting disks seen on the

top. The table is three feet six inches square and two feet nine inches

high.

[Illustration:

FIGURE 57.

MACHINE FOR MAKING MINERAL SECTIONS.

]

The grinding apparatus consists of two circular disks of solid copper,

nine inches in diameter, and three-eighths inch thick, which may be used

alternately as different grades of emery are required. They are attached

either by a screw or square socket to a vertical iron spindle which

revolves smoothly in a conical bearing. The grinding disk is surrounded

when in use by a large cylindrical pan of tin, which is not shown in the

cut, which has an opening in its center to allow of the passage of the

spindle.

The sawing apparatus consists of a horizontal countershaft placed on a

different part of the table and connected with the motor by a separate

belt. It carries at one end a vertical wheel of solid emery, and at the

other an attachment, level-table and guide for the diamond-saw. A small

water-can with spout, not shown in the cut, is suspended over the edge

of the table to keep the saw wet when it is in use.

The machine is very conveniently driven by a storage battery when street

circuits cannot be drawn on.

For the details of making mineral sections, the works on petrography may

be consulted.

=262. Separation of Silt Particles by Specific Gravity Solutions.=—In

silt separates the specific gravity of the different mineral particles

present may vary from graphite (1.9–2.3) to hematite (5.2–5–3).

The following list gives the specific gravities of some of the more

common minerals which may be met with in soils:

Gypsum 2.31

Albite 2.56–2.63

Quartz 2.65

Talc 2.74

Chlorite 2.78

Muscovite 2.85

Calcite 2.5–2.78

Dolomite 2.90

Tourmaline 2.94–3.3

Biotite 3.01

Apatite 3.16

Pyroxenes 3.22–3.5

Epidote 3.39

Titanium Minerals 3.48–4.75

Iron oxids 5.2–5.3

The finest particles of silt are separated by gravity with great

difficulty, inasmuch as they tend to remain suspended in the solutions

for an indefinite period. With the coarser silts, however, useful data

are often obtained by this method. The separation is preceded by

extraction of the particles with hydrochloric acid to remove encrusted

soluble matter, and by ignition to destroy any traces of organic matter.

Those mineral matters which are soluble in acid or are changed by

ignition must, of course, be sought for in separate portions of the

silt,

=263. Thoulet’s Solution.=[168]—The standard solution is of such a

density that particles of 2.65 specific gravity-will just float thereon,

using for this purpose a solution of about 2.7 specific gravity. The

solution from which the above standard is prepared is made as follows:

One part of potassium iodid is weighed and placed in a beaker and one

and one-quarter part of mercuric iodid is placed on top of it. Then

water is added in the proportion of ten cubic centimeters to 100 grams

of the mixture, and after some time (twelve to twenty-four hours), with

occasional stirring, the salts will nearly completely dissolve. Filter

from the undissolved residue and evaporate in a porcelain dish until

crystals form on the surface of the liquid. Allow to cool, pour off the

liquid from the crystals and evaporate the liquid for another crop. The

first solution, after cooling, has a specific gravity between 3.10 and

3.20, the second a specific gravity of 3.28, practically the limit of

density of the solution. The solution of 2.7 specific gravity and other

densities are made by cautiously adding a few drops of water at a time

and ascertaining the specific gravity by the Westphal balance or other

convenient method.

The strong solution, according to Goldschmidt,[169] may be prepared

directly by using potassium iodid and mercuric iodid in the ratio of 1 :

1.24. Twenty-five cubic centimeters of water, 210 grams of potassium

iodid, and 280 grams of mercuric iodid afford a solution of 3.196

specific gravity at 15°, on which fluorspar fragments will float.

=264. Klein’s Separating Liquid.=—A solution of cadmium borotungstate,

of the composition 2H₂O,2CdO,B₂O₃,9WO₃ + 16H₂O, has been proposed by

Klein[170] for separating silt particles. This salt is obtained by

dissolving pure sodium tungstate in five times its weight of water,

adding one and a half parts of boric acid and boiling until, complete

solution takes place. On cooling; the borax is separated in crystalline

form. The mother-liquor after the removal of the crystals is carefully

concentrated by boiling. By stirring the cold solution, there is a

further separation of sodium borate and polyborate. This operation is

continued until glass will float on the mother-liquor. The salt in

solution then has the following composition: 4Na₂O,12WO₃,B₂O₃. To this

boiling concentrated solution, is added a boiling saturated solution of

barium chlorid, in the proportion of one part of the chlorid to three

parts of the original double tungstate. An abundant pulverulent

precipitate is formed, making the whole mass mushy. The mass is filtered

under pressure and well-washed with hot water. The residue is then

suspended in hot water containing one part in ten of hydrochloric acid

of 1.18 specific gravity. It is then evaporated to dryness in the

presence of an excess of hydrochloric acid and decomposed, by which

process hydrated tungstic acid is separated. The boiling mass is taken

up with water and the boiling continued for two hours with occasional

addition of water to take the place of that evaporated, and the tungstic

acid separated by filtration.

