CHAPTER III.

THE BROAD-SWORD.

"But swords I smile at, weapons laugh to scorn,

Brandish'd by man that's of a woman born."

_Macbeth_, Act V., Scene vii.

GENERAL.

In the early stages of the world's history our very remote ancestors

were unacquainted with the art of forging instruments and weapons from

metals; they were not even aware of the existence of those metals, and

had to content themselves with sharpened flints and other hard stones

for cutting purposes. Many of these weapons were fashioned with

considerable skill, and give evidence that even in the dark days of the

Stone Age men had a good idea of _form_ and the adaptation of the

roughest materials to suit the particular purpose they had in view.

To take an example from the most common forms--the spear and

javelin-heads which are found along with the bones and other remains of

the cave bear. These are admirably designed for entering the body of

any animal; for, though varying greatly in size, weight, and shape, the

double edge and sharp point render them capable of inflicting severe

wounds, and of entering into the flesh almost as easily as the point of

a modern sword.

As good specimens of these early spear-heads fetched high prices,

_finding_ them was at one time quite a profession, like finding bullets,

etc., on the field of Waterloo. Forgeries became common, and in many

cases the imitations were so perfect that the most experienced antiquary

was often puzzled to pick out the genuine article when placed next to

the spurious.

For the benefit of those who take an interest in this branch of

research, it may be mentioned that the museum at Salisbury is full of

excellent specimens both of true spear-heads and the copies "made to

meet the demand," and I may fairly say that the ordinary observer would

be utterly incapable of distinguishing the slightest difference between

the two.

The genus "cutting instrument," then, has for its archetype the sharp

flint, which was fashioned by dint of hard labour in the very early days

of man's existence on the face of the earth.

When metals were discovered and their malleability had been tested by

the application of fire, not only spear and javelin-heads were formed

from the new material, but short swords, consisting entirely of metal,

were first constructed; and this departure marked a new era in the

civilization of the world, termed by geologists and antiquarians the

Bronze Age.

In a very short treatise on a cut-and-thrust weapon like the

broad-sword, it would be out of place to enter into any speculations as

to the probable dates at which the stone, the bronze, and the iron ages

commenced their respective epochs. It seems sufficient to give the

_order_ and to mention a few of the early weapons with which we are

acquainted, either through actually finding them, or by seeing

representations of them on early works of art, such as alto-relievos or

frescoes.

One of the earliest forms of sword was the leaf-shaped blade of the

early Greeks. It properly belongs to the Bronze Age, as it is found

amongst the human remains of that period. It was a short, heavy-bladed

weapon, with sharp point and double edge, used, it appears from ancient

monuments, for cutting purposes.

[Illustration: Fig. 12.--Early Greek sword.]

No doubt the weight of the blade, increased by the heavy deep ridge

running almost from point to hilt, made it very serviceable for cutting,

but it seems more than probable that the point was also used, and that

the idea of the edge was handed down to us because the ancient sculptor

or delineator, in his battle-piece representations, placed the swordsman

in the most spirited positions he could think of. A figure in the act of

delivering a slashing cut, say cut 1 or cut 2, looks much more

aggressive and eager for the fray than a similar figure about to give

the point.

I only advance this as a suggestion, for it seems hard to believe that

people who must have been well acquainted with the use of the point at

the end of a pole or staff--as in the case of the spear, which was the

very earliest form of thrusting weapon--should abandon it when they came

to the sword.

Be this as it may, there is no doubt that the short Roman sword, which

was practically a large heavy dagger, sharp-pointed, double-edged, and

straight-bladed, was extensively used for thrusting. For cutting

purposes, however, it could not, from the absence of curve in the edge

of the blade, have been equal to the early Greek weapon.

[Illustration: Fig. 13.--Short Roman sword.]

When iron began to play a prominent part in the construction of articles

requiring hardness, strength, and durability, a great stride was made in

the production of war-like weapons, and it was then very soon discovered

that ordinary forged iron was too soft and easily bent, and it was not

until the art of tempering began to be roughly understood that iron, or

more correctly speaking steel, swords were brought to a degree of

perfection sufficient to entitle them to a higher place than their

bronze predecessors.

It is believed that the Egyptians had some method of tempering their

bronze chisels, which is now numbered amongst the lost arts; otherwise,

how could they have carved the head of the Sphinx and innumerable other

works out of the intensely hard stone of which so many of their

monuments are cut?

The modern sword blade is constructed of steel, tempered so as to suit

the particular kind of work for which it is intended.

"Mechanical invention has not," says the "Encyclopaedia Britannica,"

"been able to supersede or equal handwork in the production of good

sword blades. The swordsmiths' craft is still, no less than it was in

the Middle Ages, essentially a handicraft, and it requires a high order

of skill. His rough material is a bar of cast and hammered steel,

tapering from the centre to the ends; when this is cut in two each half

is made into a sword. The 'tang,' which fits into the handle, is not

part of the blade, but a piece of wrought iron welded on to its base.

