BY JOEL CHANDLER HARRIS.

-------

ORDINARILY, it is not a difficult matter to write a biographical sketch.

Here are the dates, one in faded ink in an old Bible, the other

glistening under the morning sun, or the evening stars, on the cold

gravestone. Here is the business, the occupation, the profession,

success or failure—a little scrap of paper here and there, and beyond

and above everything, the fact of death; of death that, in a pitiful

way, becomes as perfunctory as any other fact or event. Ordinarily,

there is no difficulty in grouping these things, throwing in a word of

eulogy here and there, and sympathizing in a formal way with the friends

and relatives and the community in general.

But to give adequate shape to even the slightest sketch of the unique

personality and the phenomenal career of Henry Woodfin Grady, who died,

as it were, but yesterday, is well-nigh impossible; for here was a life

that has no parallel in our history, productive as our institutions have

been of individuality. A great many Americans have achieved fame in

their chosen professions,—have won distinction and commanded the popular

approval, but here is a career which is so unusual as to have no

precedent. In recalling to mind the names of those who have been most

conspicuously successful in touching the popular heart, one fact

invariably presents itself—the fact of office. It is not, perhaps, an

American fact peculiarly, but it seems to be so, since the proud and the

humble, the great and the small, all seem willing to surrender to its

influence. It is the natural order of things that an American who is

ambitious—who is willing, as the phrase goes, to serve the people (and

it is a pretty as well as a popular phrase)—should have an eye on some

official position, more or less important, which he would be willing to

accept even at a sacrifice if necessary. This is the American plan, and

it has been so sanctified by history and custom that the modern

reformers, who propose to apply a test of fitness to the office-seekers,

are hooted at as Pharisees. After our long and promiscuous career of

office-seeking and office-holding, a test of fitness seems to be a

monarchical invention which has for its purpose the destruction of our

republican institutions.

It is true that some of the purest and best men in our history have held

office, and have sought it, and this fact gives additional emphasis to

one feature of Henry Grady’s career. He never sought office, and he was

prompt to refuse it whenever it was brought within his reach. On one

occasion a tremendous effort was made to induce him to become a

candidate for Congress in the Atlanta district. The most prominent

people in the district urged him, his friends implored him, and a

petition largely signed was presented to him. Never before in Georgia

has a citizen been formally petitioned by so large a number of his

fellow-citizens to accept so important an office. Mr. Grady regarded the

petition with great curiosity. He turned it over in his mind and played

with it in a certain boyish and impulsive way that belonged to

everything he did and that was one of the most charming elements of his

character. His response to the petition is worth giving here. He was, as

he said, strongly tempted to improve a most flattering opportunity. He

then goes on to read a lesson to the young men of the South that is

still timely, though it was written in 1882. He says:

When I was eighteen years of age, I adopted journalism as my

profession. After thirteen years of service, in which I have had

various fortunes, I can say that I have never seen a day when I

regretted my choice. On the contrary, I have seen the field of

journalism so enlarged, its possibilities so widened, and its

influence so extended, that I have come to believe earnestly

that no man, no matter what his calling, his elevation, or his

opportunity, can equal in dignity, honor and usefulness the

journalist who comprehends his position, fairly measures his

duties, and gives himself entirely and unselfishly to his work.

But journalism is a jealous profession, and demands the fullest

allegiance of those who seek its honors or emoluments. Least of

all things can it be made the aid of the demagogue, or the

handmaid of the politician. The man who uses his journal to

subserve his political ambition, or writes with a sinister or

personal purpose, soon loses his power, and had best abandon a

profession he has betrayed. Within my memory there are frequent

and striking examples of men who have sacrificed the one

profession, only to be sacrificed in the other. History has not

recorded the name of a single man who has been great enough to

succeed in both. Therefore, devoted as I am to my profession,

believing as I do that there is more of honor and usefulness for

me along its way than in another path, and that my duty is clear

and unmistakable, I am constrained to reaffirm in my own mind

and to declare to you the resolution I made when I entered

journalism, namely, that as long as I remain in its ranks I will

never become a candidate for any political office, or draw a

dollar from any public treasury. This rule I have never broken,

and I hope I never shall. As a matter of course, every young man

of health and spirit must have ambition, I think it has been the

curse of the South that our young men have considered little

else than political preferment worthy of an ambitious thought.

