In the early 'sixties of the 19th century there were probably not more

than twenty-five organized clubs playing Association football in the

United Kingdom, and these were chiefly confined in the south of England

to the universities and public schools. But whilst the game was being

established in the south it was making steady progress in the north,

particularly in Yorkshire, where the Sheffield Club had been formed as

early as 1854. In 1867 the game had become so well established that it

was decided to play an inter-county match. The match, which was played

"in the wilds of Battersea Park," terminated in a draw, neither side

having obtained a goal; and it did much to stimulate the growing

popularity of the game. During the season 1870-1871, only three years

later, two matches of an international character were played between

Englishmen and Scotsmen in membership with the Football Association;

they were not, however, recognized as "international" matches. The first

real international match, England v. Scotland, was played on the 30th of

November 1872 at Partick, Glasgow; the first international match between

England and Wales was played at Kennington Oval in 1879; and that

between England and Ireland at Belfast in 1882. In 1896 amateur

international matches were inaugurated with Germany, Austria and

Bohemia; and games are now annually played with Scotland, Wales,

Ireland, France, Belgium, Germany, Holland, Austria and other

continental countries. As the outcome of the international relations

with Scotland, Wales and Ireland, an International Football Association

Board was formed in 1882, when a universal code of laws was agreed upon.

Two representatives from each of the four national associations

constitute the board, whose laws are accepted and observed not only by

the clubs and players of the United Kingdom but in all countries where

the Association game is played. At a meeting held at Paris on the 21st

of May 1904 the "International Federation of Association Football" was

instituted. It consists of the recognized national associations in the

respective countries: and its objects are to develop and control

Association international football. The countries in federation are:

Austria, Belgium, Denmark, England, Finland, France, Germany, Hungary,

Italy, Netherlands, Norway, Sweden and Switzerland.

The small number of clubs taking part in the game in the early days

becomes of interest when compared with the magnitude of the game in the

20th century. Association football has become one of the most popular of

all national sports in the United Kingdom. It is slowly but surely

taking a similar position on the continent of Europe and is making

progress even in the Far East, Japan being one of its latest adherents.

In the season of 1871-1872 the Football Association inaugurated its

popular challenge cup competition which is now competed for by both

amateur and professional clubs. In the first year fifteen clubs entered,

all of which were from the south of England. The first winners of the

cup were the Wanderers, who defeated the Royal Engineers in the final

tie by one goal to nothing. For the first ten years the competition was

mostly limited to the southern clubs, but in the season of 1881-1882 the

Blackburn Rovers were only defeated in the final tie by the Old Etonians

by one goal to nothing. Professionalism was then unknown in the game,

and comparatively little interest was taken in it except by the players

themselves. In the following season of 1882-1883 the cup was for the

first time taken north by the Blackburn Olympic Club, and it remained in

the north for the next nineteen years, until in the season of 1900-1901

it was again brought south by the Tottenham Hotspur Club, who defeated

the Sheffield United Club at Bolton by three goals to one. In the

following season the cup was again taken north by the Bury Club. In the

early days of the competition a few hundred people only attended the

final tie, which for many years was played at Kennington Oval in London.

In the course of time, however, the interest of the public so largely

increased that it became necessary to seek a ground of greater capacity;

accordingly in 1893 the final was played at Fallowfield, Manchester,

where it was watched by forty thousand people; in 1894 it was played at

Everton and in 1895 at the Crystal Palace. The attendance during the

following ten years averaged 80,000 people. The record attendance was in

the season of 1900-1901, when the south were contesting with the north,

the spectators then being upwards of 113,000. In the season of 1908-1909

356 clubs entered the competition; in 1910-11 the number had increased

to 404.

The great development of the game necessitated many changes in the

system of control. About the year 1880 (although contrary to the rules)

a practice of making payment to players crept into the game in the north

of England and slowly developed. After some years of debate as to the

best method of dealing with this development the Football Association

decided in 1885 to legalize and control the payment of players. The

rules define a professional player as one who receives remuneration of

any sort above his necessary hotel and travelling expenses actually

paid, or is registered as a professional. They further provide that

training expenses not paid by the players themselves will be considered

as remuneration beyond necessary travelling and hotel expenses. Players

competing for any money prizes in football contests are also considered

professionals.

In 1888 the Football League, a combination of professional clubs of the

north and midlands of England, was formed; and a new scheme was

inaugurated for the playing of matches on what is known as the "League"

principle, the essential advantage of which is that the clubs in

membership of a league agree to play with each other "home and home"

matches each season, and also bind themselves under certain penalties to

play their best team in all league matches. Six years later the Southern

League came into existence, primarily with the object of increasing the

interest in the game in the south and west of England. The Football

League and the Southern League very soon had their imitators, and in

1909 there were upwards of six hundred league competitions playing under

the sanction and control of the Football Association. The league system

also found favour in Scotland, Wales and Ireland, and has extended to

most of the colonies where Association football is played. In the season

of 1893-1894 the Amateur Cup Competition, restricted to amateur clubs in

membership with the Football Association, was inaugurated. In the first

season 32 clubs entered, and the growing popularity of the competition

is shown by the fact that in the season of 1908-1909 there were 229

entries.

The Football Association, founded in 1863 with its eleven clubs, had in

1909 under its jurisdiction upwards of 10,000 amateur clubs and a

quarter of a million of amateur players, and 400 professional clubs with

7000 professional players. It has also directly affiliated 52 county,

district and colonial associations, and indirectly in membership a large

number of minor associations which are affiliated through the county and

district associations. The Army Association includes 316 army clubs in

Great Britain and Ireland, together with clubs formed by the various

battalions in India, South Africa, Gibraltar and other army stations;

and the Royal Navy Football Association comprises all ships afloat

having Association football clubs.

The regulations of the Football Association, which is the recognized

administrative and legislative body for the game in England, make

provision for the sanction and control of leagues and competitions; and

its rules, regulations, principles and practices very largely prevail in

all national associations. The king is the patron, and the council

consists of 56 members, a president, 6 vice-presidents, a treasurer, 10

representatives elected by the clubs in the ten divisions into which the

country is subdivided, together with representatives of the army, the

navy and of county associations in England which have upwards of 50

clubs in membership, each representative being directly appointed by his

association. In 1905 the Football Association became incorporated under

the Joint Stock Companies Acts, and as a consequence the word "Limited"

appears in its title. It is not, however, a trading body; the

shareholders are not entitled to any dividend, bonus or profit, nor may

the members of the council, who are the directors, receive any payment

for their services. The Scottish Football Association is also an

incorporated body with similar powers. Many of the leading clubs of the

United Kingdom have also become incorporated, but under the regulations

of the Football Association they may not pay a larger dividend to their

shareholders than 5%, nor may any of the directors receive payment for

their services.