From this first stage to the finishing of the point it is all hammer and

anvil work. Special tools are used to form grooves in the blade,

according to the regulation or other pattern desired, but the shape and

weight of the blade are fixed wholly by the skilled hand and eye of the

smith. Measuring tools are at hand, but are little used. Great care is

necessary to avoid over-heating the metal, which would produce a brittle

crystalline grain, and to keep the surface free from oxide, which would

be injurious if hammered in. In tempering the blade the workman judges

of the proper heat by the colour. Water is preferred to oil by the best

makers, notwithstanding that tempering in oil is much easier. With oil

there is not the same risk of the blade coming out distorted and having

to be forged straight again (a risk, however, which the expert

swordsmith can generally avoid); but the steel is only surface-hardened,

and the blade therefore remains liable to bend. Machinery comes into

play only for grinding and polishing, and to some extent in the

manufacture of hilts and appurtenances. The finished blade is proved by

being caused to strike a violent blow on a solid block, with the two

sides flat, with the edge, and lastly with the back; after this the

blade is bent flatwise in both directions by hand, and finally the point

is driven through a steel plate about an eighth of an inch thick. In

spite of all the care that can be used, both in choice of materials and

in workmanship, about forty per cent. of the blades thus tried fail to

stand the proof and are rejected. The process we have briefly described

is that of making a really good sword; of course plenty of cheaper and

commoner weapons are in the market, but they are hardly fit to trust a

man's life to. It is an interesting fact that the peculiar skill of the

swordsmith is in England so far hereditary that it can be traced back in

the same families for several generations.

"The best Eastern blades are justly celebrated, but they are not better

than the best European ones; in fact, European swords are often met with

in Asiatic hands, remounted in Eastern fashion. The 'damascening' or

'watering' of choice Persian and Indian is not a secret of workmanship,

but is due to the peculiar manner of making the Indian steel itself, in

which a crystallizing process is set up; when metal of this texture is

forged out, the result is a more or less regular wavy pattern running

through it. No difference is made by this in the practical qualities of

the blade."

The above-quoted description, though short and superficial, is

sufficient to indicate some of the chief difficulties of the

swordsmith's art, and it sets one thinking, too, as to the various uses

to which cutting instruments are put, and gradations of hardness, from

the high temper of razors and certain chisels to the low temper of

hunters' and sailors' knives, which should always be of rather soft

steel, for they are sharpened more easily, and the saw-like edge is

better suited for cutting flesh, ropes, etc., than a very fine edge

would be.

A comparatively soft steel does well enough for the heavy cutlass used

for cutting lead or dividing a sheep, and the edge, though sharp and

keen, need not, and, indeed, cannot, approach the razor-edge necessary

for cutting a silk pocket-handkerchief or a feather.

_Every_ edge, when closely examined by a microscope, presents a more or

less saw-like and jagged appearance. It is merely a question of

_degree_, and, in a sword to be used for ordinary cutting and thrusting,

you want to secure hardness sufficient to produce a good edge and an

instant return to its former shape after any reasonable bending, and you

want to avoid anything like brittleness or liability to snap. If the

disposition of the molecules is such as to give too great hardness, the

blade, though capable of taking a fine edge, will probably snap, or the

edge will crack and shiver on meeting any hard obstacle. For example, if

you put razor steel into a cutlass, and then try to cut lead, the blade

will either snap off or the edge will break away in large pieces. If, on

the other hand, you make the blade of too soft steel, the edge will be

readily dented or turned on one side.

Though there are wonderful reports of the excellence of Eastern blades

manufactured at Damascus, it is probable that European work was quite as

good, and that the tempering of steel was quite as well understood at

Toledo, in Spain, where, in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries,

splendid rapiers were produced. It seems highly probable that the rapier

was an extension or refinement of the earlier heavy cut-and-thrust

sword, because, though the superior value of the point was beginning

then to assert itself, there was an evident attempt to preserve in the

rapier the strength and cutting properties of the long straight sword of

a previous time.

The Italian and Spanish rapiers were sometimes of great length, three

feet or three feet six inches and more in the blade, and they were often

beautifully finished, the work of the hilts being frequently both

elaborate and costly. The blade itself, which was double-edged and

inclined to be flat, tapered gradually from hilt to point, and was

strengthened by a ridge running almost its entire length.

The French duelling-sword of modern days is sometimes spoken of as a

"rapier;" but this is incorrect, as the popular Gallic dispute-settler

is three-sided, and is, as it has no edge, exclusively used for

pointing.

For _details_ of historical research, and other particulars, the reader

is referred to Mr. Egerton Castle's work on the sword.

THE MODERN CUT-AND-THRUST SWORD.

The word "Broad-sword" may be taken to include all kinds of

cut-and-thrust swords. It is the generic term for ship's cutlass,

infantry sword, and heavy cavalry sabre, which are all cutting weapons,

and, though varying in length and curvature of blade, can be used for

pointing.

[Illustration: Fig. 14.--Grip for the light cutlass.]