From the solution, beautiful quadratic crystals separate having the

composition 9WO₃,B₂O₃,2BaO₂H₂ + 18H₂O. These are purified by several

recrystallizations and freed from any scales of boric acid by washing

with alcohol. Any reducing action, revealed by a violet coloration of

the crystals, can be avoided by adding a few drops of nitric acid. From

a boiling solution of these crystals, the cadmium salt desired is

obtained by treatment with the proper amount of cadmium sulfate solution

to precipitate the barium. The barium sulfate is separated by

filtration. The cadmium borotungstate is soluble in less than ten parts

by weight of water. From this solution it is obtained in pure form by

evaporation under a vacuum, or by carefully concentrating on a

water-bath and cooling. A saturated solution of these crystals at 15°

has a bright yellow color and a specific gravity of 3.28.

If a dilute solution of the above salt be carefully evaporated on a

water-bath, any violet color which may be present disappears when the

specific gravity reaches 2.7. If the evaporation be continued until a

crystal of augite will float on the hot liquid, crystals may be obtained

on cooling which, dissolved in as little water as possible, make a

solution which will almost support olivine. If the two solutions be

united, the specific gravity of the mixture is 3.30–3.36. The highest

attainable specific gravity; _viz._, 3.6, is produced by continuing the

evaporation on a water-bath until the liquid will support olivine, and

then allowing to stand in a closed place for twenty-four hours. The

crystals of cadmium borotungstate thus obtained are freed as much as

possible from the mother-liquor by drainage and then melted at about 75°

in their own water of crystallization. A liquid is thus obtained on

which spinel will float. The same concentration may also be obtained by

careful heating on a water-bath. At its highest specific gravity this

solution has an oily consistence and this renders its practical use in

the separation of fine particles somewhat restricted. By filtering the

liquor when a crystalline crust begins to form during evaporation, a

cold solution of 3.360–3.365 specific gravity is obtained which is found

practically useful. It has a higher specific gravity than Thoulet’s

mixture, is not injurious to any of the mineral particles, not even of

iron with which it is brought into contact, but the trouble of preparing

it is far greater than that of the mixture of mercuric and potassium

iodids.

=265. Rohrbach’s Solution.=—The solution of barium mercuric iodid

recommended by Rohrbach[171] for this purpose was originally prepared by

Suchsin. The solution must be rapidly prepared on account of the

tendency of the barium salt to decomposition. The solution is prepared

by weighing rapidly 100 grams of barium and 130 grams of mercuric iodid,

mixing the two salts well in a dry flask and adding twenty cubic

centimeters of water. The mixture is raised to a temperature of

150°–200° on an oil-bath. The formation and solution of the double salt

are promoted by constant stirring.

After solution, the liquor is boiled for a few minutes and then

evaporated on a water-bath until it will bear a crystal of epidote. On

cooling, a small quantity of a yellow double salt is separated by

crystallization and the resulting mother-liquor is dense enough to carry

a fragment of topaz. Inasmuch as the liquor is filtered with difficulty,

the clear mother-liquor should be separated by decantation after

standing for several days. This solution has the disadvantage of not

being dilutable with water, the addition of which causes a separation of

red mercuric iodid. Were this solution not so easily decomposed, it

would prove of high value in silt separation.

=266. Braun’s Separating Liquid.=—In many respects the separatory

solution proposed by Braun[172] is superior to those already mentioned.

It is the commercial methylene iodid, CH₂I₂, which has at 16° a specific

gravity of 3.32, at 5° of 3.35, and at 25° of 3.31. It is a strongly

refractive liquid having a refractive index of 1.7466 for the yellow

ray.

As a separating medium the liquid is open to two objections; _viz._,

first, it cannot be diluted with water and, second, it turns brown on

heating or on long exposure to the sunlight.

When dilution is necessary, it should be accomplished with benzene or

xylene. To bring the diluted liquor again to its maximum density, the

benzene must be removed by evaporation, which causes a considerable loss

in the liquid. When this substance becomes opaque, the transparency may

be restored by removing the separated iodin by shaking with potash lye,

washing with pure water, drying by the addition of pieces of calcium

chlorid and filtering. The same result may also be reached by freezing

and separating the liquid portion. The frozen portion on melting will

have the density of the original liquid.

