GREEK ECCLESIASTICAL DOMINATION OF SLAVS

I refer to the special and exceptional position held by the Greeks in

the Turkish dominions. Though the Moslems had possessed themselves of

the Greek Empire from the Bosphorus to the Danube, Greek domination

still survived as an intellectual, ecclesiastical, and commercial

force. The nature and effects of that supremacy, and its results upon

the fortunes of other Balkan nations, we must now proceed to consider.

The Turkish government classifies its subjects not on the basis of

nationality but on the basis of religion. A homogeneous religious

group is designated a millet or nation. Thus the Moslems form the

millet of Islam. And at the present time there are among others a

Greek millet, a Catholic millet, and a Jewish millet. But from the

first days of the Ottoman conquest until very recent times all the

Christian population, irrespective of denominational differences, was

assigned by the Sultans to the {17} Greek millet, of which the

patriarch of Constantinople was the head. The members of this millet

were all called Greeks; the bishops and higher clergy were exclusively

Greek; and the language of their churches and schools was Greek, which

was also the language of literature, commerce, and polite society. But

the jurisdiction of the patriarch was not restricted even to

ecclesiastical and educational matters. It extended to a considerable

part of civil law--notably to questions of marriage, divorce, and

inheritance when they concerned Christians only.

It is obvious that the possession by the Greek patriarch of

Constantinople of this enormous power over the Christian subjects of

the Turks enabled him to carry on a propaganda of hellenization. The

disappearance for three centuries of the national consciousness in

Servia and Bulgaria was not the sole work of the Moslem invader; a more

fatal blight to the national languages and culture were the Greek

bishops {18} and clergy who conducted their churches and schools. And

if Kinglake knew nothing of Bulgaria as late as 1834 it was because

every educated person in that country called himself a Greek. For it

cannot be too strongly emphasized that until comparatively recent times

all Christians of whatever nation or sect were officially recognized by

the Turks as members of the Greek millet and were therefore designated

Greeks.

The hostility of the Slavonic peoples in the Balkans, and especially of

the Bulgarians, to the Greeks, grows out of the ecclesiastical and

educational domination which the Greek clergy and bishops so long and

so relentlessly exercised over them. Of course the Turkish Sultans are

responsible for the arrangement. But there is no evidence that they

had any other intention than to rid themselves of a disagreeable task.

For the rest they regarded Greeks and Slavs with equal contempt. But

the Greeks quickly recognized the racial advantage of their {19}

ecclesiastical hegemony. And it was not in human nature to give it up

without a struggle. The patriarchate retained its exclusive

jurisdiction over all orthodox populations till 1870, when the Sultan

issued a firman establishing the Bulgarian exarchate.

There were two other spheres in which Greek influence was paramount in

the Turkish Empire. The Turk is a soldier and farmer; the Greek is

pre-eminent as a trader, and his ability secured him a disproportionate

share of the trade of the empire. Again, the Greeks of Constantinople

and other large cities gradually won the confidence of the Turks and

attained political importance. During the eighteenth century the

highest officials in the empire were invariably Phanariots, as the

Constantinople Greeks were termed from the quarter of the city in which

they resided.

In speaking of the Greeks I have not had in mind the inhabitants of the

present kingdom of Greece. Their subjection by the Turks was as {20}

complete as that of the Serbs and Bulgarians, though of course they

were exempt from ecclesiastical domination at the hands of an alien

clergy speaking a foreign language. The enmity of the Bulgarians may

to-day be visited upon the subjects of King Constantine, but it was not

their ancestors who imposed upon Bulgaria foreign schools and churches

but the Greeks of Constantinople and Thrace, over whom the government

of Athens has never had jurisdiction.

The Balkan Wars: 1912-1913 Second Edition · 第 20 / 64 题