The method of holding the broad-sword depends entirely upon the weight

and length of the blade. If you have a light cutlass weighing, say,

about one and a half pound, and measuring about thirty-four inches in

the blade, you may hold it in the same way as in single-stick play, viz.

with the thumb on the back of the hilt, as in the sketch, and you will

probably find that in this way the guards are made with greater

facility. At the same time, when guarding, say, with the hanging guard

(_see_ Fig. 15), the thumb is liable to a severe sprain; and this is

more particularly the case when the opposing blade meets the foible, or

half nearest the point of your blade, at right angles, or nearly so.

To be more explicit. If A B C, in Fig. 16, represent your blade lying

flat on the paper, _d o_ the intersection of a plane at right angles to

the plane of the paper and also at right angles to the tangent to the

curve at the point _o_, where we will suppose the edges of the blades to

meet, it will be seen at a glance that the leverage from _o_ to C is

considerable, and that a great strain is thrown upon the thumb which is

endeavouring to keep the guard in position.

[Illustration: Fig. 15--Low hanging guard.]

In this case the cut has been received on the "foible," or half of the

blade nearest the point. All guards should, if possible, be made with

the "forte," or half nearest the hilt.

It is important to bear in mind that the cut should be received with the

guard as much as possible on the slant; _i.e._ you should endeavour to

make the opponent's blade glance off yours at an angle such as _d' o_.

The difficulty of bringing about this "glance off" is certainly

increased by having the thumb on the hilt, because your hanging

guard--which is perhaps the most important and constantly recurring of

all the guards--is apt to be higher, _so far as the point is concerned_,

and there is the chance of letting in cuts 3 or 5 at the left side,

which is exposed by an elevated point.

If, in the hanging guard, the arm is well extended, with the hand

slightly above the level of the shoulder, the point dropped well to the

left, and the edge turned outwards to the left, as in the illustration

(Fig. 15), a very good general guard will be formed. Remember, too, that

in all cuts, points, or guards, the second knuckles of the fingers

should be in a line with the edge. The only exception to this rule is,

perhaps, to be found in the third point, where a shifting of the hand,

so as to enable the edge to be more completely directed upwards, is

sometimes recommended.

[Illustration: Fig. 16--The broad-sword.]

The hanging guard, or modifications thereof, is capable of warding off

all cuts made at the left side of the head and body, and is also

effective against cut 7. Then, by bringing the hand slightly to the

right, with the elbow held well in to the right side, it is extremely

easy to come into the position for guarding cut 2.

We may, I think, assume that, on the whole, the thumb held at the back

of the hilt gives, in the case of a very light sword, an advantage in

speed, especially with short quick cuts and points.

Turning to the heavy sabre used by the cavalry of this and other

countries, we observe that to keep the thumb on the back of the hilt

would lead to constant sprains. No man is strong enough to wield with

effect a blade weighing about two and a half pounds and measuring little

short of three feet--thirty-five inches is the regulation length of the

British cavalry sabre--unless he holds it as indicated in Fig. 17.

[Illustration: Fig. 17.--Grip for the heavy sabre.]

Most cuts made with the heavy sword are more sweeping in their nature,

more "swinging," so to speak, than the short quick cuts which can be

effected with the lighter and more handy weapon; indeed, it is only to

be expected that the weight of the blade and length of the sweep should

give great force to the sabre; but it must not be forgotten that what

is thus gained in power is lost in speed, and that in nine cases out of

ten a well-directed "point" would be immeasurably superior both in speed

and effect than the most sweeping cut.

Such very different weapons are required to be thoroughly effective in

different circumstances. A light, thin-bladed sword, though admirable

for a man on foot, would not be of nearly so much use to a cavalry man,

whose slashing cut through shield or helmet renders _weight_ an absolute

necessity. The light blade might be brought to bear with all the speed

and force of the strongest man, but would be of no avail in those cases

where hard, dense, and heavy substances have to be cut through.

A fly may dash against a pane of plate-glass with the utmost speed and

yet fail to break the glass; but a cricket-ball thrown with a tenth part

of the velocity will smash the window to pieces. This is only an

analagous case, which indicates very fully the existence of the two

factors in the _vis-viva_ necessary to produce a certain result.

If you get your blade too light it will not be serviceable for

heavy-cutting work, whatever the speed of the cut; and if you get the

blade too heavy, it will be impossible to use it effectively on account

of its weight.

Everything depends upon what a sword is expected to do; and in selecting

a blade this cannot be too carefully borne in mind.

The Easterns have not, and indeed never had, any idea of using the

point; but they are far and away our superiors at edge work, and their

curved scimitars are admirably adapted for effective cutting, because

the edge, meeting the object aimed at on the slant, has great cutting or

slicing power.

This brings us to the most important matter in connection with cutting

weapons--the "draw."

If you take a razor in one hand and _hit_ the palm of the other hand a

smart _blow_ with the edge, no harm will be done; but if you vary this

hit, by making it lighter and putting the slightest possible _draw_ into

it, a cut will be the result, and blood will flow freely. That is to

say, anything like _drawing_ the edge along the skin will produce a cut.

