CHAPTER III.--IN THE METROPOLIS.

Mr Batfid was true to his word, and the new clothes were duly

delivered; and when day broke on the 13th of June, all was in readiness

for Isaac's departure. Mrs Clappen, after much cogitation, could put

this journey down to no other cause than her lodger's marriage on the

quiet; not that she had reason to suppose he meditated taking such a

step, but as he was so 'close' in his manner, she was pretty sure he

would not take her into his confidence until the fact was accomplished.

Although this was not Isaac's intention just at present, yet he had

often thought whether he, as a landed proprietor, ought not to take

unto himself a wife. With so very much on his side, he had no doubt of

being able to find, whenever he might think proper to seek, a lady not

only ready but eager to ally herself to so desirable a partner.

The only bar to his taking upon himself the holy estate of matrimony

had been the expense; since he justly considered that no two persons,

be they ever so economical, could by any possibility subsist on the

same amount of rations, &c. as one, even supposing them to be like the

wedded couple celebrated in song, one of whom could eat no fat, the

other no lean, and thus, by a happy division of labour, accomplishing

the cleanliness of the platter. It was not likely that Isaac would

be so fortunate as this; and supposing he were, he and his good lady

would not be able to do a similar thing with regard to clothes as the

before-mentioned happy pair did with regard to victuals.

Isaac had many times considered this matter, and with his usual

perspicuity, had arrived at the conclusion that there was but one

course open to him; to wit, his alliance with some lady possessing

sufficient means of her own to be able to bear her share in the cost of

housekeeping--thus making matrimony subservient to patrimony; and his

intention was to look out for such a party.

The sunlight peeping into Isaac's bedroom awoke that wary individual,

who proceeded to arise and dress himself in his new apparel. This

apparel was not, after all, entirely satisfactory, inasmuch as Mr

Batfid, too much impressed apparently with the magnitude of his

undertaking, had exaggerated the length of the seams and the fineness

of his customer's figure; for Isaac found himself arrayed in a pair of

inexpressibles very much too long, a waistcoat very much too tight,

and a coat very much too high in the neck, very much too long in the

sleeves, and likewise in the waist.

Nothing could be done but brace up the first until they nearly mounted

to his arm-pits (and were even then too long), let out the second as

far as it would go, and turn up the cuffs of the third. Thus habited,

and with a cotton umbrella in one hand and an old carpet-bag in the

other, Isaac made for the railway station, caught the 10.33 train, and

was whisked up to London in an hour and five minutes.

He was not an entire stranger in that city, for he had visited it once

before in company with his mother's half-brother, and remembered where

to put up; namely, at a small coffee-house in the neighbourhood of

Islington. Arrived there and a small bedroom engaged, the umbrella and

bag were deposited in a corner, and Isaac, after carefully locking the

door, took himself out for a stroll, telling the landlord he would be

back at six o'clock, when he would regale himself with a chop and slice

of cheese by way of dinner. Not that he entertained any high-fangled

notions about dining late, but because of the economy of the thing; for

a bun and a glass of water contented him in the middle of the day;

and by this arrangement of six o'clock dinner, tea and supper were

both dispensed with, these two meals per day being thus ticked off to

Isaac's credit.

The first few weeks of his sojourn passed in a manner that would have

been intolerably slow to anybody else, but did not appear so to him.

There was much for him to see and admire in his own way, and this way

was to walk about from morn till eve through the crowded streets, and

more particularly those which were devoted entirely to business. Thus,

next to a visit to the Docks, perhaps his favourite walk was through

Upper and Lower Thames Street, where he would watch the loading and

unloading of the various goods and merchandise. Not indeed with any

distinct and particular purpose; but it was a delight to him to gaze

upon these outward signs of the wealth within, and to ruminate on the

possibility that he might one day acquire a share and interest in some

large money-making business, which would serve as a stepping-stone to

yet greater wealth and influence; and to be able to purchase such an

interest was probably one of the reasons for his parsimoniousness. A

laudable ambition, so far as it went; but the end was more thought of

than the means by which it was to be accomplished; not indeed that he

harboured an intention of any dishonesty, but he simply considered

that the more he scraped, the sooner the final consummation would be

attained.

POISONED ARROWS.