There is a fascination about the applause of the hustings that

is hard to withstand. Really, there is no career that brings so

much of unhappiness and discontent—so much of subservience,

sacrifice, and uncertainty as that of the politician. Never did

the South offer so little to her young men in the direction of

politics as she does at present. Never did she offer so much in

other directions. As for me, my ambition is a simple one. I

shall be satisfied with the labors of my life if, when those

labors are over, my son, looking abroad upon a better and

grander Georgia—a Georgia that has filled the destiny God

intended her for—when her towns and cities are hives of

industry, and her country-side the exhaustless fields from which

their stores are drawn—when every stream dances on its way to

the music of spindles, and every forest echoes back the roar of

the passing train—when her valleys smile with abundant harvests,

and from her hillsides come the tinkling of bells as her herds

and flocks go forth from their folds—when more than two million

people proclaim her perfect independence, and bless her with

their love—I shall be more than content, I say, if my son,

looking upon such scenes as these, can stand up and say:

“My father bore a part in this work, and his name lives in the

memory of this people.”

While I am forced, therefore, to decline to allow the use of my

name as you request, I cannot dismiss your testimonial,

unprecedented, I believe, in its character and compass, without

renewing my thanks for the generous motives that inspired it.

Life can bring me no sweeter satisfaction than comes from this

expression of confidence and esteem from the people with whom I

live, and among whom I expect to die. You have been pleased to

commend the work I may have done for the old State we love so

well. Rest assured that you have to-day repaid me amply for the

past, and have strengthened me for whatever duty may lie ahead.

Brief as it is, this is a complete summary of Mr. Grady’s purpose so far

as politics were concerned. It is the key-note of his career. He was

ambitious—he was fired with that “noble discontent,” born of genius,

that spurs men to action, but he lacked the selfishness that leads to

office-seeking. It is not to be supposed, however, that he scorned

politics. He had unbounded faith in the end and aim of certain

principles of government, and he had unlimited confidence in the honesty

and justice of the people and in the destiny of the American Union—in

the future of the Republic.

What was the secret of his popularity? By what methods did he win the

affections of people who never saw his face or heard his voice? His

aversion to office was not generally known—indeed, men who regarded him

in the light of rivalry, and who had access to publications neither

friendly nor appreciative, had advertised to the contrary. By them it

was hinted that he was continually seeking office and employing for that

purpose all the secret arts of the demagogue. Yet, in the face of these

sinister intimations, he died the best beloved and the most deeply

lamented man that Georgia has ever produced, and, to crown it all, he

died a private citizen, sacrificing his life in behalf of a purpose that

was neither personal nor sectional, but grandly national in its aims.

In the last intimate conversation he had with the writer of this, Mr.

Grady regretted that there were people in Georgia who misunderstood his

motives and intentions. We were on the train going from Macon to

Eatonton, where he was to speak.

“I am going to Eatonton solely because you seem to have your heart set

on it,” he said. “There are people who will say that I am making a

campaign in my own behalf, and you will hear it hinted that I am going

about the State drumming up popularity for the purpose of running for

some office.”

The idea seemed to oppress him, and though he never bore malice against

a human being, he was keenly hurt at any interpretation of his motives

that included selfishness or self-seeking among them. In this way, he

was often deeply wounded by men who ought to have held up his hands.

When he died, those who had wronged him, perhaps unintentionally, by

attributing to him a selfish ambition that he never had, were among the

first to do justice to his motives. Their haste in this matter (there

are two instances in my mind) has led me to believe that their instinct

at the last was superior to their judgment. I have recently read again

nearly all the political editorials contributed to the _Constitution_ by

Mr. Grady during the last half-dozen years. Taken together, they make a

remarkable showing. They manifest an extraordinary growth, not in style

or expression—for all the graces of composition were fully developed in

Mr. Grady’s earliest writings—but in lofty aim, in the high and

patriotic purpose that is to be found at its culmination in his Boston

speech. I mention the Boston speech because it is the last serious

effort he made. Reference might just as well have been made to the New

England speech, or to the Elberton speech, or to the little speech he

delivered at Eatonton, and which was never reported. In each and all of

these there is to be found the qualities that are greater than literary

nimbleness or rhetorical fluency—the qualities that kindle the fires of

patriotism and revive and restore the love of country.

In his Eatonton speech, Mr. Grady was particularly happy in his

references to a restored Union and a common country, and his earnestness

and his eloquence were as conscientious there as if he were speaking to

the largest and most distinguished audience in the world, and as if his

address were to be printed in all the newspapers of the land. I am

dwelling on these things in order to show that there was nothing

affected or perfunctory in Mr. Grady’s attitude. He had political

enemies in the State—men who, at some turn in their career, had felt the

touch and influence of his hand, or thought they did—and these men were

always ready, through their small organs and mouthpieces, to belittle

his efforts and to dash their stale small beer across the path of this

prophet of the New South, who strove to impress his people with his own

brightness and to lead them into the sunshine that warmed his own life

and made it beautiful. Perhaps these things should not be mentioned in a

sketch that can only be general in its nature; and yet they afford a key

to Mr. Grady’s character; they supply the means of getting an intimate

glimpse of his motives. That the thoughtless and ill-tempered criticisms

of his contemporaries wounded him is beyond question. They troubled him

greatly, and he used to talk about them to his co-workers with the

utmost freedom. But they never made him malicious. He always had some

excuse to offer for those who misinterpreted him, and no attack, however

bitter, was ever made on his motives, that he could not find a

reasonable excuse for in some genial and graceful way.

