THE TURKISH EMPIRE IN EUROPE

A little clan of oriental shepherds, the Turks had in two generations

gained possession of the whole of the northwest corner of Asia Minor

and established themselves on the eastern shore of the Bosphorus. The

great city of Brusa, whose groves to-day enshrine the stately beauty of

their mosques and sultans' tombs, capitulated to Orkhan, the son of the

first Sultan, in 1326; and Nicaea, the cradle of the Greek church and

temporary capital of the Greek Empire, {4} surrendered in 1330. On the

other side of the Bosphorus Orkhan could see the domes and palaces of

Constantinople which, however, for another century was to remain the

seat of the Byzantine Empire.

The Turks crossed the Hellespont and, favored by an earthquake, marched

in 1358 over the fallen walls and fortifications into the city of

Gallipoli. In 1361 Adrianople succumbed to the attacks of Orkhan's

son, Murad I, whose sway was soon acknowledged in Thrace and Macedonia,

and who was destined to lead the victorious Ottoman armies as far north

as the Danube.

But though the provinces of the corrupt and effete Byzantine Empire

were falling into the hands of the Turks, the Slavs were still

unsubdued. Lazar the Serb threw down the gauntlet to Murad. On the

memorable field of Kossovo, in 1389, the opposing forces met--Murad

supported by his Asiatic and European vassals and allies, and Lazar

with his formidable army of {5} Serbs, Bosnians, Albanians, Poles,

Magyars, and Vlachs. Few battles in the world have produced such a

deep and lasting impression as this battle of Kossovo, in which the

Christian nations after long and stubborn resistance were vanquished by

the Moslems. The Servians still sing ballads which cast a halo of

pathetic romance round their great disaster. And after more than five

centuries the Montenegrins continue to wear black on their caps in

mourning for that fatal day.

In the next two centuries the Ottoman Empire moved on toward the zenith

of its glory. Mohammed II conquered Constantinople in 1453. And in

1529 Suleyman the Magnificent was at the gates of Vienna. Suleyman's

reign forms the climax of Turkish history. The Turks had become a

central European power occupying Hungary and menacing Austria.

Suleyman's dominions extended from Mecca to Buda-Pesth and from Bagdad

to Algiers. He commanded the Mediterranean, the Euxine, {6} and the

Red Sea, and his navies threatened the coasts of India and Spain.

But the conquests of the Turks were purely military. They did nothing

for their subjects, whom they treated with contempt, and they wanted

nothing from them but tribute and plunder. As the Turks were always

numerically inferior to the aggregate number of the peoples under their

sway, their one standing policy was to keep them divided--_divide et

impera_. To fan racial and religious differences among their subjects

was to perpetuate the rule of the masters. The whole task of

government, as the Turks conceived it, was to collect tribute from the

conquered and keep them in subjection by playing off their differences

against one another.

But a deterioration of Turkish rulers set in soon after the time of

Suleyman with a corresponding decline in the character and efficiency

of the army. And the growth of Russia and the reassertion of Hungary,

Poland, and Austria {7} were fatal to the maintenance of an alien and

detested empire founded on military domination alone. By the end of

the seventeenth century the Turks had been driven out of Austria,

Hungary, Transylvania, and Podolia, and the northern boundaries of

their Empire were fixed by the Carpathians, the Danube, and the Save.

How marked and rapid was the further decline of the Ottoman Empire may

be inferred from the fact that twice in the eighteenth century Austria

and Russia discussed the project of dividing it between them. But the

inevitable disintegration of the Turkish dominion was not to inure to

the glorification of any of the Great Powers, though Russia certainly

contributed to the weakening of the common enemy. The decline and

diminution of the Ottoman Empire continued throughout the nineteenth

century. What happened, however, was the revolt of subject provinces

and the creation out of the territory of European Turkey of the

independent states of Greece, Servia, {8} Roumania, and Bulgaria. And

it was Bulgarians, Greeks, and Servians, with the active assistance of

the Montenegrins and the benevolent neutrality of the Roumanians, who,

in the war of 1912-1913, drove the Turk out of Europe, leaving him

nothing but the city of Constantinople and a territorial fringe

bordered by the Chataldja line of fortifications.

The Balkan Wars: 1912-1913 Second Edition · 第 17 / 64 题