SECTION I.

E-text prepared by Jonathan Ingram, Jane Hyland, and the Project Gutenberg

Online Distributed Proofreading Team (http://www.pgdp.net)

THE

HISTORY OF TASMANIA:

by

JOHN WEST,

Minister of St. John Square Chapel, Launceston.

VOLUME I.

Tasmania:

Henry Dowling, Launceston.

1852.

Tasmania:

Printed By J. S. Waddell, Launceston

Facsimile edition 1966

TO HENRY HOPKINS, OF HOBART TOWN, ESQ.,

THE

HISTORY OF TASMANIA,

UNDERTAKEN AT HIS REQUEST, IS RESPECTFULLY INSCRIBED

BY

THE AUTHOR.

LAUNCESTON, SEPTEMBER, 1852.

ADVERTISEMENT.

The author takes this opportunity to thank the gentlemen who have

allowed him, for several years, the use of their works on the colonies,

and valuable original papers; especially the trustees of Lady Franklin's

Museum, Messrs. R. Lewis, Hone, Gunn, Joseph Archer, Henty, P. Roberts,

Wooley, and Pitcairn.

The public are indebted to Ronald Gunn, Esq., for the section on

Tasmanian Zoology; and to Mr. F. Wales for a useful list of the chief

places in this country.

CONTENTS--VOL. I.

DISCOVERY.

SECTION I. p. 1.

Anthony Van Diemen, governor of Batavia--Sir Joseph Banks obtains

Tasman's charts and journal--brass hemispheres at Amsterdam--discovery

of Van Diemen's Land--Maria Island--visit of Captains Marion, Furneaux,

Cook, Clerke, Cox, Bligh, D'Entrecasteaux--discovery of Bass' Straits by

Bass and Flinders--Flinders' misfortunes and death--Baudin--misfortunes

of our eminent navigators--monument erected by Sir John Franklin to

Flinders.

SECTION II. p. 20.

Colonel Purry's project--opinion of Dalrymple--Cook's account of New

South Wales--fleet assemble at Motherbank--Phillip governor--various

opinions of the prospects of the colony.

FROM 1803 TO 1824.

SECTION I. p. 27.

Van Diemen's Land occupied--state of Port Jackson at the time--Port

Phillip occupied--abandoned--account of Buckley--debarkation at

Sullivan's Cove--names of officers--Paterson occupies at Port

Dalrymple--account of Collins--Burke's remarks--Collins' history--Lord

Hobart.

SECTION II. p. 34.

Hobart Town named--York Town--Tamar river--Launceston--the first

house--Norfolk Island vacated--settlers conveyed to Van Diemen's

Land--overflow of the Hawkesbury--destitution--deposition of Bligh--he

visits the Derwent--conduct of Collins--establishes a newspaper--his

death--monument erected by Franklin to his memory.

SECTION III. p. 48.

Lieutenant E. Lord acting lieutenant-governor--ditto Captain

Murray--visit of Governor Macquarie--Davey lieutenant-governor

--improvements effected--St. David's church built--Bent's

newspaper--death of Colonel Davey.

SECTION IV. p. 53.

Form of colonial government--courts--legislative orders--administration

of justice--Abbot judge-advocate of Van Diemen's Land--opinions of

Mackintosh--Bentham--torture--arbitrary conduct of Macquarie--governor's

court--Abbot's death.

SECTION V. p. 66.

Lieutenant-Governor Sorell--checks bushranging--immigration of

settlers--their privileges--Macquarie's account of Van Diemen's Land.

SECTION VI. p. 70.

Sheep introduced--Merino lambs imported into Van Diemen's Land--wool

purchased by Mr. Hopkins.

SECTION VII. p. 73.

Whaling--duties on colonial oil--fetters of trade--Captain Howard's

misfortunes--currency of Van Diemen's Land--trading habits.

SECTION VIII. p. 78.

Religious efforts--notices of Reverends Johnson, Marsden,

Knopwood--Wesleyan first Sunday school--Reverends Horton, Mansfield,

Macarthur--bible society--Reverend J. Youl--Reverend P. Connolly.

SECTION IX. p. 86.

Bill for better administration of justice--supreme court

established--colonial agent--departure of Sorell--Leith

company--Sorell's character--agricultural societies--advantages of

immigrants at the present time.

FROM 1824 TO 1836.

SECTION I. p. 95.

Lieutenant-Colonel Arthur, superintendent at Honduras--dispute with

Colonel Bradley--with the slaveholders--state of Van Diemen's

Land--court proclaimed--trial by jury--charges against Mr. J. T.

Gellibrand, jun.--Talfourd's opinions--Van Diemen's Land declared

independent of New South Wales--police magistrates appointed.

SECTION II. p. 106.

Rise of the Australian press--restraint of the press by Arthur--Dr. Ross

government printer--colonists maintain the freedom of the press.

SECTION III. p. 110.

Van Diemen's Land Company formed--its investments--Jorgen Jorgenson.

SECTION IV. p. 115.

State of society at Hobart--Judge Forbes--Governor Darling--punishment

of Thomson and Sudds--trial of Dr. Wardell--Major Honor's case--Mr.

Humphrey police magistrate--petitions for an elective assembly--

disagreements with Arthur--Gellibrand, sen., dismissed from the

magistracy--act of parliament for the colony--Marshall's proposal

for a colonial association.

SECTION V. p. 120.

Dispute between Jennings and Montagu--rate on returned bills of exchange

fixed--trial of Dillon--treasury robbed--Ikey Solomon's arrest--conduct

of a jury--races at Ross--pirates take the _Cumberland_.

SECTION VI. p. 124.

Grammar school--orphan school--mechanic institution--Dr. Ross--Dr.

Henderson.

SECTION VII. p. 127.

Bank of Van Diemen's Land--state of trade--Gatenby farmers--treasury

robbed--Cox's conveyance established--dearth in New South Wales.

SECTION VIII. p. 131.

Liabilities of publicans--impounding cattle--dog act--usury law.

SECTION IX. p. 134.

Endowment of emigrants with land--early regulations--quantities of land

given--early price of land.

SECTION X. p. 136.

Van Diemen's Land divided into counties--land commissioners

appointed--conditions of grants--land obtained by fictitious capital.

SECTION XI. p. 139.

Brisbane grants--proof of ownership--resumption resisted by

juries--defect in titles discovered--defect in description--caveat board

established--Major Abbot's claim--quit rents--free grants

terminated--Lord Ripon's regulations.

SECTION XII. p. 148.

Wakefield's colonization scheme--Wilmot Morton's views--Swan River

settlement--sufferings of first settlers--colony of South

Australia--mineral wealth--Port Phillip occupied--emigration of females

and mechanics--important consequences--table of land regulations.

SECTION XIII. p. 160.

Bank of Australasia--state of the currency--Tamar bank--Union bank.

SECTION XIV. p. 161.

Glorious 23rd of May!--Baxter appointed judge--set aside--police and

gaols--land revenue.

SECTION XV. p. 165.

Mr. W. Bryan's disagreement with Arthur--Arnold condemned for cattle

stealing--case of Lewis--of Bryan, jun.--murder of Captain

Sergeantson--perjury--trial by jury.

SECTION XVI. p. 174.

"True Colonist"--state of the press--charges against Arthur--increase of

newspapers--political association.

SECTION XVII. p. 177.

Recall of Arthur--- advancement during his administration--his great

ability--his views of public works--his departure--death of Mr. J. T.

Gellibrand.

FROM 1836 TO 1843.

SECTION I. p. 191.

