CHAPTER VIII

OLD OXFORD DAYS

The history of a college like New or Wadham is written clearly on its

walls. It rose by one grand effort, from one grand conception, at the

will of founder and architect. All its future uses were more or less

plainly implied in the quadrangles, chapel, and hall, through which the

opening procession marched with solemn music; they stood in need of

little more than time and good fortune. Such a college was then in a

sense mature, fully armed and equipped, before the founder’s decease.

But it was more characteristic of an Oxford college to be evolved

irregularly, by strange and difficult ways, with much sudden expansion

and decline, into its present state. Thus Lincoln and Oriel were, for a

short time after their foundation, fallow, if not extinct. The latter,

in spite of its renovation by a king, after whom it was at first

inclined to be named, grew up around the humble, illustrious tenement of

La Oriole, where its early scholars dwelt, and whence they gave their

society its lasting name. That cradling tenement has its parallel in

many a college history.

In the thirteenth or fourteenth century some Oxford citizen would build

a pair of cottages, where a carpenter and an innkeeper came to live. At

the inrush of students to welcome a famous lecturer, the spare rooms of

those cottages received their share. Some of the lodgers stayed on,

liked the carpenter and his wife and family, with whom they lived on

terms of social equality; and in a generation the tradition of

entertaining scholars was established. A few years saw the formation of

a colony of students from one countryside or great estate. As the custom

was, they chose a superior from among their number. In those days, if an

American had run upstairs to the head, he might have had a more

satisfactory answer than he had yesterday to his command: “I’ve come to

take rooms in your college!” for the hostel was, roughly speaking, an

hotel. The members fought side by side in the battles of the nations

(viz. Northerners, Southerners, etc.), and of town and gown. They bent

over the same books. They sang the same songs. And together they came to

love the place, the two cottages and those adjacent into which they had

overflowed. Such a group fled from the ancient Brasenose Hall to

Stamford, in one of the University migrations, in 1334; carried with

them the knocker of their lodgings in the shape of a brazen nose, and

fixed it to the door of their “Brasenose Hall in Stamford.” If they

forgot to take it back on their return, it nevertheless “got perched

upon the top of the pineal gland” of the college brain; and with

characteristic spirited piety the descendants of the old hall-men found

it out in 1890, and hung it in a place of honour and safety.

In later life one of the carpenter’s tenants became a bishop, or a royal

almoner. Either at the height of his fame and wealth, or on his

deathbed, he would remember his old retreat, and its associations with

law and Aristotle and

Breed and chese and good ale in a jubbe.

There his old friends or their successors still dwelt, and learned and

taught and fought. So he gave money for the purchase of the cottages; a

neighbouring garden plot, perhaps a strip of woodland outside the walls,

and the rents of some home farms for the revenue; together with the

advowson of a church--if possible the one which he remembered best in

Oxford, or if not, then one within his diocese or influence. He sketched

the statutes, which fixed the number of the scholars and the rules for

electing new ones and a head. He himself chose the first head. The

scholars were to remain unmarried and in residence; to study the Arts,

or Theology, or Canon and Civil Law; and to pray for his soul.

The carpenter’s and innkeeper’s tenants found themselves suddenly

powerful and rich. They had their own seal, and a new and more settled

enthusiasm, and a diapason of duties and ceremonies, added to their

life. They had their aisle in the church whose shadow reached them on

summer evenings. If their estates were large and well managed,--if the

country was prosperous, and the head obeyed the statutes and the fellows

the head,--their progress was swift. Perhaps a legal difficulty

interposed delay, or their rents disappeared. Perhaps the fellows

quarrelled with the head, or the discipline was such that the fellows

climbed into college at late unstatutable hours and became a scandal in

the University. But a descendant or neighbour of the founder, or a

parishioner of the college living, came to their help. One gave a

present, in order that he might be remembered in the college prayers:

another sent books: a former fellow who was grateful or pitiful made a

rich benefaction when he went to court. Already the little original

tenements were tottering or too small. They must build and rebuild. Then

a “second founder” adopted as his children that and all succeeding

generations of scholars, who should praise him for a benefaction larger

than the first.

