MR. GRADY’S SPEECH AT ELBERTON, GEORGIA, IN JUNE, 1889.

MR. PRESIDENT, LADIES AND GENTLEMEN:—For the first time in my life I

address an audience in the open air. And as I stand here in this

beautiful morning, so shot through and through with sunshine that the

very air is as molten gold to the touch—under these trees in whose

trunks the rains and suns of years are compacted, and on whose leaves

God has laid His whispering music—here in His majestic temple, with the

brightness of His smile breaking all about us—standing above the soil

instinct with the touch of His life-giving hand, and full of His promise

and His miracle—and looking up to the clouds through which His thunders

roll, and His lightnings cut their way, and beyond that to the dazzling

glory of the sun, and yet beyond to the unspeakable splendor of the

universe, flashing and paling until the separate stars are but as mist

in the skies—even to the uplifted jasper gates through which His

everlasting glory streams, my mind falls back abashed, and I realize how

paltry is human speech, and how idle are the thoughts of men!

Another thought oppresses me. In front of me sit several thousand

people. Over there, in smelling distance, where we can almost hear the

lisping of the mop as it caresses the barbecued lamb or the pottering of

the skewered pig as he leisurely turns from fat to crackling, is being

prepared a dinner that I verily believe covers more provisions than were

issued to all the soldiers of Lee’s army, God bless them, in their last

campaign. And I shudder when I think that I, a single, unarmed,

defenseless man, is all that stands between this crowd and that dinner.

Here then, awed by God’s majesty, and menaced by man’s appetite, I am

tempted to leave this platform and yield to the boyish impulses that

always stir in my heart amid such scenes, and revert to the days of

boyhood when about the hills of Athens I chased the pacing coon, or

twisted the unwary rabbit, or shot my ramrod at all manner of birds and

beasts—and at night went home to look up into a pair of gentle eyes and

take on my tired face the benediction of a mother’s kiss and feel on my

weary head a pair of loving hands, now wrinkled and trembling, but,

blessed be God, fairer to me yet than the hands of mortal women, and

stronger yet to lead me than the hands of mortal man, as they laid a

mother’s blessing there, while bending at her knees I made my best

confession of faith and worshiped at the truest altar I have yet found

in this world. I had rather go out and lay down on the ground and hug

the grass to my breast and mind me of the time when I builded boyish

ambitions on the wooded hills of Athens, than do aught else to-day. But

I recall the story of Uncle Remus, who when his favorite hero, Brer

Rabbit, was sorely pressed by that arch villain, Brer Fox, said:

“An’ Brer Rabbit den he climb’d a tree.” “But,” said the little boy,

“Uncle Remus, a rabbit can’t climb a tree.”

“Doan you min’ dat, honey. Brer Fox pressed dis rabbit so hard he des

bleeged to clim’ a tree.”

I am pressed so hard to-day by your commands that I am just “bleeged” to

make a speech, and so I proceed. I heartily invoke God’s guidance in

what I say, that I shall utter no word to soil this temple of His, and

no sentiment not approved in His wisdom; and as for you, when the time

comes—as it will come—when you prefer barbecued shote to raw orator, and

feel that you can be happier at that table than in this forum, just say

the word and I will be with you heart and soul!

I am tempted to yield to the gaiety of this scene, to the flaunting

banners of the trees, the downpouring sunshine, the garnered plenty over

there, this smiling and hospitable crowd, and, throwing serious affairs

aside, to speak to you to-day as the bird sings—without care and without

thought. I should be false to myself and to you if I did, for there are

serious problems that beset our State and our country that no man,

facing, as I do this morning, a great and intelligent audience, can in

honor or in courage disregard. I shall attempt to make no brilliant

speech—but to counsel with you in plain and simple words, beseeching

your attention and your sympathy as to the dangers of the present hour,

and our duties and our responsibilities.