Snodgrass acting-governor--arrival of Sir John Franklin--views of the

colony--his reception--efforts to reconcile parties--magistrates

increased--council chamber opened.

SECTION II. p. 195.

Difficulties respecting the churches--Dr. Lang--church and school

corporation erected--dissolved by the crown--Sir G. Murray's

views--Bourke's plan--Arthur's views--bishopric established in New South

Wales--claims of the Presbyterians--declare for the established

church of Scotland--Sir G. Grey's decision--act of general

assembly--appellate jurisdiction refused--synod proclaimed--assembled and

dissolved--controversy between the churches--church act passed--rivalry

of the churches--act amended--demands on the treasury--bishopric of

Tasmania established--Bishop Nixon enthroned--differences with

clergy--ecclesiastical courts--refused by Wilmot--conference at

Sydney--ecclesiastical titles arranged--free church of Scotland--tolerance

of laity--respect for religion.

SECTION III. p. 215.

Education--Franklin proposes a college--Dr. Arnold's views--Mr. Gell

appointed--foundation of college laid--abandoned--- schools in New South

Wales--British system established in Van Diemen's Land--British system

abandoned.

SECTION IV. p. 219.

Distillation forbidden--emigration promoted--interference of

commissioners--libel on Mr. Dowling--emigrants prosper--effects of

probation--distress in the colonies--causes of distress--revival.

SECTION V. p. 225.

Franklin arranges probation system--dispute with Captain

Montagu--dismisses him--Lord Stanley justifies Captain Montagu--Franklin

recalled--his amiable character--last expedition.

FROM 1843 TO 1847.

SECTION I. p. 233.

Sir E. Wilmot arrives--his connexions--opinion of the _Times_--his

popular manners--the agricultural association--bushranging--Wilmot's

promises to the legislature--remodels the Tasmanian Society--his

difficulties--central committee--usury law--fetters of trade--Hutt's

motion--road bill--irrigation--expense of police--public debt--Wilmot

adheres to his instructions--duties raised from five to fifteen per

cent.--taxation defeated--quarrel with the _Courier_--Mr. Bicheno's

political opinions--discussion in the council--Mr. Dry's motion--council

adjourned--despatches respecting police and public works--injustice of

Lord Stanley--anti-colonial character of probation system--Lord

Stanley's restrictions--proposes to raise produce for commissariat--

inadequate surveillance--Wilmot's representations--Stanley's reply--council

meet--estimates unintelligible--motions rejected by the governor's

deliberative and casting votes--Mr. Smith's opinion--six members

resign--obligation of official members--defence of the six--remarks--

popular sympathy.

SECTION II. p. 252.

Development of probation system--location of gangs--Mr. Pitcairn's

petition--Wilmot's counter representation--Wilmot rejected as patron of

the Van Diemen's Land agricultural association--vacancies filled up in

the council--members resign--£24,000 allowed by home government--

differential duties bill--Hobart Town commissioners--dog act--recall

of Wilmot--defended the probation system--blame cast on him--Wilmot's

last address--Mr. Gladstone's despatch--his decision respecting the

six--Wilmot slandered--Gladstone's letter--debates in parliament--

remarks--Wilmot's death--Mr. La Trobe's administration.

FROM 1847 TO 1852.

SECTION I. p. 265.

Sir William Denison meets the twelve--re-appoints the six--errors in

commission discovered--refers home--the six appointed--dog tax declared

illegal--actions of merchants--dismissal of Judge Montagu--Judge Pedder

refuses leave of absence--Mr. Horne appointed--doubts' bill

passed--decision of home government--charge against the merchants--their

defence--appeals to Downing-street--public petitions for an

assembly--plans proposed--council of New South Wales--discontent at Port

Phillip--report of Sir William Denison--plan of Earl Grey

rejected--privy council report--opinions of their report--bill

passed--rejoicings at Port Phillip--at Van Diemen's Land--college at

Bishopsbourne--Hutchins' school--high school.

SECTION II. p. 276.

Struggle against transportation--Mr. McLachlan--English press--state of

colony--pardons extended--North Australia--squatters hire

expirees--exiles received at Port Phillip--abolition proposed--Mr.

McLachlan's letter to Mr. Gladstone--petition presented to the

Lords--Mr. Ewart's motion--Earl Grey and Mr. Hawes receive the seals of

the colonial office--avow the principles of Whately--Sir W. Denison's

circular--discussion--committees appointed--public meetings.

SECTION III. p. 283.

London agency--meeting--Lord Grey's despatch announcing the views of

government--address of Sir W. Denison--his despatch in favor of

transportation--Norfolk Island prisoners--proposal to New South Wales

accepted on both sides--repudiation by Earl Grey, and a new proposal to

New South Wales rejected--circular letter to the colonies--convicts sent

to the Cape rejected--rejected at Port Phillip--effect of the treatment

of Van Diemen's Land on other colonies--prospects of 1848.

SECTION IV. p. 289.

Lord J. Russell's speech--conduct of ministers--great number of

petitions--Sir W. Denison's views--resolution of colonists--rapid

changes of systems--the intentions of Earl Grey--evils of ticket

system--resolution of the Legislative Councils--views of different

parties--state of the colony--Earl Grey accused of breach of faith--Earl

Grey's speech--declares his determination to proceed--the effect of his

speech on Van Diemen's Land--Leagues formed--_Neptune_ arrived--protest--

petitions of all classes--convict party form an association--it is

dissolved--weakness of the colony--feelings of other colonies towards

Van Diemen's Land.

SECTION V. p. 298.

The "Australias are One"--address to the colonies--Earl Grey renews his

application to New South Wales--decision of the people--response of the

colonies--meeting of abolitionists at Hobart--declare against

transportation to any of the colonies--a conference appointed--delegates

meet in Victoria--the Australian League formed--large subscriptions--fire

in Port Phillip--meeting of delegates in New South Wales--proceedings

of conference--the elections--the discovery of gold--effects on

employers--League assailed by the convict party--delegates visit

Adelaide--League adopted at New Zealand--people return opponents of

transportation--conduct of emancipists--not one supporter of

transportation returned--resolutions of the Legislative Councils of

New South Wales, Victoria, South Australia, and Van Diemen's Land.

* * * * *

ZOOLOGY.

SECTION I. p. 321. Mammalia.--SECTION II. p. 328. Birds.--SECTION III.

p. 332. Fishes.--SECTION IV. p. 333. Reptiles.--SECTION V. p. 335.

Insects.--SECTION VI. p. 335.--Mollusca.

HISTORY OF TASMANIA.

* * * * *

DISCOVERY, &c.

DISCOVERY, &c.

SECTION I.

Nearly fifty years have elapsed, since Van Diemen's Land was numbered

with the colonies of the British empire. A generation has risen up and

is passing away. Thousands, while they venerate the land of their

European ancestors, with an amiable fondness love Tasmania as their

native country. They will, hereafter, guide its affairs, extend its

commerce, and defend its soil; and, not inferior in virtue and

intelligence, they will fill an important position in the vast system of

Australasia.

To gratify their curiosity, and offer to their view the instructive and

inspiriting events of the past, is the purpose of this history.

The difficulty of the task can be appreciated only by experience. To

collect from scattered records, facts worthy of remembrance; to separate

reality from romance; to remove partial coloring from statements made

long ago; and to exhibit useful truth without disguise and without

offence, required much research and deliberation.

It is not the intention of this history to relate every event which,

when passing, may have been deemed momentous; much less to recal from

obscurity the errors, absurdity, and wickedness which exercised no

distinct influence on the common welfare. The author has endeavoured to

realize the feelings and sympathies of the benevolent and just of

another age, and to confine his pen to details which may maintain their

interest, when the passions with which they were associated shall

subside for ever.