That savages in various quarters of the world possess the knowledge

and means of rendering their arrows poisonous, is a statement which is

generally believed by ordinary individuals, from the schoolboy fresh

from the perusal of books of adventure and travel, to his more mature

and less sanguine elders. When, however, this topic is subjected to

strict and sober investigation, it is found to present elements of

inconsistency, or at anyrate of doubt, which at once tend to modify the

previous and apparently well-founded belief of the inquirer. It is, in

fact, found that the knowledge and use of deadly poisons by savages

have been simply taken for granted, and that most of the stories or

tales of the marvellous effects of wounds inflicted by poisoned weapons

are based upon no kind of reliable evidence. These remarks apply to

the general accounts given of the practice of savages in this respect.

It is well known, however, that in some special instances an accurate

practical knowledge of vegetable poisons is possessed by certain savage

races. Thus the famous Woorali poison, obtained from a plant allied to

that which affords the _Strychnia_ of medicine, is used as a poison by

South American tribes; and the juice of an allied plant (_Strychnos

cogens_) is used to poison arrows in Darien and Panama.

But putting cases of poisoning by matter derived from vegetables

entirely out of the question, it is also a matter of belief that

savages have become possessed of the knowledge that animal matters in a

state of putrefaction or decay, when introduced into the circulation,

are capable of causing serious consequences, or even death itself.

Accordingly certain races were believed to poison their spears and

arrows by dipping them in the putrefying carcase of some animal; the

results of wounding by these weapons being supposed to resemble those

seen familiarly amongst ourselves, in the case of medical men and

others who have accidentally punctured themselves whilst performing

_post-mortem_ examinations or dissections. Here again, however,

elements of discrepancy appear. For the pathologist demands generally

the existence of some special poison, generated by some special

process in the course of putrefaction. In other words, cases of true

blood-poisoning by decomposing animal matter are not of invariable

occurrence after dissection-wounds; and such cases are further subject

to modifying conditions in the patient--such as those of age, state of

health, and susceptibility to the action of the poison.

Some highly interesting and important information on the present

subject has recently been afforded by the inquiries of Staff-surgeon

Messer of the royal navy, into the reputed poisonous qualities and

nature of the arrows of South Sea islanders--a race which, more perhaps

than any other tribe of savages, has been credited with the knowledge

and use of poisoned weapons. Dr Messer had an excellent opportunity of

making investigations into this subject during the visits of H.M.S.

_Pearl_ to the New Hebrides islands, and to the islands of Banks and

Santa Cruz, in the summer of 1875; and as certain cases of wounding

with arrows occurred under Dr Messer's eyes and were treated by him,

his remarks on this subject possess a more than usual interest.

The common belief that savages possess the requisite knowledge and

skill to manipulate and concentrate vegetable poisons, so that these

poisons may prove of effective kind when applied to weapons, and used,

it may be long after the application of the fresh poison, is freely

commented upon in an adverse manner by Dr Messer. He further points

out that savages themselves may firmly believe in the deadly nature

of their weapons, without having any idea of the really innocuous

nature of the substances with which they have smeared them. And great

allowance must also be made for the influence of fear and superstition.

The implicit belief in the poisonous nature of the weapons forms

a point of no mean importance in the consideration of the causes

whereby serious or fatal effects are produced. The 'nervous system

becomes liable,' to use Dr Messer's words, 'to certain diseases on

the slightest provocation;' and once convinced of the deadly nature

of the weapon which has wounded him, the savage--and the civilised

man also--comes to regard a fatal result as inevitable--this result

accruing simply from 'want of moral courage to resist disease.'

The chief element in cases of poisoning which appears to have given

countenance to the reality of the effects of the poison, is the

occurrence of tetanus or lock-jaw after wounds. This disease, familiar

to every medical man, as also resulting from injuries entirely

dissociated from poisoned wounds, is ascribed by the uninitiated and

ignorant to the effects of the poisoned weapons of the savage. And

hence the belief in the potency of the virus becomes more and more

assured. Thus, as is well known, Commodore Goodenough and a party

of men were fired at with arrows at Carlisle Bay in Santa Cruz. The

officer and five men were wounded by arrows, and a second officer had

his hand scratched with the point of an arrow held in the hand of a

native. The wounds in every case were slight. But the ship was ordered

to return to the more temperate climate of Sydney, in order to give

the sufferers the best chance of averting, what Dr Messer feared might

possibly be favoured by the heat of the climate--namely, the occurrence

of tetanus. All went well until the fifth and sixth days after the

reception of the wounds, when the Commodore and two of his men began to

shew symptoms of this disorder, which unfortunately proved fatal to the

three patients within sixty hours.

