NON-ÆSTHETIC ORNAMENTATION

One of the things most commonly forgotten by those who wonder at the

strange “taste” of savages is that many of their customs have nothing

whatever to do with the sense of beauty. The habit of putting on

“war-paint” originated not in a desire for ornamentation, but in the

wish to make themselves frightful in appearance to the enemy. For the

same reason heads are mutilated. As Waitz notes in speaking of Tahiti:

“A very ugly mutilation is that to which most of the boys had to subject

themselves. Immediately after birth their mothers compressed their

forehead and the back of the head, so that the former became narrow and

high, the latter flat; this was done to make their aspect more terrible,

and thus turn them into more formidable warriors.” Tattooing, likewise,

was originally intended to be an easy sign of recognition, or of social

or religious distinction, rather than an ornament of the body. And when

we consider how prone the mind of our own fashionable ladies is to

violate every canon of good taste in their wild effort to surpass one

another in some novel extravagance just from Paris; when we note that if

a Fifth Avenue lady wears a gull on her hat, her coloured cook will

invest in a turkey or ostrich for hers, we understand at once that many

of the mutilations approved by savages are the outcome of vanity and

emulation, not of æsthetic taste.

Romantic Love and Personal Beauty Their development, causal relations, historic and national peculiarities · 第 198 / 296 题