In calling this work THE HISTORY OF TASMANIA, a designation is chosen

generally preferred by the colonists, and which their successors will

certainly adopt. "Van Diemen" is a name affixed to the north coast of

New Holland; and this country is the first known discovery of Tasman.

The name of Tasman is recognised by the royal patent constituting the

diocese; by several literary societies and periodical works: it forms

the term by which we distinguish our Tasmanian from our European youth.

Tasmania is preferred, because "Van Diemen's Land" is associated among

all nations with the idea of bondage and guilt; and, finally, because

while Tasmania is a melodious and simple sound, "Van Diemen" is harsh,

complex, and infernal.

* * * * *

During the reign of Charles I. (Frederick Henry, grandfather of William

III. being Stadtholder of Holland) the Dutch discovered this island. The

enterprise of that people had raised them to the zenith of their power:

unless by England, they were unrivalled in nautical science and

commercial opulence. More for the purposes of trade than the acquisition

of knowledge, they were anxious to discover unknown countries, and to

conceal the information they possessed from the rest of the world.

At this time, Anthony Van Diemen was governor-general of Batavia: by

him, Abel Jans Tasman was commissioned to explore the "Great South

Land," the name by which New Holland was known until 1665, when, by the

authority of the Netherland government, it received its present

designation. A fragment of the journal of Tasman, containing an account

of his discovery, was first published by Dirk Rembrant, and afterwards

translated into most European tongues. In this abstract nautical details

respecting Van Diemen's Land were omitted, but were described in the

journal itself, and by thirty-eight charts, views, and figures. These

were purchased by Sir Joseph Banks, on his return from his voyage to

these seas. Tasman's journal was translated by a Netherland clergyman:

he considered the age of the manuscript confirmed by the spelling: that

it was genuine he had no doubt, although he questioned whether written

by Tasman, or transcribed at his command. Sir Joseph Banks acquired at

the same time a copy of instructions to Tasman, given by the Governor of

Batavia in 1644, for a second expedition, and which recapitulated the

various voyages of his predecessors. These, however, have no connection

with Van Diemen's Land.

To adorn the new stadthouse of Amsterdam, erected in 1665, three

hemispheres were wrought in stone, of twenty-two feet in diameter: the

circles were inlaid with brass, and were executed by a celebrated

artist. The southern hemisphere exhibited the discoveries of Tasman and

his predecessors: they formed the pavement of the hall, until

obliterated by the tread of several generations. They were quite

forgotten when Sir Joseph Banks sought information from the inhabitants.

A copy of these works of art was preserved, and displayed the extent to

which New Holland and Van Diemen's Land were known.

The journal of Tasman has been greatly admired: it is clear, laconic,

and devout.[1] It opens with an invocation: "May God Almighty be pleased

to give his blessing to this voyage. Amen." The document is, indeed,

full of pious sentiments: when a long desired breeze liberated the

vessel from port, or refreshment was obtained, or safe anchorage found,

he dots down a thanksgiving. He reckoned his longitude from the Peak of

Teneriffe: the hours he called glasses; his miles were German, fifteen

to a degree.

On the 14th of August, 1642, Tasman embarked at Batavia, on board the

_Heemskirk_, the fly-boat _Zeehaan_, Jerit Zanzoon, master, in company.

They set sail for the Mauritius, and arrived on the 5th of September.

That island, then commanded by Van Steelan, was but little cultivated,

and gave slight promise of its present importance.[2] On the 4th

October, they were ready to depart, but were delayed by contrary winds

until the 8th, when on a change in their favor they stood eastward to

sea. On the 27th, a council being called, it was resolved that a man

should constantly look out at the topmast head; and to encourage

vigilance it was determined, that the first discoverer of land should

receive three reals and a pot of arrack. On the 4th November they saw

patches of duckweed and a seal, and inferred their vicinity to land. The

first pilot, Francis Jacobzs, on the 7th, supported by the advice of the

steersman, thus delivered his opinion:--"We should keep to the 44°

south latitude, until we have passed 150° longitude; then make for

latitude 40° south, and keeping in that parallel to run eastward to 220°

longitude, and then steering northward search with the trade wind from

east to west for the Solomon Islands. We imagine, if we meet with no

main land till we come to 150° longitude, we must then meet with

islands." On the 17th, they were in latitude 44° 15' and longitude 147°

3': they concluded that they had already passed the south land then

known. On the 22nd they found their compass was not still within eight

points, which they attributed to the influence of loadstone, and which

kept the needle in continual motion. On the 24th, at noon, they found

their latitude 42° 25' south, longitude 163° 31': in the afternoon, at 4

o'clock, they observed land, Point Hibbs, bearing east by north. The

land was high, and towards evening they saw lofty mountains to the east

south-east, and to the north-east two smaller mountains: here their

compass stood right. They resolved to run off five hours to sea, and

then to run back towards the land. On the 25th, the morning was calm,

and at 5 o'clock they were within three miles of the shore, and had

soundings at sixty fathoms. They approached a level coast, and reckoned

their latitude 42° 30', and middle longitude 163° 50'. On this day they

named their discovery: "we called it Anthony Van Diemen's Land, in honor

of our high magistrate and governor-general, and the islands near

(Boreels) we named in honor of the council of India, as you may see by

the little map we made." Next day they lost sight of land. They fixed

the longitude 163° 50', and gave orders to the master of the _Zeehaan_

to adopt that reckoning. On the 28th land reappeared, and in the evening

they came near three small islands, one of which they thought like the

head of a lion (Mewstone, of Furneaux). On the following morning they

passed two cliffs, one (the Swilly, of Furneaux) like the Pedra Branca,

near the coast of China; the other, the eastern cliff, resembling a high

misshapen tower (the Eddystone, of Cook). Between the cliff and the main

land they passed, until they came almost to Storm Bay, where they found

it impossible to anchor, and were driven by the wind to sea--so far,

that land could scarcely be sighted in the morning. In the afternoon of

the 1st December, they anchored in a good port (marked Frederick Hendrik

Bay in the chart), with twenty-two fathoms water, and bottom of fine

light grey sand.

On the following morning the boats were despatched to the shore: on

their return, the steersman informed them that they had heard the sound

of voices, and of a little gong; but saw no one. They remarked two

trees, sixty feet from the ground to the branches, and two and a-half in

circumference: the bark taken off with flint stones, and steps cut to

climb for birds' nests, full five feet from each other, and indicative

of a very tall people. They saw marks, such as are left by the claws of

a tiger, and brought on board the excrements of some quadruped; gum lac,

which dropped from trees, and greens "which might be used in place of

wormwood." They saw people at the east corner of the bay:[3] they found

no fish, except mussels: many trees were burned hollow near the ground;

they were widely separated, and admitted an extensive view.

On the 3rd, they went to a little bay, south-west from their ships, in

search of water: the surf prevented their landing, but the carpenter

swam on shore; and near four remarkable trees, standing in the form of a

crescent, he erected a post, on which a compass was carved, and left the

Prince's flag flying upon it.[4] "When the said carpenter had done this

in the sight of me, Abel Jans Tasman, of the master Jerit Zanzoon, and

under merchant Abraham Coomans, we went in the shallop as near as

possible, and the said carpenter swam back through the surf. We then

returned on board, and left this memorial to the posterity of the

inhabitants. They did not show themselves, and we suspected some to be

not far from thence, and watching carefully our doings." The last object

they noticed was a large round mountain (St. Patrick's Head), on the

eastern coast, of which they lost sight on the 5th December.