The whole policy of legislation in Association football of late years

has been naturally to make the game faster by bringing every one into

full play. The great aim accordingly has been to encourage combination

and to discourage purely individual efforts. In the early days, though

there was a certain amount of cohesion, a player had to rely mainly on

himself. Even up to the middle of the 'seventies dribbling was looked

upon as the great desideratum; it was the essential for a forward, just

as long kicks were the main object of a back. The development of the

game was of course bound to change all that. The introduction of

passing, long or short, but long in particular, placed the dribbler pure

and simple at a discount, and necessitated methods with which he was

mostly unacquainted. Combined play gradually came to be regarded as the

keynote to success. Instead of one full back, as was originally the

case, and one half-back, the defence gradually developed by the addition

first of a second half, then of a second full back, and still later of a

third half-back, until it came to show, in addition to the goalkeeper of

course, two full backs and three half-backs. The eight forwards who used

to constitute the attack in the earliest days of the Association have

been reduced by degrees, as the science of the game became understood,

until they now number only five. The effect of the transition has been

to put the attack and defence on a more equal footing, and as a natural

consequence to make the game more open and thereby generally more

interesting and attractive. Association football is indeed, from the

standpoint of the spectator, a much brighter game than it was in its

infancy, the result of the new methods bringing every one of the eleven

players into full relief throughout the game. The players who, as a

rule, make or mar the success of a side in modern football are the

centre forward and the centre half-back. They are the pivot on which the

attack and the defence respectively turn. Instead of close dribbling and

following up, the new formation makes for accuracy of passing among the

forwards, with intelligent support from the half-backs. The net result

is practically the effective combination of the whole side. To do his

part as it ought to be done every member of an eleven must work in

harmony with the rest, and on a definite system, in all cases

subordinating his own methods and personal interests to promote the

general well-being of the side. (C. W. A.; F. J. W.)

The literature of British football is very extensive, but the

following works are among the best: _Football_ in the "Badminton

Library" (London, 1904), where the different games played at Eton,

Harrow, Rugby, Winchester and other public schools are thoroughly

described; Rev. F. Marshall, _Football; the Rugby Game_ (London,

Cassells); J.E. Vincent, _Football; its History for Five Centuries_

(London, 1885); C.J.B. Marriott and C.W. Alcock, _Football_ ("Oval

Series"); "Football," in the _Encyclopaedia of Sport_; _The Rugby

Football Union Handbook_, Richardson, Greenwich, Official Annual; and

_The Football Annual_, Merritt and Hatcher (Association Game), London.

_United States._--In America the game of football has been elaborated

far more than elsewhere, and involves more complications than in

England. From colonial times until 1871 a kind of football generally

resembling the English Association game was played on the village greens

and by the students of colleges and academies. There was no running with

the ball, but dribbling, called "babying," was common. In 1871 a code of

rules was drawn up, but they were unsatisfactory and not invariably

observed. "Batting the ball," i.e. striking the ball forward with the

fists, was allowed. There were two backs, sixteen rushers or forwards,

and two rovers or "peanutters," who lurked near the opponents' goal.

During this period the first international football game was played at

Yale between the college team and one made up of old Etonians, the rules

being a compromise between the American and the English.

English Rugby, introduced from Canada, was first played at Harvard

University, and in 1875 a match under a compromise set of rules, taken

partly from the Rugby Union and partly from the existing American game,

was played with Yale. The following year Yale adopted the regular Rugby

Union rules, and played Harvard under these. Later, several other

colleges adopted these English rules. Absence of tradition necessitated

expansion of these laws, and a convention of colleges was assembled.

Thenceforward annual conventions were held, which from time to time

altered and amplified the rules. A college association was formed, and

the game grew in popularity. Public criticism of the roughness shown in

the play early threatened its existence; indeed at one time the

university authorities compelled Harvard to abstain from the annual game

with Yale. Changes in the rules were introduced, and the game has been

characterized by less roughness and by increased skill. It has become

the most popular autumn game in the United States, the principal

university matches often attracting crowds of 35,000 and even 40,000

spectators. The association subsequently disbanded, but a Rules

Committee, invited by the University Athletic Club of New York, made the

necessary changes in the rules from time to time, and these have been

accepted by the country at large. In the West associations were formed;

but the game in the East is played principally under separate agreements

between the contesting universities, all using, however, one code of

rules. Later this Rules Committee amalgamated with a new committee of

wider representation. Amateur athletic clubs as well as public and

private schools have also taken up the game. The American football

season lasts from the middle of September to the first of December only,

owing to the severity of the American winter. Professional football is

not played in America.

The American Rugby game is played by teams of eleven men on a field of

330 ft. long and 160 ft. wide, divided by chalk lines into squares with

sides 5 yds. long, leaving a strip 5 ft. wide on each side of the field.

Until 1903 the field was divided by latitudinal lines only and was

therefore popularly called the "gridiron"; subsequently it was called

the "checkerboard." The end lines are called "goal-lines," the side

"touch-lines." The two lines 25 yds. from each goal-line, and the middle

line, or 55 yard-line, are made broader than the rest. In the middle of

each goal-line is a goal, consisting of two uprights exceeding 20 ft. in

length, set 18 ft. 6 in. apart with a crossbar 10 ft. from the ground.

The ball is in shape and material of the English Rugby type.

[Illustration: DIAGRAM OF FIELD.

The football rules provide that when the ball is put in play in a

scrimmage, the first man who receives the ball, commonly known as the

quarter-back, may carry it forward beyond the line of scrimmage,

provided in so doing he crosses such line at least 5 yds. from the

point where the snapper-back put the ball in play, and furthermore,

that a forward pass may be made provided the ball passes over the line

of scrimmage at least 5 yds. from the point at which the ball is put

in play. The field is marked off at intervals of 5 yds. with white

lines parallel to the goal line, for convenience in penalizing fouls

and for measuring the 10 yds. to be gained in three downs, and also at

intervals of 5 yds. with white lines parallel to the side lines, in

order to assist the referee in determining whether the quarter-back

runs according to rule, or whether, in case of a forward pass, such

pass is legally made. Thus the football field is changed from the

gridiron as in 1902, to what now resembles a checkerboard, and the

above diagram shows exactly how the field should be marked. As the

width of the field does not divide evenly into 5 yd. spaces, it is

wise to run the first line through the middle point of the field and

then to mark off the 5 yds. on each side from that middle line. In

order to save labour, it may be sufficient to omit the full completion

of the longitudinal lines, as the object of these lines is

accomplished if their points of intersection with the transverse lines

are distinctly marked, for instance, by a line a foot long.]

