EXHIBITING A CONSPIRACY AGAINST AN AUTHOR.

In the peaceful walks of literature we are startled at discovering

genius with the mind, and, if we conceive the instrument it guides to

be a stiletto, with the hand of an assassin--irascible, vindictive,

armed with indiscriminate satire, never pardoning the merit of rival

genius, but fastening on it throughout life, till, in the moral

retribution of human nature, these very passions, by their ungratified

cravings, have tended to annihilate the being who fostered them. These

passions among literary men are with none more inextinguishable than

among _provincial writers_.--Their bad feelings are concentrated by

their local contraction. The proximity of men of genius seems to

produce a familiarity which excites hatred or contempt; while he who

is afflicted with disordered passions imagines that he is urging his

own claims to genius by denying them to their possessor. A whole life

passed in harassing the industry or the genius which he has not

equalled; and instead of running the open career as a competitor, only

skulking as an assassin by their side, is presented in the object now

before us.

Dr. GILBERT STUART seems early in life to have devoted himself to

literature; but his habits were irregular, and his passions fierce.

The celebrity of Robertson, Blair, and Henry, with other Scottish

brothers, diseased his mind with a most envious rancour. He confined

all his literary efforts to the pitiable motive of destroying theirs;

he was prompted to every one of his historical works by the mere

desire of discrediting some work of Robertson; and his numerous

critical labours were all directed to annihilate the genius of his

country. How he converted his life into its own scourge, how wasted

talents he might have cultivated into perfection, lost every trace of

humanity, and finally perished, devoured by his own fiend-like

passions,--shall be illustrated by the following narrative, collected

from a correspondence now lying before me, which the author carried on

with his publisher in London. I shall copy out at some length the

hopes and disappointments of the literary adventurer--the colours are

not mine; I am dipping my pencil in the palette of the artist

himself.

In June, 1773, was projected in the Scottish capital "The Edinburgh

Magazine and Review." Stuart's letters breathe the spirit of rapturous

confidence. He had combined the sedulous attention of the intelligent

Smellie, who was to be the printer, with some very honourable critics;

Professor Baron, Dr. Blacklock, and Professor Richardson; and the

first numbers were executed with more talent than periodical

publications had then exhibited. But the hardiness of Stuart's

opinions, his personal attacks, and the acrimony of his literary

libels, presented a new feature in Scottish literature, of such

ugliness and horror, that every honourable man soon averted his face

from this _boutefeu_.

Calamities and Quarrels of Authors · 第 70 / 321 题