Turn to the case of the scimitar. It will be seen that the curved form

of the blade _from hilt to point_ renders it impossible for a sweeping

cut, given with the arm extended its full length and with the shoulder

as centre of the circle, which the hand traces out in making the cut, to

be other than a "draw," because the edge _must_ meet the object to be

severed on the slant.

[Illustration: Fig. 18.--The scimitar.]

Excellent examples of this kind of cutting are to be found in the

circular saw and the chaff-cutting machine.

But this is not the case with a nearly straight-bladed broad-sword,

which requires what may be termed an artificial draw, either backward or

forward, in order that the cut may have its full effect. Of course the

draw back is by far the most common form of the "draw;" and on reference

to the accompanying sketch (Fig. 19) it will be seen that the edge, if

the hand retains its position _throughout the entire sweep_, on the

circumference of the circle B D, will meet the object to be cut simply

as a _hit_, and not as a _cut_. This is just what we want to avoid.

[Illustration: Fig. 19.]

Suppose the cut is being made parallel to the plane of the paper, and

that the hilt of the sword is, in the first part of the sweep, moving on

the circumference of the circle from B to D. Suppose, too, that the edge

first meets the obstacle to be cut at the point _n_. Then slightly

before _n_ is reached the "draw" should commence, the hand coming into

position at F, and the point _n_ being necessarily drawn down to _n'_

by the time the object has been severed. That is to say, the portion of

the blade between _m_ and _n_ will have been made effective in the

drawing cut, the point _n_ having travelled in the direction of the

dotted lines till it arrives at _n'_.

The point _n_ is taken at random: it might be nearer the hilt or nearer

the point, according to the distance of the object aimed at. It may also

be observed that the "draw" _might_ continue during the entire sweep

from B to F, but a very slight consideration will show clearly the

advantage of keeping the arm fully extended until the edge is quite

close to the object, as, by this means, the reach is increased and the

_power of the cut gains considerably_. The dynamical proof of this

latter advantage would take up too much space, and I regret that it is

rather outside the scope of this little work.

No matter how extended the arm may be when commencing the cut--and the

more extended the better in the case of a long heavy sword--the "draw"

should always come in towards the end of the sweep, the first part of

which is merely intended to give the required impetus to the effective

portion of the cut.

How is it that an apple or potato can be divided by a straight cut when

placed in the folds of a silk pocket-handkerchief, which remains

uninjured? Simply because there is a complete absence of "draw," and the

apple or potato is broken or split in two, much as the flesh is indented

by the edge of the razor whilst the skin escapes without the slightest

mark.

In cavalry charges, etc., our soldiers too often forget that they have

in their hands _pointing_ and _cutting_ weapons, and make slashing

_hits_, which lead to a large percentage of broken blades. I should

myself always place the point before the edge, as it is quicker and far

more deadly; but as there are numerous instances where cutting is

necessary, it is as well to remember that a mere _hit_ with the true

edge of a straight-bladed sword is little better than a blow from a

heavy stick having an oval section.

This brings us to another very important part of the subject, viz. the

consideration of the best form of weapon for ordinary practice.

To many it may seem that in these few pages on swordsmanship the cart

has been placed before the horse, and that a discussion on cuts and

guards should have preceded the somewhat intricate questions we have

been considering. I have, however, thought it advisable to leave what

may be termed the "drudgery" to the end of the chapter, in the hope of

thereby creating a more lively interest in the subject. It must,

nevertheless, be remembered that, to attain to any sort of proficiency

with the sword, a long apprenticeship must be served.

Though stick-play is invaluable as an aid to work with the sword, it may

be remarked that there are two reasons, and those important ones, why

the single-stick should not be first placed in the hands of the

beginner, and why it should never altogether usurp the place of the more

lethal weapon. The reasons are--

(_a._) The stick is very light, and short smart hits can be made, which

are impossible with a sword.

(_b._) The hit with the stick is really a hit, and there need be no

draw, which, as already explained, is so important in sword-play.

To these may be added a third reason. With the stick there is always the

temptation not to cut with the true edge, and it is very hard to detect

faults in this direction--faults which are hard to cure, and which may

quite spoil good swordsmanship.

Remembering, then, that every cut and guard must be made with the true

edge, and with the second or middle knuckles of the fingers in the

direction of the edge, a navy cutlass may be placed in the beginner's

hand, and he may be gradually taught all the cuts and guards by means of

the target, a sketch of which is here given.

[Illustration: Fig. 20.--The target.]

In the manual on sword-exercises at present in use in the army, it is

stated that there are "four cuts and four guards, so arranged for the

sake of clearness, though practically there are only two cuts--from

right to left and from left to right, high and low--and two guards, one

a variation of the 'hanging' or 'engaging guard,' formed high or low,

right or left, according to the part attacked, and the other the 'second

guard,' where the point of the sword is necessarily directed upwards, to

guard the right cheek and shoulder."