=267. Method of Bréon.=—Instead of a solution of a salt, Bréon[173] has

proposed to use salts in a fused state for separating mineral particles.

Lead and zinc chlorids may be used for this purpose in a melted state,

having the specific gravities of 5.0 and 2.4, respectively. By mixing

the molten salts in different proportions, any desired specific gravity

between the extremes mentioned may be secured. The fusion is

accomplished at 400° in a test-tube. The silt is added gradually with

constant stirring until a sharp separation is secured between the

sinking and floating particles. After cooling, the tube is broken, the

two parts separated, and the silt recovered by dissolving the mixed

salts in hot water containing a little nitric acid. Only the coarser

silts can be separated by this method. Fused silver nitrate, melting

point 198°, specific gravity 4.1, has also been used for separation.

=268. The Separation.=—Forty cubic centimeters of the solution in the

Thoulet process are placed in the separatory tube A, Fig. 58, together

with from one to two grams of the silt and the stopper F inserted. The

tube G is connected with a vacuum apparatus by means of which any air

particles adhering to the mineral fragments are removed. The silt which

sinks in the solution is removed after G has been disconnected by

opening the cock C and sucking through B at I. The cock C is closed and

the separated particles washed into a beaker at H after opening D. Water

is next added to the materials left in A in quantities previously

determined to secure a given specific gravity and thus a second, a

third, etc., separation secured. An intimate mixture of the solutions in

A can be effected by closing D, opening C, and blowing through B in such

a way that no liquid is allowed to pass through C.

[Illustration:

FIG. 58.

THOULET’S SEPARATING

APPARATUS.

]

The quantity of water to be added in each case to secure a given

specific gravity is determined by the formula _v_₁ = (_v_(D − _d_))/(_d_

− 1), in which _v_ is the volume of the solution, D its specific

gravity, and _d_ and _v_₁ the specific gravity desired and volume of the

water to be added.

_Example._—Let the specific gravity of the original solution be 3.2, its

volume thirty cubic centimeters, and the desired specific gravity of the

new solution 2.85.

Then _v_₁ = (30(3.2 − 2.85))/(2.85 − 1) = 5.68.

The desired specific gravity is therefore secured by adding 5.68 cubic

centimeters of water, which is easily accomplished by means of the

graduations on the tube.

According to Rosenbusch,[174] the calculated specific gravity as made

above is not wholly reliable on account of the contraction which takes

place. An empirical process is rather to be commended which consists in

introducing a fragment of mineral of known or desired specific gravity

and then adding water drop by drop until the fragment remains suspended

in the mixture. Should too much water be added, the necessary increase

in density can be secured by adding a little of the strong solution.

=269. Method of Packard.=—A separatory funnel, according to

Packard,[175] may be safely used to hold the solution while separation

is going on. As the lighter minerals form the bulk of soils, the heavier

constituting only a small percentage, it is well to use a wide funnel

holding as much as one-half liter for quantitative separations, because

a large quantity of soil, say 100 grams, is necessary from which to

recover the small quantity of heavy particles satisfactorily. The soil

is introduced into the solution contained in the funnel, agitated,

stirred with a glass rod, and allowed to stand some time. This operation

may be repeated as often as desired. Separation is not absolute by this

operation, the heavy and light particles being sometimes so united that

they sink or float together according as one or the other preponderates.

There are also particles having so nearly the same specific gravity as

the solution that they remain indifferent to its action in any position.

After separation has been effected, the heavy portion is drawn off

through the stop-cock of the funnel and the lighter is skimmed off the

top. Both must be thoroughly washed from the adhering heavy solution for

further examination with the microscope, and by chemical, microchemical,

and blow-pipe tests. One who has familiarized himself with the

appearance of minerals in minute fragments under the microscope, in

ordinary and polarized light, will be able to determine some minerals in

that way. But for certain identification it is necessary to ascertain

their optical properties as is done in the case of the minerals in thin

sections of rocks.

_Illustration._—The following example from the work of Packard will

serve to illustrate the results of separating a soil by the specific

gravity method:

One hundred grams of soil, residual clay from the Trenton limestone,

were placed in the Thoulet’s solution contained in the large separatory

funnel. The heavy portion, after washing and drying, weighed 0.6886

gram, or 0.69 per cent. Of this, the magnet removed 0.1635 gram, or 0.16

per cent. This heavy material consisted of rounded yellowish and brown

grains up to twenty-five millimeters in diameter, mingled with lustrous

angular black grains which were seen under the microscope to be cubes

with striated faces, cubes penetrating each other and aggregations of

cubes. Combinations of cubes with octahedra and instances of the

pentagonal dodecahedron were also observed. These forms, characteristic

of pyrites, were also seen in the fine sand obtained as a residue on

elutriating the same soil. As these crystals dissolved in hydrochloric

acid, giving a strong iron solution, they were regarded as pseudomorphs

of iron oxid after pyrites. The yellowish grains on treatment with acid

left a grayish residue which contained some grains of quartz but was not

wholly quartz. The lighter portion of the soil, over ninety-nine per

cent, which floated in the Thoulet’s solution of 2.8 was next examined.

