What has been gained? Fraternity. A clean atmosphere and more

sun, more leisure and more work, a broader outlook on the life of

a city, expanded agriculture and education, greater variety of

pleasures, a more _human_ as well as _humane_ ideal, and an equable

government covering a great variety of interests, with absence of

class legislation, death to profiteering, and education in honesty

for tradesmen. What has been lost? Squalor, trade tyranny, jobbery,

pollution of rivers, smoke, drunkenness, bloodless bodies and

ill-nourished souls, and, above all, selfish class egoism. Government

is carried on with less talk and more action. There is not less but

more money in the country, which is more distributed. Agriculture

pays sufficiently. The middleman having found his match, tradesmen

can no longer extort from workers prices they cannot afford to pay.

Politicians have not the opportunity of getting the country into

a muddle and then muddling their way out of it by false promises

to whichever class is for the moment uppermost. The people, better

educated, are not easily led by windbags. They see that the whole

nation counts before the individual, that a nation which, for

temporary wealth, neglects to till the land to (as far as possible)

produce, but purchases from foreign countries its food, is neglecting

the first duty to the community. It has come to them to know that

the success of agriculture is the first necessity to be secured.

The people are being taught that a country which in an emergency

cannot feed itself off its own land may be at the mercy of its enemy

at any moment. The great war taught them that the weakest spot was

not to be found in difficulty to make guns and shells and even an

army in a hurry, but in providing them and the people at home with

food. Empty bellies are bad generals! And so the people have turned

to, and resolve that their country shall never again be exposed to

the risk of a great _débâcle_, which was nearer than politicians

desire them to know. While our cities are better organised, more

healthfully disposed, they are smaller in area; hence congestion

which produces squalor, is no more. A large proportion of what were

useless folk, undisciplined, and a drag upon the State, as well as a

shame to it, are performing the first duty of man, the tillage, the

care of, and the provisioning of the land in all matters connected

with agriculture. Agriculture being first now, industrialism second,

the cities are released from over-population, and the countryside

is adequately populated. Owing to the growth of an agricultural

population, more small towns and villages are growing up all over

England. Much of what was not a relative but positive scandal is no

more. There is plenty of work for everybody who chooses to find it

and take it. It is considered unmanly to live on doles.

Cities are not less but more successful commercial centres. But the

influx is native, not foreign. England supplies herself out of the

exertions of her people, for she is no longer buying necessities from

foreign markets, but from her own. The country is the source of the

wealth of the towns. The great war taught that in the future England

must be self-providing. She must grow her own timber, her own fruit

and corn, provide her own meat and, as far as possible, in case of

another naval war, provide her own fish from inland sources as well

as from the sea. Her fine rivers, her lakes, her ponds must be kept

stocked with fresh water fish. To do this, the pollution of all

inland waters is absolutely, not relatively, forbidden, not forbidden

by an Act of Parliament which is quite a negligible affair when

made by lawyers who leave open a back door for the escape of a rich

delinquent, who will pay a nominal fine over and over again if it

suits his purpose to destroy valuable fish by the thousand. What does

the payment of a nominal fine mean to a rich manufacturer? Nothing.

The pollution of rivers as of the air has been stopped by the people,

who very rightly say, “We will not be deprived of the food provided

for us by our rivers, and we will not be deprived of a grain of corn

unnourished by the sun, or a blade of grass for the cattle poisoned

by deleterious acids from factories.” “We have a right,” they say,

“to pure water, to pure air, and all the benefits from life-giving

rays of the sun essential in a country placed as England is in the

centre of the sea, where clouds must always hide a considerable

portion of sunlight.” The people are learning from science that light

is essential to life, that darkness is a symbol of death.

