REAL CHARACTER OF LOUIS XIV.

Concerning Louis the Fourteenth himself, the world seems at last to have

formed a correct judgment. He was not a great general; he was not a

great statesman; but he was, in one sense of the words, a great king.

Never was there so consummate a master of what our James the First would

have called king-craft,--of all those arts which most advantageously

display the merits of a prince, and most completely hide his defects.

Though his internal administration was bad,--though the military

triumphs which gave splendour to the early part of his reign were not

achieved by himself,--though his later years were crowded with defeats

and humiliations,--though he was so ignorant that he scarcely understood

the Latin of his mass-book,--though he fell under the control of a

cunning Jesuit and of a more cunning old woman,--he succeeded in passing

himself off on his people as a being above humanity. And this is the

more extraordinary, because he did not seclude himself from the public

gaze like those Oriental despots whose faces are never seen, and whose

very names it is a crime to pronounce lightly. It has been said that no

man is a hero to his valet;--and all the world saw as much of Louis the

Fourteenth as his valet could see. Five hundred people assembled to see

him shave and put on his breeches in the morning. He then kneeled down

at the side of his bed, and said his prayer, while the whole assembly

awaited the end in solemn silence,--the ecclesiastics on their knees,

and the laymen with their hats before their faces. He walked about his

gardens with a train of two hundred courtiers at his heels. All

Versailles came to see him dine and sup. He was put to bed at night in

the midst of a crowd as great as that which had met to see him rise in

the morning. He took his very emetics in state, and vomited majestically

in the presence of all the _grandes_ and _petites entrees_. Yet though

he constantly exposed himself to the public gaze in situations in which

it is scarcely possible for any man to preserve much personal dignity,

he to the last impressed those who surrounded him with the deepest awe

and reverence. The illusion which he produced on his worshippers can be

compared only to those illusions to which lovers are proverbially

subject during the season of courtship. It was an illusion which

affected even the senses. The contemporaries of Louis thought him tall.

Voltaire, who might have seen him, and who had lived with some of the

most distinguished members of his court, speaks repeatedly of his

majestic stature. Yet it is as certain as any fact can be, that he was

rather below than above the middle size. He had, it seems, a way of

holding himself, a way of walking, a way of swelling his chest and

rearing his head, which deceived the eyes of the multitude. Eighty years

after his death, the royal cemetery was violated by the revolutionists;

his coffin was opened; his body was dragged out; and it appeared that

the prince, whose majestic figure had been so long and loudly extolled,

was in truth a little man.

His person and his government have had the same fate. He had the art of

making both appear grand and august, in spite of the clearest evidence

that both were below the ordinary standard. Death and time have exposed

both the deceptions. The body of the great King has been measured more

justly than it was measured by the courtiers who were afraid to look

above his shoe-tie. His public character has been scrutinized by men

free from the hopes and fears of Boileau and Molière. In the grave, the

most majestic of princes is only five feet eight. In history, the hero

and the politician dwindles into a vain and feeble tyrant.--the slave of

priests and women,--little in war, little in government,--little in

every thing but the art of simulating greatness.

He left to his infant successor a famished and miserable people, a

beaten and humbled army, provinces turned into deserts by misgovernment

and persecution, factions dividing the court, a schism raging in the

church, an immense debt, an empty treasury, immeasurable palaces, an

innumerable household, inestimable jewels and furniture. All the sap and

nutriment of the state seemed to have been drawn to feed one bloated and

unwholesome excrescence. The nation was withered. The court was morbidly

flourishing. Yet it does not appear that the associations which attached

the people to the monarchy, had lost strength during his reign. He had

neglected or sacrificed their dearest interests; but he had struck their

imaginations. The very things which ought to have made him most

unpopular,--the prodigies of luxury and magnificence with which his

person was surrounded, while, beyond the enclosure of his parks, nothing

was to be seen but starvation and despair,--seemed to increase the

respectful attachment which his subjects felt for him.--_Edinburgh Rev._

(_just published_.)

* * * * *

The Mirror of Literature, Amusement, and Instruction. Volume 20, No. 561, August 11, 1832 · 第 9 / 31 题