Now, as Dr Messer proceeds to remark, here were three cases which

might be cited, and which have been referred to as proving the actual

occurrence of poisoning after the wounds of arrows. But the query

which science asks is, whether the symptoms in these cases present

any difference from those in ordinary cases of tetanus, and whether

anything special occurred in their history to indicate the action

of a specific poison? Without entering into particulars, it may be

asserted that these cases, in every detail, presented nothing unusual

or inconsistent with the idea of their being instances of ordinary

tetanus. The occurrence of the disease was favoured--as is well known

to medical men--in the wounded by the mental excitement and fear

consequent on the belief that the arrows had been poisoned. There was,

in fact, an utter absence of all the symptoms of poisoning; and the

tetanus did not occur under any unwonted conditions, but simply under

those which favour its development after injuries of ordinary kind.

Where then, it may be asked, is the evidence of poisoning? To this

query the obvious reply must be that, as regards the reputed poison of

the arrows, no evidence is forthcoming, from the entire history of the

case.

The actual investigation of the arrows of the natives of the South

Pacific islands forms by no means the least interesting part of Dr

Messer's communication. The arrows are generally composed of three

pieces--the shaft made of a light cane, the head composed of hard

wood, and the point or barb formed simply of the sharpened end of the

head, of a sharp bit of bone, of the fin-spine of a fish, or the spine

of a sea-urchin's shell. Specimens obtained from the New Hebrides

measured three feet in length, and weighed about eighty grains; the

points being formed of a piece of human bone of very tapering form,

and ground down to a very fine point. The point was smeared with a

black substance which had dried in separate masses upon the bone. The

arrows which were fired upon Commodore Goodenough and his party at

Carlisle Bay, Santa Cruz, were four feet in length, and had points,

composed of slender and sharp pieces of human bone, about eight inches

in length. The 'poisoned' arrows are carried about in quivers, and are

not only carefully looked after by the natives, but are very difficult

to obtain, presumably on account of the natives being jealous that the

purchasers might become possessed of the knowledge of the poison, which

in their eyes renders the weapons so valuable. The arrows of the Santa

Cruz islanders were not carried as poisoned arrows almost invariably

are, and were readily sold to the crew of the _Pearl_ by the natives.

As far as could be ascertained, the processes adopted by the South

Sea islanders to poison their arrows, consist firstly in the habit of

inserting the weapons in various parts of a decomposing human body; the

neighbourhood of the kidneys being usually preferred for this purpose.

Now, as already remarked, it so happens that physiologists and medical

men are in possession of some very definite information regarding the

manner in which decomposing animal matters act on the human organism.

And on the other hand, there appears to be an utter lack of evidence

obtained from the observation of cases of poisoned-arrow wounds, to

shew that there is any analogy between the symptoms observed in these

cases and those prevailing after blood-poisoning. It is also very

worthy of remark that tetanus--the commonest result of poisoned-arrow

wounds--is not known to be caused by the introduction, within the

system, of decomposing animal matter.

The second mode in which the natives of the South Pacific islands

are believed to render their arrows noxious, is that of smearing

them with some poisonous vegetable matters. It is probable that if

poisoned arrows are really prepared by savages in any way, it is in

this latter mode that they are rendered noxious. But there is an

evident discrepancy between the action of any known vegetable poisons

and the symptoms observed after wounding with the arrows of savages.

Thus woorali acts by paralysing the muscles concerned in breathing.

'Corroval' and 'bao,' two poisons allied to woorali, act by causing

coma or stupor and paralysis of the heart. The effect of the Upas

tree of Java (_Strychnos tiente_) is to produce artificial tetanus;

and strychnia introduced into the blood directly, as by inoculation,

gives rise to marked symptoms, which resemble tetanus--but with this

remarkable and notable distinction, that the tetanic convulsions set

in _immediately_ after the poison has been introduced into the system,

and not after several days of incubation. Thus it is clear, from this

latter fact alone, that strychnia and its allies can hardly represent

the poisons with which the arrows of savages are smeared--admitting

that these weapons are poisonous in any degree.