§ 38

A few sentences back, arboriculture has been mentioned. Let us see

how in the new England, it has become a factor in the wealth of the

country, how, once almost wholly neglected, it has become an industry

at once profitable, engaging and health-giving. It takes time to

grow a forest. Time will come when coal gives out, of that there is

no doubt, so the sooner we set to work to provide wood for burning

as well as for building the better. It is clear, then, that England

must provide wood. A war which would prevent influx of wood into

England might happen at any moment. Millions a year are spent on a

navy to protect commerce, but that navy may be rendered powerless by

mine-sowing, by stealthy under-water craft which, with one torpedo,

can sink the biggest ship ever constructed, or by a bomb from an

aeroplane, become a wreck in a moment. If that be so, it is obvious

that to neglect provision for such a fatality would be the height

of folly, which even a party politician cannot fail to acknowledge.

It is clear, then, that Britain must have wood, and wood of her

own growing. I gather from my travels that this is at last being

accomplished. Wherever, in the length and breadth of Britain, Forests

can be planted and trees grown, the Communes see to it. Some counties

lend themselves to the form of industry which forestry implies more

than others. Certain trees suffer from situations where storms of

wind prevail, some do not suffer. The fir tribe will flourish well in

windy districts, but sand is necessary for their root nourishment.

This is proved by the miles of fir forests grown on the flat lands

between the Carrara Mountains and Leghorn, and on the damp but

still sandy districts around Ravenna. Most trees, to flourish, need

drainage, but some will flourish where there is none. So now, in

Britain, forests are being planted wherever possible, so long as they

do not interfere with open land necessary to the growth of corn.

To one of these forests I made my silent, unseen way, and it was

a revelation. Thousands of hands were occupied. Forest life is

primeval, it is dignified; it is a life by itself quite away from the

distractions of city life; it breeds a hardy race. A self-contained

life, it is pre-eminently health producing. The settlers live in

wooden huts built by themselves in glades cleared for the purpose. In

a measure the people are supported with food, for game is plentiful,

and fish from lakes and ponds made for the purpose and constantly

restocked are sufficient to supply nourishing food. Game laws are no

more. There is no stoppage in production. Fresh stocks of game and

fish are constantly coming in, and this is an industry by itself,

which provides labour, ingenuity and expert technical knowledge.

The people have made their own “close time” in breeding seasons, and

have learnt not to consume more than they can breed. I heard it said

that mistakes were made at first, which experience rectified. Laws

followed the dictation of necessity. Wages are low but sufficient,

as the greater part of food is provided by nature. One law is

obligatory. When a tree is cut down, another small one is immediately

planted in its place, so there are no gaps and no waste. For this

purpose there are nurseries managed by experts in the growing of

young saplings from seed. This industry is a specialised one, needing

great skill. It is pleasant to hear the merry sound of the axe, the

music made by wind among the branches, and the sound of singing as

the people work is a sign of their health and happiness. The huts

built of wood are erected upon posts driven deep into the ground.

Their habitable parts above the ground are reached by an open

stairway. The ground floor, well concreted, is the receptacle for

forestry implements.

The forest is warm in winter, cool in summer. Wood only is permitted

as fuel; it would cost too much to get coal there; besides, the

people would object to the smoke of that bituminous and blackening

product. From what I hear said, colliery owners disliked the

innovation; it would reduce their profits. They considered that they,

and they only, held rights on fuel to provide warmth, but public

opinion obliged them to stop their class prejudice in their own

favour. Every block of buildings has its vegetable and fruit gardens

for whose well-being, for light and air, spaces are cleared of trees.

§ 39

Never were seen healthier children or more honest countenanced

people--the men at the labour, the women at their looms. The men

are hunters, too. They employ the ancient bow and arrow, so the

sweet silence is not spoiled by the irritating sound of firearms so

closely connected with war and all its abominations. The skins of

stags and roe deer form winter garments made at home, for there are

no shops here. Every household provides its own needs. Here and there

are artificial lakes where the people bathe and swim. After all, a

primitive life is the natural one, to which we soon revert when the

artificiality of life in cities is far distant.

