CHAPTER XLIX.----LOUIS XIV. AND HIS COURT.

A POPULAR HISTORY OF FRANCE FROM THE EARLIEST TIMES.

By M. Guizot

TABLE OF CONTENTS.

VOLUME VI.

XLIX. LOUIS XIV. AND HIS COURT

L. LOUIS XIV. AND DEATH. (1711-1715.)

LI. LOUIS XV., THE REGENCY, AND CARDINAL DUBOIS. (1715-1723.)

LII. LOUIS XV., THE MINISTRY OF CARDINAL FLEURY. (1723-1748.)

LIII. LOUIS XV., FRANCE IN THE COLONIES. (1745 -1763.)

LIV. LOUIS XV., THE SEVEN YEARS’ WAR. --MINISTRY OF THE DUKE OF

CHOISEUL. (1748-1774.)

LV. LOUIS XV., THE PHILOSOPHERS

LVI. LOUIS XVI., MINISTRY OF M. TURGOT. (1774-1776.)

LVII. LOUIS XVI., FRANCE ABROAD.--THE UNITED STATES’ WAR OF

INDEPENDENCE. (17751783.)

LVIII. LOUIS XVI., FRANCE AT HOME.--MINISTRY OF M. NECKER. (1776-1781.)

LIX. LOUIS XVI., M. DE CALONNE, AND THE ASSEMBLY OF NOTABLES. (1781-

1787.)

LX. LOUIS XVI., CONVOCATION OF THE STATESGENERAL. (1787-1789.)

LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS:

HOTEL DE VILLE, PARIS FRONTISPIECE.

YPRES 151

BRUSSELS 159

NAMUR 161

ANTWERP 233

LOUIS XVI. 347

MARIE ANTOINETTE 456

LIST OF WOOD-CUT ILLUSTRATIONS.

The Grand Monarch in his State Robes 9

Madame de la Valliere 10

Madame de Montespan 12

The Iron Mask 14

Bed-chamber Etiquette 15

Madame de Maintenon and the Duchess of Burgundy. 27

Death of Madame de Maintenon. 34

The King leaving the Death-bed of Monseigneur 36

Louis XIV. in Old Age 47

The Death-bed of Louis XIV 50

Versailles at Night 52

The Regent Orleans 54

The Bed of Justice 57

John Law 62

La Rue Quincampoix 68

The Duke of Maine 71

The Duchess of Maine 72

Cardinal Dubois 78

Peter the Great and Little Louis XV 82

Belzunce amid the Plague-stricken 96

The Boy King and his People 104

Death of the Regent 107

Louis XV 110

Cardinal Fleury 110

Mary Leczinska 121

Death of Plelo 130

“Moriamur pro rege nostro.” 142

Louis XV. and his Councillors 148

Louis XV. and the Ambassador of Holland 151

Marshal Saxe 154

Battle of Fontenoy 157

Arrest of Charles Edward 166

Dupleix 168

La Bourdonnais 170

Dupleix meeting the Soudhabar of the Deccan 174

Death of the Nabob of the Carnatic 174

Lally at Pondicherry 184

Champlain 190

Death of General Braddock 203

Death of Wolfe 209

Madame de Pompadour 215

Attack on Fort St. Philip. 218

Assassination of Louis XV. by Damiens 221

Death of Chevalier D’Assas 233

“France, thy Parliament will cut off thy Head too!” 249

Defeat of the Corsicans at Golo 256

Montesquieu 269

Fontenelle 274

Voltaire 277

The Rescue of “La Henriade.” 283

Arrest of Voltaire 298

Diderot 314

Alembert 317

Diderot and Catherine II 321

Buffon 323

Rousseau and Madame D’Epinay 338

Turgot’s Dismissal 367

Destruction of the Tea 378

Suffren 413

The Reading of “Paul and Virginia.” 427

Necker Hospital 432

“There are my Sledges, Sirs.” 458

Lavoisier 465

Cardinal Rohan’s Discomfiture 470

Arrest of the Members 502

A POPULAR HISTORY OF FRANCE FROM THE EARLIEST TIMES.

CHAPTER XLIX.----LOUIS XIV. AND HIS COURT.

Louia XIV. reigned everywhere, over his people, over his age, often over

Europe; but nowhere did he reign so completely as over his court. Never

were the wishes, the defects, and the vices of a man so completely a law

to other men as at the court of Louis XIV. during the whole period of his

long life. When near to him, in the palace of Versailles, men lived, and

hoped, and trembled; everywhere else in France, even at Paris, men

vegetated. The existence of the great lords was concentrated in the

court, about the person of the king. Scarcely could the most important

duties bring them to absent themselves for any time. They returned

quickly, with alacrity, with ardor; only poverty or a certain rustic

pride kept gentlemen in their provinces. “The court does not make one

happy,” says La Bruyere, “it prevents one from being so anywhere else.”

At the outset of his reign, and when, on the death of Cardinal Mazarin,

he took the reins of power in hand, Louis XIV. had resolved to establish

about him, in his dominions and at his court, “that humble obedience on

the part of subjects to those who are set over them,” which he regarded

as “one of the most fundamental maxims of Christianity.” “As the

principal hope for the reforms I contemplated establishing in my kingdom

lay in my own will,” says he in his Memoires, “the first step towards

their foundation was to render my will quite absolute by a line of

conduct which should induce submission and respect, rendering justice

scrupulously to any to whom I owed it, but, as for favors, granting them

freely and without constraint to any I pleased and when I pleased,

provided that the sequel of my acts showed that, for all my giving no

reason to anybody, I was none the less guided by reason.”

[Illustration: THE GRAND MONARCH IN HIS STATE ROBES----9]

The principle of absolute power, firmly fixed in the young king’s mind,

began to pervade his court from the time that he disgraced Fouquet and

ceased to dissemble his affection for Mdlle. de La Valliere. She was

young, charming, and modest. Of all the king’s favorites she alone loved

him sincerely. “What a pity he is a king!” she would say. Louis XIV.

made her a duchess; but all she cared about was to see him and please

him. When Madame de Montespan began to supplant her in the king’s favor,

the grief of Madame de La Valliere was so great that she thought she

should die of it. Then she turned to God, in penitence and despair.

