Some improvements were made in private carriages at this period, but

there was little change for the better in the stage coaches, which

differed slightly from the “machine” of a century earlier; the driver’s

seat was safer and less uncomfortable, and that was the only noteworthy

alteration. An advertisement of 1750 announces “accommodation behind

the coach for baggage and passengers; fares 21s., and servants 10s.

6d., riding either in the basket behind or on the box beside the

driver.”

Endeavour to expedite the service between the great towns of the

kingdom is shown in an advertisement of the “Flying Coach,” which was

put on the London and Manchester road in 1754. This informs possible

patrons that “incredible as it may appear, this coach will actually

arrive in London in four days and a half after leaving Manchester.” The

distance between the two cities is about 187 miles, making the rate of

speed a little over 44 miles per day.

The stage coach of 1755 is thus described by Mr. Thrupp.

“They were covered with dull black leather, studded by way of ornament

with broad-headed nails, with oval windows in the quarters, the frames

painted red. On the panels were displayed in large characters the

names of the places where the coach started and whither it went. The

roof rose in a high curve with an iron rail around it. The coachman

and guard sat in front upon a high narrow boot, often garnished with

a spreading hammer-cloth with a deep fringe. Behind was an immense

basket supported by iron bars in which passengers were carried at lower

fares. The whole coach was usually drawn by three horses, on the first

of which a postillion rode, in a cocked hat and a long green-and-gold

coat. The machine groaned and creaked as it went along with every tug

the horses gave it, and the speed was frequently but four miles an

hour.”

Three horses may have done the work in summer, but there is no reason

to suppose that the roads of 1755 were any better than they had been

sixteen years earlier, when Thomas Pennant thus described a journey in

March from Chester to London. The stage, he says:—

“was then no despicable vehicle for country gentlemen. The first day,

with much labour, we got from Chester to Whitchurch, twenty miles;

the second day to the Welsh Harp; the third to Coventry; the fourth

to Northampton; the fifth to Dunstable; and as a wondrous effort on

the last, to London, before the commencement of night. The strain

and labour of six good horses, sometimes eight, drew us through the

sloughs of Mireden and many other places.”

[Illustration: TRAVELLING POSTING CARRIAGE, 1750.]

THE APPLICATION OF SPRINGS.

In the year 1768 Dr. R. Lovell Edgeworth, who had devoted much

attention to the subject, and had made numerous experiments,[19]

succeeded in demonstrating that springs were as advantageous to the

horses of, as to the passengers in a coach; and he constructed a

carriage for which the Society of English Arts and Manufactures awarded

him three gold medals. In this conveyance the axletrees were divided

and the motion of each wheel was relieved by a spring. Just one dozen

patents for springs were granted during the eighteenth century, and it

is impossible to say which invention had most influence on methods of

building coaches. In 1772 a patent was granted to James Butler for a

new coach-wheel the spokes of which were constructed of springs; but

this curious contrivance is mentioned nowhere—so far as the writer’s

investigations have shown—but in the Patent Office files, whence we may

conclude it was a failure.

[19] _An Essay on the Construction of Roads and Carriages._ London,

1817.

[Illustration: TRAVELLING POSTING CARRIAGE, 1750.]

The adoption of springs was certainly gradual. It is probably right

to assume that wealthy men led the way by having coaches built on

springs or altering their vehicles. It is impossible to draw a hard and

fast line between the period of the coach without and the coach with

springs. The illustrations show that travelling carriages on springs

and braces were built in 1750. These drawings prove that, clumsy though

the public conveyances were, private carriages were both tolerably

light and comfortable. The “whip springs” to which the braces are

attached were in general use ten years later.

A curious error arose from the application of springs to public

conveyances, according to Dr. Lovell Edgeworth. Their introduction, it

must be premised, led to the accommodation of passengers and loading of

baggage on top of the stage coach, and coachmen, finding the vehicle

drew more easily, attributed the fact, not to the springs, but to the

increased height and reduced length of the load.[20]

[20] Abolition of the basket on the hind axle would have materially

reduced the length of the load.