A match game consists of two periods (_halves_) of thirty-five minutes

with an interval of fifteen minutes. Practice games usually have shorter

halves. There are four officials: the _umpire_, whose duty it is to

watch the conduct of the players and decide regarding fouls; the

_referee_, who decides questions regarding the progress of the ball and

of play; the _field judge_ who assists the referee and keeps the time;

and the _linesman_, who (with two assistants, one representing each

eleven) marks the distance gained or lost in each play.

In scoring, a "touchdown" (the English Rugby "try") counts 5 points, a

goal from a touchdown 6 (or one added to the 5 for the touchdown), a

"goal from the field," whether from placement or drop-kick, 4, and a

"safety" (the English Rugby "touchdown") 2. _Mutatis mutandis_, these

are made as in English Rugby. American Rugby differs from the English

game, because in the scrimmage the men are lined up opposite each other,

and, although separated by the length of the ball, are engaged in a

constant man-to-man contest, and also in that a system of "interference"

is allowed. Furthermore, a player in the American game is put "on side"

when a kicked ball strikes the ground; and forward passing, i.e.

throwing the ball toward the opponents' goal, is permissible under

certain restrictions. The costume usually consists of a close-fitting

jersey with shoulders and elbows padded and reinforced with leather;

short trousers with padded thighs and knees, heavy stockings and shoes

with leather cleats. In the early period of the game caps were worn,

but, as they were impossible to keep on, they were discarded in favour

of the wearing of long hair, and the "chrysanthemum head" became the

distinguishing mark of the football player. This, however, proved an

inadequate protection, and some players now wear a "head harness" of

soft padded leather. Substitutes are allowed in the places of injured

players.

The object of the game is identical with that of English Rugby, and the

rules in regard to fair catches, punting, drop-kicking, place-kicking,

goal-kicking, passing and gentlemanly conduct are practically the same,

except that, on a free kick after a fair catch, the opposing players in

the American game may not come up to the mark but must keep 10 yds. in

front of it. In the American game there is no scrummage in the English

sense, nor is the ball thrown in at right angles after going into touch.

The element of chance in both these methods of play was done away with

by the enunciation of the principle of the "possession of the ball." In

America, when the ball has gone out of bounds or a runner has been

tackled and held and the ball downed, the ball is also put into play by

an evolution called a scrimmage, usually called "line-up," which beyond

the name bears no resemblance to the English scrummage. The ball, at

every moment of the game, belongs theoretically either to one side or to

the other. It may be lost by a fumble, or by the side in possession not

being able to make the required distance of 10 yds. in three successive

attempts or by a voluntary kick. In the line-up the seven linemen (i.e.

forwards) face each other on a line parallel to the goal-lines on the

spot where it was ordered down by the referee. The ball is placed on the

ground by the centre-rush, also called the snapper-back, who, upon the

signal being given by his quarter-back, "snaps back" the ball to this

player, or to the full-back, by a quick movement of the hand or foot.

The moment the ball is snapped-back it is in play. In every scrimmage it

is a foul for the side having the ball (attacking side) to obstruct an

opponent except with the body (no use may be made of hands or arms); or

for the defending side to interfere with the snap-back. The defenders

may use their hands and arms only to get their opponents out of the way

in order to get at the man with the ball. Each member of the attacking

side endeavours, of course, to prevent his opponents from breaking

through and interfering with the quarter-back, who requires this

protection from his line in order to have time to pass the ball to one

of the backs, whom he has notified by a signal to be ready. In the

United States a player may be obstructed by an off-side opponent so long

as hands and arms are not used. In the line-up this is called

"blocking-off" and "interference" when done to protect a friend running

with the ball. Interference is one of the most important features of

American football. As soon as the ball is passed to one of the

half-backs for a run, for example, round one end of the line, his

interference must form immediately. This means that one or more of his

fellows must accompany and shield him as he runs, blocking off any

opponent who tries to tackle him. The first duty of the defence against

a hostile run is therefore to break up the interference, i.e. put these

defenders out of the play, so that the runner may be reached and

tackled.

The game begins by the captains tossing for choice of kick-off or goal.

If the winner of the toss chooses the goal, on account of the direction

of wind, the loser must kick off and send the ball at least 10 yds. into

the opponents' territory from a place-kick from the 55 yds. line. The

two ends of the kicking side, who are usually fast runners, get down the

field after the ball as quickly as possible, in order to prevent the man

who catches the kick-off from running back with the ball. When the

kick-off is caught, the catcher with the aid of interference runs it

back as far as possible, and as soon as he is tackled and held by his

opponents the ball is down, and a line-up takes place, the ball being in

the possession of the catcher's side, which now attacks. In order to

prevent the so-called "block game," once prevalent, in which neither

side made any appreciable progress, the rules provide that the side in

possession of the ball must make _at least 10 yds. in three successive

attempts_, or, failing to do so, must surrender the ball to the enemy,

or, as it is called, "lose the ball on downs". This is infrequent in

actual play, because if, after two unsuccessful attempts, or partly

successful, it becomes evident that the chances of completing the

obligatory 10-yd. gain on the remaining attempt are unfavourable, a

forward pass or a kick is resorted to, rather than risk losing the ball

on the spot. The kick, although resulting in the loss of the ball,

nevertheless gives it to the enemy much nearer his goal. When the wind

is strong the side favoured by it usually kicks often, as the other

side, not being able to kick back on equal terms, is forced to play a

rushing game, which is always exhausting. Again, the kicking game is

often resorted to by the side that has the lead in the score, in order

to save its men and yet retain the advantage. The only remaining way to

advance the ball is on a free-kick after a fair catch, as in the English

game. The free kick may be either a punt, a drop-kick or a kick from

placement. Whenever the ball goes over the side line into touch it is

brought back to the point where it crossed the line by the man who

carried it over, or, if kicked or knocked over, by a man of the side

which did not kick it out, and there put in play in one of two ways.

Either it may be touched to the ground and then kicked at least 10 yds.

towards the opponents' goal, or it may be taken into the field at right

angles to the line a distance not less than 5 yds. nor more than 15, and

there put down for a line-up, the player who takes it in first declaring

how far he will go, so that the opposing team may not be caught napping.