Twice she sought refuge in a convent at Chaillot. “I should have left

the court sooner,” she sent word to the king on leaving, “after having

lost the honor of your good graces, if I could have prevailed upon myself

never to see you again; that weakness was so strong in me that hardly now

am I capable of making a sacrifice of it to God; after having given you

all my youth, the rest of my life is not too much for the care of my

salvation.” The king still clung to her. “He sent M. Colbert to beg her

earnestly to come to Versailles, and that he might speak with her.

M. Colbert escorted her thither; the king conversed for an hour with her,

and wept bitterly. Madame de Montespan was there to meet her with open

arms and tears in her eyes.” “It is all incomprehensible,” adds Madame

de Sevigne; “some say that she will remain at Versailles, and at court,

others that she will return to Chaillot; we shall see.” Madame de La

Valliere remained three years at court, “half penitent,” she said humbly,

detained there by the king’s express wish, in consequence of the tempers

and jealousies of Madame de Montespan, who felt herself judged and

condemned by her rival’s repentance. Attempts were made to turn Madame

de La Valliere from her inclination for the Carmelites: “Madame,” said

Madame Scarron to her one day, “here are you one blaze of gold: have you

really considered that at the Carmelites’ before long, you will have to

wear serge?” She, however, persisted. She was already practising in

secret the austerities of the convent. “God has laid in this heart the

foundation of great things,” said Bossuet, who supported her in her

conflict: “the world puts great hinderances in her way and God great

mercies; I have hopes that God will prevail; the uprightness of her heart

will carry everything.”

[Illustration: Madame de la Valliere----10]

“When I am in trouble at the Carmelites’,” said Madame de La Valliere, as

at last she quitted the court, “I will think of what those people have

made me suffer.” “The world itself makes us sick of the world,” said

Bossuet in the sermon he preached on the day of her taking the dress;

“its attractions have enough of illusion, its favors enough of

inconstancy, its rebuffs enough of bitterness, there is enough of

injustice and perfidy in the dealings of men, enough of unevenness and

capriciousness in their intractable and contradictory humors--there is

enough of it all, without doubt, to disgust us.” “She was dead to me the

day she entered the Carmelites,” said the king, thirty-five years later,

when the modest and fervent nun expired at last, in 1710, at her convent,

without having ever relaxed the severities of her penance. He had

married the daughter she had given him to the Prince of Conti.

“Everybody has been to pay compliments to this saintly Carmelite,” says

Madame de Sevigne, without appearing to perceive the singularity of the

alliance between words and ideas; “I was there too with Mademoiselle.

The Prince of Conti detained her in the parlor. What an angel appeared

to me at last! She had to my eyes all the charms we had seen heretofore.

I did not find her either puffy or sallow; she is less thin, though, and

more happy-looking. She has those same eyes of hers, and the same

expression; austerity; bad living, and little sleep have not made them

hollow or dull; that singular dress takes away nothing of the easy grace

and easy bearing. As for modesty, she is no grander than when she

presented to the world a princess of Conti, but that is enough for a

Carmelite. In real truth, this dress and this retirement are a great

dignity for her.” The king never saw her again, but it was at her side

that Madame de Montespan, in her turn forced to quit the court, went to

seek advice and pious consolation. “This soul will be a miracle of

grace,” Bossuet had said.

[Illustration: Madame de Montespan 12]

It was no longer the time of “this tiny violet that hides itself in the

grass,” as Madame de Sevigne used to remark. Madame de Montespan was

haughty, passionate, “with hair dressed in a thousand ringlets, a

majestic beauty to show off to the ambassadors: “she openly paraded the

favor she was in, accepting and angling for the graces the king was

pleased to do her and hers, having the superintendence of the household

of the queen whom she insulted without disguise, to the extent of

wounding the king himself. “Pray consider that she is your mistress,” he

said one day to his favorite. The scandal was great; Bossuet attempted

the task of stopping it. It was the time of the Jubilee: neither the

king nor Madame de Montespan had lost all religious feeling; the wrath of

God and the refusal of the sacraments had terrors for them still. Madame

de Montespan left the court after some stormy scenes; the king set out

for Flanders. “Pluck this sin from your heart, Sir,” Bossuet wrote to

him; “and not only this sin, but the cause of it; go even to the root.

In your triumphant march amongst the people whom you constrain to

recognize your might, would you consider yourself secure of a rebel

fortress if your enemy still had influence there? We hear of nothing but

the magnificence of your troops, of what they are capable under your

leadership! And as for me, Sir, I think in my secret heart of a war far

more important, of a far more difficult victory which God holds out

before you. What would it avail you to be dreaded and victorious

without, when you are vanquished and captive within?” “Pray God for me,”

wrote the bishop at the same time to Marshal Bellefonds, “pray Him to

deliver me from the greatest burden man can have to bear, or to quench

all that is man in me, that I may act for Him only. Thank God, I have

never yet thought, during the whole course of this business, of my

belonging to the world; but that is not all; what is wanted is to be a

St. Ambrose, a true man of God, a man of that other life, a man in whom

everything should speak, with whom all his words should be oracles of the

Holy Spirit, all his conduct celestial; pray, pray, I do beseech you.”

At the bottom of his soul, and in the innermost sanctuary of his

conscience, Bossuet felt his weakness; he saw the apostolic severance

from the world, the apostolic zeal and fervor required for the holy

crusade he had undertaken. “Your Majesty has given your promise to God

and the world,” he wrote to Louis XIV. in, ignorance of the secret

correspondence still kept up between the king and Madame de Montespan.

“I have been to see her,” added the prelate. “I find her pretty calm;

she occupies herself a great deal in good works. I spoke to her as well

as to you the words in which God commands us to give Him our whole heart;

they caused her to shed many tears; may it please God to fix these truths

in the bottom of both your hearts, and accomplish His work, in order that

so many tears, so much violence, so many strains that you have put upon

yourselves, may not be fruitless.”

