XIV. BEGINNINGS IN REFORM

I had occasion some years ago to visit a considerable

part of Turkey, from Constantinople and Beirut to Mosul

and Bagdad, and everywhere I paid particular attention

to missionary conditions and the influence of mission

work upon the people. This is a land assigned almost

wholly to American Missionary Boards, and the influence

is everywhere marked and excellent. The late Premier

Stviloff told me in Sofia that but for young men educated

by American teachers in Constantinople, Bulgaria when it

became independent would have had to depend on Russians

for administrative officers. He was himself, like so many

other distinguished Bulgarians, a graduate of Robert

College. In Syria a native physician, graduated at the

Syrian Protestant College, said to me, “We say, ‘After

God, van Dyke.’” In the interior cities, such as Marash,

Aintab, Urfa, Mardin and Diarbekr, the American schools

and the large self-supporting churches were evidences

of the new evangelic spirit and culture which had put

new heart into those ancient seats of intellectual

decay. About Harpoot there were thousands who had

learned English, and hundreds have come from there to

this country believing it to be a very paradise. The

contrast was sad enough when I came into the towns south

from Mosul where American missionary influence had not

reached, and scarce any signs of intellectual or material

improvement were to be found. I am convinced that the work

of devoted, intelligent, broad-minded missionaries is

far more effective in lifting a people out of ignorance

and social decay into enlightened civilization, than

all the influences of commerce or mere governmental

policy. Our missionaries bring the motive of faith as the

example of unselfish service which nothing else can supply.

—WILLIAM HAYES WARD, LL. D.,

Editor “New York Independent.”

During the first generation of missionary operations in Turkey there

were few tangible results except among the Armenians. The Mohammedans

were by no means entirely hostile and revealed much friendliness and

often open sympathy. The Jews presented almost a solid wall of stolid

opposition to the effort for reform among them, while the Syrians and

Greeks, under the leadership of the Roman Catholics, were often violent

in their open attacks and secret plottings to thwart every attempt

of the missionaries to gain a foothold in the country. The people in

all the empire who seemed to have been especially prepared to receive

and profit by evangelical teaching were the Armenians, who were not

distinctly in mind when mission work in Turkey was first contemplated.

In fact, almost nothing was then known of these people in the world at

large and among the Christians of the United States who were supporting

the cause of foreign missions.

While the American Board contemplated extending its missions in the

Levant to the shores of the Black Sea and especially into Armenia, no

mention whatever seems to have been made of the Armenians in connection

with the beginning of the first “mission to Palestine.”

Not long after Rev. Levi Parsons arrived at Jerusalem in 1821 and

upon his first visit there, he came into contact with some Armenian

pilgrims with whom he had conversation upon the subject of missions to

their people and country. These expressed themselves as eager to have

missionaries sent to them. Mr. Fisk at about the same time, writing

to Boston from Smyrna, recommended the appointment of missionaries to

Armenia. From this time the idea of work among the Armenians enlarged

and deepened, although the “mission to the Jews” was kept persistently

at the front.

There had been a vast deal of preparation of the Armenian people for a

work of reform, emanating from sources quite outside of the Board and,

in fact, considerably anterior to its organization. Somewhere about

1760, an Armenian priest, who was burning with the desire to reform the

Armenian Church, appeared in Constantinople. He saw and deeply felt the

gross errors of the Gregorian Church, and wrote a book exposing them.

He was an educated man and seems to have been more or less familiar

with the work of Martin Luther, of whose Reformation he heartily

approved. He constantly referred to the Bible and to this high standard

he mercilessly brought his Church and its clergy. The inconsistent life

of the priests and bishops, and the gross superstitions of the people

at large, greatly troubled him. He lacked, however, true spiritual

enlightenment and power, and failed to see divine truth in its breadth

and purity. His book was never printed, but copies were kept in various

places which were brought to light and repeatedly referred to later.

This effort had wide influence in revealing the errors of the Armenian

Church, and did much to prepare the way for the genuine reformatory

movement.

In 1813, six years before the American Board appointed its first

missionary to Palestine, the British and Russian Bible Societies made

strenuous efforts to provide for the Armenian people a Bible in their

own tongue. An edition of an old fourth century Armenian version of

the entire Bible was commenced in that year at St. Petersburg by the

Russian Bible Society, and at about the same time another edition of

the same Bible was put on the press by the Calcutta Auxiliary of the

British and Foreign Bible Society. The Russian edition of five thousand

copies was out in 1815, and the British edition of two thousand copies

appeared two years later. The Russian Society issued a separate edition

of two thousand copies of the Ancient Armenian New Testament.