Of the seven men in the line, the centre is chosen for his weight and

ability to handle the ball cleanly in snapping back. He must also, in

case the full-back is to make the next play, be able to throw the ball

from between his legs accurately into the full-back's hands, thus saving

the time that would be wasted if the quarter-back were used as an

intermediary. The two "guards," who must also be heavy men, form with

the centre the bulk of the line, protecting the backs in offence, and in

defence blocking the enemy. The two "tackles" must be heavy yet active

and aggressive men, as they must not only help the centre and guards in

repelling assaults on the middle of the line, but also assist the ends

in stopping runs round the line as well as those between tackle and end,

a favourite point of attack. The "ends" are chosen for their activity,

sure tackling, fast running and ability to follow up the ball after a

kick. Of the four players behind the line, the full-back must be a sure

catcher and tackler and a fast runner. The two half-backs must also be

fast runners and good dodgers. One of them is often chosen for his

ability to gain ground by "bucking the line," i.e. plunging through the

opposing team's line. He must therefore be over the average weight,

while the other half-back is called upon to gain by running round the

opposing ends. The quarter-back is the commanding general and therefore

the most important member of his side, as with him lies the choice of

plays to be made when on the attack. Courage, coolness, promptness in

decision and discrimination in the choice of plays are the qualities

absolutely required for this position. As soon as his side obtains the

ball, the quarter-back shouts out a signal, consisting of a series of

numbers or letters, or both, which denotes a certain play that is to be

carried through the moment the ball is snapped back. A good quarter-back

thinks rapidly and shouts his signal for the next play as soon as a down

has been called and while the scrimmage is forming, so that the plays

are run off rapidly and the enemy is given as little time as possible to

concentrate. The signals, which are secret and often changed to guard

them from being solved by the enemy, are formed by designating every

position and every space in the line, as well as kicks and other open

plays, by a number or letter. Some signals are called sequence-signals,

and indicate a prearranged series of plays for use in certain

emergencies. Every manoeuvre of the attacking side is carried out by

every member of the team, the ideal being "every man in every play every

time." As soon as a signal is given each man should know what part of

the ensuing move will fall to him, in carrying the ball, interfering for

the runner, or getting down the field under a punt. Every team has its

own code.

About 1890 the system of interference led to momentum and mass plays

(wedge-formations, tandems, &c.), i.e. to the grouping of bodies of men

behind the line, and starting them before the ball was snapped back, so

that they struck the line with an acquired momentum that was extremely

severe, particularly when met by men equally determined. These plays

caused frequent injuries and led to legislation against them, the most

important law providing for a limitation to the number of men who could

be dropped back of the line, and practically keeping seven men drawn up

in the line.

_Penalties_ are of three kinds: (1) forfeiture of the game, for refusing

to play when directed to do so by the referee, and for repeated fouls

made with the intention of delaying the game; (2) disqualification of

players for unnecessary roughness or ungentlemanly conduct; and (3) for

infringement of rules, for which certain distances are taken away from

the previous gains of the side making the fouls.

The game resolves itself into a series of scrimmages interspersed with

runs and kicks. The systematized development of plays places at the

disposal of the quarter an infinite variety of attack, which he seeks to

direct at the opposing line with bewildering rapidity and dash. During

the preliminary games of the season "straight football" is generally

played; that is, intricate attacks are avoided and kicks and simple

plunges into the line are mainly relied upon. "Trick plays," which

comprise all manoeuvres of an intricate nature, are reserved for later

and more important matches. Among these is the "fake (false) kick," in

which the full-back takes position as if to receive the ball for a kick,

but the ball is passed to a different player for a run. Another play of

this kind is the "wing-shift," in which some or all of the players on

one side of centre suddenly change to the other side, thus forming a

mass and throwing the opponents' line out of balance. To this category

belong also "double passes," "false passes," "delayed passes," "delayed

runs" and "criss-crosses."

Training for football in America resembles that for other sports in

regard to food and hygiene. The coaching systems at the universities

differ, but there is generally a head coach, who is assisted by

graduates, each of whom pays especial attention to one set of men, one

to the men in the centre of the line, one to the backs, another to the

ends, &c. Candidates for the teams are put through a severe course of

practice in catching punts and hard-thrown passes, in quick starts,

falling on the ball, tackling a mechanical dummy, in blocking, breaking

through the line, and all kinds of kicking, although in matches the

kicking is generally left to one or two men who have shown themselves

particularly expert. Every player is taught to dive for the ball

whenever he sees it on the ground, as possession is of cardinal

importance in American football, and dribbling for this reason is

unknown. When running with the ball the player is taught to take short

steps, to follow his interference, that is, not isolate himself from his

defenders, and neither to slow up nor shut his eyes when striking the

opposing line. Tackling well below the waist is taught, but it is a foul

to tackle below the knee. The general rule for defensive work of all

kinds is "play low."

See Walter Camp, _How to play Football_, and the _Official Football

Guide_ (annual), both in Spalding's Athletic Library; his _Book of

College Sports_ (New York, 1893), his _American Football_ (New York,

1894), and his _Football_ (Boston, 1896)--the last in co-operation

with L.F. Deland; R.H. Barbour, _The Book of School and College

Sports_ (New York, 1904); W.H. Lewis, _Primer of College Football_

(Boston, 1896). (E. B.; W. Ca.)

FOOTE, ANDREW HULL (1806-1863), American admiral, was born at New Haven,

Connecticut, on the 12th of September 1806, his father, Samuel Augustus

Foote (1780-1846), being a prominent lawyer and Whig politician, who as

U.S. senator moved in 1829 "Foote's resolutions" on public lands, in the

discussion of which Daniel Webster made his "reply to Hayne." He entered

the U.S. navy in 1822, and was commissioned lieutenant in 1830. After

cruising round the world (1837-1840) in the "John Adams," he was

assigned to the Philadelphia Naval Asylum, and later (1846-1848) to the

Boston Navy Yard. In 1849 he was made commander of the "Perry," and

engaged for two years in suppressing the slave trade on the African

coast. In 1856, as commander of the "Portsmouth," he served on the East

India station, under Com. James Armstrong, and he captured the Barrier

Forts near Canton. From October 1858 to the outbreak of the Civil War,

he was in charge of the Brooklyn Navy Yard, becoming a full captain in

1861. In August 1861 he was assigned to the command "of the naval

operations upon the Western waters." His exploit in capturing Fort Henry

(on the right bank of the Tennessee river) from the Confederates, on the

6th of February 1862, without the co-operation of General Grant's land

forces, who had not arrived in time, was a brilliant success; but their

combined attack on Fort Donelson (12 m. off, on the left bank of the

Cumberland river), whither most of the Fort Henry garrison had escaped,

resulted, before its surrender (Feb. 16), in heavy losses to Foote's

gunboats, Foote himself being severely wounded. In March-April he

co-operated in the capture of New Madrid (q.v.) and Island No. 10. In

June he retired from his command and in July was promoted rear-admiral,

and became chief of the Bureau of Equipment and Recruiting. On the 26th

of June 1863 he died at New York.