This is very brief, and, to my mind, the effort to be concise has tended

to somewhat confuse. It may, however, be well enough for the army, where

there are plenty of instructors ready to explain the meanings of terms,

etc. For ordinary beginners it is certainly better to take the old

target and thoroughly master the seven cuts and three points, with the

corresponding guards and parries, as by so doing the learner will more

readily acquire a thorough appreciation of true edge-cutting. The

general statement that there are two cuts--viz. variations from right to

left, and variations from left to right--is correct enough, and a

swordsman understands it; but it is bad for beginners to start with

loose notions on the subject. Better far learn all the cuts, and learn

them _well_, in the first instance. By this means a man and his sword

become one, as it were, and the point and edge of the weapon are in time

brought so completely under control that they can be directed as easily

as the pencil and brush are directed by the hand of a skilful

draughtsman.

As the reader will have surmised, the lines drawn through the centre of

the circle indicate the directions of the cuts; but a little further

explanation is necessary, for it must not be supposed that a mere

following of these lines with the point of the sword is all that is

required. The flat of the blade (or, more accurately, a plane passing

through the edge and a line drawn down the centre of the back of the

blade from hilt to point) should, throughout the entire cut, coincide

with the plane intersecting the plane of the target at right angles in

the particular line in which the cut is being made.

Careful attention to this will ensure cutting with the true edge, and,

in the first instance, all the cuts should be made slowly and

deliberately, so that errors may be instantly corrected. This may be

somewhat tedious to the impetuous learner, but it really saves time in

the end.

The target should be hung up on a wall with the centre about the height

of a man's shoulder from the ground. Directly below the centre a

straight line should be drawn on the ground from the wall, and at right

angles to it.

The beginner should be stationed on this line in the position of

"Attention," at about nine or ten feet from the wall, so that when he

comes into the first position of the exercise his right foot may be on

the line, and may point directly towards the wall.

Instructions as to drawing swords, etc., will be given later on with the

Extension Motions and rules for loose play (_vide_ p. 44). At this stage

it may possibly be less confusing to merely give the following

positions, leaving to the concluding portions of the chapter a few

amplifications which may materially assist the swordsman when he has

begun to take a genuine interest in the subject.

_Attention._--Having taken the cutlass in the right hand, stand facing

the target, body and head erect, and the heels close together and

meeting at an angle of sixty degrees on the line drawn from the wall.

With the sword hand in front of, and on a level with, the elbow, which

should be close to the body, and with the blade pointing perpendicularly

upwards with the edge to the front, you will be in the position of

"Carry swords." Now relax the grasp of the last three fingers, and,

without altering the position of the hand, let the back of the blade

fall on the shoulder half-way between the neck and the point of the

shoulder. This forms the position of "Slope swords," with which the

exercise begins.

_First Position._--Bring the right heel before the left; feet at right

angles, right foot pointing towards target; shoulders square to left,

and weight of body chiefly resting on left leg.

_Second Position._--Bend both knees, keeping them well apart, without

raising the heels or altering the erect position of the body. Step out

with the right foot along the line for about eighteen or twenty inches

straight in direction of the target, still retaining most of the weight

of the body on the left leg.

_Third Position._--Step out still further along the line--about a yard

or so (according to the height of the individual)--keeping the shin-bone

as nearly as possible perpendicular to the instep. The left leg should

be straight and the left heel should not leave the ground. The heels

should be both on the line, and the shoulders should be square to the

left; _i.e._ the right shoulder should be well extended and the left

held back. The weight is now, of course, principally on the right leg.

At the word "Attention," then, the pupil should come into the position

of "Slope swords," already described.

_Prepare for Sword Exercise._--Turning on the heels, come into the

"first position," with the left forearm well behind the back and the

hand closed.

_Right, Prove Distance._--Bring the upper part of the hilt of the sword

on a level with the mouth, blade pointing perpendicularly upwards, edge

to the left, and the elbow close to the side. This forms the position

"Recover swords." Now extend the arm to the right, and lower the blade

in a horizontal position straight out from the right shoulder, edge to

the rear, shoulders square to the front, and the head and eyes turned to

the right in the direction in which the sword is pointing.

Return to the position "Slope swords."

_Front, Prove Distance._--"Recover swords" as before, and, extending the

arm with the point of the sword directed towards the centre of the

target, step out into the third position, taking care that the edge is

towards the right.

Return to the position "Slope swords."

In proving distance Right and Front, the forefinger and thumb may be

stretched along the handle of the hilt, the thumb being on the back and

the pommel of the hilt in the palm of the hand.

_Assault._--Come into First Position; raise the right arm to the front

with the wrist opposite No. 1 and the elbow rather bent, and inclining

towards the centre of the target, the back of the blade, near the point,

resting on the shoulder, with the edge inclined to the right.

_Cut One._--With an extension of the arm direct the cut diagonally from

No. 1 to No. 4 (_remembering in this, and all the following cuts, to use

the true edge_), and as the point clears the circle, turn the knuckles

upwards, continuing the sweep of the sword until the point comes to the

rear of the left shoulder, with edge to the left and the wrist opposite

No. 2.

_Cut Two._--Now cut diagonally from left to right from No. 2 to No. 3.

Continue the motion till the arm is extended to the right, on a level

with the shoulder, edge to the rear.