The great point about this man was that he never bore malice. His heart

was too tender and his nature too generous. The small jealousies, and

rivalries, and envies that appertain to life, and, indeed, are a

definite part of it, never touched him in the slightest degree. He was

conscious of the growth of his powers, and he watched their development

with the curiosity and enthusiasm of a boy, but the egotism that is

based on arrogance or self-esteem he had no knowledge of. The

consciousness of the purity of his motives gave him strength and power

in a direction where most other public men are weak. This same

consciousness gave a breadth, an ardor, and an impulsiveness to his

actions and utterances that seem to be wholly lacking in the lives of

other public men who have won the applause of the public. The secret of

this it would be difficult to define. When his companions in the office

insisted that it was his duty to prepare at least an outline of his

speeches so that the newspapers could have the benefit of such a basis,

the suggestion fretted him. His speech at the annual banquet of the New

England Society, which created such a tremendous sensation, was an

impromptu effort from beginning to end. It was the creature of the

occasion. Fortunately, a reporter of the New York _Tribune_ was present,

and he has preserved for us something of the flavor and finish of the

words which the young Southerner uttered on his first introduction to a

Northern audience. The tremendous impression that he made, however, has

never been recorded. There was a faint echo of it in the newspapers, a

buzz and a stir in the hotel lobbies, but all that was said was

inadequate to explain why these sons of New England, accustomed as they

were to eloquence of the rarer kind, as the volumes of their proceedings

show, rose to their feet and shouted themselves hoarse over the simple

and impromptu effort of this young Georgian.

Mr. Grady attended the New England banquet for the purpose of making a

mere formal response to the toast of “The South,” but, as he said

afterwards, there was something in the scene that was inspiring. Near

him sat General Tecumseh Sherman, who marched through Georgia with fire

and sword, and all around him were the fat and jocund sons of New

England who had prospered by the results of the war while his own people

had had the direst poverty for their portion. “When I found myself on my

feet,” he said, describing the scene on his return, “every nerve in my

body was strung as tight as a fiddle-string, and all tingling. I knew

then that I had a message for that assemblage, and as soon as I opened

my mouth it came rushing out.”

That speech, as we all know, was an achievement in its way. It stirred

the whole country from one end to the other, and made Mr. Grady famous.

Invitations to speak poured in upon him from all quarters, and he at

last decided to deliver an address at Dallas, Texas. His friends advised

him to prepare the speech in advance, especially as many of the

newspapers of the country would be glad to have proofs of it to be used

when it was delivered. He saw how essential this would be, but the

preparation of a speech in cold blood (as he phrased it) was irksome to

him, and failed to meet the approval of his methods, which were as

responsive to the occasion as the report of the thunder-clap is to the

lightning’s flash. He knew that he could depend on these methods in all

emergencies and under all circumstances, and he felt that only by

depending on them could he do himself justice before an audience. The

one characteristic of all his speeches, as natural to his mind as it was

surprising to the minds of others, was the ease and felicity with which

he seized on suggestions born of the moment and growing out of his

immediate surroundings. It might be some incident occurring to the

audience, some failure in the programme, some remark of the speaker

introducing him, or some unlooked-for event; but, whatever it was, he

seized it and compelled it to do duty in pointing a beautiful moral, or

he made it the basis of that swift and genial humor that was a feature

not only of his speeches, but of his daily life.

He was prevailed on, however, to prepare his Dallas speech in advance.

It was put in type in the _Constitution_ office, carefully revised, and

proof slips sent out to a number of newspapers. Mr. Grady’s journey from

Atlanta to Dallas, which was undertaken in a special car, was in the

nature of an ovation. He was met at every station by large crowds, and

his appearance created an enthusiasm that is indescribable. No such

tribute as this has ever before been paid, under any circumstances, to

any private American citizen, and it is to be doubted whether even any

public official, no matter how exalted his station, has ever been

greeted with such hearty and spontaneous enthusiasm. His reception in

Dallas was the culmination of the series of ovations through which he

had passed. Some sort of programme had been arranged by a committee, but

the crowds trampled on this, and the affair took the shape of an

American hullaballoo, so to speak, and, as such, it was greatly enjoyed

by Mr. Grady.