The king was on the road back to Versailles; Madame de Montespan was to

return thither also, her duties required her to do so, it was said;

Bossuet heard of it; he did not for a single instant delude himself as to

the emptiness of the king’s promises and of his own hopes. He

determined, however, to visit the king at Luzarches. Louis XIV. gave him

no time to speak.

“Do not say a word to me, sir,” said he, not without blushing, do not say

a word; I have given my orders, they will have to be executed.” Bossuet

held his tongue. “He had tried every thrust; had acted like a pontiff of

the earliest times, with a freedom worthy of the earliest ages and the

earliest bishops of the Church,” says St. Simon. He saw the inutility of

his efforts; henceforth, prudence and courtly behavior put a seal upon

his lips. It was the time of the great king’s omnipotence and highest

splendor, the time when nobody withstood his wishes. The great

Mademoiselle had just attempted to show her independence: tired of not

being married, with a curse on the greatness which kept her astrand, she

had made up her mind to a love-match. “Guess it in four, guess it in

ten, guess it in a hundred,” wrote Madame de Sevigne to Madame de

Coulanges: “you are not near it; well, then, you must be told. M. de

Lauzun is to marry on Sunday at the Louvre, with the king’s permission,

mademoiselle . . . mademoiselle de . .. mademoiselle, guess the name

. . . he is to marry Mademoiselle, my word! upon my word! my sacred

word! Mademoiselle, the great Mademoiselle, Mademoiselle daughter of the

late Monsieur, Mademoiselle grand-daughter of Henry IV., Mademoiselle

d’Eu, Mademoiselle de Dombes, Mademoiselle de Montpensier, Mademoiselle

d’ Orleans, Mademoiselle, cousin-german to the king, Mademoiselle

destined to the throne, Mademoiselle, the only match in France who would

have been worthy of Monsieur!” The astonishment was somewhat premature;

Mademoiselle did not espouse Lauzun just then, the king broke off the

marriage. “I will make you so great,” he said to Lauzun, “that you shall

have no cause to regret what I am taking from you; meanwhile, I make you

duke, and peer, and marshal of France.” “Sir,” broke in Lauzun,

insolently, “you have made so many dukes that it is no longer an honor to

be one, and as for the baton of marshal of France, your Majesty can give

it me when I have earned it by my services.” He was before long sent to

Pignerol, where he passed ten years. There he met Fouquet, and that

mysterious personage called the Iron Mask, whose name has not yet been

discovered to a certainty by means of all the most ingenious conjectures.

It was only by settling all her property on the Duke of Maine after

herself that Mademoiselle purchased Lauzun’s release. The king had given

his posts to the Prince of Marcillac, son of La Rochefoucauld. He at the

same time overwhelmed Marshal Bellefonds with kindnesses.

[Illustration: The Iron Mask----14]

“He sent for him into his study,” says Madame de Sevigne,--and said to

him, ‘Marshal, I want to know why you are anxious to leave me. Is it a

devout feeling? Is it a desire for retirement? Is it the pressure of

your debts? If the last, I shall be glad to set it right, and enter into

the details of your affairs.’ The marshal was sensibly touched by this

kindness: ‘Sir,’ said he, ‘it is my debts; I am over head and ears.

I cannot see the consequences borne by some of my friends who have

assisted me, and whom I cannot pay.’ ‘Well,’ said the king, ‘they must

have security for what is owing to them. I will give you a hundred

thousand francs on your house at Versailles, and a patent of retainder

(_brevet de retenue_--whereby the emoluments of a post were not lost to

the holder’s estate by his death) for four hundred thousand francs, which

will serve as a policy of assurance if you should die; that being so, you

will stay in my service.’ In truth, one must have a very hard heart not

to obey a master who enters with so much kindness into the interests of

one of his domestics; accordingly, the marshal made no objection, and

here he is in his place again, and loaded with benefits.”

The king entered benevolently into the affairs of a marshal of France; he

paid his debts, and the marshal was his domestic; all the court had come

to that; the duties which brought servants in proximity to the king’s

person were eagerly sought after by the greatest lords. Bontemps, his

chief valet, and Fagon, his physician, as well as his surgeon Marachal,

very excellent men, too, were all-powerful amongst the courtiers. Louis

XIV. had possessed the art of making his slightest favors prized; to hold

the candlestick at bedtime (_au petit coucher_), to make one in the trips

to Marly, to play in the king’s own game, such was the ambition of the

most distinguished; the possessors of grand historic castles, of fine

houses at Paris, crowded together in attics at Versailles, too happy to

obtain a lodging in the palace. The whole mind of the greatest

personages, his favorites at the head, was set upon devising means of

pleasing the king; Madame de Montespan had pictures painted in miniature

of all the towns he had taken in Holland; they were made into a book

which was worth four thousand pistoles, and of which Racine and Boileau

wrote the text; people of tact, like M. de Langlee, paid court to the

master through those whom he loved. “M. de Langlee has given Madame de

Montespan a dress of the most divine material ever imagined; the fairies

did this work in secret, no living soul had any notion of it; and it

seemed good to present it as mysteriously as it had been fashioned.

Madame de Montespan’s dressmaker brought her the dress she had ordered of

him; he had made the body a ridiculous fit; there was shrieking and

scolding as you may suppose. The dressmaker said, all in a tremble, ‘As

time presses, madame, see if this other dress that I have here might not

suit you for lack of anything else.’ ‘Ah! what material! Does it come

from heaven? There is none such on earth.’ The body is tried on; it is

a picture. The king comes in. The dressmaker says, ‘Madame, it is made

for you.’ Everybody sees that it is a piece of gallantry; but on whose

part? ‘It is Langl4e,’ says the king; ‘it is Langlee.’ ‘Of course,’

says Madame de Montespan, ‘none but he could have devised such a device;

it is Langlee, it is Langlee.’ Everybody repeats, ‘it is Langlee;’ the

echoes are agreed and say, ‘it is Langlee;’ and as for me, my child, I

tell you, to be in the fashion, ‘it is Langlle.’ ”

[Illustration: Bed-chamber Etiquette----15]

All the style of living at court was in accordance with the magnificence

of the king and his courtiers; Colbert was beside himself at the sums the

queen lavished on play. Madame de Montespan lost and won back four

millions, in one night at bassette; Mdlle. de Fontanges gave away twenty

thousand crowns’ worth of New Year’s gifts; the king had just

accomplished the dauphin’s marriage. “He made immense presents on this

occasion; there is certainly no need to despair,” said Madame de Sevigne,

“though one does not happen to be his valet; it may happen that, whilst

paying one’s court, one will find one’s self underneath what he showers

around. One thing is certain, and that is, that away from him all

services go for nothing; it used to be the contrary.” All the court were

of the same opinion as Madame de Sevigne.