_Cut Three._--Now turn the wrist so that the knuckles and edge face to

the front, and cut diagonally upwards from No. 3 to No. 2, and continue

the sweep until the wrist rests in the hollow of the left shoulder,

with the point of the sword pointing upwards and the edge to the rear;

turn the wrist so that the edge faces to the front, and drop the point

until the blade is in the position for the next cut.

_Cut Four._--Cut diagonally upwards from No. 4 to No. 1 until the blade

is nearly perpendicular, edge and knuckles to the rear. Bring the arm,

still fully extended, to the position of "Right, prove distance," and

turn the wrist so that the knuckles and edge face to the front, the

blade being horizontal and on a level with the shoulders.

_Cut Five._--Cut horizontally from No. 5 to No. 6. The edge will now be

to the left and the point to the rear, over the left shoulder.

_Cut Six._--Turn the wrist so that knuckles and edge face to the front,

and cut horizontally from No. 6 to No. 5. Continuing the sweep until the

hand is nearly over the head and in the direction of No. 7, the sword

being on the same line over the head, point lowered to the rear, and the

edge directed vertically upwards.

_Cut Seven._--Cut vertically downwards from No. 7 to the centre of the

target, and remain with the arm extended.

_First Point._--Turn the wrist, with the edge of the sword upwards, to

the right. Bring the hand upwards on a level with the eyes, elbow bent

and raised, the point of the sword directed towards the centre of the

target, and the left shoulder advanced. Now, by an extension of the arm,

deliver the point smartly to the front, with the edge of the sword still

inclined upwards to the right and the point accurately directed to the

centre. The right shoulder should now be well advanced and the left

drawn back--this motion of the shoulders being applicable to all the

points.

_Second Point._--Turn the edge upwards to the left, draw the elbow

close to the body and let the wrist be as high as, and in front of, the

left breast. Now deliver the point, as before directed, accurately

towards the centre of the target, the wrist inclining towards No. 2.

_Third Point._--Draw in the arm till the inside of the wrist touches the

right hip, the edge being raised upwards to the right, the left shoulder

slightly advanced and the hips well thrown back. Now deliver the point

accurately towards the lowest point on the target, the edge being

carefully directed upwards to the right throughout the motion.

_Guards._--Having gone through the cuts and points, the pupil should now

give his attention to the guards and parries.

A reference to Fig. 20, in which the directions of the blade are

indicated by means of the hilt and dotted lines, will make it easy for

the beginner to place his sword in the seven guarding positions which

follow.

_Guard One._--Grasp the hilt as shown in Fig. 17, turn the edge to the

left with the elbow held close to the body, the wrist well to the front.

Let the blade be as nearly as possible parallel to the direction of cut

1, and let it slope in the direction of the target at an angle of about

forty-five degrees with the ground: _i.e._ let the point in this, and

indeed all the guards, be well advanced to the front.

_Guard Two._--Turn the knuckles up, draw the elbow nearer the right side

and let the edge face to the right, and let the blade be parallel to cut

2. In this guard the forearm will be more directly pointing towards the

target.

_Guard Three._--Turn wrist and edge to the left, the hand being rather

below the left shoulder, and the blade following the dotted lines marked

"third guard."

_Guard Four._--Bring the wrist and hand across the body to the right,

edge to right and blade following dotted line marked "fourth guard."

_Guard Five._--Wrist and edge to the left, with blade pointing

vertically downwards.

_Guard Six._--Wrist and edge to the right, with blade pointing

vertically downwards. [It will be observed that these two guards, five

and six, are but extensions of guards three and four, the difference

being merely in the height of the hand and inclination of the blade.]

_Guard Seven._--Raise the hand well above the level of the eyes, so that

the target can be seen under the wrist; let the arm be extended, the

point of the sword dropped forward to the left and parallel to dotted

lines marked "seventh guard," and let the edge face vertically upwards.

It may be here again mentioned that with all guards and parries in

actual practice, the "forte," or half nearest the hilt, should be the

portion of the blade which meets the opponent's sword when the attack is

made.

_Left Parry._--Let the wrist be drawn back to within eight or ten inches

of the right shoulder, the blade pointing in the direction of the

perpendicular line on the target, and let the edge be turned to the

right. Now, by a second motion, turn the wrist so that the point drops

to the left and forms a circle from left to right and then returns to

the former position.

_Right Parry._--Drop the point to the rear and form the circle from

right to left of your body, the sword returning to its position as

before.

Both these circular parries should be learnt and practised for the sake

of adding to the strength and suppleness of the wrist; but for actual

use it is better to turn the point aside by one of the simple guards,

remembering not to let the hand wander far from the line of attack. In

other words, you should let your "forte" catch the "foible" of the

adversary's blade just sufficiently to turn aside the point, and then

instantly give your point or come back to whatever guard you may have

assumed in the first instance.

Some diversity of opinion exists as to the best "Engaging Guard" to take

up. In the two Figs., 21 and 22, I am inclined to favour the former for

use when opposed either to the small sword or the bayonet, and give

preference to the latter when facing another broad-swordsman. In Fig.