In the belief that a high and short load possessed some mysterious

property which made it easier to draw than a low long one, builders

vied with each other in building lofty vehicles. “Hence in all

probability,” says the authority we are quoting, “arose the

preposterous elevation of public carriages.”

OUTSIDE PASSENGERS.

Dr. Lovell Edgeworth gives us to understand that the practice of

carrying passengers on the roof of the coach followed the application

of springs to stage coaches; and in view of the belief noticed above

this seems exceedingly probable. The practice had clearly been in vogue

for some years when the _Annual Register_ published the following

paragraph:—

“_September 7 (1770)._—It were greatly to be wished the stage coaches

were put under some regulations as to the numbers of persons and

quantity of baggage. Thirty-four persons were in and about the Hertford

coach this day when it broke down by one of the braces giving way.”

In 1775, we learn from the same publication, stage coaches generally

carried eight persons inside and often ten outside passengers. On

another page appears the statement that “there are now of these

vehicles [stage coaches], flies, machines and diligences upwards of

400, and of other wheeled carriages 17,000.”

In 1785 was passed George III.’s Act, which forbade the conveyance of

more than six persons on the roof of any coach and more than two on the

box. This Act was superseded in 1790 by another which permitted only

one person to travel on the box and only four on the roof of any coach

drawn by three or more horses. A coach drawn by less than three horses

might carry one passenger on the box and three on the roof, but such

vehicles might not ply more than twenty-five miles from the London Post

Office.

The first “long coaches” (_i.e._ long-stage vehicles) and those called

diligences were superseded by what were called the “old heavies,”

carrying six inside passengers and twelve out.[21]

[21] _The Public Carriages of Great Britain._ J. E. Bradfield, London,

1855.

ROADS IN GEORGE III’s TIME.

The turnpike road had been improved by the year 1773, when Mr. Daniel

Bourn wrote a pamphlet[22] answering some objections which had been

urged against his waggon on rollers (see p. 79). Mr. Jacob had

asserted that the roughness of the roads was an insuperable obstacle to

the enormously wide wheels invented by Mr. Bourn; and the latter, while

admitting the wretched condition of local roads, refutes this argument

as applied to the great roads:—

“A person might follow a waggon from London to York and meet with very

few great stones ... let us now view this more agreeable turnpike road,

yet even here you will find that there is less degrees of loose dirt

and mangled materials.”

[22] _Some Brief Remarks upon Mr. Jacob’s Treatise._ London, 1773.

In this connection it will be remembered that the road roller had been

brought into use in the previous year (see footnote p. 80).

The improvement was by no means universal, however. Arthur Young[23]

writes:—

“I know not in the whole range of language terms sufficiently

expressive to describe this infernal road. To look over a map, and

perceive that it is a principal one, not only to some towns, but even

whole counties, one would naturally conclude it to be at least decent;

but let me most seriously caution all travellers who may accidentally

purpose to travel this terrible country, to avoid it as they would the

devil, for a thousand to one but they break their necks or their limbs

by overthrows or breakings down. They will here meet with ruts, which

I actually measured, four feet deep, and floating with mud, only from

a wet summer; what, therefore, must it be after the winter? The only

mending it receives, in places, is the tumbling in loose stones, which

serve no other purpose but jolting the carriage in a most intolerable

manner. These are not merely opinions, but facts, for I actually passed

three carts broken down in these eighteen miles of execrable memory.”

[23] _Tour in the North of England._ London, 1770.

IMPROVEMENTS IN STAGE COACHES.

The last twenty-five years of the eighteenth century saw great increase

of the coaching industry and many important improvements. The “long

stages” were still slow; the _Edinburgh Courant_, of 1779, contains

an advertisement of the London Coach which “will run every Tuesday,

occupying ten days, resting all Sunday at Barrowbridge; for the better

accommodation of passengers will be altered to a new genteel two-end

coach machine hung upon steel springs, exceeding light and easy.” At

this period the newspapers often contained advertisements inviting

a companion to share with the advertiser the risks and expenses of

posting to London.

It was no doubt the love of Englishmen for privacy which led a Mr.

