BOLINGBROKE AND MALLET'S POSTHUMOUS QUARREL WITH POPE.

Lord BOLINGBROKE affects violent resentment for Pope's pretended

breach of confidence in having printed his "Patriot King"--WARBURTON'S

apology for POPE'S disinterested intentions--BOLINGBROKE instigates

MALLET to libel POPE, after the poet's death--The real motive for

libelling POPE was BOLINGBROKE'S personal hatred of WARBURTON, for the

ascendancy the latter had obtained over the poet--Some account of

their rival conflicts--BOLINGBROKE had unsettled POPE'S religious

opinions, and WARBURTON had confirmed his faith--POPE, however,

refuses to abjure the Catholic religion--Anecdote of POPE'S anxiety

respecting a future state--MALLET'S intercourse with POPE: anecdote of

"The Apollo Vision," where MALLET mistook a sarcasm for a

compliment--MALLET'S character--Why LEONIDAS GLOVER declined writing

the Life of Marlborough--BOLINGBROKE'S character hit off--WARBURTON,

the concealed object of this posthumous quarrel with POPE.

On the death of POPE, 1500 copies of one of Lord BOLINGBROKE'S works,

"The Patriot King," were discovered to have been secretly printed by

Pope, but never published. The honest printer presented the whole to

his lordship, who burned the edition in his gardens at Battersea. The

MS. had been delivered to our poet by his lordship, with a request to

print a few copies for its better preservation, and for the use of a

few friends.

Bolingbroke affected to feel the most lively resentment for what he

chose to stigmatise as "a breach of confidence." "His thirst of

vengeance," said Johnson, "incited him to blast the memory of the man

over whom he had wept in his last struggles; and he employed Mallet,

another friend of Pope, to tell the tale to the public with all its

aggravations. Warburton, whose heart was warm with his legacy, and

tender by the recent separation," apologised for Pope. The irregular

conduct which Bolingbroke stigmatised as a breach of trust, was

attributed to a desire of perpetuating the work of his friend, who

might have capriciously destroyed it. Our poet could have no selfish

motive; he could not gratify his vanity by publishing the work as his

own, nor his avarice by its sale, which could never have taken place

till the death of its author; a circumstance not likely to occur

during Pope's lifetime.[237]

The vindictive rage of Bolingbroke; the bitter invective he permitted

MALLET to publish, as the editor of his works; and the two anonymous

pamphlets of the latter, which I have noticed in the article of

WARBURTON; are effects much too disproportionate to the cause which is

usually assigned. JOHNSON does not develope the secret motives of what

he has energetically termed "Bolingbroke's thirst of vengeance." He

and Mallet carried their secret revenge beyond all bounds: the lordly

stoic and the irritated bardling, under the cloak of anonymous

calumny, have but ill-concealed the malignity of their passions. Let

anonymous calumniators recollect, in the midst of their dark work,

that if they escape the detection of their contemporaries, their

reputation, if they have any to lose, will not probably elude the

researches of the historian;--a fatal witness against them at the

tribunal of posterity.

The preface of Mallet to the "Patriot King" of Bolingbroke, produced a

literary quarrel; and more pamphlets than perhaps I have discovered

were published on this occasion.

Every lover of literature was indignant to observe that the vain and

petulant Mallet, under the protection of Pope's

Guide, philosopher, and friend!

should have been permitted to have aspersed Pope with the most

degrading language. Pope is here always designated as "This Man." Thus

"_This Man_ was no sooner dead than Lord Bolingbroke received

information that an entire edition of 1500 copies of these papers had

been printed; that this very _Man_ had corrected the press, &c." Could

one imagine that this was the Tully of England, describing our Virgil?

For Mallet was but the mouthpiece of Bolingbroke.

After a careful detection of many facts concerning the parties now

before us, I must attribute the concealed motive of this outrage

on Pope to the election the dying poet made of Warburton as his

editor. A mortal hatred raged between Bolingbroke and Warburton. The

philosophical lord had seen the mighty theologian ravish the prey

from his grasp. Although Pope held in idolatrous veneration the

genius of Bolingbroke, yet had this literary superstition been

gradually enlightened by the energy of Warburton. They were his good

and his evil genii in a dreadful conflict, wrestling to obtain the

entire possession of the soul of the mortal. Bolingbroke and

Warburton one day disputed before Pope, and parted never to meet

again. The will of Pope bears the trace of his divided feelings: he

left his MSS. to Bolingbroke as his executor, but his works to

Warburton as his editor. The secret history of Bolingbroke and

Warburton with Pope is little known: the note will supply it.[238]

But how did the puny Mallet stand connected with these great men? By

the pamphlets published during this literary quarrel he appears to

have enjoyed a more intimate intercourse with them than is known. In

one of them he is characterised "as a fellow who, while Mr. Pope

lived, was as diligent in licking his feet, as he is now in licking

your lordship's; and who, for the sake of giving himself an air of

importance, in being joined with you, and for the vanity of saying

'the Author and I,'--'the Editor and me,'--has sacrificed all his

pretensions to friendship, honour, and humanity."[239] An anecdote in

this pamphlet assigns a sufficient motive to excite some wrath in a

much less irritable animal than the self-important editor of

Bolingbroke's Works. The anecdote may be distinguished as

Calamities and Quarrels of Authors · 第 130 / 321 题