They pull down the old buildings, all save a flanking wall with a

gateway to their taste, and begin to build. The benefactor sends teams

of oxen to carry wood and stone. They are quarrying at Eynsham and

Headington, and in the benefactor’s own distant county. They are felling

oaks at Cumnor or Nuneham, actually before the bronzed foliage has

crisped to brown. All day the oxen come and go: on the river, the boats

are carrying stone, slates, and wood, unless the frost binds the barges

among the reeds and the foundation soil breaks the spade. The master

mason has already roughly hewn a statue of the patron saint or the

founder, or his

[Illustration: THE LIBRARY, ORIEL COLLEGE

Across the picture, opposite the spectator, appears the Library, a

dignified building of the Ionic order of architecture, designed by James

Wyatt about 1788. It occupies the northern side of the inner quadrangle.

On the ground floor, in the rusticated “basement” upon which the Library

stands, are the Common Rooms of the College.

The time is late afternoon in summer.]

rebus and coat of arms. He has decided that the old doorway shall be the

entrance to the college kitchen, lying far back in the main quadrangle,

which will not only take in the site of the demolished buildings, but

the neighbouring garden and a lane that could be spared. If he is

unfortunate, he may have to stop when he has completed only the

entrance, with the head’s lodgings vigilant above it, and a few sets of

rooms adjacent on either side, already occupied. If all is well, in a

few years, or perhaps at the end of the mason’s life, the shining whole

is the admiration of Oxford. The bishop who is to consecrate the chapel

comes informally to see it a few days beforehand, and is therefore able

to restrain his wonder when he comes pompously with the chancellor and

all the great names of the University. The chapel and hall face the

entrance. All round are the dwelling rooms, on two storeys, if we count

the long-untenanted attics. On one side alone there is twice the space

of the old cottages; but the arrangement is the same--the rooms

branching on the left and right from a staircase that rises from ground

to attic. The library is on a first floor: on one side of it, the

windows invite the earliest light,

Whan that the belle of laudes gan to rynge

And freres in the chauncel gonne synge;

on the other, they enable the late student, who cannot buy light, to

read until the martins cast no shadow as they pass in June: and there

they put the gorgeous Latin poets and missals, embroidered with colours

like the bank of a brook, and along with them the dull works of a

benefactor, in that very corner where the spider loves them to-day. The

fellow who loves sleep will not choose the eastward-facing, library side

of the quad. But they have made it almost impossible for him to

oversleep himself. For in a humbler truckle-bed a younger scholar sleeps

near him. Some rooms contain three beds side by side. Leading out of

this dormitory are little cupboards or studies, sometimes under lock and

key, for solitary work. Most of the walls are ungarnished; a few are

hung with coloured cloth or even frescoed. The furniture is simple and

scanty. The hall itself has but a “green hanging of say,” a high table

for the seniors, and two pairs of forms and tables on trestles for the

juniors. The kitchen is more opulent, with its tall andirons,

chopping-board, trivet, gridiron, spit, and great pot and chafer of

brass, its pans, dishes, and platters; while in the buttery there are

four barrels abroach. Now and then an old member or admirer of the

society sends a group of silver vessels: the most honoured becomes the

loving cup that circulates on gaudy days; and with it goes some

significant toast, as the _jus suum cuique_ at Magdalen accompanies the

“Restoration cup,” on which the names of James II.’s ejected fellows are

engraved. For while the college grows, and sends its just proportion of

astute or learned men into the world, it flowers with customs and

traditions--prayers in the chapel, festivals in the hall,--the Christmas

boar’s head decorated with banners at Queen’s,--the ancestral vine at

Lincoln. At dinner

[Illustration: MAGDALEN COLLEGE TOWER FROM THE MEADOWS

To the left of the picture appear those noble black poplars of which

Oxford is justly proud. The College tower is seen between them and

another group of trees, Magdalen Bridge and the elms in the “Grove”

finishing to the extreme right.

The time is late afternoon.]

the tables shine with flagons and tankards, and great “sprig salts” of

silver plate, which were the main college investment, the pledges of

affection, or, as at Wadham, the customary gift of those who were

admitted to the dignity of the high table. The shining of most was put

out for ever in Charles I.’s melting-pot at New Inn Hall; and only the

lists survive, each tankard and ewer and candlestick described by its

donor’s name.