At Saturday noon in any part of this county you may note the farmer

going from his field, eating his dinner thoughtfully and then saddling

his plow-horse, or starting afoot and making his way to a neighboring

church or schoolhouse. There he finds from every farm, through every

foot-path, his neighbors gathering to meet him. What is the object of

this meeting? It is not social, it is not frolic, it is not a

pic-nic—the earnest, thoughtful faces, the serious debate and council,

the closed doors and the secret session forbid this assumption. It is a

meeting of men who feel that in spite of themselves their affairs are

going wrong—of free and equal citizens who feel that they carry unequal

burdens—of toilers who feel that they reap not the just fruits of their

toil—of men who feel that their labor enriches others while it leaves

them poor, and that the sweat of their bodies, shed freely under God’s

command, goes to clothe the idle and the avaricious in purple and fine

linen. This is a meeting of protest, of resistance. Here the farmer

meets to demand, and organize that he may enforce his demand, that he

shall stand equal with every other class of citizens—that laws

discriminating against him shall be repealed—that the methods oppressing

him shall be modified or abolished—and that he shall be guaranteed that

neither government nor society shall abridge, by statute or custom, his

just and honest proportion of the wealth he created, but that he shall

be permitted to garner in his barns, and enjoy by his hearthstone, the

full and fair fruits of his labor. If this movement were confined to

Elbert, if this disturbing feeling of discontent were shut in the limits

of your county lines, it would still demand the attention of the

thoughtful and patriotic. But, as it is in Elbert, so it is in every

county in Georgia—as in Georgia, so it is in every State in the South—as

in the South, so in every agricultural State in the Union. In every

rural neighborhood, from Ohio to Texas, from Michigan to Georgia, the

farmers, riding thoughtful through field and meadow, seek ten thousand

schoolhouses or churches—the muster grounds of this new army—and there,

recounting their wrongs and renewing their pledges, send up from

neighborhoods to county, from county to State, and State to Republic,

the measure of their strength and the unyielding quality of their

determination. The agricultural army of the Republic is in motion. The

rallying drumbeat has rolled over field and meadow, and from where the

wheat locks the sunshine in its bearded sheaf, and the clover carpets

the earth, and the cotton whitens beneath the stars, and the tobacco

catches the quick aroma of the rains—everywhere that patient man stands

above the soil, or bends about the furrow, the farmers are ready in

squads and companies and battalions and legions to be led against what

they hold to be an oppression that honest men would not deserve, and

that brave men would not endure. Let us not fail to comprehend the

magnitude and the meaning of this movement. It is no trifling cause that

brings the farmers into such determined and widespread organization as

this. It is not the skillful arts of the demagogue that has brought

nearly two million farmers into this perfect and pledge-bound

society—but it is a deep and abiding conviction that, in political and

commercial economy of the day, he is put at a disadvantage that keeps

him poor while other classes grow rich, and that bars his way to

prosperity and independence. General Toombs once said that the farmer,

considered the most conservative type of citizenship, is really the most

revolutionary. That the farmers of France, flocking to the towns and

cities from the unequal burdens of their farms, brought about the French

Revolution, and that about once in every century the French peasant

raided the towns. Three times the farmers of England have captured and

held London. It was the farmers of Mecklenburg that made the first

American declaration, and Putnam left his plow standing in the furrow as

he hurried to lead the embattled farmers who fought at Concord and

Lexington. I realize it is impossible that revolution should be the

outcome of our industrial troubles. The farmer of to-day does not

consider that remedy for his wrongs. I quote history to show that the

farmer, segregated and deliberate, does not move on slight provocation,

but organizes only under deep conviction, and that when once organized

and convinced, he is terribly in earnest, and is not going to rest until

his wrongs are righted.

Now, here we are confronted with the most thorough and widespread

agricultural movement of this or any other day. It is the duty alike of

farmers and those who stand in other ranks, to get together and consult

as to what is the real status and what is the patriotic duty. Not in

sullenness, but in frankness. Not as opponents, but as friends—not as

enemies, but as brothers begotten of a common mother, banded in common

allegiance, and marching to a common destiny. It will not do to say that

this organization will pass away, for if the discontent on which it is

based survives it, it had better have lived and forced its wrongs to

final issue. There is no room for divided hearts in this State, or in

this Republic. If we shall restore Georgia to her former greatness and

prosperity—if we shall solve the problems that beset the South in honor

and safety—if we shall save this Republic from the dangers that threaten

it—it will require the earnest and united effort of every patriotic

citizen, be he farmer, or merchant, or lawyer, or manufacturer. Let us

consider then the situation, and decide what is the duty that lies

before us.

In discussing this matter briefly, I beg the ladies to give me their

attention. I have always believed that there are few affairs of life in

which woman should not have a part. Not obtrusive part—for that is

unwomanly. The work falling best to the hand of woman is such work as is

done by the dews of night—that ride not on the boasting wind, and shine

not in the garish sun, but that come when the wind is stilled and the

sun is gone, and night has wrapped the earth in its sacred hush, and

fall from the distillery of the stars upon the parched and waiting

flowers, as a benediction from God.