There are millions of acres of these forests growing up in Britain

now. There is a population growing thereon second to none in the

country for healthy manhood and industrious, thrifty womanhood. Two

generations of such a healthy state of things is enough to eliminate

the supineness of so-called civilised life. I saw no complicated

machinery. The axe and double-handed saw does well, if leisurely,

all necessary work for a generation that is learning that speed

is not essential to good workmanship or sustained trade! Light

railways driven by electricity take the timber to its destination,

but I noticed that few people travel in them. They have lost a

restless spirit, being content with the interests provided by their

environment. Learned in their craft and entertained by the practice

of it, these foresters have little need for _books_, but I did hear

that story-tellers visit them in winter time, and that they act

plays among themselves, and well can I imagine the big log fires,

the warm ale, the venison and fish suppers and the story-telling,

delightful and simple, of these forest folk. I imagined that a new

folklore was dawning and new poets might come out of this natural

life. One thing we may be sure of. A new life will set in motion a

new set of ideas; new, anyway, to modern minds, but ancient in their

simplicity and growth under identical circumstances. I heard it said

that this new life is productive of Romance, and is very satisfying

to that part of the human that asks for it. There is a great deal

left still in us which is closely allied to the instincts of our

forefathers. The temptation to roam is less acute now. Romance, badly

needed by all of us, is found in the new life. What a contrast this

is to the impositions of ruthless industrialism, that Juggernaut,

that tyrannical destroyer of agricultural life, that brutalising

devastator of Beauty, that cold but systematised muck rake, which,

while it pretended to give liberty, was making slaves, which, while

it was providing a Health Minister, was destroying health, and

while providing artificial wealth was destroying the soul of the

people, because it was withdrawing them from simple and leading them

to artificial pleasures, and so was breeding discontent. What is

necessary for the future of England is industry less concentrated in

cities, more extended over the whole country, and this industry of

Forestry is one act in the new drama that is doing it.

The new life is recreating honesty and straight dealing. Once

corrupt, Borough and County Councils are composed of honourable men,

not of selfish _class legislators_. Jobbery, that fatal failing among

tradesmen who formed the majority in the old system of municipal

rule, is at a minimum, it was in a maximum. Unscrupulous agitators

have been found out and given a dismissal. Trades unions, not in

principle bad, only bad as far as they became decadent, played an

artificial game, have been broken up by the people, who discovered

before it was too late that a tyranny of the gravest character was

being enacted and growing stealthily was ruining a class under the

pretence of giving power to it. The great war proved that as a

class tradesmen are untrustworthy; as individuals there is good in

them, but the nature of their education being, “Get all you can,

at whatever cost to your neighbour,” is a policy the reverse of a

good one. As soon as these things were realised by the people they

began to see straight. Blinkers were withdrawn from their eyes and

they looked right and left for the cause of impending disaster.

The people, led now by honesty and intelligence in place of crafty

subterfuge, know that industry, not industrialism, is the key to

happiness. By largely extended agriculture, the necessities, indeed,

most of the luxuries of life, can be secured. More grass, more

beasts, more cows, sheep and goats, more milk, more wool, more hides,

more grain, more bread, more cheap and good houses for workmen and

craftsmen. No smoke, more sun, hence a quicker ripening of grain and

fruit. Hence finer energies, more vitality, and less discontent. The

invasion of industrialism has been the creation of an enemy to light,

to joy, to freedom. To turn a man into a machine is to contradict

the first elements of his creation. To put him on a level with a

screwdriver, a hammer, a grease-pot, is to lower him all round.

Why does it lower him? Because it kills his individuality, blunts

his ambition, and destroys his creative faculty. Hand labour is

dignified, but a man reduced to the level of a machine is a cripple.

The industrious class, of which happily many remained, even under

depressing environment and determined to earn honest money,

emancipated themselves from their evil leaders who would, but for

the remnant of honest men left, have destroyed their freedom. Never

in the ugly history of agitators did they give themselves away more

successfully than when they threatened to starve England by direct

action to gain an addition to already good wages. At once, this was a

little too much for the people. “If England starves, we shall,” was

their logical conclusion. If production is strangled by unreasonable

wages, the time will come when there is no money left to pay a

reasonable wage. In revolution, it always happens that extremists

break the bank they sought to enrich. The good sense at the bottom

of the English character prevailed; and even if slowly, it overcame.