Thus, by the fact of their coming from neighbour villages and towns,

perhaps also from one school, to a home on which they depended for their

learning and the necessities of life, the fellows and scholars became

knit together, with noticeable characteristics and peculiarities--almost

a family resemblance; and in religious or political difficulties they

made a solid strength of opinion and influence. A little heresy might

break out under Henry the Eighth or Mary. A great benefaction might

encourage the building of another quadrangle or a new library, and the

institution of more fellowships and scholarships. They contributed a

handsome quantity of plate to the king, and an officer to his army; or,

to a man, resisted the Puritan intrusion after his death. Such were the

more conspicuous events of centuries. The conflicts in the University,

according to some proverbial Latin verses, were in early times at least

as important as the boat race to-day. They were a subtle measure of the

state of parties and movements; and in these the college played its

part. And when the days of fighting were over, there was the University

lampoon: “These paltry scholars,” says an old ballad, supposed to be

addressed by an Oxford alderman to the Duke of Monmouth,--

These paltry scholars, blast them with one breath,

Or they’ll rhime your Grace and us to death.

The college was busy in sending out into the world of Church and State

its more vigorous members--those who excelled in the age when

examinations were disputations that sometimes became almost a form of

athletic sport; and in keeping within its walls the quieter spirits, who

were willing to spend a life among manuscripts, in perfecting the

management of the college estates, or in the education and discipline of

others. From a scholarship to a fellowship, and from a fellowship to a

college living, were frequently made the very calmest windings to a

happy decent age, though no doubt the last stage sometimes led to such a

regret as this:--

Why did I sell my College Life

(He cries) for Benefice and Wife?

Return, ye Days! when endless Pleasure

I found in Reading or in Leisure!

When calm around the Common Room

I puff’d my daily Pipe’s Perfume!

Rode for a stomach, and inspected,

At Annual Bottlings, corks selected:

And din’d untax’d, untroubled, under

The Portrait of our pious Founder!

It was a fine thing to sit day after day, in rooms sweetened, as in

Burton’s day, with juniper, or in the college library, which was as a

bay or river mouth leading into the very land of silence--to sit and

write, or not write, as you pleased; and, in the days when books were

no longer shelved with their faces to the wall, look up at

Bullarium

Cherubini

printed in gold upon the glowing calf, and making mystical combinations

as night came on. There, and in hall, chapel, study, and garden, men

doomed to very diverse fates and stations went and still go, and found

it possible to live a more enchanted life than anywhere else.

The refractory Headington stone crumbled, and while the classical

buildings became yearly less handsome than when the masons left them,

the Gothic gained by the rich inlay and delicate waste of weather and

time. As if time and weather wrote the chronicles of the society, the

walls came to have a singular influence upon each generation, and gave

them, as it were, a common ancestry and blood--noble blood, for all.

Even when they departed they had the irrefragable right of exiles to

look back and salute.

And yet how different the life within those walls which some now living

can remember! Sixty years ago, they lament, “no man was ever seen in the

streets of Oxford after lunch without being dressed as he would have

been in Pall Mall.” Charles Reade at Magdalen “created a panic even

among the junior members” by wearing a green coat and brass buttons, as

Dean of Arts. Sixty years before that, George Colman had matriculated in

a grass-green coat, “with the furiously bepowdered pate of an ultra

coxcomb.” And now, says the first-quoted authority, “shooting-jackets

of all patterns, in which it is not given to every man to look like a

gentleman,” have taken the place of frock-coat, tall hat, and gloves,

“in which every one looked well.” The change from knee-breeches to

trousers early last century was made possible by the gross lenience of a

proctor.

Without college or university games, the old Oxford day was very much

unlike our own. Bonfires of celebration, almost alone among modern

amusements, are of great antiquity, in street and quad. A hundred years

ago the man who would now row or play cricket for his college, was

hunting, or pole-jumping across the fields; or, if he was original, he

took the long walks which were popular a few generations ago, but are

now so exceptional that I know nobody who ever saw, and recognised,

Matthew Arnold’s tree, though some are lazily inclined to believe that

it is the one elm that dwells with the seven firs on Cumnor Hurst.

