A GREAT LEADER HAS FALLEN.

-------

_From the “Raleigh, N.C., State-Chronicle.”_

Good mother, weep, Cornelia of the South,

For thou indeed has lost a jewel son;

The Gracchi great were not so much beloved,

Nor with more worthy deeds their honors won.

Thy stalwart son deserves a Roman’s fame,

For Cato was not more supremely just;

Augustus was not greater in the State,

Nor Brutus truer to the public trust.

IN the death of Mr. Henry W. Grady the South loses its brightest and

most useful man. He was the only Southern man who really had the ear of

the people of the whole country, and he had just reached the position

where he could be useful in the largest sphere. It is inexplicable why

so young and robust a man—(he was not over thirty-nine years of age)—a

man so brilliant and so able, should be taken just as he was entering

upon the plane of wider influence and greater usefulness. To the South

it is the greatest loss that it has sustained by death in a quarter of a

century. To the whole people of the country, which he loved with his

great-hearted devotion, it is nothing short of a National calamity.

Mr. Grady had the ear and heart of the South because he loved its

history and its very soil, and because he was the leading exponent of

the idea that is working to build up a prosperous manufacturing New

South. He had the ear of the North because, while he had no apologies to

make for Southern actions and was proud of Southern achievements, he had

turned his eyes to the morning and lived in the busy world of to-day. He

recognized changed conditions and did not bemoan fate. He stood up in

his manliness and his faith and went to work to bring prosperity where

poverty cast its blight. He inspired others in the South with faith in

the future of his section, and invited Northern men of money, brains,

and brawn to come South and make a fortune; and when they accepted his

invitation, as not a few did, he gave them a brotherly welcome and made

them feel that they were at home. In this he showed practical

patriotism. Under no temptation—even when speaking in Boston—did he ever

so far forget his manhood as to

Crook the pregnant hinges of the knee,

Where thrift may follow fawning.

The people of the North also heard him because of his candor. He never

deceived them about the race problem or the difficulties in the way of

the South’s future. He admitted their gravity, and sought a peaceful

solution in a just, fair, and honest way. His speech in Boston was a

lamentation and an earnest appeal. He cried aloud for sympathetic help,

and his cry, sealed with his life, we must believe, will not be heard in

vain. God grant that his prayer for Peace and Union may be answered!

Mr. Grady’s most attractive quality was his warm great heartedness. He

was generous to a fault. No tale of suffering or poverty was unheeded by

him. He had a buoyant spirit and a light heart and deep affections. He

was reverent in speech and with pen. He believed in God, had learned the

truth of the gospel at his mother’s knee, “The truest altar I have yet

found,” he said in his last speech. He was a member of the Methodist

church. He had profound convictions, and his eloquent speeches in favor

of Prohibition in Atlanta will not be forgotten. No man ever spoke more

earnest words for what he conceived to be the safety of the homes of

Atlanta than he. They will long be treasured up with fondness by those

who mourn that he was cut down in the zenith of what promised the most

brilliant career that lay out before any man in America.

Henry W. Grady was a grandson of North Carolina. His father was a native

of Macon county, but early in life emigrated to Rome, Georgia, to make

his fortune, and he made it. He was one of those men who succeed in

every undertaking. Everything he touched seemed to turn to gold. He

prospered and made a large estate. When the war came on he had a

presentiment that he would be killed. But notwithstanding that idea took

possession of him, he raised and equipped _at his own expense_ a

regiment of cavalry, and hastened to the front as its captain. His

company was attached as company G to the 25th N.C. Regiment, commanded

by Col. Thos. L. Clingman. Eventually Capt. Grady was promoted to be

major of the regiment. In the first battle he fell mortally wounded,

showing how true was his presentiment of death. He was surrounded by his

men, some of them brave, sturdy North Carolinians. He left a legacy of

honor to his son, who always called North Carolina his grandmother and

had a deep affection for its sons.

Mr. Grady graduated with high honors at the University of Georgia in

Athens. Then he spent two years at the University of Virginia, where he

devoted himself rather to the study of literature and to the work of the

societies than to the regular college course. He won high honors there

as an orator and as a debater. He was as well equipped and as ready and

as effective as a debater as he became later on as an orator and editor.

He was regarded there as a universal genius and the most charming of

men. Leaving college he established a paper at Rome. Later in connection

with Mr. Alston (North Carolina stock) he established the Atlanta

_Herald_. It was a brilliant paper but was not a financial success. Our

readers will remember that Mr. Alston was shot in the Capitol by State

Treasurer Cox. Upon the failure of the _Herald_, Mr. Grady went to New

York. He was without money and went there looking for something to do.