The historical accounts of cases of wounding by the arrows of savages,

evince a singular want of any distinct or decided evidence to prove

the clearly specific nature of any symptoms observed. Thus Mendaña

in 1595 remarks that the Santa Cruz islanders were believed to use

poisoned arrows, but the Spaniards did not believe the poison to be of

very noxious kind. Burney in the _History of Discoveries in the South

Seas_ makes an observation to the same effect; and as Dr Messer well

remarks, probably no fatal case occurred--with one exception--from

wounding with the arrows, else such a result would have surely been

mentioned. In 1797 Carteret in the _Swallow_ visited Santa Cruz, and

several of his crew were severely wounded by arrows of the usually

reputed and poisonous kind. Three fatal cases occurred, but no mention

is made of the effects being due to poison--a fact which would have

been expected to have been duly chronicled from its interesting, if

also sad, nature. Direct experiments with poisoned arrows are mentioned

in the second volume of Forster's account of Cook's _Voyages_; the

arrows being those of the New Hebrides islanders. A dog was wounded

with the weapons, but no ill effects followed; whilst fishes were not

affected after being wounded with these avowedly poisonous weapons. A

pig wounded in 1827 by a poisoned arrow from the Santa Cruz islands,

exhibited no symptoms whatever; and it is noteworthy to find that in

the attack on Bishop Patteson's party at Santa Cruz in 1864, after

which two deaths from tetanus occurred from wounding by arrows, the

weapons were said _not_ to have been poisoned. Here we find an effect

produced from non-poisoned arrows similar to that observed in the case

of Commodore Goodenough after wounding with weapons reputed to be

poisoned.

Accounts given by missionaries of the probable nature of the poisons

used to render arrows noxious, appear to shew that the natives of

the North New Hebrides and Banks' islands do not themselves attach

importance to the effects of the substance with which the arrows are

poisoned, but seem to regard the innocuous human bone, forming the

point of the weapon, as a powerful agent in producing deleterious

effects. The poisons, according to the evidence of the missionaries,

are derived from vegetables; the plants used in Banks' islands being

'Toe,' a species of Euphorbiaceæ, and 'Loke,' a climbing plant, allied

to Strychnia. The same evidence declares the fact that the usual

effects of wounding with arrows so prepared are inflammation, and

occasionally tetanus; but the important remark is also made that the

natives of the South Pacific are very subject to tetanus 'after wounds

_not_ produced by poisoned arrows,' and that this disorder is also

common among the natives independently of wounding.

Professor Halford of Melbourne University--an authority on

snake-bites--gives evidence to the effect that dogs and pigeons

exhibited no evil effects after being wounded in various ways by

poisoned arrows, obtained from the Solomon Islands, and by the

substances obtained from these weapons.

That Dr Messer's observations on this subject therefore afford good

grounds for believing that many of the reports relating to the deadly

nature of the arrows used by the South Sea islanders are decidedly

erroneous, there can be no reasonable doubt. And that many of the cases

of so-called poisoning are due simply to mental fear and the physical

irritation inducing tetanus, seems also a fair inference. But there

can be no doubt, that at the same time, travellers and missionaries,

by careful observation, might furnish scientific men with secure data

upon which to establish sound conclusions. At present, the entire body

of evidence clearly warrants us in entertaining a negative opinion

regarding firstly the generally poisonous nature of the arrows of

South Sea islanders; and secondly regarding the use by these races of

any active poison derived from decomposing animal matter.

MINDING THE BAIRN.

The little story of 'Rob Graham,' which lately appeared in these pages,

may possibly have aroused some interest concerning the poor but by

no means insufficient manner in which children are reared among the

Scottish peasantry. They get their food regularly, though in a plain

way. They are usually stuffed into holes and corners to sleep. The

older girls take charge of the younger; even the boys are pressed

into this sort of service. All without exception run about barefooted

in summer--not altogether on account of the cost of shoes, but from

preference. Where there are burns to paddle in, and waters to cross,

shoes and stockings would only be an encumbrance.