One of the few college games was confined to the fives courts, which lay

within the walls and have long disappeared, and are inconceivable

to-day, when competition and spectators on ground remote from the

colleges are characteristic of Oxford sport. Earlier still, a form of

college game was the “vile and horrid sport” of forcibly shaving those

who were about to become Masters of Arts, and the “tucking” (_i.e._

scratching on the chin with the thumb nail) of freshmen, which the first

Earl of Shaftesbury put down at Exeter. These customs cast but a feeble

shadow to-day in the occasional solemnity of trimming a contemporary’s

exuberant or ill-kept hair. A more appropriate form of celebrating the

taking of degrees was an elaborate supper, which is now less often

possible, when a man frequently takes his degree in solitude and leaves

Oxford immediately. William Paston, in the fifteenth century, writes,

that he was made bachelor on a Friday and had his feast on the Monday

following. He was promised a gift of venison, and though disappointed,

his guests “were pleased with such meat as they had.” Even William of

Wykeham, who forbade every possible game to his scholars at New, and

would not allow the post-prandial leisure to be spent on ordinary days

around the fire in the middle of his great hall, provided that, after

supper, “on festivals and other winter nights, on which, in honour of

God, his Mother, or some other saint,” there is a fire in the hall, the

fellows might indulge in singing or reading “poems, chronicles of the

realm, and the wonders of the world.” Some of the college halls

preserved their old central fireplaces, under a louvre, until early in

the last century. While the fellows dined, a servitor stood there, and

read aloud from the Bible, in the first days of the college; or, as at

Trinity in 1792, recited a passage from Homer or Virgil or Milton.

Southey records it as a rule, that every member of the University could

go by right once a year to Balliol hall, and “be treated with bread and

cheese and beer, and all on condition that, when called upon, he should

either sing a song or tell a story.” Those who were unqualified

doubtless stayed away. Yet there is little sign that the temperate or

secluded undergraduate suffered for his gifts. Whitefield himself, who

cost his relatives £24 for his first three years, and wore “woollen

gloves, a patched gown, and dirty shoes,” says that the other men left

him alone when “he became better than other people,” as a “singular odd

fellow,” at Pembroke. There was, however, one custom which must have

left such men with a sore memory. For the “fresh night” was long the

common doom of men soon after entering the University. There were fires

of charcoal in the hall on All Saints’ eve, All Saints’ day and night,

and onwards to Christmas day and Candlemas day; and the freshmen were

brought in before an assembly of their seniors among the undergraduates.

Anthony à Wood describes the ordeal thus:--

“On Candlemas day, or before, every freshman had warning given him to

provide his speech, to be spoken in the public hall before the

undergraduates and servants on Shrove Tuesday night that followed, being

always the time for the observation of that ceremony.

“Feb. 15, 164⅞, Shrove Tuesday, the fire being made in the common

hall before five of the clock at night, the fellows would go to supper

before six, and making an end sooner than at other times, they left the

hall to the liberty of the undergraduates, but with an admonition from

one of the fellows (who was then principal of the undergraduates and

postmasters [at Merton]) that all things should be carried in good

order. While they were at supper in the hall, the cook (Will Noble) was

making the lesser of the brass pots full of cawdel at the

[Illustration: THE CLOISTERS, NEW COLLEGE

The great west window of the College Chapel shows above the Cloisters to

the east. The window was painted from designs made by Sir Joshua

Reynolds.

To the right of the drawing is the picturesque group of the Warden’s

Lodgings.

The area of the Cloisters was consecrated as a private burial-place for

the College, 19th October 1400.]

freshmen’s charge; which, after the hall was free from the fellows, was

brought up and set before the fire in the said hall. Afterwards every

freshman, according to seniority, was to pluck off his gown and band,

and if possible make himself look like a scoundrel. This done, they were

conducted each after the other to the high table, and there made to

stand on a form placed thereon: from whence they were to speak their

speech with an audible voice to the company; which if well done, the

person that spoke it was to have a cup of caudle and no salted drink; if

indifferently, some caudle and some salted drink; but if dull, nothing

was given to him but salted drink, or salt put in college beer, with

tucks to boot. Afterwards when they were to be admitted into the

fraternity, the senior cook was to administer to them an oath over an

old shoe. After which, spoken with gravity, the freshman kissed the

shoe, put on his gown and band, and took his place among the seniors.”