He went into the office of the New York _Herald_ and asked for a

position.

“What can you do?” asked the managing editor, when Mr. Grady asked for a

position. “Anything,” was the reply of the young Georgian, conscious of

his powers and conscious of ability to do any kind of work that was to

be done in a great newspaper office. The editor asked him where he was

from, and learning that he was from Georgia, said: “Do you know anything

about Georgia politics?” Now if there was any subject which he knew all

about it was Georgia politics, and he said so. “Then sit down,” said the

managing editor, “and write me an article on Georgia politics.” He sat

down and dashed off an article of the brightest matter showing thorough

insight into the situation in Georgia and thorough knowledge of the

leaders in that State. He was always a facile writer, and all his

articles were printed without erasing or re-writing. The article was put

into the pigeon-hole, and Mr. Grady took his departure. He left the

office, so he said, very despondent, thinking the article might be

published after several weeks, but fearing that it would never see the

light. What was his surprise and joy to see it in the _Herald_ the next

morning. He went down to the office and was engaged as correspondent for

Georgia and the South. In this capacity he wrote letters upon Southern

topics of such brilliancy as have never been surpassed, if equaled, in

the history of American journalism. They gained for him a wide

reputation, and made him a great favorite in Georgia. The public men of

that State recognized his ability, and saw how much he might do to

develop the resources and advance the prosperity and fame of Georgia if

at the head of a great State paper. The late Alexander H. Stephens

interested himself in Mr. Grady and assisted to get him on the staff of

the _Constitution_. From the day he went to Atlanta on the staff of the

_Constitution_ until his death his best energies and his great abilities

were directed toward making it a great paper, and a powerful factor in

developing the resources of Georgia. It became the most successful of

Southern newspapers, and is to-day a competitor with the great papers of

the North. To have achieved this unprecedented success in journalism

were honor enough to win in a life-time. He was confessedly the Gamaliel

of Southern journalism, and the best of it all was that he was, as was

said of Horace Greeley after his death, “a journalist because he had

something to say which he believed mankind would be the better for

knowing; not because he wanted something for himself which journalism

might secure for him.”

He was a Saul, and stood head and shoulders above all his fellows as an

orator as well as an editor. We cannot dwell upon his reputation as an

orator, or recount the scenes of his successes. We had heard him only in

impromptu efforts and in short introductory speeches, where he easily

surpassed any man whom we ever heard. He had a fine physique, a big,

round, open, manly face, was thick-set, was pleasing in style, and had a

winning and captivating voice. He could rival Senator Vance in telling

an anecdote. He could equal Senator Ransom in a polished, graceful

oration. He could put Governor Fowle to his best in his classical

illustrations. He could equal Waddell in his eloquent flights. In a word

he had more talent as a public speaker than any man we ever knew; and

added to that he had _heart_, _soul_, _fire_—the essentials of true

oratory. We recall four speeches which gave him greatest reputation. One

was in Texas at a college commencement, we think; another at the New

York banquet on “The New South”; the third at the University of

Virginia; and the last—(alas! his last words)—at the Boston banquet just

two weeks ago. These speeches, as well as others he has made, deserve to

live. The last one—published in last week’s _Chronicle_—is emphasized by

his untimely death. In it he had so ably and eloquently defended the

South and so convincingly plead for a united country based upon mutual

confidence and sympathy that, in view of his death, his words seem to

have been touched by a patriotism and a devoutness akin to inspiration.

His broad catholicity and his great patriotism bridged all sectional

lines, and he stood before the country the most eloquent advocate of “a

Union of Hearts” as well as a “Union of Hands.” As the coming greatest

leader of the South, he sounded the key-note of sublimest patriotism.

Less profound than Daniel Webster, his burning words for the perpetuity

of the Union, with mutual trust and no sectional antagonism, were not

less thrilling nor impressive. The Southern people ought to read and

re-read this great speech, which, doubtless, cost him his life, and make

it the lamp to their feet. If we heed his words and bury sectionalism,

it will be written of him that “though dead, he yet speaketh.”

Star of the South!

To thee all eyes and hearts were turned,

As round thy path, from plain to sea,

The glory of thy greatness burned.

Millions were drawn to thee and bound

By mind’s high mastery, millions hailed

In thee a guide-star—and ne’er found

A ray in thee, that waned or failed.

No night’s embrace for thee! nor pall,

But such as mortal hand hath wrought,

Thou livest still in mind—in all

That breathes, or speaks, or lives in thought.

------------------

Joel Chandler Harris' life of Henry W. Grady including his writings and speeches · 第 252 / 327 题