It was colored red by the iron oxid which coated and adhered to the

other minerals. It contained all the quartz, the feldspars if present,

and the other minerals whose specific gravity is less than 2.8. It was

examined by the microscope and found to consist largely of irregular

grains of a mineral which acted on polarized light, obscured somewhat by

the iron oxid, and was apparently quartz; and another mineral which was

yellowish-brown in color and seemed to be dull and not transparent.

Besides there was a large quantity of indistinguishable amorphous

material. To clean these minerals the material was treated with

hydrochloric acid to remove the iron oxid and other matter soluble in

acid, when the quartz grains appeared transparent and gave interference

colors in polarized light. But mingled with these were grains of the

other mineral which now appeared grayish, dull, and without action on

polarized light. The character of this mineral substance could only be

determined by chemical analysis.

=270. Harada’s Apparatus.=—Although it has been affirmed by some

analysts that in the subsidence of small particles it is advisable that

the containing vessels have parallel sides, yet in the method just

given, and in those about to be described, good results are obtained in

a funnel or pear-shaped holder.

[Illustration:

FIGURE 59.

HARADA’S APPARATUS.

]

In the apparatus of Harada,[176] Fig. 59, the separating vessel _a_ is

made of thick glass furnished with a glass stopper above and a glass

stop-cock _h_ below. The separating liquid and silt are placed in the

pear-shaped vessel _a_, the stopper inserted, and the whole well-shaken.

As soon as a ring of clear liquid is seen between the sinking and

floating silt, the lower end of the apparatus is brought near the bottom

of a conical glass _b_, the cock _h_ opened and the heavy silt allowed

to fall out. Very little of the liquor will flow out because of the air

pressure. Should an air bubble enter the apparatus and be held at the

stop-cock, it should be made to ascend by gently tapping. When all the

heavy silt has passed into the conical glass, the cock _h_ is closed and

some water poured over the solution and silt in _b_. The separatory

apparatus is now raised until the beveled end of it is in the water

layer, when the water at once rises to _h_ and thus washes all the silt

particles adhering to the glass into _b_. The liquid in _a_ may then be

diluted by inverting the apparatus, adding the required amount of water

through _h_, again shaken after closing _h_, and another separation

secured as before.

This apparatus is somewhat easier to manipulate than Thoulet’s but does

not admit of the same quantitative dilution of the separating liquid.

[Illustration:

FIG. 60 a. FIG. 60 b. FIG. 60 c.

BRÖGGER’S APPARATUS.

]

=271. Apparatus of Brögger.=—All silt separations in narrow tubes are

open to the objection of permitting more or less flocculation. Some of

the lighter particles are thus carried down by the heavier, and, on the

other hand, some of the heavier float with the lighter. This disturbing

action Brögger[177] seeks to avoid by the following device, Fig. 60, a,

b, c. The length of the apparatus is forty-six centimeters, and its

greatest diameter 3.5 centimeters. The opening in the large stop-cock A

is the same diameter as that of the apparatus at that point. The cubical

content of the apparatus with A open and B closed is about seventy-five

cubic centimeters. In conducting the separation the cock B is closed,

the separating liquid and silt introduced, A being open, the stopper K

inserted and the whole well-shaken. In the first separation, the silt S,

lying over B is contaminated with some of the lighter particles S′₂,

while the lighter particles above A, S₂, are mixed with some of the

heavier particles, S′₁. After closing A the apparatus is again

well-shaken and inverted as in Fig. 60 b. The two parts of the silt will

now undergo another separation as indicated. The apparatus is now

carefully inclined as in c, when the various grades of silt will flow in

the directions indicated by the arrows, but without mixing, passing each

other on opposite sides of the apparatus. When the movement is complete,

A is carefully opened, the apparatus still being held as in c, and the

light silt formerly between A and B will flow above A, while the heavy

silt above A will flow down and join the silt collected over B. This

operation may be repeated until a perfect separation is effected.

Finally B is opened and the heavy silt collected in a beaker, and the

lighter silt then removed from the upper part of the apparatus.

[Illustration:

FIGURE 61.

APPARATUS OF WÜLFING.

]

Principles and practice of agricultural analysis. Volume 1 (of 3), Soils · 第 24 / 54 段