A farm establishment in Scotland is familiarly known by the Anglo-Saxon

term, the _toun_. It is so called by the workers on the farm. Embraced

in the toun, though situated perhaps at a hundred yards distant, is

a row of cottages with little gardens behind them. These are the

quarters of the hinds or ploughmen and their families. Ordinarily,

there are dwellings for five or six hinds, besides one for the grieve

or overseer. Latterly, the condition of the hinds--at least in the

southern counties--has been greatly improved. They are each allowed so

much oatmeal per annum; and perhaps a cow, which is allowed to graze

with the cows of the farmer. There is an allowance of a rig or two of

potatoes. A pig may be kept. The farmer engages to give the use of a

horse and cart to drive a certain quantity of coals. Besides these

indispensable allowances, there is a wage paid in money. The total

value may be estimated at from fifty to sixty pounds a year. That does

not seem a large income, but the outgoings are small--very different

from what they are among artisans in large towns, where everything

has to be bought and paid for. There is the house free of rent; the

oatmeal for the porridge; milk from the cow in abundance; potatoes

for the lifting and storing; coal driven to the very door; vegetables

from the garden; fresh and pure water from the mountain rill; hams

of the last year's pig dangling from the ceiling. For all this there

is doubtless pretty hard labour in the field and barn; yet there are

many assuagements. The labour is regular and healthful. Nothing is

paid for seats in the parish church; the minister exacts no fees for

baptisms; the children are educated for a trifle in the nearest school;

even before the late access of educational power, there was no want

of schooling, nor was there any disinclination to make use of it. We

do not remember ever visiting the house of a Scottish peasant and not

seeing books--very frequently a large family Bible--and that is saying

a good deal.

For anything like thrift and comfort, there is of course a dependence

on the wife. She has no servants to assist her. She could not pay for

help. She is wife, house-servant, and cook all in one. Woe be to the

hind who marries a slattern, one who likes finery and has a taste for

delicacies! This, however, rarely occurs. We can say that within our

observation the hinds' wives are thrifty and industrious, making the

best of matters within their sphere. To use a common phrase, they soon

'fall into a family.' Then arise new duties to be encountered. We

have often been filled with wonder how they at all manage to conduct

their multifarious affairs. Not only the house to look after, but a

crowd of children. It is a blessed thing for them that there is the

open air, with the slip of green before the door, to which all the

youngsters at times may be bundled, and where they rollick and tumble

about, strengthening their legs and arms, and bringing their lungs into

splendid exercise. Without a particle of scientific knowledge, the

_clachan_ generally is by intuition kept in excellent health.

The hind's wife, in looking forward to a family, is hopeful that

her first-born may be a female. The hope is quite natural. In high

life, where it is important to have a male heir to an estate, it is

anxiously hoped that the first will be a boy; and when he makes his

appearance, the bonfires are set ablazing. Among the cottagers we are

talking about, there is no heritage but toil. The poor wife, foreseeing

what may be her fate--a 'heavy handful' of children--piously wishes

that she may be provided with a girl, who will grow up to help her in

her interminable round of duties. Heaven has heard and answered her

prayer. A baby girl is placed in the loving arms of her mother. We

need not be surprised that the infancy of this eldest daughter, as

conventionally considered, is curtailed in order that she may qualify

for the position of nurse to her brothers and sisters. As early as

her sixth year, she has not only to superintend the amusements of

those next to her in seniority, but to undertake the sole charge of

the baby while the parent is otherwise necessarily employed. And it

is marvellous how aptly a child so placed will assume the air of

responsibility, and evince the tact and solicitude of maternity! When

children better circumstanced are yet devoted to the interests of their

dolls, she is seated at the cottage-door, or on the green bank amongst

the daisies, singing to her little human charge, or with matronly

pride twining chaplets of the simple flowers for its adornment. Her

engrossment would be perfect, but that she has occasionally to cast

her eye in the direction of the burn to see that Johnnie, aged four,

has not ventured too close to its margin; or to look that Bessie, in

the innocence of her two and a half years, does not pull the tail of

the faithful but cross-grained old collie which snoozes on the grass

beside them. Returned home with her charges as gloaming falls, the

baby is transferred to its mother; but the little maid's anxieties are

not yet ended. She assists Johnnie and Bessie to their suppers, and

then, amid pleasant reminiscences of the day's simple events, undresses

them for bed. In virtue of her position in the household, she herself

is permitted to sit up an hour or two later, and is rewarded for her

good behaviour by being permitted for a short time to nurse baby in

its night-clothes. Thus the first-born girl grows up to womanhood--her

mother's right hand and the friend-in-council to each and all of her

nurslings.