A new power was beginning to appear on the horizon, with such modesty and

backwardness that none could as yet discern it, least of all could the

king. Madame de Montespan had looked out for some one to take care of

and educate her children. She had thought of Madame Scarron; she

considered her clever; she was so herself, “in that unique style which

was peculiar to the Mortemarts,” said the Duke of St. Simon; she was fond

of conversation; Madame Scarron had a reputation of being rather a

blue-stocking; this the king did not like; Madame de Montespan had her

way; Madame Scarron took charge of the children secretly and in an

isolated house. She was attentive, careful, sensible. The king was

struck with her devotion to the children intrusted to her. “She can

love,” he said; “it would be a pleasure to be loved by her.” The

confidence of Madame de Montespan went on increasing. “The person of

quality (Madame de Montespan) has no partnership with the person who has

a cold (Madame Scarron), for she regards her as the confidential person;

the lady who is at the head of all (the queen) does the same; she is,

therefore, the soul of this court,” writes Madame de Sevigne in 1680.

There were, however, frequent storms; Madame de Montespan was jealous and

haughty, and she grew uneasy at the nascent liking she observed in the

king for the correct and shrewd judgment, the equable and firm temper, of

his children’s governess. The favor of which she was the object did not

come from Madame de Montespan. The king had made the Parliament

legitimatize the Duke of Maine, Mdlle. de Nantes, and the Count of Vexin;

they were now formally installed at Versailles. Louis XIV. often chatted

with Madame Scarron. She had bought the estate of Maintenon out of the

king’s bounty. He made her take the title. The recollection of Scarron

was displeasing to him. “It is supposed that I am indebted for this

present to Madame de Montespan,” she wrote to Madame de St. Geran; “I owe

it to my little prince. The king was amusing himself with him one day,

and, being pleased with the manner with which he answered his questions,

told him that he was a very sensible little fellow. ‘I can’t help

being,’ said the child, ‘I have by me a lady who is sense itself.’

‘Go and tell her,’ replied the king, ‘that you will give her this evening

a hundred thousand francs for your sugar-plums.’ The mother gets me into

trouble with the king, the son makes my peace with him; I am never for

two days together in the same situation, and I do not get accustomed to

this sort of life, I who thought I could make myself used to anything.”

She often spoke of leaving the court. “As I tell you everything

honestly,” she wrote in 1675 to her confessor, Abbe Gobelin, “I will not

tell you that it is to serve God that I should like to leave the place

where I am; I believe that I might work out my salvation here and

elsewhere, but I see nothing to forbid us from thinking of our repose,

and withdrawing from a position that vexes us every moment. I explained

myself badly if you understood me to mean that I am thinking of being a

nun; I am too old for a change of condition, and, according to the

property I shall have, I shall look out for securing one full of

tranquillity. In the world, all reaction is towards God; in a convent,

all reaction is towards the world; there is one great reason; that of age

comes next.” She did not, however, leave the court except to take to the

waters the little Duke of Maine, who had become a cripple after a series

of violent convulsions. “Never was anything more agreeable than the

surprise which Madame de Maintenon gave the king,” writes Madame de

Sdvigne to her daughter. “He had not expected the Duke of Maine till the

next day, when he saw him come walking into his room, and only holding by

the hand of his governess; he was transported with joy. M. do Louvois on

her arrival went to call upon Madame de Maintenon; she supped at Madame

de Richelieu’s, some kissing her hand, others her gown, and she making

fun of them all, if she is not much changed; but they say that she is.”

The king’s pleasure in conversing with the governess became more marked

every day; Madame de Montespan frequently burst out into bitter

complaints. “She reproaches me with her kindnesses, with her presents,

with those of the king, and has told me that she fed me, and that I am

strangling her; you know what the fact is; it is a strange thing that we

cannot live together and that we cannot separate. I love her, and I

cannot persuade myself that she hates me.” They found themselves alone

together in one of the court carriages. “Let us not be duped by such a

thing as this,” said Madame de Montespan, rudely; “let us talk as if we

had no entanglements between us to arrange; it being understood, of

course,” added she, “that we resume our entanglements when we get back.”

“Madame de Maintenon accepted the proposal,” says Madame de Caylus, who

tells the story, “and they kept their word to the letter.” Madame de

Maintenon had taken a turn for preaching virtue. “The king passed two

hours in my closet,” she wrote to Madame de St. Geran; “he is the most

amiable man in his kingdom. I spoke to him of Father Bourdaloue. He

listened to me attentively. Perhaps he is not so far from thinking of

his salvation as the court suppose. He has good sentiments and frequent

reactions towards God.” “The star of Quanto (Madame de Montespan) is

paling,” writes Madame de Sevigne to her daughter; “there are tears,

natural pets, affected gayeties, poutings--in fact, my dear, all is

coming to an end. People look, observe, imagine, believe that there are

to be seen as it were rays of light upon faces which, a month ago, were

thought to be unworthy of comparison with others. If Quanto had hidden

her face with her cap at Easter in the year she returned to Paris, she

would not be in the agitated state in which she now is. The spirit,

indeed, was willing, but great is human weakness; one likes to make the

most of a remnant of beauty. This is an economy which ruins rather than

enriches.” “Madame de Montespan asks advice of me,” said Madame de

Maintenon; “I speak to her of God, and she thinks I have some

understanding with the king; I was present yesterday at a very animated

conversation between them. I wondered at the king’s patience, and at the

rage of that vain creature. It all ended with these terrible words: ‘I

have told you already, madame; I will not be interfered with.’”