Meanwhile, the programme that had been arranged for the speech-making

was fully carried out. The young editor completely captured the vast

crowd that had assembled to hear him. This information had been promptly

carried to the _Constitution_ office by private telegrams, and

everything was made ready for giving the speech to the public the next

morning; but during the afternoon this telegram came:

“_Suppress speech: It has been entirely changed. Notify other

papers._”

At the last moment, his mind full of the suggestions of his

surroundings, he felt that the prepared speech could not be depended on,

and he threw it away. It was a great relief to him, he told me

afterward, to be able to do this. Whatever in the prepared speech seemed

to be timely he used, but he departed entirely from the line of it at

every point, and the address that the Texans heard was mainly an

impromptu one. It created immense enthusiasm, and confirmed the promise

of the speech before the New England Society.

The speech before the University of Virginia was also prepared

beforehand, but Mr. Grady made a plaything of the preparation before his

audience. “I was never so thoroughly convinced of Mr. Grady’s power,”

said the Hon. Guyton McLendon, of Thomasville, to the writer, “as when I

heard him deliver this speech.” Mr. McLendon had accompanied him on his

journey to Charlottesville. “We spent a day in Washington,” said Mr.

McLendon, recalling the incidents of the trip. “The rest of the party

rode around the capital looking at the sights, but Mr. Grady, myself,

and one or two others remained in the car. While we were waiting there,

Mr. Grady read me the printed slips of his speech, and I remember that

it made a great impression on me. I thought it was good enough for any

occasion, but Mr. Grady seemed to have his doubts about it. He examined

it critically two or three times, and made some alterations. Finally he

laid it away. When he did come to deliver the speech, I was perhaps the

most astonished person you ever saw. I expected to hear again the speech

that had been read to me in the Pullman coach, but I heard a vastly

different and a vastly better one. He used the old speech only where it

was most timely and most convenient. The incident of delivering the

prize to a young student who had won it on a literary exercise of some

sort, started Mr. Grady off in a new vein and on a new line, and after

that he used the printed speech merely to fill out with here and there.

It was wonderful how he could break away from it and come back to it,

fitting the old with the new in a beautiful and harmonious mosaic. If

anybody had told me that the human mind was capable of such a

performance as this on the wing and in the air, so to speak, I shouldn’t

have believed it. To me it was a wonderful manifestation of genius, and

I knew then, for the first time, that there was no limit to Mr. Grady’s

power and versatility as a speaker.”

In his speeches in the country towns of Georgia and before the farmers,

Mr. Grady made no pretense of preparation. His private secretary, Mr.

James R. Holliday, caught and wrote out the pregnant paragraphs that go

to make up his Elberton speech, which was the skeleton and outline on

which he based his speeches to the farmers. Each speech, as might be

supposed, was a beautiful variation of this rural theme to which he was

wedded, but the essential part of the Elberton speech was the bone and

marrow of all. I think there is no passage in our modern literature

equal in its effectiveness and pathos to his picture of a Southern

farmer’s home. It was a matter on which his mind dwelt. There was that

in his nature to which both sun and soil appealed. The rain falling on a

fallow field, the sun shining on the bristling and waving corn, and the

gentle winds of heaven blowing over all—he was never tired of talking of

these, and his talk always took the shape of a series of picturesque

descriptions. He appreciated their spiritual essence as well as their

material meaning, and he surrendered himself entirely to all the

wholesome suggestions that spring from the contemplation of rural

scenes.

I suppose it is true that all men—except those who are brought in daily

contact with the practical and prosy side of it—have a longing for a

country life. Mr. Grady’s longing in that direction took the shape of a

passion that was none the less serious and earnest because he knew it

was altogether romantic. In the Spring of 1889, the matter engaged his

attention to such an extent, that he commissioned a compositor in the

_Constitution_ office to purchase a suburban farm. He planned it all out

beforehand, and knew just where the profits were to come in. His

descriptions of his imaginary farm were inimitable, and the details, as

he gave them out, were marked by the rare humor with which he treated

the most serious matters. There was to be an old-fashioned spring in a

clump of large oak-trees on the place, meadows of orchard grass and

clover, through which mild-eyed Jerseys were to wander at will, and in

front of the house there was to be a barley patch gloriously green, and

a colt frolicking and capering in it. The farm was of course a dream,

but it was a very beautiful one while it lasted, and he dwelt on it with

an earnestness that was quite engaging to those who enjoyed his

companionship. The farm was a dream, but he no doubt got more enjoyment

and profit out of it than a great many prosy people get out of the farms

that are real. Insubstantial as it was, Mr. Grady’s farm served to

relieve the tension of a mind that was always busy with the larger

affairs of this busy and stirring age, and many a time when he grew

tired of the incessant demands made on his time and patience he would

close the door of his room with a bang and instruct the office-boy to

tell all callers that he had “gone to his farm.” The fat cows that

grazed there lowed their welcome, the chickens cackled to see him come,

and the colt capered nimbly in the green expanse of barley—children of

his dreams all, but all grateful and restful to a busy mind.

Joel Chandler Harris' life of Henry W. Grady including his writings and speeches · 第 60 / 327 题