Let no one doubt the power of this work, though it lack pomp and

circumstance. Is Bismarck the mightiest power of this earth, who is

attended by martial strains when he walks abroad, and in whose path

thrones are scattered as trophies? Why, the little housewife alone in

her chimney-corner, musing in her happiness with no trophy in her path

save her husband’s loving heart, and no music on her ear save the

chirping of the cricket beneath her hearthstone, is his superior. For,

while he holds the purse-strings of Germany, she holds the heart-strings

of men. She who rocks the cradle rules the world. Give me then your

attention, note the conflict that is gathering about us, and take your

place with seeming modesty in the ranks of those who fight for right. It

is not an abstract political theory that is involved in the contest of

which I speak. It is the integrity and independence of your home that is

at stake. The battle is not pitched in a distant State. Your home is the

battle-field, and by your hearthstones you shall fight for your

household gods. With your husband’s arms so wound around you that you

can feel his anxious heart beating against your cheek—with your sons,

sturdy and loving, holding your old hands in theirs—here on the

threshold of your house, under the trees that sheltered your babyhood,

with the graves of your dead in that plain enclosure yonder—here men and

women, heart to heart, with not a man dismayed, not a woman idle—while

the multiplied wolves of debt and mortgage, and trust and monopoly,

swarm from every thicket; here we must fight the ultimate battle for the

independence of our people and the happiness of our homes.

Now let us look at the facts: First, the notable movement of the

population in America is from the country to the cities. In 1840—a

generation ago, only one-twelfth of the American people lived in cities

of more than 8000 people. In 1850, one-eighth; in 1860, one-sixth; in

1870, one-fifth; in 1880, one-fourth. In the past half-century the

population of cities has increased more than four times as rapidly as

that of the country. Mind you, when I say that the city population has

increased in one generation from 8 per cent. to 25 per cent. in

population, I mean the population of cities of more than 8000 people.

There is not such a city in this congressional district. It is the

village and town population, as well as that of the farms, that goes to

swell so enormously the population of the great cities. Thus we see

diminishing with amazing rapidity that rural population that is the

strength and the safety of the people—slow to anger and thus a

safeguard, but terrible in its wrath, and thus a tremendous corrective

power. No greater calamity could befall any country than the sacrifice

of its town and village and country life. I rejoice in Atlanta’s growth,

and yet I wonder whether it is worth what it cost when I know that her

population has been drawn largely from rural Georgia, and that back of

her grandeur are thousands of deserted farms and dismantled homes. As

much as I love her—and she is all to me that home can be to any man—if I

had the disposal of 100,000 immigrants at her gates to-morrow, 5000

should enter there, 75,000 should be located in the shops and factories

in Georgia towns and villages, and 20,000 sent to her farms. It saddens

me to see a bright young fellow come to my office from village or

country, and I shudder when I think for what a feverish and speculative

and uncertain life he has bartered his rural birthright, and surrendered

the deliberation and tranquillity of his life on the farm. It is just

that deliberate life that this country needs, for the fever of the

cities is already affecting its system. Character, like corn, is dug

from the soil. A contented rural population is not only the measure of

our strength, and an assurance of its peace when there should be peace,

and a resource of courage when peace would be cowardice—but it is the

nursery of the great leaders who have made this country what it is.

Washington was born and lived in the country. Jefferson was a farmer.

Henry Clay rode his horse to the mill in the slashes. Webster dreamed

amid the solitude of Marshfield. Lincoln was a rail splitter. Our own

Hill walked between the handles of the plow. Brown peddled barefoot the

product of his patch. Stephens found immortality under the trees of his

country home. Toombs and Cobb and Calhoun were country gentlemen, and

afar from the cities’ maddening strife established that greatness that

is the heritage of their people. The cities produce very few leaders.

Almost every man in our history formed his character in the leisure and

deliberation of village or country life, and drew his strength from the

drugs of the earth even as a child draws his from his mother’s breast.

In the diminution of this rural population, virtuous and competent,

patriotic and honest, living beneath its own roof-tree, building its

altars by its own hearthstone and shrining in its own heart its liberty

and its conscience, there is abiding cause for regret. In the

corresponding growth of our cities—already center spots of danger, with

their idle classes, their sharp rich and poor, their corrupt politics,

their consorted thieves, and their clubs and societies of anarchy and

socialism—I see a pressing and impending danger. Let it be noted that

the professions are crowded, that middlemen are multiplied beyond

reason, that the factories can in six months supply the demand of

twelve—that machinery is constantly taking the place of men—that labor

in every department bids against itself until it is mercilessly in the

hands of the employer, that the new-comers are largely recruits of the

idle and dangerous classes, and we can appreciate something of the

danger that comes with this increasing movement to strip the villages

and the farms and send an increasing volume into the already overcrowded

cities. This is but one phase of that tendency to centralization and

congestion which is threatening the liberties of this people and the

life of this Republic.