See the life (1874) by Professor James Mason Hoppin (1820-1906).

FOOTE, MARY HALLOCK (1847- ), American author and illustrator, was

born in Milton, New York, on the 19th of November 1847, of English

Quaker ancestry. She was educated at the Poughkeepsie (N.Y.) Female

Collegiate Seminary and at the Cooper Institute School of Design for

women, in New York. In 1876 she married Arthur De Wint Foote, a mining

engineer, and subsequently lived in the mining regions of California,

Idaho, Colorado and Mexico. She is best known for her stories, in which,

as in her drawings, she portrays vividly the rough picturesque life,

especially the mining life, of the West. Some of her best drawings

appear in her own books. Among her publications are _The Led-Horse

Claim_ (1883), _John Bodewin's Testimony_ (1886), _The Chosen Valley_

(1892), _Coeur d'Alene_ (1894); _The Prodigal_ (1900), a novelette; _The

Desert and the Sown_ (1902); and several collections of short stories,

including _A Touch of Sun and other Stories_ (1903).

FOOTE, SAMUEL (1720-1777), English dramatist and actor, was baptized at

Truro on the 27th of January 1720. Of his attachment to his native

Cornwall he gives no better proofs as an author than by making the

country booby Timothy (in _The Knights_) sound the praises of that

county and of its manly pastimes; but towards his family he showed a

loyal and enduring affection. His father was a man of good family and

position. His mother, Eleanor Goodere, whom he is said in person as well

as in disposition to have strongly resembled, he liberally supported in

the days of his prosperity, and after her death indignantly vindicated

her character from the imputations recklessly cast upon it by the

revengeful spite of the duchess of Kingston. About the time when Foote

came of age, he inherited his first fortune through the murder of his

uncle, Sir John Dinely Goodere, Bart., by his brother, Captain Samuel

Goodere. Foote was educated at the collegiate school at Worcester, and

at Worcester College, Oxford, distinguishing himself in both places by

mimicry and audacious pleasantries of all kinds, and, although he left

Oxford without taking his degree, acquiring a classical training which

afterwards enabled him neatly to turn a classical quotation or allusion,

and helped to give to his prose style a certain fluency and elegance.

Foote was "designed" for the law, but certainly not by nature. In his

chambers at the Temple, and in the Grecian Coffee-house hard by, he

learned to know something of lawyers if not of law, and was afterwards

able to jest at the jargon and to mimic the mannerisms of the bar, and

to satirize the Latitats of the other branch of the profession with

particular success. The famous argument in Hobson v. Nobson, in _The

Lame Lovers_, is almost as good of its kind as that in Bardell v.

Pickwick. But a stronger attraction drew him to the Bedford Coffee-house

in Covent Garden, and to the theatrical world of which it was the social

centre. After he had run through two fortunes (the second of which he

appears to have inherited at his father's death), and had then passed

through severe straits, he made his first appearance on the actual stage

in 1744. It is said that he had married a young lady in Worcestershire;

but the traces of his wife (he affirmed himself that he was married to

his washer-woman) are mysterious, and probably apocryphal.

Foote's first appearance as an actor was made little more than two

years after that of Garrick, as to whose merits the critics, including

Foote himself, were now fiercely at war. His own first venture, as

Othello, was a failure; and though he was fairly successful in genteel

comedy parts, and was, after a favourable reception at Dublin, enrolled

as one of the regular company at Drury Lane in the winter of 1745-1746,

he had not as yet made any palpable hit. Finding that his talent lay

neither in tragedy nor in genteel comedy, he had begun to wonder "where

the devil it _did_ lie," when his successful performance of the part of

Bayes in _The Rehearsal_ at last suggested to him the true outlet for

his extraordinary gift of mimicry. Following the example of Garrick, he

had introduced into this famous part imitations of actors, and had added

a variety of other satirical comment in the way of "gag." Engaging a

small company of actors, he now boldly announced for the 22nd of April

1747, at the theatre in the Haymarket "_gratis_," "a new entertainment

called the _Diversions of the Morning_," to which were to be added a

farce adapted from Congreve, and an epilogue "spoken by the B-d-d

Coffee-house." Foote's success in these _Diversions_ obtained for him

the name of "the English Aristophanes," an absurd compliment, declined

by Foote himself (see his letter in _The Minor_). The _Diversions_

consisted of a series of imitations of actors and other well-known

persons, whose various peculiarities of voice, gesture, manner or dress

were brought directly before the spectators, while the epilogue

introduced the wits of the Bedford engaged in ludicrous disputation, and

specially "took off" an eminent physician (probably the munificent Sir

William Browne, whom he afterwards caricatured in _The Devil on Two

Sticks_), and a notorious quack oculist of the day. The actors ridiculed

in this entertainment having at once procured the aid of the constables

for preventing its repetition, Foote immediately advertised an

invitation to his friends to drink a dish of tea with him at the

Haymarket on the following day at noon--"and 'tis hoped there will be a

great deal of comedy and some joyous spirits; he will endeavour to make

the morning as diverting as possible. Tickets for this entertainment to

be had at St George's coffee-house, Temple-Bar, without which no person

will be admitted. N.B.--_Sir Dilbury Diddle will be there, and Lady

Betty Frisk has absolutely promised._" The device succeeded to

perfection; further resistance was abandoned as futile by the actors,

whom Foote mercilessly ridiculed in the "instructions to his pupils"

which the entertainer pretended to impart (typifying them under

characters embodying their several chief peculiarities or defects--the

massive and sonorous James Quin as a watchman, the shrill-voiced Lacy

Ryan as a razor-grinder, the charming Peg Woffington, whose tones had an

occasional squeak in them, as an orange-woman crying her wares and the

bill of the play); and Mr Foote's _Chocolate_, which was afterwards

converted into an evening _Tea_, became an established favourite with

the town.