The people began to see that once loosened from the chain their

mischievous leaders had wound round them that antagonism between

class and class is fatal to peace and progress, to realise that the

rise in prices was the work of profiteering tradesmen, and to them

the onus of the necessity for a rise in wages was chiefly due. The

profiteering tradesman was their enemy, not the capitalist. Then they

said among themselves, “We must get to work like honest men and give

the best that is in us. We must improve and not strangle British

trade, if we do we shall be the first to suffer.” We must not trust

to foreign countries to produce for us, but produce for ourselves.

He who trusts to purchase the necessities of life from foreign

neighbours may some day find they have nothing to sell.

There is nothing in this that is new or original, it is the commonest

common sense. It was by trying to escape labour and to put it into

foreign hands and secure profit that England was growing idle. Trade

was given over to the Germans, who, seeing they could produce more

cheaply than the English because they paid lower wages, grew rich

at the expense of England. England had the most industrious workmen

in Europe, and the best, but by teaching them to shirk work, trades

unions gave them away. In the new order this is changed. The workmen

know now that to labour honestly brings not only pleasure but

profit. The idle inherit poverty and discontent. The Germans said to

themselves, “British labour in a state of unrest brings profit to us.

Britain poor means Germany rich.” Germans are cunning.

§ 40

In a northern county, I heard the following talk. A group of typical

blue-eyed artizans were sitting under an oak, enjoying their smoke

after a hearty midday meal. The day was glorious; this English

climate was at its best. One of them, evidently rather a leader of

the others, was recounting memories. He was a fair old man, with

something of the Dane in appearance, the kind of strong-spirited

sensible character that the North supplies, a type of the men that

made England strong. He said, speaking with a broad, pleasant North

Country accent which I will not attempt to imitate: “The strikers

were foolish fellows. I was a boy at the time. My father was dead

against them. We had good wages, but we wasted them in selfish

pleasures. We thought more about amusing ourselves than doing our

duty, that is true. We had leisure, which we used badly. If we had

chosen to do so, we could have got on quite well, but we were got

hold of by unprincipled fellows a little more learned than we.

They led us astray with promises to be rich _without work_. They

turned our heads. It is true that food was dear by way of the rascal

tradesmen--a lying lot they were. They hid behind their counters

rabbits and such-like food because the Government was making them

lower their prices when food got scarce.

“Now I see straight. Instead of striking we ought to have gone for

the tradesmen. It was they who sent up the prices to profit by it

while we were getting hungry. The lists of strikers the leaders

published were all ‘bunkum,’ the majority did not want to strike.