From Van Diemen's Land they proceeded to New Zealand, where by an

encounter with the natives several lives were lost: thence they passed

Tongataboo, Amsterdam, and Rotterdam, and arrived at Batavia on the 15th

June, 1643. Tasman closes his journal with his usual devotion: "God be

praised for this happy voyage. Amen."

That Maria Island was named after the daughter of Van Diemen, and that

Tasman went over the ocean writing down her name in the imperishable

records of his discoveries, is a pleasing tale; but the evidence on

which it rests is far from conclusive. Thus at Amsterdam he called the

anchorage Van Diemen's Road, and where the boats went for water Maria's

Bay, "in honor of our governor-general and his lady." That a daughter of

the same name existed is not improbable, but who can tell whether the

Maria Island of Tasmania's coast was named in complaisance to the

daughter, or to conciliate the mother! In hope to confirm the agreeable

fiction the journal of Tasman has been examined, but in vain.

The spirit of discovery revived in Europe after a long slumber; and a

succession of illustrious navigators, in their passage to regions deemed

more important, touched at Van Diemen's Land, and thus rapidly developed

its geography. After Tasman, the next visitor was Captain Marion, of the

_Mascarin and Castries_, who in 1772 arrived from the Mauritius, in

search of the "southern continent," then the grand object of nautical

inquiry, and anchored in Frederick Hendrik Bay, the 4th March. The visit

is chiefly memorable for a fatal collision with the natives, who,

according to the French, exhibited uncommon ferocity. On his stepping on

shore they offered Captain Marion a fire stick, which he supposed a

ceremony of friendship; but when he lighted a heap of wood, as he

imagined in compliance with their custom, they retired to a hill, and

threw a shower of stones. The French fired their muskets, and the

natives fled: their pursuers found in the wood a dying savage--the first

victim of European intrusion. Marion and some others were injured

slightly by the missiles of the natives, and a black servant was wounded

by a spear.

The remarks they made are of no great value: they entered the country,

and saw everywhere the effects of fire, which they supposed was intended

to drive wild animals from the coast. They could not discover a tree

suitable for a mast, and were unsuccessful in obtaining water. A small

map, which sketched the form of the coast with considerable exactness,

accompanied the account of this voyage, and tended to awaken the French

to the importance of these seas.

The next visit was accidental, but most important: Captain Cook, in

1772, left Great Britain to explore the icy region near the Pole. There

the vessels separated in a fog: they were unable to rejoin, and while

Cook proceeded to New Zealand in the _Resolution_, Captain Tobias

Furneaux, his second in command, touched at Van Diemen's Land in the

_Adventure_. He made the south-west cape on the 9th of March, 1773,

exactly one year after Marion left the island. After passing the

Mewstone, a boat's crew sent on shore reported favorably of the country,

and that they had seen beautiful cascades pouring from rocks two hundred

feet high. Finding no anchorage, Furneaux passed the black rocks (the

Boreels of Tasman), which he called the Friars, and discovered Adventure

Bay, which is separated from Storm Bay by Cape Frederick Henry. There

they found anchorage in seven fathoms, within half a mile of either

shore, and obtained wood and water in abundance. The numerous islets and

tortuous navigation of the coasts led Furneaux into several errors. To

discuss them would tire the patience of nine readers in ten, and afford

no pleasure to the tenth.

The _Adventure_ sailed along the eastern coast to the latitude of 40°

50', where Furneaux observed the land turned towards the westward. He,

however, narrowly missed the discovery of the straits, and turned off

for New Zealand, convinced "that there was no strait between New Holland

and Van Diemen's Land, but a very deep bay." The impression he adopted,

he conveyed to Captain Cook, who had intended to visit Van Diemen's Land

for the solution of this geographical problem, which now he considered

determined.[5]

On his third and final voyage to the Pacific, Captain Cook touched at

Van Diemen's Land in the _Resolution_, then accompanied by Captain

Clerke. He sighted the island bearing north-west half-west, distant

three leagues from Mewstone. A neighbouring rock, unnoticed by Furneaux,

he called the Eddystone, from its resemblance to an English lighthouse

of that name. Detained by calms, he did not reach Adventure Bay until

the 26th, where at 4 P.M. he dropped anchor in twelve fathoms, within a

mile of the shore. The officers were delighted with the country, and

particularly with its gigantic forests. Mr. Anderson, the surgeon, spent

his leisure wandering on the beach of Adventure Bay; angling in a lake,

or ascending the neighbouring hills.[6] Captain Cook left swine on the

shore, which were driven into the bush when the natives were not

present; in the hope they might escape them, and thus add to the

resources of the country. He departed on the 30th for New Zealand. The

account left by Cook is chiefly interesting for its description of the

natives, and will be noticed in the history of that unfortunate people.

On the 3rd July, 1789, the brig _Mercury_, John Henry Cox, master,

entered a deep bay on the south side of Van Diemen's Land, and was about

ten miles from the Mewstone: attempting Adventure Bay, he was carried to

the eastward, and afterwards accidentally discovered Oyster Bay.

Captain Wm. Bligh, subsequently governor of New South Wales, touched at

Van Diemen's Land in 1788, when on his voyage to Tahiti, whence he was

instructed to convey the bread fruit tree to the West India Islands. His

object was frustrated by the mutiny of his crew; and after a passage in

an open boat, attended with extraordinary perils, he reached Great

Britain. The _Providence_ and _Assistant_ were placed under his command:

he was sent on the same errand, in which he was successful, and

re-appeared in Adventure Bay in 1792. During his stay he planted several

fruit trees, acorns, and vegetables.

An inscription found by the French crew on a tree, signified that near

by, "Captain William Bligh planted seven fruit trees: Messrs. T. and W.,

botanists." They consisted of one fig, two pomegranates, and four

quinces. An apple tree was found by Labillardière on the coast. They

doubtless all perished. The Frenchman was greatly scandalised by the

despotism which condemned men of science to initials, and gave a sea

captain a monopoly of fame.

This celebrated naturalist was attached to the expedition of

Rear-Admiral Bruné D'Entrecasteaux, sent out by the government of France

to ascertain the fate of La Perouse, whose amiable reputation

conciliated the good-will of all parties. Although concluded that the

vessel he commanded must be lost, it was fondly hoped that he still

survived. The national assembly paused in the midst of its conflict with

the king, to request that vessels might be dispatched, and rewards

offered, for his relief. In his decree, Louis XVI. describes the

expedition as intended, beyond its primary design, to perfect the

description of the globe. On the day the first colonists of New South

Wales entered Port Jackson, the expedition of La Perouse was seen by the

astonished English approaching the coast. After an interchange of those

civilities which dignify the intercourse of polished nations, he left

New Holland.

In a letter, dated September, 1787, Perouse stated his intention "to

employ six months in visiting the Friendly Islands to procure

refreshments; the south-west coast of Mendana, the land of the

Arsacides, with that of Louisiade, as far as New Guinea."[7]

Many years after, relics were recovered, which demonstrated the vicinity

of his misfortunes. A lascar informed Captain Peter Dillon, of the East

India Company's service, that two Frenchmen survived at Manicola; he

therefore visited the island, where he found several relics of the lost

admiral, although the Frenchmen were dead; among the rest his sword

guard, marked with his cypher.[8] Dillon was honored by the French

government with the title of Chevalier, and received a pension.