In spite of this success, he seems to have contrived to spend a third

fortune, and to have found it necessary to eke out his means by a

speculation in small-beer, as is recorded in an amusing anecdote told of

him by Johnson. But he could now command a considerable income; and when

money came he seems to have freely expended it in both hospitality and

charity. During his engagements at Covent Garden and at Drury Lane, of

which he was joint-manager, and in professional trips to Scotland, and

more especially to Ireland, he appeared both in comedies of other

authors and more especially in his own. He played Hartop in his

_Knights_ (1749, printed 1754). _Taste_ (1752), in which parts of the

_Diversions_ were incorporated, was followed by some eighteen pieces,

the majority of which were produced at the Haymarket, the favourite home

of Foote's entertainments. In 1760 he succeeded in obtaining for this

theatre a licence from the lord chamberlain, afterwards (in 1766)

converted into a licence for summer performances for life. The

entertainments were a succession of variations on the original idea of

the _Diversions_ and the _Tea_. Now, it was an Auction of Pictures

(1748), of part of which an idea may be formed from the second act of

the comedy Taste; now, a lecture on _Orators_ (1754), suggested by some

bombastic discourses given by Macklin in his old age at the Piazza

coffee-house in Covent Garden, where Foote had amused the audience and

confounded the speaker by interposing his humorous comments. _The

Orators_ is preserved in the shape of a hybrid piece, which begins with

a mock lecture on the art of oratory and its representatives in England,

and ends with a diverting scene of a pot-house forum debate, to which

Holberg's _Politician-Tinman_ can hardly have been a stranger. At a

later date (1773) a new device was introduced in a _Puppet-show_. The

piece (unprinted) played in this by the puppets was called _Piety in

Pattens_, and professed to show "by the moral how maidens of low degree

might become rich from the mere effects of morality and virtue, and by

the literature how thoughts of the most commonplace might be concealed

under cover of words the most high flown." In other words, it was an

attack upon sentimental comedy, which was still not altogether

extinguished. An attack upon Garrick in connexion with the notorious

Shakespeare jubilee was finally left out from the _Puppet-show_, and

thus was avoided a recurrence of the quarrel which many years before had

led to an interchange of epistolary thrusts, and an imitation by

Woodward of the imitative Foote.

On the whole, the relations between the two public favourites became

very friendly, and on Foote's part unmistakably affectionate, and they

have not been always generously represented by Garrick's biographers. A

comparison between the two as actors is of course out of the question;

but, though Foote was a buffoon, and his tongue a scurrilous tongue,

there is no authentic ground for the suggestion that his character was

one of malicious heartlessness. Of Samuel Johnson's opinions of him many

records remain in Boswell; when Johnson had at last found his way into

Foote's company (he afterwards found it to Foote's own table) he was

unable to "resist" him, and, on hearing of Foote's death, he thought the

career just closed worthy of a lasting biographical record.

Meanwhile most of poor Foote's friendships in high life were probably

those that are sworn across the table, and require "t'other bottle" to

keep them up. It is not a pleasant picture--of Lord Mexborough and his

royal guest the duke of York, and their companions, bantering Foote on

his ignorance of horsemanship, and after he had weakly protested his

skill, taking him out to hounds on a dangerous animal. He was thrown and

broke his leg, which had to be amputated, the "patientee" (in which

character he said he was now making his first appearance) consoling

himself with the reflection that he would now be able to take off "old

Faulkner" (a pompous Dublin alderman with a wooden leg, whom he had

brought on the stage as Peter Paragraph in _The Orators_) "to the life."

The duke of York made him the best reparation in his power by promising

him a life-patent for the theatre in the Haymarket (1766); and Foote not

only resumed his profession, as if, like Sir Luke Limp, he considered

the leg he had lost "a redundancy, a mere nothing at all," but

ingeniously turned his misfortune to account in two of his later pieces,

_The Lame Lover_ and _The Devil on Two Sticks_, while, with the true

instinct of a public favourite, making constant reference to it in plays

and prologues. Though the characters played by him in several of his

later plays are comparatively short and light, he continued to retain

his hold over the public, and about the year 1774 was beginning to think

of withdrawing, at least for a time, to the continent, when he became

involved in what proved a fatal personal quarrel. Neither in his

entertainments nor in his comedies had he hitherto (except in Garrick's

case, and it is said in Johnson's) put any visible restraint upon

personal satire. _The Author_, in which, under the infinitely humorous

character of Cadwallader, he had brought a Welsh gentleman of the name

of Ap-Rice on the stage, had, indeed, been ultimately suppressed. But in

general he had pursued his hazardous course, mercilessly exposing to

public ridicule and contempt not only fribbles and pedants, quacks or

supposed quacks in medicine (as in _The Devil on Two Sticks_),

enthusiasts in religion, such as Dr Dodd (in _The Cozeners_) and George

Whitefield and his connexion (in _The Minor_). He had not only dared the

wrath of the whole Society of Antiquaries (in _The Nabob_), and been

rewarded by the withdrawal, from among the pundits who rationalized away

Whittington's Cat, of Horace Walpole and other eminent members of the

body, but had in the same play attacked a well-known representative of a

very influential though detested element in English society,--the

"Nabobs" themselves. But there was one species of cracked porcelain

which he was not to try to hold up to contempt with impunity. The rumour

of his intention to bring upon the stage, in the character of Lady Kitty

Crocodile in _The Trip to Calais_, the notorious duchess of Kingston,

whose trial for bigamy was then (1775) impending, roused his intended

victim to the utmost fury; and the means and influence she had at her

disposal enabled her, not only to prevail upon the lord chamberlain to

prohibit the performance of the piece (in which there is no hint as to

the charge of bigamy itself), but to hire agents to vilify Foote's

character in every way that hatred and malice could suggest. After he

had withdrawn the piece, and letters had been exchanged between the

duchess and him equally characteristic of their respective writers,

Foote took his revenge upon the chief of the duchess's instruments, a

"Reverend Doctor" Jackson, who belonged to the "reptile" society of the

journalists of the day, so admirably satirized by Foote in his comedy of

_The Bankrupt_. This man he gibbeted in the character of Viper in _The

Capuchin_, under which name the altered _Trip to Calais_ was performed

in 1776. But the resources of his enemies were not yet at an end; and a

discharged servant of Foote's was suborned by Jackson to bring a charge

of assault and apply for a warrant against him. Though the attempt

utterly broke down, and Foote's character was thus completely cleared,

his health and spirits had given way in the struggle--as to which,

though he seems to have had the firm support of the better part of the

public, including such men as Burke and Reynolds, the very audiences of

his own theatre had been, or had seemed to be, divided in opinion. He

thus resolved to withdraw, at least for a time, from the effects of the

storm, let his theatre to Colman, and after making his last appearance

there in May 1777, set forth in October on a journey to France. But at

Dover he fell sick on the day after his arrival there, and after a few

hours died (October 21st). His epitaph in St Mary's church at Dover

(written by his faithful treasurer William Jewell) records that he had a

hand "open as day for melting charity." His resting-place in Westminster

Abbey is without any memorial.