Henceforth Madame de Montespan “interfered with” the king. He gave the

new dauphiness Madame de Maintenon as her mistress of the robes. “I am

told,” writes Madame de Sevigne, “that the king’s conversations do

nothing but increase and improve, that they last from six to ten o’clock,

that the daughter-in-law goes occasionally to pay them a shortish visit,

that they are found each in a big chair, and that, when the visit is

over, the talk is resumed. The lady is no longer accosted without awe

and respect, and the ministers pay her the court which the rest do. No

friend was ever so careful and attentive as the king is to her; she makes

him acquainted with a perfectly new line of country--I mean the

intercourse of friendship and conversation, without chicanery and without

constraint; he appears to be charmed with it.”

Discreet and adroit as she was, and artificial without being false,

Madame de Maintenon gloried in bringing back the king and the court to

the ways of goodness. “There is nothing so able as irreproachable

conduct,” she used to say. The king often went to see the queen; the

latter heaped attentions upon Madame de Maintenon. “The king never

treated me more affectionately than he has since she had his ear,” the

poor princess would say. The dauphiness had just had a son. The joy at

court was excessive. “The king let anybody who pleased embrace him,”

says the Abbe de Croisy; “he gave everybody his hand to kiss. Spinola,

in the warmth of his zeal, bit his finger; the king began to exclaim.

‘Sir,’ interrupted the other, ‘I ask your Majesty’s pardon; but, if I

hadn’t bitten you, you would not have noticed me.’ The lower orders

seemed beside themselves, they made bonfires of everything. The porters

and the Swiss burned the poles of the chairs, and even the floorings and

wainscots intended for the great gallery. Bontemps, in wrath, ran and

told the king, who burst out laughing and said, ‘Let them be; we will

have other floorings.’”

The least clear-sighted were beginning to discern the modest beams of a

rising sun. Madame de Montespan, who had a taste for intellectual

things, had not long since recommended Racine and Boileau to the king to

write a history of his reign. They had been appointed historiographers.

“When they had done some interesting piece,” says Louis Racine in his

Memoires, “they used to go and read it to the king at Madame de

Montespan’s. Madame de Maintenon was generally present at the reading.

She, according to Boileau’s account, liked my father better than him, and

Madame de Montespan, on the contrary, liked Boileau better than my

father, but they always paid their court jointly, without any jealousy

between them. When Madame de Montespan would let fall some rather tart

expressions, my father and Boileau, though by no means sharp-sighted,

observed that the king, without answering her, looked with a smile at

Madame de Maintenon, who was seated opposite to him on a stool, and who

finally disappeared all at once from these meetings. They met her in the

gallery, and asked her why she did not come any more to hear their

readings. She answered very coldly, ‘I am no longer admitted to those

mysteries.’ As they found a great deal of cleverness in her, they were

mortified and astonished at this. Their astonishment was very much

greater, then, when the king, being obliged to keep his bed, sent for

them with orders to bring what they had newly written of history, and

they saw as they went in Madame de Maintenon sitting in an arm-chair near

the king’s pillow, chatting familiarly with his Majesty. They were just

going to begin their reading, when Madame do Montespan, who had not been

expected, came in, and after a few compliments to the king, paid such

long ones to Madame de Maintenon, that the king, to stop them, told her

to sit down. ‘As it would not be fair,’ he added, ‘to read without you a

work which you yourself ordered.’ From this day, the two historians paid

their court to Madame de Maintenon as far as they knew how to do so.”

The queen had died on the 30th of July, 1683, piously and gently, as she

had lived. “This is the first sorrow she ever caused me,” said the king,

thus rendering homage in his superb and unconscious egotism, to the

patient virtue of the wife he had put to such cruel trials. Madame de

Maintenon was agitated but resolute. “Madame de Montespan has plunged

into the deepest devoutness,” she wrote, two months after the queen’s

death; “it is quite time she edified us; as for me, I no longer think of

retiring.” Her strong common sense and her far-sighted ambition, far

more than her virtue, had secured her against rocks ahead; henceforth she

saw the goal, she was close upon it, she moved towards it with an even

step. The king still looked in upon Madame de Montespan of an evening

on his way to the gaming-table; he only staid an instant, to pass on to

Madame de Maintenon’s; the latter had modestly refused to become lady in

attendance upon the dauphiness. She, however, accompanied the king on

all his expeditions, “sending him away always afflicted, but, never

disheartened.” Madame de Montespan, piqued to see that the king no

longer thought of anybody but Madame de Maintenon, “said to him one day

at Marly,” writes Dangeau, “that she has a favor to ask of him, which was

to let her have the duty of entertaining the second-carriage people and

of amusing the antechamber.” It required more than seven years of wrath

and humiliation to make her resolve upon quitting the court, in 1691.

The date has never been ascertained exactly of the king’s private

marriage with Madame de Maintenon. It took place, probably, eighteen

months or two years after the queen’s death; the king was forty-seven,

Madame de Maintenon fifty.

“She had great remains of beauty, bright and sprightly eyes, an

imcomparable grace,” says St. Simon, who detested her; “an air of ease,

and yet of restraint and respect; a great deal of cleverness, with a

speech that was sweet, correct, in good terms, and naturally eloquent and

brief.”

Madame do La Valliere had held sway over the young and passionate heart

of the prince, Madame de Montespan over the court, Madame de Maintenon

alone established her empire over the man and the king. “Whilst giving

up our heart, we must remain absolute master of our mind,” Louis XIV.

had written, “separate our affections from our resolves as a sovereign,

that she who enchants us may never have liberty to speak to us of our

business or of the people who serve us, and that they be two things

absolutely distinct.” The king had scrupulously applied this maxim;

Mdlle. de La Valliere had never given a thought to business; Madame de

Montespan had sought only to shine, disputing the influence of Colbert

when he would have put a limit upon her ruinous fancies, leaning for

support at the last upon Louvois, in order to counterbalance the growing

power of Madame de Maintenon; the latter alone had any part in affairs,

a smaller part than has frequently been made out, but important,

nevertheless, and sometimes decisive. Ministers went occasionally to do

their work in her presence with the king, who would turn to her when the

questions were embarassing, and ask, “What does your Solidity think?”