21, it will be observed, the point is well forward, and it is easy with

a light pressure to turn aside the opposing point and instantly lunge

out in the return. The engagement is here in Tierce, but it might just

as well be in Quarte, in which case the edge would be turned to the left

instead of to the right.

[Illustration: Fig. 21.--Engaging guard, A.]

At the same time, the more common engaging guard, the very low hanging

guard in Fig. 22, has many merits not possessed by the other. It will be

better to constantly practise _both_ these guarding positions and then

come to a decision as to which you can do best in. Two things are

certain, viz., you can, if proficient at both, puzzle an opponent who is

at home only in one, and the change of position is a great rest in a

long succession of bouts.

[Illustration: Fig. 22.--Engaging guard, B.]

It will now be well to combine the cuts and guards, and, for this, take

up the second position in front of the target, and in making each cut

lunge well out into the third position, not allowing the blade to cut

further than the centre of the target. Then spring back to the position

from which you lunged and form the guard for the cut you have just made.

For instance, having made cut 1 as far as the centre of the target,

return to the second position and form guard 1. Similarly for cut 2 and

all the other cuts.

In the same way make the points in the lunge, in position three, and the

corresponding parries in the second position.

In many works on the subject, the foregoing exercises are given with the

return in each case to the first position instead of, as above, to the

second. It is, however, advisable to accustom yourself as much as

possible to rapid returns from the lunge to the engaging position in

which you habitually face an opponent. The change from position one to

position three involves a long stretch out, and the return is, of

course, harder than the return to position two, and, for this very

reason, it is well to practise the exercises from both initial

positions--one and two.

[Illustration: Fig. 23.--Point, with lunge.]

At the risk of being considered old-fashioned, I have given the sword

exercise with seven cuts and three points, with corresponding guards and

parries, and it is my conviction that the beginner will do well to

follow the advice given on p. 34.

The following instructions are taken from the Manual on the Infantry

Sword, now used in the army.

INSTRUCTIONS FOR DRAWING THE SWORD (LONG).

_Draw Swords._--Take hold of the scabbard of the sword, with the left

hand below the hilt, which should be raised as high as the hip, then

bring the right hand smartly across the body, grasping the hilt and

turning it at the same time to the rear, raise the hand the height of

the elbow, the arm being close to the body.

_Two._--Draw the sword from the scabbard, the edge being to the rear,

and lower the hand until the upper part of the hilt is opposite the

mouth, the blade perpendicular, edge to the left, elbow close to the

body, which forms the position "Recover swords."

_Three._--Bring the sword smartly down until the hand is in front of the

elbow and little finger in line with it, the elbow close to the body,

blade perpendicular, edge to the front; which forms the position of

"Carry swords;" the left hand resumes the position of "Attention"

directly the sword is drawn.

_Slope Swords._--Relax the grasp of the last three fingers, and, without

disturbing the position of the hand, allow the back of the sword to

fall lightly on the shoulder, midway between the neck and the point of

the shoulder.

_Return Swords._--Carry the hilt to the hollow of the left shoulder (the

left hand, as before, raising the scabbard), with the blade

perpendicular and the back of the hand to the front, then by a quick

turn of the wrist drop the point into the scabbard, turning the edge to

the rear until the hand and elbow are in line with each other square

across the body.

_Two._--Replace the sword in the scabbard, keeping the hand upon the

hilt.

_Three._--The hands are brought back to the position of "Attention."

_Draw Swords._--As before.

_Slope Swords._--As before.

_Stand at Ease._--Keeping the sword at the "Slope," draw back the right

foot six inches, and bend the left knee.

THE FOUR CUTS (from Second Position).

_Assault._--Raise the hand and sword to the rear, arm bent, wrist

rounded, the back of the sword resting upon the shoulder, with the edge

inclined to the right.

_One._--Extend the arm, and direct the cut diagonally downwards from

right to left, and, continuing the sweep of the sword, prepare for cut

"two," the back of the sword upon the left shoulder, edge inclined to

the left.

_Two._--Cut diagonally downwards from left to right, and turning the

wrist let the sword continue its motion until it rests upon the right

shoulder, edge to the right.

_Three._--Cut horizontally from right to left, and prepare for cut

"four," the flat of the sword resting upon the left shoulder.

_Four._--Cut horizontally from left to right, and come to the "Engaging

Guard" (_vide_ Fig. 22).

THE FOUR GUARDS.

_First._--Raise the hand smartly above the head, and a little in advance

of it, the point of the sword lowered to the left front, edge upwards.

_Second._--Draw back the elbow to the right, and bring the sword to a

diagonal position, covering the right cheek and shoulder, point upwards,

inclining to the left, edge to the right.

_Third._--Bring the hand across the body towards the left shoulder, edge

of the sword to the left, point down and inclining to the front.

_Fourth._--Square the upper arm with the shoulder, the forearm to be in

front line with the elbow, and wrist slightly below it, point of the

sword inclined to the front, edge to the right.

_Engage._--As before.

POINTS AND PARRIES.

_First._--With a quick motion, direct the point to the front by

extending the arm, the arm moving in a straight line to the front of the

"First Guard" position, and without altering the direction of the edge.