Foote's chief power as an actor lay in his extraordinary gift of

mimicry, which extended to the mental and moral, as well as the mere

outward and physical peculiarities of the personages whose likeness he

assumed. He must have possessed a wonderful flexibility of voice,

though his tones are said to have been harsh when his voice was not

disguised, and an incomparable readiness for rapidly assuming

characters, both in his entertainments and in his comedies, where he

occasionally "doubled" parts. The excellent "patter" of some of his

plays, such as _The Liar_ and _The Cozeners_, must have greatly

depended for its effect upon rapidity of delivery. In person he was

rather short and stout, and coarse-featured; but his overflowing

humour is said to have found full expression in the irresistible

sparkle of his eyes.

As a dramatic author he can only be assigned a subordinate rank. He

regarded comedy as "an exact representation of the peculiar manners of

that people among whom it happens to be performed; a faithful

imitation of singular absurdities, particular follies, which are

openly produced, as criminals are publicly punished, for the

correction of individuals and as an example to the whole community."

This he regarded as the _utile_, or useful purpose, of comedy; the

_dulce_ he conceived to be "the fable, the construction, machinery,

conduct, plot, and incidents of the piece." For part at least of this

view (advanced by him in the spirited and scholarly "Letter" in which

he replied, "to the Reverend Author of the 'Remarks, Critical and

Christian,' on _The Minor_"), he rather loftily appealed to classical

authority. But he overlooked the indispensableness of the _dulce_ to

the comic drama under its primary aspect as a species of art. His

comic genius was particularly happy in discovering and reproducing

characters deserving of ridicule; and the fact that he not only took

them from real life, but closely modelled them on well-known living

men and women, was not in himself an artistic sin. Nor indeed was the

novelty of this process absolute, though probably no other comic

dramatist has ever gone so far in this course, or has pursued it so

persistently. The public delighted in his "d----d fine originals,"

because it recognized them as copies; and he was himself proud that he

had taken them from real persons, instead of their being "vamped from

antiquated plays, pilfered from the French farces, or the baseless

beings of the poet's brain." But the real excellence of many of

Foote's comic characters lies in the fact that, besides being

incomparably ludicrous types of manners, they remain admirable comic

types of general human nature. Sir Gregory Gazette, and his imbecile

appetite for news; Lady Pentweazel, and her preposterous vanity in her

superannuated charms; Mr Cadwallader, and his view of the advantages

of public schools (where children may "make acquaintances that may

hereafter be useful to them; for between you and I, as to what they

learn there, does not signify twopence"); Major Sturgeon and Jerry

Sneak; Sir Thomas Lofty, Sir Luke Limp, Mrs Mechlin, and a score or

two of other characters, are excellent comic figures in themselves,

whatever their origin; and many of the vices and weaknesses exposed by

Foote's vigorous satire will remain the perennial subject of comic

treatment so long as a stage exists. The real defect of his plays lies

in the abnormal weakness of their construction, in the absolute

contempt which the great majority of them show for the invention or

conduct of a plot, and in the unwarrantable subordination of the

interest of the action to the exhibition of particular characters. His

characters are ready-made, and the action is only incidental to them.

With the exception of _The Liar_ (which Foote pretended to have taken

from Lope de Vega, but which was really founded on Steele's adaptation

of Corneille's _Le Menteur_), and perhaps of _The Bankrupt_, there is

hardly one of Foote's "comedies" in which the conception and conduct

of the action rise above the exigencies of the merest farce. Not that

sentimental scenes and even sentimental characters are wanting, but

these familiar ingredients are as incapable of exciting real interest

as an ordinary farcical action is in itself unable to produce more

than transitory amusement. In his earlier plays Foote constantly

resorts to the most hackneyed device of farce--a disguise. Of course

Foote must have been well aware of the shortcomings of his rapidly

manufactured productions; he knew that if he might sneer at "genteel

comedy" as suited to the dramatists of the servants' hall, and

pronounce the arts of the drama at the great houses to be "directed by

the genius of insipidity," he, like the little theatre where he held

sway, was looked upon as "an eccentric, a mere summer fly."

At the same time, he was inexhaustible in the devising of comic scenes

of genuine farce. An oration of "old masters," an election of a

suburban mayor, an examination at the College of Physicians, a

newspaper conclave where paragraphs are concocted and reputations

massacred--all these and other equally happy situations are brought

before the mere reader with unfailing vividness. And everywhere the

comic dialogue is instinct with spirit and vigour, and the comic

characters are true to themselves with a buoyancy which at once raises

them above the level of mere theatrical conventionalism. Foote

professed to despise the mere caricaturing of national peculiarities

as such, and generally used dialect as a mere additional colouring; he

was, however, too wide awake to the demands of his public not to treat

France and Frenchmen as fair game, and coarsely to appeal to national

prejudice. His satire against those everlasting victims of English

comedy and farce, the Englishman in Paris and the Englishman returned

from Paris, was doubtless well warranted; while at the same time he

made fun of the fact that Englishmen are nowhere more addicted to the

society of their countrymen than abroad. In general, the purposes of

Foote's social satire are excellent, and the abuses against which it

is directed are those which it required courage to attack. The tone of

his morality is healthy, and his language, though not aiming at

refinement, is remarkably free from intentional grossness. He made

occasional mistakes; but he was on the right side in the warfare

against the pretentiousness of Cant and the effrontery of Vice, the

two master evils of the age and the society in which he lived.

The following is a list of Foote's farces or "comedies" as he calls

them, mostly in three, some in two acts, which remain in print. The

date of production, and the character originally performed by Foote,

are added to the title of each:

_The Knights_ (1748: Hartop, who assumes the character of Sir

Penurious Trifle); Taste (1752), in which part of the _Diversions_ is

incorporated; _The Englishman in Paris_ (1753: Young Buck); _The

Englishman returned from Paris_ (1756: Sir Charles Buck); _The Author_

(1757: Cadwallader); _The Minor_ (1760: Smirk and Mrs Cole); _The

Liar_ (1762); _The Orators_ (1762: Lecturer); _The Mayor of Garratt_

(1763: Major Sturgeon and Matthew Mug); _The Patron_ (1764: Sir Thomas

Lofty and Sir Peter Peppercorn); _The Commissary_ (1765: Mr Zac.