Now, let us go one step further. What is the most notable financial

movement in America? It is the mortgaging of the farm lands of the

country—the bringing of the farmer into bondage to the money-lender. In

Illinois the farms are mortgaged for $200,000,000, in Iowa for

$140,000,000, in Kansas for $160,000,000, and so on through the

Northwest. In Georgia about $20,000,000 of foreign capital holds in

mortgage perhaps one-fourth of Georgia’s farms, and the work is but

started. Every town has its loan agent—a dozen companies are quartered

in Atlanta, and the work goes briskly on. A mortgage is the bulldog of

obligations—a very mud-turtle for holding on. It is the heaviest thing

of its weight in the world. I had one once, and sometimes I used to

feel, as it rested on my roof, deadening the rain that fell there, and

absorbing the sunshine, that it would crush through the shingles and the

rafters and overwhelm me with its dull and persistent weight, and when

at last I paid it off, I went out to look at the shingles to see if it

had not flopped back there of its own accord. Think of it, Iowa strips

from her farmers $14,000,000 of interest every year, and sends it to New

York and Boston to be reloaned on farms in other States, and to support

and establish the dominion of the money-lenders over the people. Georgia

gathers from her languishing fields $2,000,000 of interest every year,

and sends it away forever. Could her farmers but keep it at home, one

year’s interest would build factories to supply at cost every yard of

bagging and every pound of guano the farmers need, establish her

exchanges and their warehouses, and have left more than a million

dollars for the improvement of their farms and their homes. And year

after year this drain not only continues, but deepens. What will be the

end? Ireland has found it. Her peasants in their mud cabins, sending

every tithe of their earnings to deepen the purple luxury of London,

where their landlords live, realize how poor is that country whose farms

are owned in mortgage or fee simple by those who live beyond its

borders. If every Irish landlord lived on his estate, bought of his

tenants the product of their farms, and invested his rents in Irish

industries, this Irish question that is the shame of the world would be

settled without legislation or strife. Georgia can never go to Ireland’s

degradation, but every Georgia farm put under mortgage to a foreign

capitalist is a step in that direction, and every dollar sent out as

interest leaves the State that much poorer. I do not blame the farmers.

It is a miracle that out of their poverty they have done so well. I

simply deplore the result, and ask you to note in the millions of acres

that annually pass under mortgage to the money-lenders of the East, and

in the thousands of independent country homes annually surrendered as

hostages to their hands, another evidence of that centralization that is

drinking up the life-blood of this broad Republic.

Let us go one step further. All protest as to our industrial condition

is met with the statement that America is startling the world with its

growth and progress. Is this growth symmetrical—is this progress shared

by every class? Let the tax-books of Georgia answer. This year, for the

first time since 1860, our taxable wealth is equal to that with which,

excluding our slaves, we entered the civil war—$368,000,000. There is

cause for rejoicing in this wonderful growth from the ashes and

desolation of twenty years ago, but the tax-books show that while the

towns and cities are $60,000,000 richer than they were in 1860, the

farmers are $50,000,000 poorer.

Who produced this wealth? In 1865, when our towns and cities were

paralyzed, when not a mine or quarry was open, hardly a mill or a

factory running; when we had neither money or credit, it was the

farmers’ cotton that started the mills of industry and of trade. Since

that desolate year, when, urging his horse down the furrow, plowing

through fields on which he had staggered amid the storm of battle, he

began the rehabilitation of Georgia with no friend near him save nature

that smiled at his kindly touch, and God that sent him the message of

cheer through the rustling leaves, he has dug from the soil of Georgia

more than $1,000,000,000 worth of product. From this mighty resource

great cities have been builded and countless fortunes amassed—but amid

all the splendor he has remained the hewer of wood and the drawer of

water. He had made the cities $60,000,000 richer than they were when the

war began, and he finds himself, in the sweat of whose brow this miracle

was wrought, $50,000,000 poorer than he then was. Perhaps not a farmer

in this audience knew this fact—but I doubt if there is one in the

audience who has not felt in his daily life the disadvantage that in

twenty short years has brought about this stupendous difference. Let the

figures speak for themselves. The farmer—the first figure to stumble

amid the desolate dawn of our new life and to salute the coming

day—hurrying to market with the harvest of his hasty planting that

Georgia might once more enter the lists of the living States and buy the

wherewithal to still her wants and clothe her nakedness—always

apparently the master of the situation, has he not been really its

slave, when he finds himself at the end of twenty hard and faithful

years $110,000,000 out of balance?