Where the elder children are boys, the less fortunate mother has to

do her best with the material at her disposal--that is, invest one

or other of her manikins with the rôle of nurse. The character is

not so natural, nor can the experiment, we are afraid, be considered

an invariable success; and yet we have known boys with strong innate

love for children, whose skill and devotedness in nursing would put

to shame many a woman of average maternal instinct. But however that

may be, the young rustic rarely escapes altogether what to many of

them is at times the irksome task of 'minding the bairn,' although, on

the score of his incipient manhood, he may the earlier transfer the

service to his juniors. At one stage or other of his boyhood, if his

supply of sisters is limited, he is liable to be called from his hoop

or marbles, or to forego his projected bird-nesting, in order to rock

the cradle or dandle the baby while mother washes up the house or gets

ready father's dinner. Even the youngest of the family does not always

succeed in evading the doom of his elders; for one or other of these

having married young and settled down in the neighbourhood, has of

course defied all that philosophy has said or might have to say on the

subject, and straightway added to the population; so that nothing is

more natural than that the immature uncle or aunt should be wheedled or

coerced into tending their still tenderer relatives until one of them

shall have developed sufficiently to assume the hereditary duties of

its position.

A curious reversion of this case is when the grandchildren are called

upon to 'mind' their uncles or aunts--a by no means inconceivable

circumstance, when the frequency of early marriages among the poor

is considered. We remember some years ago, while on a visit in

Forfarshire, that this very subject was broached by our hostess, who,

as faithful helpmate of the minister, was herself mother-in-chief to

the parish. She told us of a poor woman who had had a great number

of children, all of whom had died young except one, a girl, who had

married early, but who also died, in giving birth to an infant son.

The infant was taken care of by the bereaved grandmother, who was

still in the prime of life, and who had herself, after the adoption of

her grandson, other two children, one of which survived, a fine boy

of fifteen months old. At our friend's invitation we visited with her

the humble cottage where this singular combination of relationships

existed. The mistress was busy churning as we entered, while seated by

the fire was the grandson, some eight or nine years of age, engrossed

in the task of amusing the baby. After greeting the good dame in homely

kindly manner, the minister's wife turned to the children and asked:

'How are you to-day, Jockie?'

'Fine,' answered the little fellow bashfully.

'And how is your uncle?' continued his questioner with a merry twinkle

in her eye and a significant glance at us.

'Ou, he's fu' weel; only gey girnie whiles wi' his back-teeth,' glibly

answered the urchin, throwing aside his shyness when his precious

charge had become the subject.

'Dear me, Jockie,' laughed my friend, 'you will have some trouble with

him then?'

'Whiles,' soberly said the boy, who, although conscious that the

question was meant for banter, seemed unable to restrain himself on a

matter evidently near his heart. 'He disna sleep weel, an' I'm obliged

to sit up at nicht an' whussle till him; but he's guid, puir mannie,

when the fashious teeth are no troublin' him.'

We were much affected by the artless affection which Jockie displayed

towards his uncle; and learned recently with pleasure that he had,

through the minister's good services, been appointed pupil-teacher in

what was formerly the parish school; and that his nursling, hardier

than the rest of the family, was acquiring his first knowledge under

his nephew's affectionate tuition.

Without pleading ignorance of the evils frequently attendant on the

practice of intrusting children with the care of infants, we prefer

simply to accept it as inevitable, and to contemplate the advantages

with which it is as undoubtedly accompanied. In the first place, it

is this early discipline, this facing of the harder realities in

their lot from the outset, which could alone prepare those in the

humbler walks of life to tolerate the position in which their maturer

years will have to be spent. The girl whom necessity has taught the

rudiments of housewifery simultaneously with her alphabet, and the

mysteries of nursing together with the secret of making pot-hooks and

hangers, will blend most naturally and easily into the mistress of a

poor man's home, where the anxieties and solicitudes common to women

are indefinitely multiplied. If not so palpable, the value to boys of

the knowledge of simple household duties is after all scarcely less

important; for aptitude in these is perhaps the most efficacious weapon

with which he can enter the lists of a determinately arduous life. In

their acquirement the future workman has been taught self-reliance and

the habit of industry--qualities on which his success mainly depends;

while he is specifically prepared for the not uncommon eventuality--as

soldier, sailor, or emigrant, or even in the ordinary casualties of

married life in his own sphere--of having to minister to the physical

wants of himself and others. Nor in the last of these situations will

his juvenile experience of 'minding the bairn' be without its useful

application; for at meal-times, in his evenings off work, and even in

the night-watches, he will be called upon to accept his share in those

solemn rites which his domestic felicity has entailed.

