NOISE AND CIVILISATION

What is the cause of the folding of the margin of the human ear, which

distinguishes it from that of all other animals? Darwin remarks that it

“appears to be in some manner connected with the whole external ear

being permanently pressed backwards;” but this does not explain the

mysterious phenomenon. After many hours of profound meditation on this

subject I have come to the conclusion that this slight folding of the

ear’s margin is the beginning of a new phase of human evolution. In

course of time—this cannot be disproved—the fold of the margin will

become larger and larger, until finally the shells of the ear will have

been transformed into mobile lids for shutting out at will disagreeable

noises, even as the eyelids have been developed to shut out glaring

light. This would account for the providential preservation of the

rudimentary ear-muscles referred to above. When this process of

evolution is completed men coming home late will no longer have to

listen to curtain-lectures. The innovation will tend to make them

polite, for instead of telling the lecturer to “shut up,” they will shut

up themselves.

Seriously speaking, such movable ear-lids are very much needed in this

transition stage of civilisation. The present age of steam will by

future historians be classified as the age of noise. It is almost

impossible to find a place within ten miles of a city where one can rest

without having one’s sleep constantly disturbed, or at least _deprived

of its refreshing depth_, by the blowing of railway and factory

whistles. Both are unnecessary, inasmuch as railway signals would be

quite as effective if not so murderously loud and prolonged, while

factory whistles are either blown at the moment when the operatives go

to work, when a simple bell would do as well, or they are blown an hour

earlier to wake up the workmen,—a most outrageous proceeding, as

everybody else sleeping within a radius of a mile or more is thus waked

up at six o’clock.

The fact that these nuisances have so long been tolerated shows how

primitive is as yet the æsthetic development of the average human ear.

Some people even smile at you for being so “nervous,” and boast of their

indifference to such hideous, brain-racking noises. The Esquimaux and

Chinese would doubtless assume a similar attitude regarding their

indifference to noisome stenches. In mediæval times, Europeans in

general were quite as indifferent to the emanations from their gutters

as they still are to the hideous noises in the streets. It has often

been noted with surprise that the death-rate in London and the general

aspect of health should be so much more favourable than that of

continental cities, which are free from the depressing London fogs. The

reason, doubtless, lies chiefly in the facts that there are no vile

sewer odours in London to poison the atmosphere, and that the pavement

of the streets is of such a nature that one can sleep soundly at night,

provided there are no steam whistles near. London, too, does not

tolerate the brutal whip-cracking which transforms French, German, and

Swiss towns and cities into Bedlams of noise. In this respect New York

resembles London; but here the comparison ends. New York pavements are

the noisiest, roughest, and dirtiest in the world. I have known of

invalids who were advised to drive in the Central Park, but could not do

so because they could not bear on their way to drive even up Fifth

Avenue,—a street lined with the houses of millionaires. And to walk on

Broadway for twenty minutes, talking to a friend, makes one as hoarse as

delivering a two-hour lecture.

There can be no doubt that a horror of useless noise grows with the

general refinement of the senses and the mind. Goethe’s aversion to

noise, especially at night, is well known. It led him to poison dogs

that disturbed him. The delicate hearing of Franz, the great song

composer, was ruined by the whistle of a locomotive. And Schopenhauer

has put the whole matter into a nutshell in these admirable words:

“Intellectual persons, and all in general who have much _esprit_, cannot

endure noise. Astounding, on the other hand, is the insensibility of

ordinary people to noise. The quantity of noise which any one can endure

without annoyance is really related inversely to his mental endowments,

and may be regarded as a pretty accurate measure of them.”

Romantic Love and Personal Beauty Their development, causal relations, historic and national peculiarities · 第 254 / 296 题