Crispus Claggett to patent in 1780 his “Imperial Mercury.” This vehicle

had the outward appearance of one carriage, but it was divided into

four equal compartments with space in each for four persons. Each

compartment was entered by its own door and was partitioned off from

the others by doors and glasses, This curious conveyance must have

somewhat resembled an early railway coach.

THE MAIL COACH.

Mr. John Palmer’s[24] “diligences” were put upon the road in 1783,

and with these the proprietor laid the first crude foundation of the

mail service. The ordinary post was carried by boys on horseback and

was both slow and uncertain owing to the poor quality of the horses,

the badness of the roads and not least to the untrustworthiness of the

boys. Every letter for which expedition was necessary was now sent by

diligences where they were established, and they ran from nearly all

the towns in the kingdom to London and between many of the principal

towns. Postage by these was very expensive: a letter by the ordinary

post from Bath to London cost fourpence, whereas it cost two shillings

for “booking, carriage and porterage” if sent by diligence. The

greater speed and safety were the inducements to use the diligence for

important letters, as on the stage coaches both guard and coachman were

well armed; the former sat on the box with the driver, and, says a

writer of the time, “always sat with his carbine cocked on his knees.”

[24] The story of John Palmer’s work in connection with the postal

service, may be read in Joyce’s _History of the Post Office_ (1893),

and in many histories and other works dealing with Bath. Palmer became

Member of Parliament for Bath in 1801.

The conveyance of letters by diligence or “coach diligence” from Bath,

where Mr. Palmer resided, to London was an experiment on the success of

which that gentleman depended largely in his battle with the officials

of Parliament and Parliamentary Committees when he sought to bring

about change in the method of carrying letters. For a considerable

time those in authority refused to admit the possibility of a coach

travelling from Bath to London, 108 miles, in eighteen hours; but after

a hard struggle Mr. Palmer triumphed, and the first mail coach ran

from Bristol to London on August 2, 1784. Six miles an hour had been

promised, but the journey, 117 miles, was performed in seventeen hours,

or at a rate of nearly seven miles an hour, about double the speed of

the mounted post-boy.

[Illustration: JOHN PALMER.

(_From a portrait in the possession of Henry G. Archer, Esq._)]

These early mail coaches (the “old heavies”) were cumbrous vehicles,

and by no means remarkable for strength of construction: indeed, until

Mr. Palmer took the matter firmly in hand and compelled the contractors

to replace their worn-out coaches by new ones (which were built by

Besant), three or four breakdowns or upsets were daily reported to

the Post-master General. They were drawn by four horses; carried

six inside passengers and, until the law of 1785 already noticed,

twelve “outsides.” Their speed on the principal roads was gradually

accelerated about this time, and after the mail coaches began to work

the pace of “fly stage coaches,” or flying coaches, was increased to

eight miles an hour.

On some roads the old slow coaches remained; as late as the year 1798

the Telegraph left Gosport at one o’clock in the morning and reached

Charing Cross at eight in the evening, thus occupying nineteen hours

over a journey of 80 miles; a speed of little over four miles an hour.

In 1792 sixteen mail coaches left London daily; and seven years later

these had increased to about eighty.

REGULATIONS FOR MAIL AND STAGE COACHES.

During George III’s reign, three Acts of Parliament had been passed

defining the number of outside passengers that any stage coach might

carry, and making other regulations in the public interest; these three

Acts were repealed by a fourth placed on the statute book in 1810,

which enacted that any “coach, berlin, landau, chariot, diligence,

calash, chaise-marine or other four-wheeled vehicle,” employed as

a public carriage and drawn by four horses might carry ten outside

passengers including the guard but not the coachman; that only one

person might share the box with the coachman; and of the remaining

nine, three should sit in front and six behind. No passenger might sit

on the baggage. Stages drawn by two or three horses might carry not

more than five outside passengers; “long coaches” or “double-bodied

coaches” might carry eight.

The social distinction between “inside” and the “outside” is betrayed

by a clause of this law which forbade any outside passenger to travel

inside unless with the consent of one inside passenger; and the

“inside” who gave consent was to have the “outside” placed next him.