Now, let us review the situation a moment. I have shown you, first, that

the notable drift of population is to the loss of village and country,

and the undue and dangerous growth of the city; second, that the notable

movement of finance is that which is bringing villages and country under

mortgage to the city; and third, that they who handle the products for

sale profit more thereby than those who create them—the difference in

one State in twenty years reaching the enormous sum of $110,000,000. Are

these healthy tendencies? Do they not demand the earnest and thoughtful

consideration of every patriotic citizen? The problem of the day is to

check these three currents that are already pouring against the bulwarks

of our peace and prosperity. To anchor the farmer to his land and the

villager to his home; to enable him to till the land under equal

conditions and to hold that home in independence; to save with his hands

the just proportion of his labor, that he may sow in content and reap in

justice,—this is what we need. The danger of the day is centralization,

its salvation diffusion. Cut that word deep in your heart. This Republic

differs from Russia only because the powers centralized there in one man

are here diffused among the people. Western Ohio is happy and tranquil,

while Chicago is feverish and dangerous, because the people diffused in

the towns and the villages of the one are centralized and packed in the

tenements of the other; but of all centralization that menaces our peace

and threatens our liberties, is the consolidation of capital—and of all

the diffusion that is needed in this Republic, congesting at so many

points, is the leveling of our colossal fortunes and the diffusion of

our gathered wealth amid the great middle classes of this people. As

this question underruns the three tendencies we have been discussing,

let us consider it a moment.

Few men comprehend the growth of private fortunes in this country, and

the encroachments they have made on the rest of the people. Take one

instance: A man in Chicago that had a private fortune secured control of

all the wheat in the country, and advanced the price until flour went up

three dollars a barrel. When he collected $4,000,000 of this forced

tribute from the people, he opened his corner and released the wheat,

and the world, forgetting the famishing children from whose hungry lips

he had stolen the crust, praised him as the king of finance and trade.

Let us analyze this deal. The farmer who raised the wheat got not one

cent of the added profit. The mills that ground it not one cent. Every

dollar went to swell the toppling fortunes of him who never sowed it to

the ground, nor fed it to the thundering wheels, but who knew it only as

the chance instrument of his infamous scheme. Why, our fathers declared

war against England, their mother country, from whose womb they came,

because she levied two cents a pound on our tea, and yet, without a

murmur, we submit to ten times this tax placed on the bread of our

mouths, and levied by a private citizen for no reason save his greed,

and no right save his might. Were a man to enter an humble home in

England, bind the father helpless, stamp out the fire on the

hearthstone, empty the scanty larder, and leave the family for three

weeks cold and hungry and helpless, he would be dealt with by the law;

and yet four men in New York cornered the world’s cotton crop and held

it until the English spindles were stopped and 14,000,000 operatives

sent idle and empty-handed to their homes, to divide their last crust

with their children, and then sit down and suffer until the greed of the

speculators was filled. The sugar refineries combined their plants at a

cost of $14,000,000, and so raised the price of sugar that they made the

first year $9,500,000 profit, and since then have advanced it rapidly

until we sweeten our coffee absolutely in their caprice. When the

bagging mills were threatened with a reduced tariff, they made a trust

and openly boasted that they intended to make one season’s profits pay

the entire cost of their mills—and these precious villains, whom thus

far the lightnings have failed to blast, having carried out their

infamous boast, organized for a deeper steal this season. And so it

goes. There is not a thing we eat or drink, nor an article we must have

for the comfort of our homes, that may not be thus seized and controlled

and made an instrument for the shameless plundering of the people. It is

a shame—this people patient and cheerful under the rise or fall of

prices that come with the failure of God’s season’s charge as its

compensation—or under the advance at the farm which enriches the farmer,

or under that competitive demand which bespeaks brisk prosperity—this

people made the prey and the sport of plunderers who levy tribute

through a system that mocks at God’s recurring rains, knows not the

farmer, and locks competition in the grasp of monopoly. And the

millions, thus wrung from the people, loaned back to them at usury,

laying the blight of the mortgage on their homes, and the obligation of

debt on their manhood. Talk about the timidity of capital. That is a

forgotten phrase. In the power and irresponsibility of this sudden and

enormous wealth is bred an insolence that knows no bounds. “The public

be damned!” was the sentiment of the plutocrats, speaking through the

voice of Vanderbilt’s millions. In cornering the product and levying the

tribute—in locking up abundant supply until the wheels of industry

stop—in oppressing through trusts, and domineering in the strength of

corporate power, the plutocrats do what no political party would dare

attempt and what no government on this earth would enforce. The Czar of

Russia would not dare hold up a product until the mill-wheels were idle,

or lay an unusual tax on bread and meat to replenish his coffers, and

yet these things our plutocrats, flagrant and irresponsible, do day

after day until public indignation is indignant and shame is lost in

wonder.

