SECTION VII.

The charter of the Van Diemen's Land Bank having expired, it became a

joint stock company, and enlarged its capital to £50,000; ten per cent.

being charged upon discounts. The Tasmanian was a private bank, of which

the Messrs. Gellibrand were proprietors. The limited business carried

large profits, and the purchase of bills, not passed in the regular

course of discount, then, as afterwards, yielded large returns. The

Derwent, established chiefly by persons connected with the government,

was opened for business on 1st January, 1828, with a capital of £20,000.

At the same time, the Cornwall Bank, with £10,000, was established by

the merchants of Launceston; and the facility of monetary transactions

increased on every side. The arrival of considerable investments from

India, brought rupees into extensive circulation, and they formed a

great proportion of the current coin.

The large imports of English goods, and the increase of promissory

notes, alarmed several persons connected with trade. An advertisement,

signed John Dunn, offered a quantity of shares in the Derwent on liberal

terms. At a meeting of the shareholders, Mr. Dunn maintained that the

liabilities of the community were dangerous, and twenty times greater

than the circulating medium. It was replied, that bills were chiefly

multiplied by re-sales, and that the cash of the consumer would be

transmitted through the whole mercantile chain.

The Van Diemen's Land Bank discovered a singular fraud by the cashier in

1828. Amongst the large accounts, which were unlikely to be drawn, he

debited the cash which he employed as a private discounter of bills. The

sudden presentation of an unexpected draft led to an examination, and

£2,000 were found deficient. The money was refunded, except a trifling

amount, and prosecution waved.

The interest of the officers of the government in the Derwent Bank

occasioned complaint. The risks, liabilities, and antipathies of trade,

were deemed unsuited to their duties. At the governor's request, the

relation was disguised, but it was not dissolved.

The state of trade at this time wore a deceptive aspect. Dr. Henderson

reckoned the actual profit of the colony at 1-1/2 per cent., while Mr.

Prinsep, a barrister, of Calcutta, described every branch of business as

a path to opulence. In 1829, a merchant sold £1,500 worth of goods at an

advance of 50 per cent., and a credit over three years bearing 15 per

cent., amounting to £2,250 in all. A glut sometimes reduced the value of

merchandise below the London price.

"See, how I am changed!" said Mr. Prinsep. "Amongst all the beauties, I

am beginning to think none so beautiful as the interests of capital.

Interests alone on mortgage, with the very best securities, is 15 or 20

per cent. Invest your money in wool, and it brings you a return of 50

per cent. per annum: in the whale-fishery, 100 per cent. Bank dividends

now paid are 16 per cent. I only brought down a broken-winded Arab or

two, and their hire pays my current expenses. Money invested in land

will be ten-fold its original value in fifteen years. £200 will purchase

a noble property here; £1,000 will buy a fine, healthy, and beautiful

estate--two hundred of them already in cultivation. The whole colony is

on the advance, and its resources remain to be developed." Such was the

bright picture published in Calcutta. The influx of speculators

postponed the crisis, and prolonged the delusion.[158]

The increase of capital, and the opening of cash credits, facilitated

the operations of the settlers, but tempted many to ruin. The government

rewarded the rapid improvement of estates, the erection of substantial

dwellings, farm buildings, and fences, by grants of land in extension.

To secure the proffered boon the settlers accepted the assistance of

money-lenders, whose claims at length absorbed the proceeds of their

toil. During a progress through the colony, the governor visited many

establishments, and distinguished the enterprising agriculturist with

special favor. On his return to head-quarters he expressed the pleasure

his inspection had afforded; and noticed in a public order Mr. Gatenby,

of the Isis, as a "good old English yeoman," and an example of

enterprise and skill. Well assured that his Majesty was desirous that

the character of a plain, upright farmer, should meet with encouragement

and reward, he added to this settler's grant 1,000 acres.[159] The

"Gatenby farmers" were henceforth noted as a favored class; and many,

anxious for the same recompense, borrowed, enclosed and improved, until

they had not a rood of land to call their own.

The most distinguished money-lender was Sheriff Ferreday, whose ordinary

charge was 35 per cent., or less with ample security. After a few years

(1834) he returned to Europe, having realised £20,000 by usury. At his

death, he devised a portion of his wealth to Oxford, to found a

scholarship. He suffered much vituperation, probably with little

comparative justice. "His bible," said Mr. Gellibrand, "is his bill

book, and his gold his god"--a quotation from Burke, highly relished at

the time.

The treasury was again robbed in 1832. It was observed the office papers

were deranged: constables were stationed to watch, and a sentinel was

placed at the door. The sudden examination of the chest by the governor

discovered a more serious transaction. It appeared, capital had been

borrowed from the chest without authority, to the amount of some

thousands; the money was, however, restored. No public care could

reclaim these funds from their tendency to escape, and they were not

deemed sure until out of the custody of the government.

The secretary of state directed the public cash to be deposited with the

banks. The treasurer was not authorised to retain more than £10,000 of

paper, and the Van Diemen's Land and Derwent establishments each

received charge of £10,000 cash. During six years, the revenue had risen

from £30,000 to £60,000: notwithstanding a very liberal official

expenditure, the surplus funds (1831) amounted to nearly £40,000.

The interior communication was facilitated both by the business of the

police and the cheap labor in the hands of the crown. The post of

Sorell's time was a private speculation, conveyed on foot, afterwards on

horseback. On the 19th June, 1832, a "cheap and expeditious conveyance,

to and from Launceston," was announced. The owner, Mr. J. E. Cox, drove

tandem, at the rate of forty miles a-day: only one passenger was

accommodated, at a fare of £5. The practicability of the journey was

then the subject of considerable betting.[160]

In 1827, and during two following seasons, New South Wales suffered a

serious drought, which increased in severity. Rivers were exhausted, and

their beds left dry. Not only the want of rain was felt, but a withering

blight, travelling in a defined current over the cultivated districts,

cut off their harvests. In two years the cultivation of wheat in Van

Diemen's Land increased from twenty to thirty thousand acres, and the

average price of wheat at Hobart Town was 8s. per bushel. This

stimulated further production, and tended to avert from Van Diemen's

Land the distress, which over speculation and scarcity produced in New

South Wales.

This dearth was followed by two plentiful harvests (1831), and a

depression of price. The farmers of New South Wales entreated General

Darling to establish a corn law, to check importation. In declining the

project, he attributed the successful competition of this country to the

superiority of its wheat and facility of transit; and hinted that the

elder colony was indebted to foreign supplies for its subsistence.

FOOTNOTES:

[Footnote 157: _Observations on the Colonies of New South Wales and Van

Diemen's Land._ By John Henderson. Calcutta, 1832. p. 5.]

[Footnote 158: _Journal of a Voyage to Van Diemen's Land_, p. 108.]

[Footnote 159: _Gazette_, March, 1828.]

[Footnote 160: Until 1832, the post was managed by Mr. Collicott, as a

private speculation. There were nine post stations. The number of

newspapers conveyed by post in 1832, was 13,000; in 1833, 102,

400.--_Montagu's Statistics._]

The History of Tasmania, Volume I · 第 7 / 20 章