There is a reflection too of a far higher character to which the

consideration of this simple theme not inaptly gives rise. Solicitude

for the welfare of those whom they have cared for and protected remains

with the elder brothers and sisters in greater or less force throughout

life; and the younger members of the family can never wholly divest

themselves of the confidence and respect which such services have

engendered. Each unit in the tale of the poor man's family thus stands

to the other not merely in the fraternal, but, in varying degrees, also

in the filial relation. Hence that wonderful tenacity of kindredship by

which they are distinguished. Diverging careers, conflicting interests,

petty jealousies, and even animosities, may temporarily step in to

arrest the current of their affection; but the advent of calamity or

sorrow to one or other is a signal which rarely fails to reunite them

in bonds stronger than ever. Is not blood, after all, thicker than

water, in their own idiomatic phrase? The successful digger or colonial

shepherd needs nothing more transcendental than the memory of the

humble home in which all were mutually dependent, to send his tenderest

thoughts wandering across the ocean which divides him from his

playmates and friends. Wherever their various lots may be cast, there

is to the end a common haunt in which their loving spirits may meet, in

the 'auld clay biggin' or 'humble cot' where each in his turn performed

his part in 'minding the bairn.'

The family affections are, moreover, the pith and marrow of patriotism;

and who will venture to estimate the degree in which a nation's

stability is dependent upon the primitive economy of the poor man's

household? It is only by association with the loves and sorrows and

joys of his childhood that the external surroundings of his home

become endeared to the heart of man. How naturally Burns arises, in

his _Cotter's Saturday Night_, from the more immediate reflections

which the happiness of his humble characters suggests, to that eloquent

exclamation in praise of his native land, beginning,

From scenes like these old Scotia's grandeur springs.

CAPTURING OSTRICHES.

The greatest feat of an Arab hunter is to capture an ostrich. Being

very shy and cautious, and living on the sandy plains, where there

is little chance to take it by surprise, it can be captured only by

a well-planned and long-continued pursuit on the swiftest horse. The

ostrich has two curious habits in running when alarmed. It always

starts with outspread wings against the wind, so that it can scent

the approach of an enemy. Its sense of smell is so keen that it can

detect a person a great distance long before he can be seen. The other

curious habit is that of running in a circle. Usually five or six

ostriches are found in company. When discovered, part of the hunters,

mounted on fleet horses, will pursue the birds, while the other hunters

will gallop away at right angles to the course the ostriches have

taken. When these hunters think they have gone far enough to cross

the path the birds will be likely to take, they watch upon some rise

of ground for their approach. If the hunters hit the right place and

see the ostriches, they at once start in pursuit with fresh horses,

and sometimes they overtake one or two of the birds; but often one or

two of the fleet horses fall, completely tired out with so sharp a

chase.--_Newspaper paragraph._

SONNET.

Oft let me wander hand-in-hand with Thought

In woodland paths and lone sequestered shades,

What time the sunny banks and mossy glades,

With dewy wreaths of early violets wrought,

Into the air their fragrant incense fling,

To greet the triumph of the youthful Spring.

Lo, where she comes! 'scaped from the icy lair

Of hoary Winter; wanton, free, and fair!

Now smile the heavens again upon the earth;

Bright hill and bosky dell resound with mirth;

And voices full of laughter and wild glee

Shout through the air pregnant with harmony,

And wake poor sobbing Echo, who replies

With sleeping voice, that softly, slowly dies.

* * * * *

Printed and Published by W. & R. CHAMBERS, 47 Paternoster Row, LONDON,

and 339 High Street, EDINBURGH.

* * * * *

_All Rights Reserved._

Chambers's Journal of Popular Literature, Science, and Art, No. 693 April 7, 1877 · 第 3 / 3 章