Wood himself not only earned pure caudle, but sack as well, with an

oration in this vein:--

“Most reverend Seniors,--May it please your Gravities to admit into your

presence a kitten of the Muses, and a meer frog of Helicon to croak the

cataracts of his plumbeous cerebrosity before your sagacious

ingenuities. I am none of the University blood-hounds that seek for

preferment, and whose noses are as acute as their ears, that lie perdue

for places, and who, good saints! do groan till _the Visitation_ comes.

These are they that esteem a tavern as bad as purgatory, and wine more

superstitious than holy water; and therefore I hope this honourable

convocation will not suffer one of that tribe to taste of the sack, lest

they should be troubled with a vertigo and their heads turn _round_.”

Except at such a special season as that, the old Oxford day bore more

resemblance than our own to the life elsewhere. The fashions in cards

and dress were the same as in London; the outdoor amusements were those

of other town or country gentlemen. There was horse-racing at Spurton

Hill and Brackley, cock-fighting at Holywell. Edgeworth’s contemporaries

attended the assizes, and interfered on behalf of justice, in spite of

sheriff and judge. Anthony à Wood went to fish at Wheatley Bridge, and

“nutted at Shotover by the way.” And early rising was a tradition in

every college until last century. The undergraduate, who to-day lives on

historical principles, is often later than his sixteenth-century

original was to dine, when he sits at his breakfast of steak and XX in a

fine old room. Chapel at six o’clock and a lecture at seven was a common

doom. Shelley and Hogg, after their days spent in shooting at a mark,

and making ducks and drakes and paper boats at a Shotover pond, sat up,

indeed, until two, over their conversations on literature and chemistry,

but rose at seven, because it was customary. While dinner was at ten or

eleven, breakfast was an informal meal. Some attempted to do without it:

hence a morning preacher swooned on the altar steps. Wood speaks of the

juniors “at breakfast in hall” in 1661. The majority took beer and

bread from the buttery, and probably taking it in one another’s rooms,

started the genial custom of breakfast parties, which was perfected

early in the nineteenth century. “Let the tender swain,” says the

well-spiced _Oxford Sausage_, a mid-eighteenth-century product of Oxford

(and Cambridge) wits,--

Let the tender Swain

Each Morn regale on nerve-relaxing Tea,

Companion meet of languor-loving Nymph:

Be mine each Morn with eager appetite

And Hunger undissembled, to repair

To friendly Buttery; there on smoaking Crust

And foaming Ale to banquet unrestrained,

Material Breakfast! Thus in ancient Days

Our ancestors robust with liberal cups

Usher’d the Morn, unlike the squeamish Sons

Of modern Times: Nor ever had the Might

Of Britons brave decay’d, had thus they fed,

With British Ale improving British worth.

The institution of breakfast, whatever happened to British worth, was

certainly helped forward by the tea, rolls, and toast which slowly

ousted ale. Lectures and disputations in private or in the Schools

followed breakfast. The latter possibly encouraged inter-collegiate

sports, since Exeter and Christ Church on one occasion resolved their

disputation into a fight which attracted Masters of Arts. And well it

might; for otherwise they were in danger of dining like fighting cocks

and amusing themselves like doves: the sixteenth-century fellows of

Corpus, for example, were permitted no games but ball in the college

garden. Examinations are still a select and expensive form of

amusement. The stories told of celebrated men and their _viva voce_

conflicts with examiners, and the like, have inspired more than one to

go into the Schools in a mood of smiling irreverence. The fame

resulting, it is true, has to be propagated by much anecdote from the

lips of the hero himself. In the Middle Ages the humour was of a lustier

kind. The parsley crown went, or should have gone, to the most brazen

giver and taker of learned wit. In Anthony à Wood’s day, one William

George, “cynical and hirsute in his behaviour,” was a noted sophister

and disputant, and improved his purse by preparing the exercises of the

dull or lazy for public recitation. The nature of these examinations, in

their dull old age, has been recorded by one who took part:--

“Two boys, or men, as they call themselves, agree to _do generals_

together. The first stage in this mighty work is to produce arguments.