This Act also prescribed important limitations to the height of

coaches: neither passenger nor luggage might be carried on the roof of

any coach the top of which was over 8 feet 9 inches from the ground and

whose width was under 4 feet 6 inches measured from the centre of one

wheel track to the centre of the other. On a four-horse coach 8 feet 9

inches high the baggage might be piled to a height of two feet; on one

drawn by two or three horses, to a height of eighteen inches. As it was

considered expedient to encourage low-hung coaches with the view of

attaining greater immunity from accidents, it was legal to pile baggage

up to a height of 10 feet 9 inches from the ground. Any passenger might

require any turnpike keeper to count the “outsides” or to measure

the height of the luggage on the roof. At a later date the fast mail

coaches were prohibited by the Post-master General from carrying any

baggage at all on the roof.

MAIL COACH PARADE ON THE KING’S BIRTHDAY.

Mr. Thrupp gives the following description of the mail coaches as they

appeared at the “King’s Birthday Parade,” an interesting display which

appears to have been held for the first time in the year 1799, and

which remained an annual function until 1835. The coaches assembled

in Lincoln’s Inn Fields, and drove through the streets past St. James’

Palace and back to the General Post Office, then in Lombard Street:—

“Each coach was new or turned out to look like new and was painted red

with the Royal Arms on the door panel, and on the smaller panel above

the name of the town to which the coach went; on the boot the number

of the mail, and on each upper quarter one of the stars of the four

Orders of the Knighthood of the United Kingdom, the Garter, the Bath,

the Thistle and St. Patrick. The coaches were built just big enough to

contain four inside and three or four outside, and coachman and guard.

The body was hung upon a perch carriage and eight telegraph springs,

the underworks being both solid and simple in construction.”

A writer in _Baily’s Magazine_ (June, 1900), gives a description of

this parade; only the coachmen and guards, in new uniforms, were

allowed on the coaches, for which gentlemen used to lend their best

teams; the procession generally consisted of about twenty-five coaches

and was prolonged by the presence of a horseman between every two

coaches.

THE MAIL COACHMAN AND GUARD.

The mail coaches in their daily routine assembled in Lombard Street

between 8 and 8.20 p.m. every evening to receive the mails, and drew up

in double file. Each was known by the name of the town to which it ran,

and on the call of “Manchester,” “Liverpool,” or “Chester,” the coach

bound thither broke rank and came up to the post-office door to receive

the mails; the bags were tossed into the boot and the slamming of the

lid of the boot was the signal to start.

Most of the mails for the Western counties started at 7 p.m. from the

Gloucester Coffee House in Piccadilly, the mail bags being brought

thither from the General Post Office in gigs drawn by fast-trotting

horses, The stages for the West started from Hatchett’s; for the North,

from the Peacock, Islington.

The mail guard was a considerable personage; when the modern style

of build was adopted, the hind seat over the mail boot was strictly

reserved to him, nobody being allowed to share it, as a precaution

against robbery of the mails. To obtain an appointment as guard on a

mail coach the applicant had to produce a recommendation from a Member

of Parliament showing that he bore a high character, and a medical

certificate to effect that he was of good constitution (exceedingly

necessary in view of the nature of his work); if accepted as a

probationer he had to spend a term in a coach factory and there learn

how to repair a broken pole and patch up any other fracture that might

occur on the road. His pay was only 10s. per week, but his perquisites

were considerable; he might make as much as £3 or £4 a week, by taking

charge of plate chests and valuables entrusted to his care; and it was

the custom to allow the guard and coachman to divide all fares of 3s.

or less between them.

The guard went the whole way with his coach; the coachman’s “stage” was

generally forty or fifty miles out and home again. The latter’s wages

were supplemented by tips from the passengers, who were admonished

that the time had come to open their purses by the coachman’s polite

“Gentlemen, I leave you here.”

The money thus collected by the driver of a first-class coach amounted,

it is said, to £200 or £300 a year. The coachman was subject to

numerous regulations which aimed at the security of passengers and

mails. He might not allow anyone else to drive, without the consent of

the coach proprietor or against the wishes of the other passengers; he

might not leave his box unless a man was at the leaders’ heads; and

there were many such minor instructions to be observed.