In 1792, D'Entrecasteaux in the _Recherche_, and Captain Huon Kermandee

in the _Esperance_, reached Van Diemen's Land. On the 20th April, when

looking for Adventure Bay, they discovered the channel which bears the

name of D'Entrecasteaux. They remained a month, when they departed on

their search, and returned on the 20th January, 1793, to complete their

observations. They found that the channel extended to the Storm Bay of

Tasman: they entered and named the Huon, and the Rivère du Nord, now the

Derwent, and examined the different harbours. Their charts are said to

exhibit the finest specimen of marine surveying ever made in a new

country.[9] Of D'Entrecasteaux's Channel, then deemed the most important

discovery since the time of Tasman, Rossel, who recorded the events of

the voyage, writes with rapture:--"A harbour, twenty-four miles in

length, and equally safe in every part. Such a retreat, in a gulph which

bears the menacing name of Storm Bay, is a luxury that, to be able to

express, must be felt."

Captain John Hayes, of the Bombay marine, with the private ships _Duke_

and _Duchess_, examined Storm Bay and D'Entrecasteaux's Channel, in

1794. He passed up the Rivère du Nord much farther than the French,

which he called the Derwent; and in his passage affixed names to various

places, which have effaced those given by the original French

discoverers--whose survey, however, to the extent of their navigation,

was more correct than his own.

The form of Van Diemen's Land had long been a nautical problem. Captain

Hunter, observing the swell of the ocean, deemed the existence of a

strait highly probable. Mr. George Bass, surgeon of the royal navy, a

gentleman to whom his generous friend Flinders refers with great

admiration, resolved to test the conjecture. He had already given proof

of intrepidity: in company with Flinders and a boy, he embarked in a

boat, eight feet long, called _Tom Thumb_. After escaping great dangers,

they returned to Port Jackson with valuable information respecting the

coast.

In 1798, Bass obtained from Governor Hunter a six-oared whale boat, six

men, and six weeks provisions: with this outfit he proceeded along the

eastern coast of New Holland, occasionally landing and obtaining

supplies, which enabled him to prolong his absence to eleven weeks. He

continued his course until the agitation of the water convinced him that

the open sea was not far distant: he discovered Western Port, and a

country of great attraction. He explored six hundred miles of coast,

one-half of which was hitherto unknown; an enterprise beyond example in

nautical adventure, and entitling him to that renown which belongs to

his name.

To test this discovery, the governor authorised Lieutenant Flinders and

Mr. Bass to sail through the strait in the _Norfolk_, a colonial sloop,

of 25 tons. Twelve weeks only were allowed for the voyage, which

compelled the navigators to content themselves with a cursory survey.

In October, 1798, they left Port Jackson: after spending some time

among the islands which crowd the straits, they sighted Cape Portland, a

name given it in honor of the Duke of Portland, then secretary for the

colonies; thence they passed Port Waterhouse, so called after the

captain of the _Reliance_. The first important discovery was Port

Dalrymple, called after the hydrographer of the admiralty, Alexander

Dalrymple.[10] Green Isle, Western Arm, Middle Island, Whirlpool Reach,

Swan Point, and Crescent Shore, preserve memorials of the visit in their

designations.

They reported Port Dalrymple an excellent place for refreshments: black

swans, whose quills covered the beach in countless thousands; kangaroos,

of the forest kind; flocks of ducks and teal, and mussels and oysters,

were found in abundance.

Proceeding along the coast, they came to a headland, which they called

Circular Head, from its resemblance to a Christmas cake. They now

approached the solution of the question which had dictated their voyage.

They remarked a long swell from the south-west breaking on the western

shore: they hailed it with joy and mutual gratulation, and passed in

safety the clustering islets in their course: the extreme north-west

they called Cape Grim. Proceeding round the western coast, they observed

the mountains noticed by Tasman when he visited the island, which in

memory of his vessels they called Mount Heemskirk and Mount Zeehaan.

They named Point Hibbs after the master of the _Norfolk_. The

discoveries of Flinders here may be said to terminate, until he

proceeded up the Derwent.

The utility of the strait was highly rated. It secured perpetual renown

to Bass, whose name it bears: this was given by Governor Hunter at the

recommendation of Flinders, whose candour is always conspicuous in

awarding the palm of discovery to those to whom it is due! Not only does

the strait curtail a voyage from the Cape by four degrees, but vessels

avoid the winds which obstruct navigation round the South Cape and Cape

Pillar of Van Diemen's Land, which prolong the passage several days; a

point of great importance in the conveyance of passengers.

The _Norfolk_ steered into the Derwent by the chart of Hayes. Both

Flinders and Bass observe, with indignation, how creeks are magnified

into rivers, coves into bays, and a few acres into plains: as Risdon

River, Prince of Wales's Bay, and King George's Plains. They corrected

his definitions, but left him the honors of discovery. Flinders

proceeded to Herdsman's Cove, which he so distinguished for its

extensive pasture and plentiful waters.

Bass depicts the Derwent as a dull and lifeless stream, respectable only

because the Tasmanian rivers are insignificant![11] To a bay they

entered on the western side of Tasman's Peninsula, they gave the name of

their vessel, which was built at Norfolk Island, of the pine peculiar to

that place.

Flinders continued, after the departure of Bass, to prosecute researches

on the coast of New Holland, until the _Reliance_ returned home. In that

vessel his charts were conveyed, and were published. On a plan being

offered by Sir Joseph Banks for completing the survey, the

_Investigator_ was placed under the command of Flinders, who was

promoted to the rank of commander, furnished with a chosen crew, and

attended by Westall, a painter, and Brown, a naturalist whose collection

added largely to his department of science. Flinders received a passport

from the French government, expressed with the usual amplitude. It

inhibited all vessels of war from molesting the _Investigator_, and gave

right of entry to all ports subject to France, for refitting or

refreshment, on condition that nothing were done hostile to that power.

This protection was demanded by Lord Hawksbury, of M. Otto, the

celebrated representative of the Republic in England. Flinders had

proposed to visit Van Diemen's Land, but had been partly anticipated by

the _Lady Nelson_, sent from England to be employed as tender to the

_Investigator_, and fitted with a keel suited to shallow waters. Brown,

the naturalist, remained some time after the expedition was interrupted.

He wandered on the banks of the Derwent and Tamar, collecting shrubs and

flowers during a stay of several months; and although some specimens of

plants were lost in the _Porpoise_, not one out of 3,900 species was

wanting.[12]

In June, 1803, Flinders passed the north coast of Van Diemen's Land:

eighteen men were lying in their hammocks almost hopeless of recovery,

some of whom died before the vessel entered Port Jackson, and several

afterwards. A survey was instantly held, and the _Investigator_ was

condemned: the hull was found rotten, both plank and timbers, and it

was declared that reparation was impossible. On inspecting her

condition, Flinders expressed great astonishment, and remarked that a

hard gale must have sent her to the bottom.[13]

The volumes of Captain Flinders, though of vast scientific worth, are

not greatly interesting to the general reader, except when he tells of

his trials, which were many. His work was patronised by the admiralty,

and he had the prospect of reward; but on the day of publication, fame

ceased to be valuable to him,[14]--he cast that anchor which is never

weighed.

A long imprisonment in the Isle of France, and the mental anxiety

inseparable from a strong sense of injustice, it is said, destroyed him.

