BALTIMORE.

An inevitable step forward in anti-Negro prejudice is being taken in

Baltimore, and threatened elsewhere. The colored folk of that city

long ago became dissatisfied with a particularly bad system of alley

homes. They saved their money and purchased nearly the whole length of

Druid Hill avenue--one of the best colored streets in the world. Then

they began to expand into parallel streets, one of which was McCulloh.

They had been told that “money talks,” and that the surest road to

respect in America was financial success. The result was inevitable.

The white people of McCulloh street rose in indignation and are

importuning the City Council to pass an ordinance prohibiting colored

people from “invading” white residential districts, and _vice versa_.

Their argument sounds strong: colored residents bring down the price of

property, therefore get rid of colored residents.

Is this the real logic of the situation? Why do colored people depress

property values? Because of an exaggerated and persistently encouraged

racial prejudice. In the encouragement of such prejudice, Baltimore

and Maryland have particularly sinned. Would not an attempt to allay

prejudice be wiser than laws against thrift?

The crisis(#71222) · 第 23 / 61 题