These are always handed down from generation to generation, on long

slips of paper, and consist of foolish syllogisms on foolish subjects.

The next step is to go for a _liceat_ to one of the petty officers,

called the Regent Master of the Schools, who subscribes his name to the

questions, and receives sixpence as his fee. When the important day

arrives, the two doubty disputants go into a large dusty room, full of

dirt and cobwebs, with walls and wainscot decorated with the names of

former disputants, who, to divert the tedious hours, cut out their names

with their penknives or wrote verses with a pencil. Here they sit in

mean desks, opposite to each other, from one till three. Not once in a

hundred times does any officer enter; and if he does, he hears one

syllogism or two, and then makes a bow, and departs, as he came and

remained, in solemn silence. The disputants then return to the amusement

of cutting the desks, carving their names, or reading Sterne’s

_Sentimental Journey_, or some other edifying novel.”

Thus, towards the end of the eighteenth century, “great progress is made

towards the wished-for honour of a bachelor’s degree”; the goal might be

reached, if the undergraduate knew a few “jolly young Masters of Arts,”

by answering questions concerning the pedigree of a race-horse. Such was

the lack of interest in the disputations that they were called “wall”

lectures, after the name of their principal auditor.

A little poaching gave a very attractive substitute for cross-country

running. But increasing college discipline and the heightening average

of wealth and birth among students cut off the more violent sports of

the Middle Ages. The unattached, poor Welsh and Irish students, who kept

up the University name for rough and adventurous relaxations,

disappeared before the Reformation; and after the Poor Law Act of 1531

had condemned begging scholars, who were not authorised under the seal

of a university, to be treated as able-bodied beggars, there can have

been few to poach at Shotover and Abingdon. The masked Mohock revels and

Jacobite struttings of the Augustan age were a poor alternative. The

blithe and fearless spirit of trespassing, so common among

undergraduates, is the sole survival to-day, if we exclude the pious

uprooting of stakes and fences on fields supposed (by reference to

Doomsday Book) to be common land. Before and after the Puritans, who

preferred music in their rooms, there was free access to the acting of

dramas in Latin and English, and earlier still, to the miracle plays of

Herod and Noah and the like. Even during the Commonwealth private

theatricals were popular; and Wood speaks of one John Glendall, a fellow

of Brasenose, who was the witty _terræ filius_ in 1658, when the Acts

were kept in St. Mary’s Church, as “a great mimick, and acted well in

several plays which the scholars acted by stealth in Kettle Hall, the

refectory at Gloster Hall,” etc.

For centuries the ale-houses were full of university life. At one time

there were three hundred in Oxford. They had excellent uses before a

common room perfected the homeliness of the college; and even

afterwards, in the eighteenth century, a poetical club met at “The Tuns”

to display their wit. There the undergraduates freshened and shared

their wit, before each had an ample sitting-room, and before the junior

common room,--where now the newspaper rustles, and the debate roars or

chirps, and the senior scholar, on rare occasions, speaks to a not

wholly reverent college meeting from the time-honoured elevation of the

mantelpiece. The men of Balliol continued the old-fashioned devotion to

the “Split Crow” in Broad Street long after the coffee-house had become

fashionable. The vice-chancellor, being president of the rival and

neighbouring society of Trinity, scoffed at the Master’s

[Illustration: BROAD STREET, LOOKING WEST

On the left of the picture is the enclosing wall of the Sheldonian

Theatre, with its startlingly picturesque thermes. A flight of

semicircular steps leads to an entrance between two of them.

In the first bay of the wall, seen through the palisade fence, is the

old Ashmolean Museum, and farther on is a glimpse of Exeter College. The

spire is that of the College Chapel.

By the large tree standing near the Church of St. Mary Magdalen are the

buildings of Balliol College, and nearer to the spectator is the

entrance to Trinity College and Kettle Hall.

