OUR BOOKING-OFFICE.

(_By Mr. Punch's Staff of Learned Clerks._)

I would heartily commend to all good English women and men _The Book of

Italy_ (UNWIN), first because it will help the families of those

Italians who have left England to join their ships and regiments and

will make possible the works of mercy of the Italian Red Cross, and

secondly because it is in itself an admirable book--the most

distinguished, I think, of any of its kind published here during the

War. It tells us something of the great Italian creators and liberators,

DANTE, LEONARDO, MICHELANGELO, MAZZINI, GARIBALDI, CAVOUR--too little

perhaps of MAZZINI, than whom no movement for liberty ever had a nobler

or a saner prophet. Of the good things, besides the contributions of

distinguished Italians (a particularly interesting note on the Italian

Red Cross by Signor GALANTE claims a Neapolitan, FERDINANDO PALASCIANO,

as the pioneer, in 1848, of the Red Cross idea), let me specially

commend the spirited introduction of Lord BRYCE, the eloquent letter of

SABATIER, the memories of FREDERIC HARRISON, the quiet wisdom of

CLUTTON-BROCK, the learning (decently veiled for normal eyes) of FRAZER,

of _The Golden Bough_; the inspired prejudices, fringed with epigram, of

G. K. C. A mere catalogue of a few of the well-known writers

represented, of SYMONS, GALSWORTHY, GILBERT MURRAY, BAGOT, HICHIENS,

BARRY BAIN, PHILLPOTTS; and of artists such as BRANGWYN, SARGENT,

SHANNON, JOHN, LAVERY, RICHMOND, POYNTER, FRAMPTON, RICKETTS, ANNING

BELL, CAYLEY ROBINSON, makes its best testimonial. England has never

been other than the friend of modern Italy, for the Triple Alliance was

merely a freak of desperate diplomacy and was broken by the popular will

when Germany (be it remembered) was giving fair promise of ultimate

victory. We don't need conversion to the cause of Italy, but everything

that helps to foster and develop the comradeship of the now

_Risorgimento_ of the Allied Nations is welcome. And _The Book of Italy_

will serve this purpose excellently well.

* * * * *

More than once before now I have commented upon that almost unique gift

that Mr. JACK LONDON has of transferring physical energy to fiction. His

characters must always be about some sinew-straining business that makes

the reader ache in sympathy. However in _The Little Lady of the Big

House_ (MILLS AND BOON) the author seems to have allowed himself and his

creations an unwonted holiday. Here is no fierce struggle for existence,

but the fruits of it upon a millionaire ranche in California. _Dick

Forrest_ was the millionaire, by heritage and his own success; a great

farmer and a breeder of shires. He had a wife, the _Little Lady_ of the

title, and a Big House that was one of the most eligible dwellings in

fiction. A plain recital of the arrangements ("tweaks" we should have

called them at school) in _Dick's_ open-air bedroom makes the ordinary

home look like ten cents. Mr. LONDON certainly knows how to luxuriate

when he gives his mind to it. Moreover there was a wonderful

swimming-bath, with a concealed submarine chamber in which the _Little

Lady_ used to hide for the terror of uninstructed guests (she was rather

that kind of person), and a great music-room for her to play

RACHMANINOFF in and flirt with the Other Man. This is all the tale.

Eventually the flirtation becomes serious and the _Little Lady_ is

driven to suicide, with a death scene of rather unconvincing sentiment.

The fact is, I am afraid, that Capuan ease does not altogether suit the

super-strenuous beings whom Mr. JACK LONDON designs. They are too

energetic for it, and, lacking an outlet, tend to become melodramatic. I

hope that next time he will take us back to the muscle-grinding.

* * * * *

When the War broke out Mr. F. W. WILE, an American gentleman, was living

in Berlin as the correspondent of _The Daily Mail_. Having read his

book, _The Assault_ (HEINEMANN), I may say that I judge him to be

singularly alert and wide-awake and admirably fitted for the position he

occupied. He has no scintilla of hatred or animosity for the German

people as individuals, but he wishes to see Germany beaten. "I wish her

beaten," he says, "for the Allies' sake and for my own country's sake. A

victorious Germany would be a menace to international liberty and become

automatically a threat to the happiness and freedom of the United

States." He saw the furious transports of patriotism and hatred to which

the Berlin mob gave way; he witnessed the brutal attack on the British

Embassy, and he was himself denounced as an English spy, was arrested

and was lodged in jail, whence he was rescued only by the direct

interposition of the American Ambassador. All these incidents he relates

in a very vivid way and with a certain dry humour that adds to the

effect. His description of the manner in which, on his way to prison in

a taxi with two German policemen, he managed to destroy a telegraph code

which was in his breast pocket, is positively thrilling. Had it been

discovered on him, nothing, he thinks, would have availed to save him,

so delirious were his captors with rage and suspicion. Certainly a

delightful people. Finally he was allowed to leave Berlin and travel to

England as a member of Sir EDWARD GOSCHEN'S party. In the later portion

of this book Mr. WILE castigates us, not too unkindly, but, perhaps, a

little too insistently, for not being ready, for not realising what war

means and for being self-complacent. Since his criticisms are based on

affection for us we can make an effort to kiss the rod, especially as he

discerns signs of improvement in us. Incidentally I may add that he is,

perhaps, not altogether fair to Lord HALDANE, but, _per contra_, he

gives Lord NORTHCLIFFE a high testimonial to character and behaviour.

* * * * *

_Cordelia_ (MELROSE) is a story as agreeable as its name, or as the

pretty, if rather chocolate-box-school, picture on its wrapper. One

small defect I find in the dissipation of its interest. Beginning with

one hero, it goes on with another; and the result is some confusion for

the reader who has backed the wrong horse. But Mr. E. M. SMITH-DAMPIER

might very justly retort that this is but fidelity to life. When in the

early chapters we see the first hero turned from home by an

unsympathetic parent, and faring forth to seek romance in a new world,

it was surely reasonable to suppose that he would eventually be rewarded

by the pretty lady of the wrapper, especially as _Savile Brand_ (though

his name inevitably suggests tobacco) is a character drawn with

understanding and skill. But Mr. SMITH-DAMPIER is good at lovers. He has

another, even better, up his sleeve. This is _Peter_, the forty-year-old

American cousin, who cherishes a tender regard for _Mistress Cordelia_.

I should explain that all this happened in the time of powder, lace

coats, and witches. This last is important. Those were the days when

_Cherchez la sorcière_ was the unfailing remedy in New England for every

ill, material or emotional. It is from this, coupled with the mistaken

jealousy of her sister, that _Cordelia's_ troubles come, and so nearly

turn her story to tragedy. The main motive may remind you a little of

that grim play of witchcraft that we saw at the St. James's Theatre some

years ago. But fortunately the end is more comfortable. _Cordelia_, in

short, is a nicely-flavoured romance of old America, with at least three

unusually well-drawn characters to give it substance. I have no doubt at

all of its success.

* * * * *

Punch, or the London Charivari, Vol. 150, May 3, 1916 · 第 28 / 29 题