LUNCHEON CAUSERIES.

A young lady typist was overheard remarking in a City teashop the other

day that she liked SILAS HOCKING better than JOSEPH, because the latter

was "rather deep." The remark was significant of the new atmosphere of

literary enthusiasm which the feminine invaders of business London have

brought with them into the luncheon-hour. We are instituting a causerie

for the special benefit of this large class of readers, i.e. those who

get out of their depth in the transition from SILAS to JOSEPH.

I want to introduce you to-day to a writer whose subtle genius defies

analysis but demands reverent appreciation. Ruby L. Binns came into my

own intellectual life at a rather critical stage in my reading. Like

most young men of the early nineteen-noughts, I had fallen under the

spell of Guy Beverley, whose _Only a Mill Hand_ and _Squire Darrell's

Heir_ appeared to us the consummation of the novelettist's art. In those

days every other young man you met was mouthing the great renunciation

scene from the _Mill Hand_. Small marvel too! As I recall it even now

something of the old glamour revives.

"Go!" cried Mary Ellen. "Though you are the Export Manager and I

but a poor humble mill-girl, I would sooner beg my bread from

door to door than seek it at _your_ hand." She eyed him with

pitiless scorn. Jasper Dare went out into the night.

Fine? Ay, and more than fine. But we young men of the nineteen-noughts

made one big mistake. We thought Guy Beverley had scaled the summit of

art; but art has no summit. We thought he had plumbed the depths of

psychology; but psychology defies the plumber. I date a new epoch in my

life from that day in 19-- when I picked up my _Daily Reflector_ and

read the opening chapter of a new serial, _Her Soldier Sweetheart_, by

Ruby L. Binns. That was on a Monday. By Wednesday of that week this

unknown writer had revealed to me a New Idea and a New Style. The idea

is familiar to most of you now, but in those days the daring conception

that a common soldier might turn out to be the missing heir of a baronet

rang like a challenge in the ears of the older romanticism. It is her

style, however, that is Ruby Binns's most enduring gift to English prose

literature. Lean, restrained, economical, it holds (for me) the very

spirit of the English race and tongue. Listen:--

She went to the door, thinking she heard something. There was

nobody there, so she went back to her work, thinking sadly of

her soldier boy. "Cheer up," said Clarice; "perhaps he'll come

back soon." "Perhaps," answered Yvonne wanly, "but it does not

seem very likely, does it, dear?" The next moment the door

opened and a tall soldierly figure entered the room.

English? It is like a May morning on Tooting Common. Beverley would have

handled that situation well, no doubt. But could he--could anyone--have

achieved the poignancy of that unaffected phrase, "It does not seem very

likely"? I said that the depths of Art were unplumbable. True, but Ruby

Binns has at least got lower than most.

Next week I want to speak of a new man and a new book, Stott Mackenzie

and his _Only a Trailer-Car Conductress_.

* * * * *

Punch, or the London Charivari, Vol. 150, May 3, 1916 · 第 14 / 29 题