In their report of 1814 the British and Foreign Bible Society said

that the printing of the Armenian Testament had aroused much interest

among the Armenians, especially those in Russia. Emperor Alexander at

that time took a keen interest in the work of the Russian Bible Society

and therefore the cause itself became popular among all classes. The

Armenian Catholicos, the spiritual head of that Church, with residence

at Etchmiadzin, now in Russia, bordering upon Armenia, was elected

one of the vice-presidents of the society. He wrote a letter to its

president commending the work of the society, and approving of the plan

to supply his own people with the Word of God. The Armenian archbishop

of Tiflis contributed six hundred roubles for that purpose.

In 1818 the British and Foreign Bible Society purchased one thousand

five hundred copies of the Armenian New Testament from the Armenian

Catholic College located on the Island of St. Lazarus, Venice, for

distribution among the Armenians. Later, a still larger number was

purchased and distributed in the same way. In 1823 the same Bible

Society published at Constantinople an edition of five thousand copies

of the Armenian New Testament and three thousand copies of the four

Gospels alone. These books were rapidly distributed by agents of the

British and Foreign Bible Society and by Mr. Connor of the Church

Missionary Society, at that time in Constantinople, among the Armenians

of the Trans-Caucasian provinces in Russia and in Turkey.

These facts have an important bearing upon the preparation of the

Armenians for a reform movement. Hitherto, while they had the Bible in

its entirety, it was mostly in manuscript form, and inaccessible to the

people. These valuable copies of the Holy Scriptures were kept in the

monasteries or in the larger churches, carefully guarded by the priests

or other custodians, who usually were themselves unable to read or

understand the writing. All the Armenians everywhere accepted the Bible

as the divine and inspired Word of God.

The name of the Bible is Astvadsashoonch, or “_The breath of God_.”

With joy they welcomed the printed word that could be kept in their

houses, handled with their own hands, and perused at their leisure.

Hitherto they had been permitted only to kiss its silver adorned covers

at the close of the formal services of their churches.

It was soon found, however, that the ancient Armenian, the language

of all the manuscripts of the Bible and rituals of the Old Church and

also of the Bibles and Testaments recently printed, was not understood

by the common, uneducated people. As the educated were few, the number

of intelligent readers was greatly limited. This number was confined

practically to the higher clergy, a few priests and vartabeds, and

the teachers in the schools. In order to reach the common people,

the Russian Bible Society issued in 1822 and 1823 a New Testament

translated into Turkish and printed with the Armenian character. As

a large proportion of the Armenians understood Turkish this version

brought to them the Word of God.

Hitherto the Armenian ecclesiastics had made little or no opposition

to the circulation of the Bible among the people, while some of the

most prominent seemed to favor the work. In 1823 the agents of the

British and Foreign Bible Society at Constantinople endeavored to

secure the sanction of the Armenian patriarch for the printing and

circulation of the New Testament in the modern, spoken Armenian tongue,

the home language of most of the Armenians in Turkey. They were met

with the severest opposition, and with threats of prohibiting the

reading of the book if it should be issued.

Without attempting to follow the course of Bible publication, upon

which depended the plan of reform for both the Armenian and Greek

churches as well as for all the other races dwelling in the empire,

suffice it to say that the hostility of the Armenian clergy, called

forth by the publication of the modern Armenian version of the

Scriptures, started a conflict, which waged throughout the country

for more than a generation, as to whether that version was the true

Word of God. The ancient Armenian Scriptures were translated from

the Septuagint and the Latin Vulgate while the modern versions were

made from the Hebrew and Greek. For this reason there were many

discrepancies between the two versions which were discussed everywhere.

This drove the people to a careful study of the Bible. If it could

be once established that the modern version was also the “Word of

God,” there could be no hesitation upon the part of the Armenians in

accepting it as such. This phase of the controversy passed fully forty

years ago, and throughout the country this version is now accepted as

_Astvadsashoonch_ or the _veritable Word of God_. It was, however, for

many years a vital question which commanded the attention and energy of

the strongest men of the race.

The work of Bible translation and publication has continued under

the patronage of the British and Foreign Bible Society and the

American Bible Society until the entire Bible is now available for

all Turkish, Arabic, Syrian, Persian, Armenian, Bulgarian, and

Greek speaking peoples, and parts of the same are available for the

Koords and Albanians. Nothing in the line of reform in Turkey has

been more potent than the Word of God in the spoken languages of its

many-tongued people, put up in cheap form and in convenient sizes and

widely distributed in all parts of the empire. The Bible is not only

welcomed by nearly all classes, but it is eagerly sought by many who

are remotely informed of its contents but who are eager to investigate

for themselves. It is an interesting fact that wherever the Bible,

and especially the New Testament, has been most widely read, there

the people have been the more determined to have modern educational

facilities for their children and better prepared to welcome the better

forms of Western civilization.

Daybreak in Turkey Second Edition · 第 34 / 48 题