The opinions she gave were generally moderate and discreet. “I did not

manage to please in my conversation about the buildings,” she wrote to

Cardinal Noailles, “and what grieves me is to have caused vexation to no

purpose. Another block of chambers is being built here at a cost of a

hundred thousand francs; Marly will soon be a second Versailles. The

people, what will become of them?” And later on: “Would you think

proper, monsignor, to make out a list of good bishops? You could send it

me, so that, on the occasions which are constantly occurring, I might

support their interests, and they might have the business referred to

them in which they ought to have a hand, and for which they are the

proper persons. I am always spoken to when the question is of them; and

if I were better informed, I should be bolder.” “It is said that you

meddle too little with business,” Fenelon wrote to her in 1694; “your

mind is better calculated for it than you suppose. You ought to direct

your whole endeavors to giving the king views tending to peace, and

especially to the relief of the people, to moderation, to equity, to

mistrust of harsh and violent measures, to horror for acts of arbitrary

authority, and finally to love of the Church, and to assiduity in seeking

good pastors for it.” Neither Fenelon nor Madame de Maintenon had seen

in the revocation of the edict of Nantes “an act of arbitrary authority,

or a harsh and violent measure.” She was not inclined towards

persecution, but she feared lest her moderation should be imputed to a

remnant of prejudice in favor of her former religion, “and this it is,”

she would say, “which makes me approve of things quite opposed to my

sentiments.” An egotistical and cowardly prudence, which caused people

to attribute to Madame de Maintenon, in the severities against the

Huguenots, a share which she had not voluntarily or entirely assumed.

Whatever the apparent reserve and modesty with which it was cloaked, the

real power of Madame de Maintenon over the king’s mind peeped out more

and more into broad daylight. She promoted it dexterously by her extreme

anxiety to please him, as well as by her natural and sincere attachment

to the children whom she had brought up, and who had a place near the

heart of Louis XIV. Already the young Duke of Maine had been sent to the

army at the dauphin’s side; the king was about to have him married

[August 29, 1692] to Mdlle. de Charolais; carefully seeking for his

natural children alliances amongst the princes of his blood, he had

recently given Mdlle. de Nantes, daughter of Madame de Montespan, to the

duke, grandson of the great Conde. “For a long time past,” says St.

Simon, “Madame de Maintenon, even more than the king, had been thinking

of marrying Mdlle. de Blois, Madame de Montespan’s second daughter, to

the Duke of Chartres; he was the king’s own and only nephew, and the

first moves towards this marriage were the more difficult in that

Monsieur was immensely attached to all that appertained to his greatness,

and Madame was of a nation which abhorred misalliances, and of a

character which gave no promise of ever making this marriage agreeable to

her.” The king considered himself sure of his brother; he had set his

favorites to work, and employed underhand intrigues. “He sent for the

young Duke of Chartres, paid him attention, told him he wanted to have

him settled in life, that the war which was kindled on all sides put out

of his reach the princesses who might have suited him, that there were no

princesses of the blood of his own age, that he could not better testify

his affection towards him than by offering him his daughter whose two

sisters had married princes of the blood; but that, however eager he

might be for this marriage, he did not want to put any constraint upon

him, and would leave him full liberty in the matter. This language,

addressed with the awful majesty so natural to the king to a prince who

was timid, and had not a word to say for himself, put him at his wits’

end.” He fell back upon the wishes of his father and mother. “That is

very proper in you,” replied the king; “but, as you consent, your father

and mother will make no objection;” and, turning to Monsieur, who was

present, “Is it not so, brother?” he asked. Monsieur had promised; a

messenger was sent for Madame, who cast two furious glances at her

husband and her son, saying that, as they were quite willing, she had

nothing to say, made a curt obeisance, and went her way home. Thither

the court thronged next day; the marriage was announced. “Madame was

walking in the gallery with her favorite, Mdlle. de Chateau-Thiers,

taking long steps, handkerchief in hand, weeping unrestrainedly, speaking

somewhat loud,, gesticulating and making a good picture of Ceres after

the rape of her daughter Proserpine, seeking her in a frenzy, and

demanding her back from Jupiter. Everybody saluted, and stood aside out

of respect. Monsieur had taken refuge in lansquenet; never was anything

so shamefaced as his look or so disconcerted as his whole appearance, and

this first condition lasted more than a month with him. The Duke of

Chartres came into the gallery, going up to his mother, as he did every

day, to kiss her hand. At that moment, Madame gave him a box of the ear

so loud that it was heard some paces off, and given as it was before the

whole court, covered the poor prince with confusion, and overwhelmed the

countless spectators with prodigious astonishment.” That did not prevent

or hamper the marriage, which took place with great pomp at Versailles on

the 18th of February, 1692. The king was, and continued to the last, the

absolute and dread master of all his family, to its remotest branches.

He lost through this obedience a great deal that is charming and sweet

in daily intercourse. For him and for Madame de Maintenon the great and

inexhaustible attraction of the Duchess of Burgundy was her gayety and

unconstrained ease, tempered by the most delicate respect, which this

young princess, on coming as quite a child to France from the court of

Savoy, had tact enough to introduce, and always maintain, amidst the most

intimate familiarity. “In public, demure, respectful with the king, and

on terms of timid propriety with Madame de Maintenon, whom she never

called anything but aunt, thus prettily blending rank and affection.

In private, chattering, frisking, fluttering around them, at one time

perched on the arm of one or the other’s chair, at another playfully

sitting on their knee, she would throw herself upon their necks, embrace

them, kiss them, fondle them, pull them to pieces, chuck them under the

chin, tease them, rummage their tables, their papers, their letters,

reading them sometimes against their will, according as she saw that they

were in the humor to laugh at it, and occasionally speaking thereon.

Admitted to everything, even at the reception of couriers bringing the

most important news, going into the king at any hour, even at the time

the council was sitting, useful and also fatal to ministers themselves,

but always inclined to help, to excuse, to benefit, unless she were

violently set against anybody. The king could not do without her; when,

rarely, she was absent from his supper in public, it was plainly shown by

a cloud of more than usual gravity and taciturnity over the king’s whole

person; and so, when it happened that some ball in winter or some party

in summer made her break into the night, she arranged matters so well

that she was there to kiss the king the moment he was awake, and to amuse

him with an account of the affair.” [Memoires de St. Simon, t. x.

p. 186.]