Some of the houses to the right of the picture are fair specimens of

eighteenth-century domestic architecture.

Two or three bicycles are shown, and the time is early noon.]

attempt to discourage them; “so now they may be sots by authority.” The

disorder was winked at because it increased the “natural stupidity” of

the Balliol men of the day. But the attitude of the University towards

humour two centuries ago was a wily mixture of patronage and ferocity.

The _terræ filius_ was only not official in his reckless bombardment of

order and authority at the annual University Act. It was as though a

jackdaw should be invited to church. He and his companion (for they

hunted in couples) were chosen, as regularly as proctors, by election;

and to become _terræ filius_ must have been the blue riband of the

wilder sort of University wits. Year after year pairs of _terræ filii_

fired their random shots at great and small, always with audacity,

sometimes with the utmost scurrility; and year after year one or both of

the pair suffered expulsion, or, like Addison’s father, public

humiliation, for their scandalous and opprobrious words, which no doubt

earned the gratitude of irresponsible juniors.

It was long a common recreation, a recreation only, to go on the river

in a boat, and to row or be rowed to some place of meditation or

festivity, or to go with music and wine upon the Isis to Godstow Bridge

or Sandford--

And there

Beckley provides accustom’d fare

Of eels, and perch, and brown beefsteak.

And the mention of Sandford carries with it many memories for modern

Oxford men, even if perch is not always to be had--of winter afternoons

when the mulled port was as sweet as a carnation, and a voice from a

slowly-gliding barge was the sole sound in all the land. One joyous

company long ago went, “like country fiddlers,” to Farringdon fair, with

cithern, bass viol, and violin. The city itself offered other amusements

than the theatre, music hall, billiard tables, and picture shows of

to-day. Freaks, monstrosities, mountebanks, jugglers, were welcome not

only to undergraduates of fifteen or sixteen. There was “a brazen head

that could speak and answer” at the Fleur de Lace on one day; on

another, strange beasts. On May-day a maypole stood near St.

Peter’s-in-the-East and opposite the “Mitre.” A bear-baiting was always

a possibility. There was a fencing school at hand. One who cared for

none of these has left this account of his Oxford day in the seventeenth

century:--

_Morn, mend hose, stu. Greek, breakfast, Austen, quoque dinner;_

_Afternoon, wa. me., cra. nu., take a cup, quoque supper--_

_i.e._, interprets Wood, in the morning he mended his stockings, studied

Greek, took breakfast, studied St. Augustine, and dined; and in the

afternoon, walked in Christ Church meadows, cracked nuts, took a drink,

and had supper.

Above all, in and after the time of Cromwell the city provided

coffee-houses,--the real, steaming, smoking, witty thing. The

hospitality and spirit of careless intercourse between college and

college which they fostered belong to the present day. They were first

opened, too, at a time when much of mediæval life was

[Illustration: THE HIGH STREET LOOKING EAST

The Mitre Inn is on the left of the picture, and above the white

building rises the tower and lantern of All Saints’ Church. A part of

these buildings has been removed for the extension of Brasenose College.

Farther on, the spire of the University Church appears above the porch

of All Saints’, and a portion of the battlements of All Souls’ College

closes the perspective.]

departing, when Christmas sports were dying, and Latin conversation at

dinner and supper was going out of use; and Anthony à Wood laments that

scholar-like conversation (“viz. by quoting the fathers, producing an

antient verse from the poets suitable to his discourse”) was accounted

pedantic, and “nothing but news and the affairs of Christendom,” he says

scornfully, “is discoursed of, and that generally at coffee-houses.” At

some, perhaps at all of them, there was a light library, which

apparently resembled the library of a modern college barge. A copy of

Rabelais, with poems and plays, all chained in the old manner,

embellished Short’s coffee-house. Later came the _Tatlers_ and

_Spectators_ and _Connoisseurs_, for “such as have neglected or lost

their Latin or Greek,” as Tom Warton said:--

“As there are here books suited to every Taste, so there are liquors

adapted to every species of reading. Amorous tales may be perused over

Arrack punch and jellies; insipid odes over orgeat or capilaire;