And when an outraged people turn to government for help what do they

find? Their government in the hands of a party that is in sympathy with

their oppressors—that was returned to power with votes purchased with

their money—and whose confessed leaders declared that trusts are largely

private concerns with which the government had naught to do. Not only is

the dominant party the apologist of the plutocrats and the beneficiary

of their crimes, but it is based on that principle of centralization

through which they came into life and on which alone they can exist. It

holds that sovereignty should be taken from the States and lodged with

the nation—that political powers and privileges should be wrested from

the people and guarded at the capital. It distrusts the people, and even

now demands that your ballot-boxes shall be hedged about by its

bayonets. It declares that a strong government is better than a free

government, and that national authority, backed by national armies and

treasury, is a better guarantee of peace and prosperity and liberty and

enlightenment diffused among the people. To defend this policy, that

cannot be maintained by argument or sustained by the love or confidence

of the people, it rallies under its flag the mercenaries of the

Republic, the syndicate, the trust, the monopolist, and the plutocrat,

and strengthening them by grant and protection, rejoices as they grow

richer and the people grow poorer. Confident in the debauching power of

money and the unscrupulous audacity of their creatures, they catch the

spirit of Vanderbilt’s defiance and call aloud from their ramparts, “the

people be damned!” I charge that this party has bought its way for

twenty years. Its nucleus was the passion that survived the war—and

around this it has gathered the protected manufacturer, the pensioned

soldier, the licensed monopolist, the privileged corporation, the

unchallenged trust—all whom power can daunt, or money can buy, and with

these in close and constant phalanx it holds the government against the

people. Not a man in all its ranks that is not influenced by prejudice

or bought by privilege.

What a spectacle, my countrymen! This free Republic in the hands of a

party that withdraws sovereignty from the people that its own authority

may be made supreme—that fans the smouldering embers of war, and loosing

among the people the dogs of privilege and monopoly to hunt, and harrow

and rend, that its lines may be made stronger and its ramparts

fortified. And now, it is committed to a crime that is without precedent

or parallel in the history of any people, and this crime it is obliged

by its own necessity as well as by its pledge to commit as soon as it

gets the full reins of power. This crime is hidden in the bill known as

the service pension bill, which pensions every man who enlisted for

sixty days for the Union army. Let us examine this pension list. Twelve

years ago it footed $46,000,000. Last year it was $81,000,000. This year

it has already run to over $100,000,000. Of this amount Georgia pays

about $3,500,000 a year. Think of it. The money that her people have

paid, through indirect taxation into the treasury, is given, let us say

to Iowa, for that State just equals Georgia in population. Every year

$3,500,000 wrung from her pockets and sent into Iowa as pensions for her

soldiers. Since 1865, out of her poverty, Georgia has paid $51,000,000

as pensions to Northern soldiers—one-sixth of the value of her whole

property. And now it is proposed to enlarge the pension list until it

includes every man who enlisted for sixty days. They will not fail. The

last Congress passed a pension bill that Commissioner Black—himself a

gallant Union general—studied deliberately, and then told the President

that if he signed it, it would raise the pension list to $200,000,000,

and had it not been for the love of the people that ran in the veins of

Grover Cleveland and the courage of Democracy which flamed in his heart,

that bill would have been law to-day. A worse bill will be offered.

There is a surplus of $120,000,000 in the treasury. While that remains

it endangers the protective tariff, behind which the trained captains of

the Republican party muster their men. But let the pension list be

lifted to $200,000,000 a year. Then the surplus is gone and a deficiency

created, and the protective tariff must be not only perpetuated but

deepened, and the vigilance of the spies and collectors increased to

meet the demands of the government. And back of it all will be mustered

the army of a million and a half pensioners, drawing their booty from

the Republican party and giving it in turn their purchased allegiance

and support.

My countrymen, a thousand times I have thought of that historic scene

beneath the apple-tree at Appomattox, of Lee’s 8000 ragged, half-starved

immortals, going home to begin anew amid the ashes of their homes, and

the graves of their dead, the weary struggle for existence, and Grant’s

68,000 splendid soldiers, well fed and equipped, going home to riot amid

the plenty of a grateful and prosperous people, and I have thought how

hard it was that out of our poverty we should be taxed to pay their

pension, and to divide with this rich people the crust we scraped up

from the ashes of our homes. And I have thought when their maimed and

helpless soldiers were sheltered in superb homes, and lapped in luxury,

while our poor cripples limped along the highway or hid their shame in

huts, or broke bitter bread in the county poor-house, how hard it was

that, of all the millions we send them annually, we can save not one

dollar to go to our old heroes, who deserve so much and get so little.