Fungus); _The Devil upon Two Sticks_ (1768: Devil,--alias Dr Hercules

Hellebore); _The Lame Lover_ (1770: Sir Luke Limp); _The Maid of Bath_

(1771: Mr Flint); _The Nabob_ (1772: Sir Matthew Mite); _The Bankrupt_

(1773: Sir Robert Riscounter); _The Cozeners_ (1774: Mr Aircastle);

_The Capuchin_, a second version of The Trip to Calais, forbidden by

the censor (1776: O'Donovan). His dramatic works were collected in

1763-1768.

BIBLIOGRAPHY.--Foote's biography may be read in W. ("Conversation")

Cooke's _Memoirs of Samuel Foote_ (3 vols., 1805), which contain,

amidst other matter, a large collection of his good things and of

anecdotes concerning him, besides two of his previously unpublished

occasional pieces (with the _Tragedy a la mode_, part of the

_Diversions_, in which Foote appeared as Fustian). From this source

seems to have been mainly taken the biographical information in the

rather grandiloquent essay on Foote prefixed by "Jon Bee" (John

Badcock, fl. 1816-1830, also known as "John Hunds") to his useful

edition of Foote's Works (3 vols., 1830). Various particulars will be

found in Tate Wilkinson's _Wandering Patentee_ (York, 1795) and in

other sources. There is an admirable essay on Foote, reprinted with

additions, from the _Quarterly Review_, in John Forster's

_Biographical Essays_ (1858). A recent life of Foote is by Percy

Fitzgerald (1910). (A. W. W.)

FOOTMAN, a name given among articles of furniture to a metal stand,

usually of polished steel or brass, and either oblong or oval in shape,

for keeping plates and dishes hot before a dining-room fire. In the days

before the general use of hot-water dishes the footman possessed

definite utility, but although it is still in occasional use, it is now

chiefly regarded as an ornament. It was especially common in the

hardware counties of England, where it is still frequently seen; the

simple conventionality of its form is not inelegant.

FOOTSCRAY, a city of Bourke county, Victoria, Australia, on the

Saltwater river, 4 m. W. of and suburban to Melbourne. Pop. (1901)

18,301. The city has large bluestone quarries from which most of the

building stones in Melbourne and the neighbourhood is obtained; it is

also an important manufacturing centre, with numerous sugar-mills, jute

factories, soap works, woollen-mills, foundries, chemical works and many

other minor industries.

FOOT-STALL, a word supposed to be a literal translation of _piedestal_,

or pedestal, the lower part of a pier in architecture (see BASE).

FOPPA, VINCENZO, Italian painter, was born near Brescia. The dates of

his birth and death used to be given as 1400 and 1492; but there is now

good reason for substituting 1427 and 1515. He settled in Pavia towards

1456, and was the head of a Lombard school of painting which subsisted

up to the advent of Leonardo da Vinci. In 1489 he returned to Brescia.

His contemporary reputation was very considerable, his merit in

perspective and foreshortening being recognized especially. Among his

noted works are a fresco in the Brera Gallery, Milan, the "Martyrdom of

St Sebastian"; and a "Crucifixion" in the Carrara gallery, Bergamo,

executed in 1455. He worked much in Milan and in Genoa, but many of his

paintings are now lost.

See C.J. Ffoulkes and R. Maiocchi, _Vincenzo Foppa_ (1910).

FORAGE, food for cattle or horses, chiefly the provender collected for

the food of the horses of an army. In early usage the word was confined

to the dried forage as opposed to grass. From this word comes "foray,"

an expedition in search of "forage," and hence a pillaging expedition, a

raid. The word "forage," directly derived from the Fr. _fourrage_, comes

from a common Teutonic origin, and appears in "fodder," food for cattle.

The ultimate Indo-European root, _pat_, cf. Gr. [Greek: pateisthai],

Lat. _pascere_, to feed, gives "food," "feed," "foster"; and appears

also in such Latin derivatives as "pastor," "pasture."

FORAIN, J. L. (1852- ), French painter and illustrator, was born in

1852. He became one of the leading modern Parisian caricaturists, who in

his merciless exposure of the weaknesses of the _bourgeoisie_ continued

the work which was begun by Daumier under the second Empire. The

scathing bitterness of his satire is as clearly derived from Daumier as

his pictorial style can be traced to Manet and Degas; but even in his

painting he never suppresses the caustic spirit that drives him to

caricature. He has, indeed, been rightly called "a Degas pushed on to

caricature." In his pen-and-ink work he combines extraordinary economy

of means with the utmost power of expression and suggestion. Forain's

popularity dates from the publication of his _Comedie parisienne_, a

series of two hundred and fifty sketches republished in book form. He

has contributed many admirable, if sometimes over-daring, pages to the

_Figaro_, _Le Rire_, _L'Assiette au beurre_, _Le Courrier francais_, and

_L'Indiscret_. His political drawings for the _Figaro_ were republished

in book form under the title of _Doux Pays_.

FORAKER, JOSEPH HENSON (1846- ), American political leader, was born

near Rainsboro, Highland county, Ohio, on the 5th of July 1846. He

passed his early life on a farm, enlisted as a private in the 89th Ohio

Volunteer Infantry in July 1862, served throughout the Civil War, for

part of the time as an aide on the staff of General H.W. Slocum, and in

1865 received a captain's brevet for "efficient services during the

campaigns in North Carolina and Georgia." After the war he spent two

years at the Ohio Wesleyan University and two years at Cornell. In 1869

he was admitted to the Ohio bar and began practice in Cincinnati. He was

a judge of the Cincinnati Superior Court from 1879 to 1882. In 1883 he

was the Republican candidate for governor of Ohio, but was defeated; in

1885 and 1887, however, he was elected, but was again defeated in 1889.

He then for eight years practised law with great success in Cincinnati.

In 1896 he was elected United States senator to succeed Calvin S. Brice

(1845-1898); in 1902 was re-elected and served until 1909. In the Senate

he was one of the aggressive Republican leaders, strongly supporting the

administration of President M'Kinley (whose name he presented to the

Republican National Conventions of 1896 and 1900) in the debates

preceding, during, and immediately following the Spanish-American War,

and later, during the administration of President Roosevelt, was

conspicuous among Republican leaders for his independence. He vigorously

opposed various measures advocated by the president, and led the

opposition to the president's summary discharge of certain negro troops

after the Brownsville raid of the 13th of August 1906 (see BROWNSVILLE,

Texas).

Encyclopaedia Britannica, 11th Edition, "Fleury, Claude" to "Foraker" Volume 10, Slice 5 · 第 36 / 36 题