Now we have got rid of strike leaders, we see what they were--just

men who wanted to get power to be in the House of Commons and play

the gentleman at our expense. Now I know the difference between an

honest master and the swaggering tyrants who pretended to be our

friends. Give me for a master an educated gentleman, not a howling

agitator, who out of our money built themselves fine houses. If we

had known then what we know now, wild horses would not have made us

‘down tools.’ I see now, no capital, no labour. We had got into idle

habits. Now we have changed, and see that honest work brings honest

reward. Instead of dog-fighting, drinking, and low sports, in off

times we do a bit of gardening, grow our own vegetables, and our

missus and girls make their own frocks and weave the stuff on the

old-fashioned looms I often heard my grandmother talk about. We are

twice the men we were. A football match now and again is all very

well, but making a business of games and gambling is ROT. And the

best of it is that Parliament, where there was more talk than doing,

didn’t work the change, we did it ourselves, setting to work like

men, and gave up whimpering and grumbling like silly girls. I guess

we took the wind out of the sails of the Germans and the rascally

Bolsheviks. What the high up in authority were playing for was our

votes, that’s all. We see straight through the politicians now, and

don’t give them a vote, so the Talking House, I hear, is shut up,

and a good thing too. We can keep some restraint over the chaps we

have now at hand, and good ones they are. They pull the strings of

the Commune effectually, where the tradesmen and suchlike folk out

for themselves played what games they liked with us. There are good

honest citizens on the Councils with no axes to grind, and they keep

the axe-grinders straight. The Union leaders went too far for us when

they threatened to starve England and tried to prevent milk from

reaching our children. That was too much for us! We’ve got hearts

and now we have got heads, and see through humbug like through a

pane of glass. Since food is a reasonable price, we are satisfied

with reasonable wages, and we have plenty of leisure, which we use

profitably. Instead of only thinking of ourselves, we give a thought

to the other chap, and that makes for union and fraternity.” These

remarks, spoken with conviction, were received with applause. The

man was the spokesman of the thought in the minds of his fellows.

“That is Democracy.”

The English County Communes did well when they taxed the entrance

of foreigners into local trades, and taxed all foreign goods (save

Colonial) before permitting them to enter the country. Now there is

plenty of work for all Britons, agricultural and industrial, and it

will take a long time before the artificial liberty (so-called) has

power again, because “The People” know their way about, and are no

longer led by schemers and well paid “windbags.”

Before the change, which grew out of honest guiding, public opinion

and education in its best sense was coming to a standstill.

Parliament played with it in committee, the usual course when

Ministers do not know what to do. New schemes for education wasted a

lot of paper and ink, and cost the nation more than it could afford.

Schemes which only played into the hands of the place-hunters came

to little. Guidance is better than legislation, and immediate touch

of class with class will do more to mend matters than a plethora

of work of committees. The working class (inclusive) claimed a

right to govern, and it is doing so now that it is learning to rule

itself. All men, in whatever station, from the King to the humblest

peasant, should be working men--anyway, the State demands that of

them and rightly. The greatest crime to the State is indolence and

idleness. The state has no need for them, or for those who, being

so, are living on the earnings of their betters. Under the tyranny

of commercial unrest every honest profession and trade was suffering

(save the profiteers). The arts were suffering. A publisher had to

think twice before he published a good book, a painter before he

started a picture. The initial expenses had grown so large that under

the best conditions only a very small margin of profit was left,

scarce enough to keep body and soul together. Science was suffering

because research can make no progress without capital. The expense

of living to the most moderate consumer was becoming intolerable.

Ministers played cup and ball with legislation by first attempting

to exercise control over prices, then withdrawing control, thereby

leaving a new muddle to be dealt with. We all know Æsop’s satiric

fable of blowing hot and cold with the same breath, but that is

exactly what Government did. Who, putting two and two together,

could, with the most kindly feeling, respect a weak policy which so

well imitates the first Fable of Æsop, “The Man, the Boy, and the

Ass”? wherein first the man was criticised for riding, then the boy

for doing the same, then both for carrying the ass, which finally,

was cast into a river and so disposed of. Compromise followed

compromise, until the whole country lost confidence in their rulers,

who, without a policy, were always watching which way the cat would

jump. During the war we were better off than after it. After it was

over the curtain had to be pulled up and the players to come forward,

but no cheers for them. We saw the men who had made the muddle, which

they were trying by every compromise to clear up. “The People,”

seeing the paralysis of Government, took the matter into their hands

and set to work to clear the situation by restoring industry, and

they set to reform themselves by a sensible mode of living, not in

sections only, but as a part of a great scheme in which everybody,

rich and poor, learned and unlearned, was individually concerned.

No amount of legislation made in the talking house, could reform a

people unwilling for reform. “The People” saw their mistakes and set

themselves to rectify them. The rich resolved to use their wealth for

the public benefit; the leisurely their leisure to instruct, or, I

like better the word, to guide the less cultivated minds; and young

men on whose education large sums of money had been expended, instead

of wasting energies on sport and a lazy club or society life, turned

to make themselves factors of usefulness in a great national cause.

Thus, the general tone of the nation rose rapidly from apathy to

activity, from selfishness to altruism.

§ 41

Democracy—false or true? · 第 10 / 13 段