And yet we made no complaint. We were willing that every Union soldier

made helpless by the war should have his pension and his home, and thank

God, without setting our crippled soldiers on the curbstone of distant

Babylons to beg, as blind Belisarius did, from the passing stranger. We

have provided them a home in which they can rest in honorable peace

until God has called them hence to a home not made with hands, eternal

in the heavens. We have not complained that our earnings have gone to

pension Union soldiers—the maimed soldiers of the Union armies. But the

scheme to rob the people that every man who enlisted for sixty days, or

his widow, shall be supported at public expense is an outrage that must

not be submitted to. It is not patriotism—it is politics. It is not

honesty—it is plunder. The South has played a patient and a waiting game

for twenty years, fearing to protest against what she knew to be wrong

in the fear that she would be misunderstood. I fear that she has gained

little by this course save the contempt of her enemies. The time has

come when she should stand upright among the States of this Republic and

declare her mind and stand by her convictions. She must not stand silent

while this crowning outrage is perpetrated. It means that the Republican

party will loot the treasury to recruit its ranks—that $70,000,000 a

year shall be taken from the South to enrich the North, thus building up

one section against another—that the protective tariff shall be

deepened, thus building one class against another, and that the party of

trusts and monopoly shall be kept in power, the autonomy of the Republic

lost, the government centralized, the oligarchs established, and justice

to the people postponed. But this party will not prevail, even though

its pension bill should pass, and its pretorial God be established in

every Northern State. It was Louis XVI. who peddled the taxing

privileges to his friends, and when the people protested surrounded

himself with an army of Swiss mercenaries. His minister, Neckar, said to

him: “Sire, I beseech you send away these Swiss and trust your people”;

but the king, confident in his strength and phalanx, buckled it close

about him and plundered the people until his head paid the penalty of

his crime. So this party, bartering privileges and setting up classes,

may feel secure as it closes the ranks of its mercenaries, but some day

the great American heart will burst with righteous wrath, and the voice

of the people, which is the voice of God, will challenge the traitors,

and the great masses will rise in their might, and breaking down the

defenses of the oligarchs, will hurl them from power and restore this

Republic to the old moorings from which it had been swept by the storm.

The government can protect its citizens. It is of the people, and it

shall not perish from the face of the earth. It can top off these

colossal fortunes and, by an income tax, retard their growth. It can set

a limit to personal and corporate wealth. It can take trusts and

syndicates by the throat. It can shatter monopoly; it can equalize the

burden of taxation; it can distribute its privileges impartially; it can

clothe with credit its land now discredited at its banks; it can lift

the burdens from the farmer’s shoulders, give him equal strength to bear

them—it can trust the people in whose name this Republic was founded; in

whose courage it was defended; in whose wisdom it has been administered,

and whose stricken love and confidence it can not survive.

But the government, no matter what it does, does not do all that is

needed, nor the most; that is conceded, for all true reform must begin

with the people at their homes. A few Sundays ago I stood on a hill in

Washington. My heart thrilled as I looked on the towering marble of my

country’s Capitol, and a mist gathered in my eyes as, standing there, I

thought of its tremendous significance and the powers there assembled,

and the responsibilities there centered—its presidents, its congress,

its courts, its gathered treasure, its army, its navy, and its

60,000,000 of citizens. It seemed to me the best and mightiest sight

that the sun could find in its wheeling course—this majestic home of a

Republic that has taught the world its best lessons of liberty—and I

felt that if wisdom, and justice, and honor abided therein, the world

would stand indebted to this temple on which my eyes rested, and in

which the ark of my covenant was lodged for its final uplifting and

regeneration.

A few days later I visited a country home. A modest, quiet house

sheltered by great trees and set in a circle of field and meadow,

gracious with the promise of harvest—barns and cribs well filled and the

old smoke-house odorous with treasure—the fragrance of pink and

hollyhock mingling with the aroma of garden and orchard, and resonant

with the hum of bees and poultry’s busy clucking—inside the house,

thrift, comfort and that cleanliness that is next to godliness—the

restful beds, the open fireplace, the books and papers, and the old

clock that had held its steadfast pace amid the frolic of weddings, that

had welcomed in steady measure the newborn babes of the family, and kept

company with the watchers of the sick bed, and had ticked the solemn

requiem of the dead; and the well-worn Bible that, thumbed by fingers

long since stilled, and blurred with tears of eyes long since closed,

held the simple annals of the family, and the heart and conscience of

the home. Outside stood the master, strong and wholesome and upright;