Until about 1815 the coachman’s box was not part of the body of the

vehicle, and while the passengers rode comfortably on springs the

unfortunate driver had a seat as comfortless as want of springs could

make it. When this was done away with, it was quite in accord with

British traditions that strong objections should be made, the chief

being founded on the idea that if the coachman were made so comfortable

he would go to sleep on his box. The Manchester Telegraph, celebrated

as one of the smartest coaches of the day, was the first which was thus

altered.

The guard was responsible for the punctuality of the coach, and each

evening when leaving the General Post Office he was handed a watch

officially set and officially locked in a case in such wise that it

could not be tampered with. The guard also carried what was called a

“snow book” from the fact that entries therein were most usually caused

by heavy snowstorms. In this he recorded any such incidents as the hire

of extra horses when these might be needed, of saddle horses to carry

the mail bags forward if the coach came to grief, or of any other

outlay.

“THE ROAD” IN WINTER.

Mention of the guard’s “snow book” suggests that a winter’s journey

in the coaching days was an undertaking not to be lightly faced. One

morning in March, 1812, the Bath coach arrived at Chippenham with two

outside passengers frozen to death in their seats, and a third in a

dying state. A snow shovel strapped behind his seat was a regular

item of the guard’s winter equipment, but only too often a shovel was

useless. In the winter of 1814, the Edinburgh mail had to be left in

the snow and the mail bags forwarded to Alnwick on horseback; in the

same week eight horses were needed to draw the York coach to Newcastle.

When a coach was snow-bound it was the guard’s duty to get the mails

forward; this he did when possible by taking two of the horses and

riding one while the other carried the bags. Some of the best of

Pollard’s coaching pictures represent such incidents as occurred in the

severe winters of 1812, 1814, and 1836.

The winter of 1814 was long remembered for the great and prolonged fog

which disorganised traffic; the fog was followed by a singularly severe

snow storm which continued for forty-eight hours; while it lasted

no fewer than thirty-three mails in one day failed to arrive at the

General Post Office.

The Christmas season of 1836 is historical in meteorological annals

for the unprecedented severity of the snowfall. The storm lasted for

the best part of the week, and for ten days travelling was suspended.

Christmas night was the worst, and scarcely a single coach ventured

to quit London on the 26th and 27th, St. Albans was literally full of

mails and stages that could not get forward; on December 27, no fewer

than fourteen mail coaches were abandoned snow-bound on various roads;

and the Exeter mail, on December 26, was dug out five times on the way

to Yeovil. In flat and open country all traces of the roads were lost,

and the coachman had to trust the safety of the vehicle to his horses’

instinct. In some places the snow drifts gathered to an enormous depth

and made the roads utterly impassable.

It was an article of the coaching creed to “get forward” if humanly

possible; and the feats of endurance and courage accomplished by guards

and coachmen in these old times prove them to have been a remarkably

fine class of public servant, deserving all that has been written of

them.

PASSENGER FARES.

Passenger fares by mail coach were higher than by the ordinary stage;

on the former the rates were from 4d. to 5d. per mile for “outsides,”

and 8d. to 10d. per mile for “insides”; on the stage coach the outside

passenger paid from 2½d. to 3d. per mile, and the inside from 4d.

to 5d. Posting cost about eighteenpence per mile, and was therefore

reserved to rich men.

DIFFERENCE BETWEEN STAGE AND MAIL COACH.

In the early days of the century, though the actual rate of travel was

about eight miles an hour by the ordinary stage coach, much time was

occupied over the journey. There appears to have been no such thing

as a “time bill.” The coachman would go out of his way to set down or

pick up a passenger: he would wait to oblige a friend if desired, and

“Nimrod” in his famous article on “The Road” cites, as an example of

the leisurely fashion prevalent, the civility of “Billy” Williams, who

drove the Shrewsbury-Chester coach in his school days, and took twelve

hours to cover the forty miles, Two hours were allowed for dinner at

Wrexham, but this obliging coachman would come into the parlour and

say, “The coach is ready, gentlemen, but don’t let me disturb you if

you wish for another bottle.”

Early Carriages and Roads · 第 4 / 5 段