His case may be told in few words: the _Investigator_ was condemned as

unfit for service, and Flinders embarked at Port Jackson on board the

_Porpoise_, in company with the _Cato_ and the _Bridgewater_. When

passing through Torres Straits, at between eight and nine knots, they

saw breakers a-head. Before signals could be made, the other vessels

were seen hastening to the same destruction. They hauled to the wind

across each other; a collision seemed inevitable: a death-like silence

prevailed during the awful crisis; but happily they passed off side by

side. Instantly, however, the _Cato_ struck on the reef, and was totally

lost. All hands were preserved, except three boys; of these, one spent

the night on a spar, bewailing his unhappy lot: four times he had

embarked in different vessels, and each time had been wrecked; this was

the last, for before morning he disappeared. The _Bridgewater_ was yet

safe: she was seen at dawn; but while awaiting her help, the captain,

with a selfishness happily not common--without even sending a boat to

pick up a cast-away--proceeded on his voyage.[15] He reached India in

safety; sailed for Europe, and was never heard of more: the people he

had abandoned were all rescued.

This was effected by Flinders. A cutter was built and provisioned from

the stores saved on the reef: in this, which he called the _Hope_, he

set out for Port Jackson, 750 miles distant. There he obtained the

assistance of two vessels, beside the _Cumberland_, a colonial schooner

of 29 tons. The inhabitants, unsolicited, sent many presents to the

sufferers, who soon hailed the arrival of Flinders with rapturous

cheers.

Having performed this duty, he proceeded towards England in the

_Cumberland_, with seven men and three officers; but finding that she

was unable to bear the voyage, he resolved to confide in the honor of

the French, and present his passport at the Mauritius. There he was

detained a prisoner six years; first charged with imposture, then

treated as a spy; and when these imputations were refuted, he was

accused of violating his passport. The French had found in his journal a

wish dotted down to examine the state of that settlement, written when a

stranger to the renewal of war. Some doubt seems to have been really

entertained, for the moment, respecting him; but his long detention

after his release was promised, was ascribed to the ambition of

Napoleon, and the dishonesty of the French Institute, who from Flinders'

papers were appropriating to Baudin the honor of discoveries he never

himself claimed.

Before the _Investigator_ left England, the _Geographe_ and

_Naturaliste_, under Captains Baudin and Hamelin, visited this island.

During a pause in the hostilities of Europe, the French government

obtained from Mr. Addington, then premier, a safe conduct for this

expedition. The terms granted entitled them to freedom from search; to

supplies in any English colony, notwithstanding the contingency of war:

it being well said by the French, that the promoters of scientific

knowledge were the common benefactors of mankind. While Flinders was

prosecuting his voyage he met Baudin on the coast of New Holland, at a

place thence called Encounter Bay. The interview was civil, rather than

cordial; both nations were competitors in science, and rivals are rarely

kind. Yet the suffering of the French may be mentioned with pity: of

twenty-three scientific men who accompanied the expedition, three only

survived. The vessels were ill-provisioned, the water corrupt, and they

encountered fearful tempests, in attempting to circumnavigate this

island.

Captain Baudin had been directed by his government to examine the

eastern coast of Van Diemen's Land, the discoveries of D'Entrecasteaux,

and the channels and rivers of the coast. The surgeon of the

_Geographe_, Monge, fell by an attack of the natives, and was buried on

the spot which bears his name.[16] The French surveyed the eastern

coast, and finally determined the position of the Frederick Henry Bay of

Tasman. They examined the intricacies which had escaped the observation

of earlier navigators, who erroneously numbered the islands on their

charts, and thus overlooked the bays. They coasted between the main and

the Schoutens, and gave the name of Fleurieu to the Oyster Bay of Cox.

They then passed through a strait heretofore unnoticed, which divides

the Schoutens and Freycinet's Peninsula. Their survey was minute, and

sometimes three boats were employed in different directions. The French

vessels parted company, and the _Naturaliste_, after a long search for

her consort, proceeded to New South Wales.

Baudin, of the _Geographe_, was far more unfortunate. Having touched at

his land of Napoleon, instead of returning through Bass's Strait to Port

Jackson, he resolved to pass the south cape of Van Diemen's Land.

Throughout the passage he experienced the most fearful storms: the

darkness at night often prevented the execution of naval manoeuvres, and

the vessel was drenched with water. The condition of the crew was

terrible; "cries of agony made the air ring:" four only, including the

officers of the watch, were able to keep the decks. After beating about

Port Jackson for several days, a boat appeared which had been dispatched

by the governor, who saw the French were unable to manage the vessel. By

a change of diet, they speedily recovered.

When at Port Jackson, Flinders showed his discoveries to the French, who

admitted the justice of his prior claim, but with little sincerity.

M. Baudin died: Captain Hamilin, of the _Naturaliste_, returned to the

Mauritius. He eulogised the conduct of the colonists to

extravagance;[17] but it is mortifying to find, that soon after, having

captured a small English settlement, he burned the property he could not

carry off; and invited upon deck the ladies, his prisoners, to witness

the devastations of their late peaceful dwellings.

The misfortunes of the distinguished navigators, whose success has been

recorded, fully equalled their fame. The fate of Cook belongs to a story

which mingles with our early remembrance. A child need scarcely be told,

that after a career eminently glorious to his country and profession,

while attempting to restrain his men who were firing to protect him, he

fell by the dagger of a savage.

His colleague, Captain Clerke, who attended him through all his

expeditions, did not long survive him. Resolved to complete his

instructions, he remained in the neighbourhood of Kamschatka, which

hastened the crisis of a consumption. He was buried beneath a tree at

the harbour of St. Peter and St. Paul, and an inscription pointed to his

grave.[18] This was found by M. Perouse defaced, who restored it. On his

arrival at Botany Bay, he interred the naturalist of his expedition: the

memorial he set up was destroyed by the natives, and Governor Phillip

repaid, by the substitution of another, the honor done to his own

countryman.[19]

De L'Angle, the companion of Perouse, with eleven officers and men, lost

their lives by a misunderstanding at the Navigators' Isles: the manner

of his own death may be inferred from the native tradition.[20]

The end of D'Entrecasteaux and Huon, was hardly less melancholy: both

commanders were buried by their crews; the admiral at Louisiade, and

Huon at New Caledonia. The vessels were detained by the Dutch at Java,

and many of the seamen died in captivity. There the calamities of their

country became known to them: some sided with the royalists, others with

the jacobins, but few regained their native land; among these, however,

was Labillardière.[21]

The fate of Captain Flinders is already told; that of Dr. Bass is

involved in obscurity. A rumour that he was alive in 1812, in South

America, was circulated in London.[22] In the colonies it was reported,

that the vessel in his charge foundered at sea; others alleged that he

attempted a contraband trade in the Spanish colonies, was taken

prisoner, and with his companions sent to the quicksilver mines, and

there died.[23]

The whale-boat of Bass, which first swept the waters of the strait, was

long preserved at Port Jackson. Of its keel snuff boxes were wrought,

and regarded as valuable relics. A fragment, mounted with silver,

engraven with the particulars of the passage, was presented to M.

Baudin, as a memorial of the man whose example had stimulated colonial

discovery.

Flinders[24] predicted that the name of Bass would be conspicuous among

the benefactors of mankind: the glory of his own will enlarge with the

value of his discoveries. They resulted not from accident, which may

give reputation to success without merit, but were the reward of prudent

enthusiasm. A small community cannot, indeed, rear a monument worthy the

destinies of their names: private memorials may be perishable, like the

sympathies which inscribed them, but a future and opulent era will

display the moral grandeur of their enterprise, and posterity will pay

public honors to their fame.