politics over coffee; divinity over port; and defences of bad generals

and bad ministers over whipt syllabubs. In a word, in these libraries

instruction and pleasure go hand in hand; and we may pronounce, in a

literal sense, that learning remains no longer a dry pursuit.” And in

Gibbon’s day the dons changed their seats from chapel to hall, and from

common room to coffee-house, in an indolent circle; and not only dons,

but the infinite variety of University types in the distinguishing

raiment of that day--

Such nice distinction one perceives

In cut of gown, and hoods and sleeves,

Marking degrees, or style, or station,

Of Members free, or on foundation,

That were old Cato here narrator

He must perforce have nomenclator.

There, or at an ale-house, which appears to have been less exposed to a

proctorial raid, the sociable spent the Oxford evening, which grew

longer as the nineteenth century approached. Sunday evenings were

frequently devoted to the fair sex in Merton walks, which were always

gay.

My hair in wires exact and nice,

I’ll trim my cap to smallest size,

That _Polly_ sure may see me,

exclaims an eighteenth-century spark, with a hint that the kindly

relations between town and gown sometimes reached the married state. Yet

another writer with an eye for the amusing side of Oxford life drew the

following picture, which a diligent seeker might, with difficulty,

parallel to-day. Gainlove and Ape-all, two Oxford undergraduates, are

talking:--

“_Gainlove._ What, bound for the Port of Wedlock, Sir?

“_Ape-all._ No, no, no, no, Sir; I only use her as a Pleasure boat to

dabble about the stream with, purely for a Passo Tempo, or so. O Lord,

Sir, I have been at London, and know more of the world than to make love

to a woman I intend to marry--only it diverts the spleen to talk to a

girl sometimes, you know--and ’tis such a comedy, when one gallants them

to college, to

[Illustration: THE BOTANIC GARDEN

The Garden is surrounded by a wall, commenced in 1632, pierced by

several noble gateways one of which shows to the left of the picture.

The entrance gateway fronting the High Street was designed by Inigo

Jones.

The Garden is a favourite promenade and spot for rest; Magdalen Tower is

seen to great advantage through its grand trees.]

see all the young Fellows froze with envy, stand centinel in their

niches, like the figures of the Kings round the Royal Exchange. And the

old Dons who would take no more notice of one at another time than a

bishop of a country curate, will come cringing, cap in hand, to offer to

show the ladies the curiosities of the College--when the duce knows they

only want to be nibbling.”

Those who liked not these things had at least as good an opportunity of

quiet work as to-day. A separate set of rooms for each member of a

college had gradually become almost universal in the eighteenth century;

and the great outer door or “oak” shut off those who wished from the

rest of the world. Shelley was so pleased with that impervious door that

he exclaimed: the oak “is surely the tree of knowledge!” The simplicity

of the quarters within, before much of undergraduate social life was

passed in their rooms, would astonish modern eyes, if we may judge from

contemporary cuts, that show a few chairs, a small table with central

leg, a cap and gown on the wall, an inkhorn hanging by the window, a

pair of bellows and tongs by the fire, and over the mantel-piece a

picture or mirror. But there the undergraduate was safe from duns “with

vocal heel thrice thundering at the gate,” and, let us hope, from dons,

in colleges where they came round at nine in the evening, to see that he

kept good hours. Dibdin tells us that, as he closed the _Curiosities of

Literature_, he saw the Gothic battlements outside his window “streaked

with the dapple light of morning.” Ten years later, in the first year

of the nineteenth century, Reginald Heber, then at Brasenose, looked out

from his window and saw the fellows of All Souls’ thundering the “All

Souls’ Mallard” song--

Griffin, Turkey, Bustard, Capon

Let other hungry mortalls gape on,

And on their bones with stomachs fall hard.

But let All Souls men have the Mallard.

Hough the blood of King Edward, by ye blood of King Edward,

It was a swapping, swapping mallard--

carrying torches and inspired with canary as they sang. No one appears

to have heard the song again. And with that sound old Oxford life died

away.

THE OXFORD COUNTRY

Oxford(#55918) · 第 8 / 10 章