wearing no man’s collar; with no mortgage on his roof, and no lien on

his ripening harvest; pitching his crops in his own wisdom, and selling

them in his own time in his chosen market; master of his lands and

master of himself. Near by stood his aged father, happy in the heart and

home of his son. And as they started to the house the old man’s hands

rested on the young man’s shoulder, touching it with the knighthood of

the fourth commandment, and laying there the unspeakable blessing of an

honored and grateful father. As they drew near the door the old mother

appeared; the sunset falling on her face, softening its wrinkles and its

tenderness, lighting up her patient eyes, and the rich music of her

heart trembling on her lips, as in simple phrase she welcomed her

husband and son to their home. Beyond was the good wife, true of touch

and tender, happy amid her household cares, clean of heart and

conscience, the helpmate and the buckler of her husband. And the

children, strong and sturdy, trooping down the lane with the lowing

herd, or weary of simple sport, seeking, as truant birds do, the quiet

of the old home nest. And I saw the night descend on that home, falling

gently as from the wings of the unseen dove. And the stars swarmed in

the bending skies—the trees thrilled with the cricket’s cry—the restless

bird called from the neighboring wood—and the father, a simple man of

God, gathering the family about him, read from the Bible the old, old

story of love and faith, and then went down in prayer, the baby hidden

amid the folds of its mother’s dress, and closed the record of that

simple day by calling down the benediction of God on the family and the

home!

And as I gazed the memory of the great Capitol faded from my brain.

Forgotten its treasure and its splendor. And I said, “Surely here—here

in the homes of the people is lodged the ark of the covenant of my

country. Here is its majesty and its strength. Here the beginning of its

power and the end of its responsibility.” The homes of the people; let

us keep them pure and independent, and all will be well with the

Republic. Here is the lesson our foes may learn—here is work the

humblest and weakest hands may do. Let us in simple thrift and economy

make our homes independent. Let us in frugal industry make them

self-sustaining. In sacrifice and denial let us keep them free from debt

and obligation. Let us make them homes of refinement in which we shall

teach our daughters that modesty and patience and gentleness are the

charms of woman. Let us make them temples of liberty, and teach our sons

that an honest conscience is every man’s first political law. That his

sovereignty rests beneath his hat, and that no splendor can rob him and

no force justify the surrender of the simplest right of a free and

independent citizen. And above all, let us honor God in our homes—anchor

them close in His love. Build His altars above our hearthstones, uphold

them in the set and simple faith of our fathers and crown them with the

Bible—that book of books in which all the ways of life are made straight

and the mystery of death is made plain. The home is the source of our

national life. Back of the national Capitol and above it stands the

home. Back of the President and above him stands the citizen. What the

home is, this and nothing else will the Capitol be. What the citizen

wills, this and nothing else will the President be.

Now, my friends, I am no farmer. I have not sought to teach you the

details of your work, for I know little of them. I have not commended

your splendid local advantages, for that I shall do elsewhere. I have

not discussed the differences between the farmer and other classes, for

I believe in essential things there is no difference between them, and

that minor differences should be sacrificed to the greater interest that

depends on a united people. I seek not to divide our people, but to

unite them. I should despise myself if I pandered to the prejudice of

either class to win the applause of the other.

But I have noted these great movements that destroy the equilibrium and

threaten the prosperity of my country, and standing above passion and

prejudice or demagoguery I invoke every true citizen, fighting from his

hearthstone outward, with the prattle of his children on his ear, and

the hand of his wife and mother closely clasped, to determine here to

make his home sustaining and independent, and to pledge eternal

hostility to the forces that threaten our liberties, and the party that

stands behind it.

When I think of the tremendous force of the currents against which we

must fight, of the great political party that impels that fight, of the

countless host of mercenaries that fight under its flag, of the enormous

powers of government privilege and monopoly that back them up, I confess

my heart sinks within me, and I grow faint. But I remember that the

servant of Elisha looked abroad from Samaria and beheld the hosts that

encompassed the city, and said in agonized fear: “Alas, master, what

shall we do?” and the answer of Elisha was the answer of every brave man

and faithful heart in all ages: “Fear not, for they that be with us are

more than they that be with them,” and this faith opened the eyes of the

servant of the man of God, and he looked up again, and lo, the air was

filled with chariots of fire, and the mountains were filled with

horsemen, and they compassed the city about as a mighty and

unconquerable host. Let us fight in such faith, and fear not. The air

all about us is filled with chariots of unseen allies, and the mountains

are thronged with unseen knights that shall fight with us. Fear not, for

they that be with us are more than they that be with them. Buckle on

your armor, gird about your loins, stand upright and dauntless while I

summon you to the presence of the immortal dead. Your fathers and mine

yet live, though they speak not, and will consecrate this air with their

wheeling chariots, and above them and beyond them to the Lord God

Almighty, King of the Hosts in whose unhindered splendor we stand this

morning. Look up to them, be of good cheer, and faint not, for they

shall fight with us when we strike for liberty and truth, and all the

world, though it be banded against us, shall not prevail against them.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

Joel Chandler Harris' life of Henry W. Grady including his writings and speeches · 第 76 / 327 题