At the cost of £250, Sir John Franklin erected an obelisk on the rock of

Stamford Hill, Port Lincoln, with the following inscription:--

This place,

from which the gulf and its shores

were first surveyed,

on the 26th of Feb., 1802, by

MATTHEW FLINDERS, R. N..

commander of H.M.S. _Investigator_,

and the discoverer of the country now called South Australia,

was

on 12th Jan., 1841,

with the sanction of Lieut.-Colonel GAWLER, K.H.,

then Governor of the Colony, then set apart for,

and in the first year of the

Government of Captain G. GREY,

adorned with this monument,

to the perpetual memory of the illustrious navigator,

his honoured commander,

by JOHN FRANKLIN, Captain R.N., K.C.H., K.R., Lt.-Governor of

Van Diemen's Land.

FOOTNOTES:

[Footnote 1: The following is its title:--_Journal of Discovery, by me,

Abel Jans Tasman, of a Voyage from Batavia for making discoveries of the

unknown South Land_, 1642.--_Burney's Chronological History_, 1813.]

[Footnote 2: Discovered in the year 1505, by Don Pedro Mascarequas, a

Spanish navigator: he gave it the name of "Cerné." It was uninhabited,

and destitute of every species of quadruped. In 1598 it was visited by

the Dutch Admiral Van Neck, who finding it unoccupied gave it its

present name, in honor of Maurice, Prince of Holland. In 1601 a

Frenchman was found on the island by a Dutch captain. He had been left

by an English vessel, and had remained two years subsisting on turtle

and dates: his understanding was impaired by his long solitude. The

Dutch had a small fort, when it was visited by Tasman, which is

represented in the drawings that illustrated his journal. The Dutch

afterwards abandoned the island, and it has passed through many changes,

until it was conquered by Great Britain.--_Grant's History of the

Mauritius._]

[Footnote 3: Probably their fires: had they seen them, they could not

have fallen into error respecting their height.]

[Footnote 4: "The same romantic little rock, with its fringe of grey

ironstone shingle, still shelters itself under the castellated cliffs of

trap rock, on its northern and southern horns; embosomed in its

innermost recesses by a noble forest, whose green shades encroach upon

the verge of the ocean. It is less than half-a-mile across, and nearer

its northern than its southern extremity, the sea has cast up a key of

large grey rounded ironstone, which interrupts the equal curve of the

beach, and doubtless marks the spot where the ship's carpenter swam

ashore."--_Gell's Remarks on the First Discovery: Tasmanian Journal_,

vol. ii. p. 327.]

[Footnote 5: _Cook's Voyages._]

[Footnote 6: A folio edition of _Cook's Voyages_, published in the last

century, at the "King's Arms," Paternoster-row, London, contains the

following sentence, which, as perhaps the first example of invention in

reference to the country, may deserve remembrance:--"Stately groves,

rivers, and lawns, of vast extent." "Thickets full of birds of the most

beautiful plumage, of _various notes, whose melody was truly

enchanting_. It was _now_ the time (29th January!) when nature poured

forth her luxuriant exuberance, to clothe this country with rich

variety."--Vol. ii. p. 425.]

[Footnote 7: _Voyage of Perouse_ (translation). London, 1799.

Letters buried in a bottle, beneath a tree in Adventure Bay, were found

by Captain Bunker, of the _Venus_, in 1809, to which he was directed by

the words, still legible, "dig underneath;" and supposed, from his

imperfect knowledge of the language, that they were left by Perouse. In

this he was mistaken: they were deposited by D'Entrecasteaux, at his

second visit. _Bent's Almanack_, 1828, adopted Bunker's mistake: it was

copied by Mr. Widowson, who adds--"these letters were dated one month

after his departure from Port Jackson, and led to the opinion that the

expedition must have perished on some reef of Van Diemen's Land. In

consequence of this idea, the French government in 1791," &c. The first

mistake can be allowed for; but not that a discovery of letters in 1809,

prompted an expedition in 1791.]

[Footnote 8: _Hobart Town Gazette_, 1827.]

[Footnote 9: _Flinders' Introduction, &c._]

[Footnote 10:

Position of Low Head:--Lat. 41° 3' 30" S.

Long. 146° 48' 15" E.--_Flinders._]

[Footnote 11: _Collins_, vol. ii. p. 183.]

[Footnote 12: _Remarks by Robert Brown, F.R.S. Appendix to Flinders_,

vol. ii. p. 533.]

[Footnote 13: _Flinders_, vol. ii. p. 275. Jorgenson, the Dane, who was

a seaman on board the _Lady Nelson_, tender to the _Investigator_,

stated, in his rattling way, that she was in good condition, and

absurdly insinuated foul play. The _Investigator_ was cut down, and

returned to Europe in charge of Captain Kent, R.N.]

[Footnote 14: _Quarterly Review_, 1814.]

[Footnote 15: See _Flinders_, vol. i. p. 305.]

[Footnote 16: This statement, after Rev. Mr. Gell, is erroneous. Mougé

died from diseases occasioned by the climate of Timor, and the hardships

of the voyage (See Peron's work). He arrived in an exhausted and

consumptive state: when he attempted to land (20th January, 1802), he

fainted, and was instantly conveyed on board. He went no more on shore,

but to the grave. He was buried at the foot of a tree, at Maria Island,

and the name Point Mougé was given to the spot.

On the 17th January, the French were attacked by natives at Swan Port,

and Mougé was probably of the party. A native attempted to snatch the

drawings; "then to strike down our weak friend, when he was prevented by

those who ran to his assistance." The French say, they loaded them with

favors, and did not avenge this violence. It is, no doubt, this account

which Mr. Gell confused with the death of Mougé.]

[Footnote 17: "The famous northern confederacy placed England on the

verge of destruction, and Captain Hamilin had reason to fear that he

should not have been allowed to remain in port, or at least should be

refused succour; but the English received him with liberality, _grande

et loyale_: the first houses at Port Jackson were open, and the whole

resources of the colony were at the disposal of the French captain."

"Oftentime did they repeat that excellent maxim, that France first

inscribed on the code of nations: _causa scientiarum causa

populorum_"--the cause of science is the people's cause. So writes M.

Peron; but the benefit of these sentiments was denied Captain Flinders.]

[Footnote 18: _Cook's Voyages._]

[Footnote 19: _Tench's Narrative_, p. 99.]

[Footnote 20: "The _Astrolabe_, M. de la Perouse, and the _Boussole_, M.

de L'Angle, were lost on the S. W. side of Manicolo. On one stormy

dismal night, the oldest natives state, the vessels were blown upon a

reef. One was a complete wreck by day-light, and all hands perished!

From the other, however, some of the crew managed to effect a landing,

when many of them were massacred as they gained the shore, the natives

taking them for white spirits, with long noses (their cocked hats being

considered a part of the face!). As soon as the unfortunate mariners

were proved to be human beings, those that had escaped death from the

waves and the savages were allowed to remain unmolested. A small vessel

was built from the wrecks, which spot Captain Dillon saw; and as soon as

the bark was ready, the survivors, with the exception of two, left

Manicolo, and have never been heard of since! The natives further

represented, whilst on the island, that the strangers were continually

looking at the sun, and taking their usual observations. So late as six

years ago, the two Frenchmen were alive; but one joined a party of the

natives in a war, who were defeated: the other died at Manicolo about

three years since. Captain Dillon has secured several nautical

instruments, many silver spoons, a silver salver, which are all marked

with the _fleur-de-lis_; a pair of gold buckles, some China ware, a

Spanish dollar, a piece of the ornamental work of the stern of a ship

(with the arms of France) much decayed; several brass sheaves belonging

to a frigate's topmast, a composition pump, copper cooking utensils, a

large quantity of iron knees; the silver handle of a sword-guard that

was taken to Calcutta in the _St. Patrick_, which led to this important

discovery, and which bears the ciphers of the unfortunate Count; several

large brass guns, which were found where one vessel was totally wrecked;