[Illustration: Madame de Maintenon and the Duchess of Burgundy.----27]

The dauphiness had died in 1690; the Duchess of Burgundy was, therefore,

almost from childhood queen of the court, and before long the idol of the

courtiers; it was around her that pleasures sprang up; it was for her

that the king gave the entertainments to which he had habituated

Versailles, not that for her sake or to take care of her health he would

ever consent to modify his habits or make the least change in his plans.

“Thank God, it is over!” he exclaimed one day, after an accident to the

princess; “I shall no longer be thwarted in my trips, and in all I desire

to do, by the representations of physicians. I shall come and go as I

fancy; and I shall be left in peace.” Even in his court, and amongst his

most devoted servants, this monstrous egotism astounded and scandalized

everybody. “A silence in which you might have heard an ant move

succeeded this sally,” says St. Simon, who relates the scene; “we looked

down; we hardly dared draw breath. Everybody stood aghast. To the very

builders-men and gardeners everybody was motionless. This silence lasted

more than a quarter of an hour. The king broke it, as he leaned against

a balustrade of the great basin, to speak about a carp. Nobody made any

answer. He afterwards addressed his remarks about these carp to some

builder’s-men who did not keep up the conversation in the regular way; it

was but a question of carp with them. Everything was at a low ebb, and

the king went away some little time after. As soon as we dared look at

one another out of his sight, our eyes meeting told all.” There was no

venturing beyond looks. Fenelon had said, with severe charity, “God will

have compassion upon a prince beset from his youth up by flatterers.”

Flattery ran a risk of becoming hypocrisy. On returning to a regular

life, the king was for imposing the same upon his whole court; the

instinct of order and regularity, smothered for a while in the heyday of

passion, had resumed all its sway over the naturally proper and steady

mind of Louis XIV. His dignity and his authority were equally involved

in the cause of propriety and regularity at his court; he imposed this

yoke as well as all the others; there appeared to be entire obedience;

only some princes or princesses escaped it sometimes, getting about them

a few free-thinkers or boon-companions; good, honest folks showed

ingenuous joy; the virtuous and far-sighted were secretly uneasy at the

falsehood, and deplored the pressure put on so many consciences and so

many lives. The king was sincere in his repentance for the past, many

persons in his court were as sincere as he; others, who were not,

affected, in order to please him, the externals of austerity; absolute

power oppressed all spirits, extorting from them that hypocritical

complaisance which is liable to engender; corruption was already brooding

beneath appearances of piety; the reign of Louis XV. was to see its

deplorable fruits displayed with a haste and a scandal which are to be

explained only by the oppression exercised in the last years of King

Louis XIV.

Madame de Maintenon was like the genius of this reaction towards

regularity, propriety, order; all the responsibility for it had been

thrown upon her; the good she did has disappeared beneath the evil she

allowed or encouraged; the regard lavished upon her by the king has

caused illusions as to the discreet care she was continually taking to

please him. She was faithful to her friends, so long as they were in

favor with the king; if they had the misfortune to displease him, she,

at the very least, gave up seeing them; without courage or hardihood to

withstand the caprices and wishes of Louis XIV., she had gained and

preserved her empire by dint of dexterity and far-sighted suppleness

beneath the externals of dignity.

She never forgot her origin. “I am not a grandee,” she would say;

“I am a mushroom.” Her life, entirely devoted to the king, had become a

veritable slavery; she said as much to Mdlle. d’Aumale at St. Cyr. “I

have to take for my prayers and for mass the time when everybody else is

still sleeping. For, when once they begin coming into my room, at half

past seven, I haven’t another moment to myself. They come filing in, and

nobody goes out without being relieved by somebody higher. At last comes

the king; then, of course, they all have to go out; he remains with me up

to mass. I am, still in my night-cap. The king comes back after mass;

then the Duchess of Burgundy with her ladies. They remain whilst I dine.

I have to keep up the conversation, which flags every moment, and to

manage so as to harmonize minds and reconcile hearts which are as far as

possible asunder. The circle is all round me, and I cannot ask for

anything to drink; I sometimes say to them (aside), ‘It is a great honor,

but really I should prefer a footman.’ At last they all go away to

dinner. I should be free during that time, if Monseigneur did not

generally choose it for coming to see me, for he often dines earlier in

order to go hunting. He is very difficult to entertain, having very

little to say, and finding himself a bore, and running away from himself

continually; so I have to talk for two. Immediately after the king has

dined, he comes into my room with all the royal family, princes and

princesses; then I must be prepared for the gayest of conversation, and

wear a smiling face amidst so much distressing news. When this company

disperses, some lady has always something particular to say to me; the

Duchess of Burgundy also wants to have a chat. The king returns from

hunting. He comes to me. The door is shut, and nobody else is admitted.

Then I have to share his secret troubles, which are no small number.

Arrives a minister; and the king sets himself to work. If I am not

wanted at this consultation, which seldom happens, I withdraw to some

farther distance and write or pray. I sup, whilst the king is still at

work. I am restless, whether he is alone or not. The king says to me,

‘You are tired, Madame; go to bed.’ My women come. But I feel that they

interfere with the king, who would chat with me, and does not like to

chat before them; or, perhaps, there are some ministers still there, whom

he is afraid they may overhear. Wherefore I make haste to undress, so

much so that I often feel quite ill from it. At last I am in bed. The

king comes up and remains by my pillow until he goes to supper. But a

quarter of an hour before supper, the dauphin and the Duke and Duchess of

Burgundy come in to me again. At ten, everybody goes out. At last I am

alone, but very often the fatigues of the day prevent me from sleeping.”

She was at that time seventy. She was often ailing; but the Duchess of

Burgundy was still very young, and the burden of the most private matters

of court diplomacy fell entirely upon Madame de Maintenon. “The Princess

des Ursins is about to return to Spain,” she said; “if I do not take her

in hand, if I do not repair by my attentions the coldness of the Duchess

of Burgundy, the indifference of the king and the curtness of the other

princes, she will go away displeased with our court, and it is expedient

that she should praise it, and speak well of it in Spain.”