_Parry._--Brace up the arm quickly and parry upwards by forming "First

Guard."

_Second._--Deliver the point quickly by extending the arm and sword to

the front.

_Parry._--Draw back the arm and parry to the right, by forming "Second

Guard."

_Third._--Lowering the point, extend the arm.

_Parry._--Draw back the arm, and parry to the left by forming "Third

Guard."

_Fourth._--Raise the point and deliver the thrust.

_Parry._--Parry downwards to the right by forming "Fourth Guard."

It will be worth the reader's while to compare carefully the preceding

four cuts and points and their guards and parries, with the earlier

exercises, the description of which commences on p. 37.

It will be seen that the third and fifth guards (old style) are merged

in one, that the fourth and sixth are also merged in one, and the first

guard--the old guard in quarte--is dispensed with altogether, and its

place taken by a low hanging guard, which is a variation of the old

seventh guard, formed with the hand held rather more to the left.

It will also be observed that the parries for the points are also very

different. My advice is, "Learn in the old style and then glean all you

can from the new."

EXTENSION MOTIONS.

It is a good plan to practise the following movements every morning

before beginning the sword exercises. To avoid confusion they are here

given as in the little Manual on the Infantry Sword; they are effected

without any accessories, and you commence by being in the position of

"Attention," _i.e._ stand with the heels close together at an angle of

about sixty degrees, arms hanging down by the sides, chest expanded,

back straight, shoulders back, and head well up.

FIRST EXTENSION MOTIONS.

_One._--Bring the hands, arms, and shoulders to the front, the fingers

lightly touching at the points, nails downwards; then raise them in a

circular direction well above the head, the ends of the fingers still

touching, the thumbs pointing to the rear, the elbows pressed back and

shoulders kept down.

_Two._--Separate and extend the arms and fingers upwards, forcing them

obliquely back until they are extended on a line with the shoulders, and

as they fall gradually from thence to the original position of

"Attention," endeavour as much as possible to elevate the neck and

chest.

_Three._--Turn the palms of the hands to the front, press back the

thumbs with the arms extended, and raise them to the rear until they

meet above the head, the fingers pointing upwards and the thumbs locked,

with the left thumb in front.

_Four._--Keep the knees and arms straight, and bend over until the hands

touch the feet, the head being brought down in the same direction, and

resume the "Third motion" slowly by raising the arms to the front.

_Five._--Resume the position of "Attention," as directed in "Second

motion."

The whole of these motions should be done very slowly, so as to feel the

exertion of the muscles throughout.

FIRST POSITION IN THREE MOTIONS.

_One._--Move the hands smartly to the rear, the left grasping the right

just above the elbow, and the right supporting the left arm under the

elbow.

_Two._--Half turn to the left, turning on the heels, so that the back of

the left touches the inside of the right heel, the head retaining its

position to the front.

_Three._--Bring the right heel before the left, the feet at right

angles, the right foot pointing to the front.

SECOND POSITION IN TWO MOTIONS.

_One._--Bend the knees gradually, keeping them as much apart as possible

without raising the heels, or changing the erect position of the body.

_Two._--Step out smartly with the right foot about eighteen inches in

line with the left heel, bringing the foreleg to the perpendicular, and

retaining the left as in preceding motion, the weight of the body

resting equally upon both legs.

THIRD POSITION IN ONE MOTION.

_One._--Step forward to about thirty-six inches, the right knee

remaining perpendicular to the instep, the left knee straight and firm,

and foot flat upon the ground, the body upright, and the shoulders

square to the left.

LOOSE PRACTICE.

In practising with broadswords the blades should be as light as

possible, and I believe an eminent firm has brought out a special sword

for the purpose. The following rules and suggestions may be of use in

independent practice.

1. Helmets, jackets, gauntlets, body pads, and leg pads should

invariably be worn.

2. No hits or points to be attempted until the swords have been crossed.

The parties should engage out of distance, _i.e._ after crossing the

blades, step back about eight inches and come to the "Engage" _just_ out

of distance.

3. All cuts and thrusts must be delivered lightly and with the true edge

or point. Heavy sweeping cuts should not, under any pretence whatever,

or however thickly the parties may be padded, be allowed.

4. Only one cut or thrust should be made on the same lunge.

5. In case the opponents both attack at once, the hit counts to the one

in the third position, or on the lunge. If both parties lunge

simultaneously, and both bring the hit home at the same instant, no hit

is to be scored to either.

6. If one party is disarmed, a hit is scored to his opponent.

7. Care should be taken to protect the inside of the right knee with an

extra pad, as this is a particularly tender spot, and a hard hit there

may cause serious injury.

When the beginner has established some command over the cutlass he

should learn the cavalry sword-exercise, for a description of which the

reader is referred to Colonel Bowdler Bell's Manual.

Broad-Sword and Single-Stick With Chapters on Quarter-Staff, Bayonet, Cudgel, Shillalah, Walking-Stick, Umbrella and Other Weapons of Self-Defence · 第 3 / 6 章