It was, in fact, through Madame de Maintenon and her correspondence with

the Princess des Ursins, that the private business between the two courts

of France and Spain was often carried on. At Madrid, far more than at

Versailles, the influence of women was all-powerful. The queen ruled her

husband, who was honest and courageous, but without wit or daring; and

the Princess des Ursins ruled the queen, as intelligent and as amiable as

her sister the Duchess of Burgundy, but more ambitious and more haughty.

Louis XIV. had several times conceived some misgiving of the _camarera

major’s_ influence over his grandson; she had been disgraced, and then

recalled; she had finally established her sway by her fidelity, ability,

dexterity, and indomitable courage. She served France habitually, Spain

and her own influence in Spain always; she had been charming, with an air

of nobility, grace, elegance, and majesty all together, and accustomed to

the highest society and the most delicate intrigues, during her sojourn

at Rome and Madrid; she was full of foresight and calculation, but

impassioned, ambitious, implacable, pushing to extremes her amity as well

as her hatred, faithful to her master and mistress in their most cruel

trials, and then hampering and retarding peace for the sake of securing

for herself a principality in the Low Countries. Without having risen

from the ranks, like Madame de Maintenon, she had reached a less high and

less safe elevation; she had been more absolutely and more daringly

supreme during the time of her power, and at last she fell with the

rudest shock, without any support from Madame de Maintenon. The

pretensions of Madame des Ursins during the negotiations had offended

France; “this was the stone of stumbling between the two supreme

directresses,” says St. Simon; after this attempt at sovereignty, there

was no longer the same accord between Madame de Maintenon and Madame des

Ursins, but this latter had reached in Spain a point at which she more

easily supposed that she could dispense with it. The Queen of Spain had

died at the age of twenty-six, in 1714; did the princess for a moment

conceive the hope of marrying Philip V. in spite of the disproportion in

rank and age? Nobody knows; she had already been reigning as sovereign

mistress for some months, when she received from the king this stunning

command: “Look me out a wife.” She obeyed; she looked out. Alberoni, an

Italian priest, brought into Spain by the Duke of Vendome, drew her

attention to the Princess of Parma, Elizabeth Farnese. The principality

was small, the princess young; Alberoni laid stress upon her sweetness

and modesty. “Nothing will be more easy,” he said, “than for you to

fashion her to Spanish gravity, by keeping her retired; in the capacity

of her _camarera major,_ intrusted with her education, you will easily be

able to acquire complete sway over her mind.” The Princess des Ursins

believed him, and settled the marriage. “Cardonne has surrendered at

last, Madame,” she wrote on the 20th of September, 1714, to Madame de

Maintenon; “there is nothing left in Catalonia that is not reduced. The

new queen, at her coming into this kingdom, is very fortunate to find no

more war there. She whom we have lost would have been beside herself

with delight at enjoying peace after having experienced such cruel

sufferings of all kinds. The longer I live, the more I see that we are

never so near a reverse of Fortune as when she is favorable, or so near

receiving favors as when she is maltreating us. For that reason, Madame,

if one were wise, one would take her inconstancy graciously.”

The time had come for Madame des Ursins to make definitive trial of

Fortune’s inconstancy. She had gone to meet the new queen, in full dress

and with her ornaments; Elizabeth received her coldly; they were left

alone; the queen reproached the princess with negligence in her costume

Madame des Ursins, strangely surprised, would have apologized, “but, all

at once there was the queen at offensive words, and screaming, summoning,

demanding officers, guards, and imperiously ordering Madame des Ursins

out of her presence. She would have spoken; but the queen, with

redoubled rage and threats, began to scream out for the removal of this

mad woman from her presence and her apartments; she had her put out by

the shoulders, and on the instant into a carriage with one of her women,

to be taken at once to St. Jean-de-Luz. It was seven o’clock at night,

the day but one before Christmas, the ground all covered with ice and

snow; Madame des Ursins had no time to change gown or head-dress, to take

any measures against the cold, to get any money, or any anything else at

all.” Thus she was conducted almost without a mouthful of food to the

frontier of France. She hoped for aid from the king of Spain; but none

came; it got known that the queen had been abetted in everything and

beforehand by Philip V. On arriving at St. Jean-de-Luz, she wrote to the

king and to Madame de Maintenon: “Can you possibly conceive, Madame, the

situation in which I find myself? Treated in the face of all Europe,

with more contempt by the Queen of Spain than if I were the lowest of

wretches? They want to persuade me that the king acted in concert with a

princess who had me treated with such cruelty. I shall await his orders

at St. Jean-de-Luz, where I am in a small house close by the sea. I see

it often stormy and sometimes calm; a picture of courts. I shall have no

difficulty in agreeing with you that it is of no use looking for

stability but in God. Certainly it cannot be found in the human heart,

for who was ever more sure than I was of the heart of the King of Spain?”

The king did not reply at all, and Madame de Maintenon but coldly,

begging the princess, however, to go to Versailles. There she passed but

a short time, and received notice to leave the kingdom. With great

difficulty she obtained an asylum at Rome, where she lived seven years

longer, preserving all her health, strength, mind, and easy grace until

she died, in 1722, at more than eighty-four years of age, in obscurity

and sadness, notwithstanding her opulence, but avenged of her Spanish

foes, Cardinals della Giudice and Alberoni, whom she met again at Rome,

disgraced and fugitive like herself. “I do not know where I may die,”

she wrote to Madame de Maintenon, at that time in retirement at St. Cyr.

Both had survived their power; the Princess des Ursins had not long since

wanted to secure for herself a dominion; Madame de Maintenon, more

far-sighted and more modest, had aspired to no more than repose in the

convent which she had founded and endowed. Discreet in her retirement as

well as in her life, she had not left to chance the selection of a place

where she might die.

[Illustration: Death of Madame de Maintenon.----34]

A Popular History of France from the Earliest Times, Volume 6 · 第 1 / 13 章