together with about four or five tons of other valuable and recognisable

articles. Most of the houses, or huts, were found to have bags suspended

to their sides, and those contained human sculls in a decaying

condition; but whether they were of European or aboriginal extraction,

in the absence of an able phrenologist, could not be ascertained."--_Sydney

Gazette, January, 1828._

The following curious relation, is of a dream of John Maatzuiker, whose

name is given by Tasman to a rock on the coast. On the 11th of Feb.,

1662, he dreamed, "that he saw Arnold de Vlaming, member of the council

of India and admiral of the fleet, who sailed for his native country on

the 23rd of December, 1661, in extreme danger, and heard him call

several times for help." The dream was repeated: "he then remained

awake, noted the day," &c., "sealed it, and gave it to the other members

of government." "Accounts were brought from the Cape, that the same day

his ship and some others had sunk with man and mouse." "The paper still

remains at Batavia, or did twenty years ago."--_Collection of remarkable

Dreams, by Dr. Wm. Greve._ Amsterdam, 1819. The story is taken from _Old

and New West Indies. By François Valentijn_. vol. iv. p. 312.]

[Footnote 21: Rossel, the editor of _D'Entrecasteaux's Voyage_, on

returning homeward was captured by the English, and being a royalist was

employed in the admiralty; but when emigrants were permitted to return,

he went home, and was patronised by Napoleon. His account of

D'Entrecasteaux is more favorable than that in the work of

Labillardière.]

[Footnote 22: _Penny Cyclopædia_: art. Bass.]

[Footnote 23: _Ross's Almanack_, 1835.]

SECTION II.

The settlement of New Holland was proposed by Colonel Purry, in 1723: he

contended that in 33° south, a fertile region would be found, favorable

to European colonisation. He offered his theory to the British

government, then to the Dutch, and afterwards to the French; but with

little encouragement. His views were submitted to the Academy of

Sciences at Paris, who replied that "they could not judge of countries

they had not seen."[25] Thus the project slept, until the great English

navigator in 1770 gave certainty to what had been conjecture.

To Dalrymple, the hydrographer, the impulse of this enterprising era is

largely due. He fully believed that a vast southern continent must

exist, to balance the antipodes. So firm was his conviction, that he

defined its extent as "greater than the whole civilised part of Asia,

from Turkey to the extremity of China. Its trade would be sufficient to

maintain the power of Great Britain, employing all its manufactories and

ships." The position of this region of fancy was traversed by Cook, who

found nothing but ocean. The doctrine of terrestial counterpoise was

disturbed; he, however, alighted on a great reality.

The description of New South Wales by Cook and his companions, which

charmed the public, attracted the attention of the crown; and Botany

Bay, named on account of the variety and beauty of its vegetation--long

known through Europe as a region of gibbets, triangles, and chains; to

be celebrated hereafter as the mistress of nations--was selected for a

settlement. 565 men and 192 women, the pioneers of a larger division,

were embarked under the charge of a military force composed of

volunteers; comprehending, besides the staff, sixteen commissioned

officers.

The fleet consisted of H.M.S. _Sirius_, _Hyena_, and _Supply_; six

transports and three victuallers: they assembled at the Motherbank on

the 16th March, and sailed on the 13th May, 1787.[26] They touched at

Teneriffe, and then at the Cape. Separated into two divisions, they

reached their destination within forty-eight hours of each other. On the

day of their junction, dense clouds threw a gloom over the sea; but they

rejected the omen, and believed that they had seen "the foundation, and

not the fall of an empire." Having found the bay unsuitable for

location, they proceeded to examine the port called after Jackson, a

seaman, who observed it from the mast, and immortalised his name. As

they passed the capes, which form an entrance, they were in raptures

with the scene:--the tall mouldering cliffs; the trees, which touched

the water's edge; and the magnificent harbour, four miles in length,

begirt with a luxuriant shore.

It was on the 7th February, 1788, that the Governor was inaugurated: an

area being cleared for the purpose, the military marched to the ground

with music, and colors flying; 750 convicts, 212 marines and their

officers, were assembled. The standard of England was unfurled, the

commission of Phillip, the first governor, published, and the courts of

justice proclaimed. The usual formalities being complete, Phillip turned

to the prisoners, and declared his intentions. He had resolved to

cherish and render happy such as might deserve his favour; but to allow

the law its course with the impenitent and unreformed. In such language

we discern the sentiments which prevailed: banishment, not punishment

for past crimes, was implied in the cheering alternative. From that

moment he possessed authority to manumit not less absolute than the

sovereign, but immeasurably more power to avenge.

Those who first entered New Holland, and witnessed the elevation of the

royal standard on the shores of Port Jackson, described in terms of

despondency its barren soil, barely compensated by its salubrious

atmosphere. Contemporary political writers looked coldly on the infant

establishment, as the diseased and hopeless progeny of crime: one, which

could never recompense the outlay of the crown, either by its vigour or

its gratitude. The projects entertained, in connection with commerce,

were the growth of flax and the supply of naval timber, both of which

had been reported by Cook as indigenous to Norfolk Island. "When viewed

in a commercial light," Captain Tench observes (writing in 1789), "the

insignificance of the settlement is very striking." "Admitting the

possibility," he continues, "that the country will hereafter yield a

sufficiency of grain, the parent state must long supply the necessaries

of life. The idea of breeding cattle sufficient to meet the consumption,

must be considered very chimerical." Such desponding sentiments mostly

attend the first stages of colonisation; but in a much later period, the

enterprise was regarded with scarcely less suspicion: "Why," said a

celebrated critic, "we are to erect penitentiaries and prisons, at the

distance of half the diameter of the globe, and to incur the enormous

expense of feeding and transporting its inhabitants, it is extremely

difficult to discover. It is foolishly believed, that the colony of

Botany Bay unites our moral and commercial interests, and that we shall

receive, hereafter, an ample equivalent in the bales of goods, for all

the vices we export."[27] With what obstinacy an idea once mooted is

cherished, may be inferred from an opinion afterwards expressed by an

authority of still greater pretension:--"The most sanguine supporter of

New South Wales system of colonisation, will hardly promise himself any

advantage from the produce it may be able to supply."[28] Its corn and

wool, its timber and hemp, he excludes from the chances of European

commerce, and declares that the whale fishery, after repeated failures,

had been relinquished!

It is not less instructive than pleasing, to notice the past epochs of

opinion: we find consolation against the dark clouds overshadowing the

future, by discovering how many forebodings of ancient seers have

vanished before the light of the event.

These discouraging views were not, however, universal. Many

distinguished men imagined an advancement, which our age has been

sufficient to realise. To commemorate the foundation of the colony the

celebrated artist, Wedgewood, modelled, from clay brought from the

neighbourhood of Sydney, an allegorical medallion, which represented

Hope encouraging Art and Labor, under the influence of Peace.[29]

The French, however, always represented this colony as a masterpiece of

policy; an element of Anglican power, pregnant with events. Peron, when

dwelling on the moral prodigies of the settlement, declared that these

but disguised the real objects of its founders, which, however, could

not escape the discernment of statesmen: they saw the formidable germ of

great revolutions.[30]

The expedition of Baudin was connected by English politicians[31] with a

project of French colonisation. His instructions directed him to inspect

narrowly the places eligible for occupation, and it was expected that an

Australian Pondichery would become a new focus of rivalry and intrigue.

The special injunctions to survey the inlets of Van Diemen's Land,

seemed to indicate the probable site of an establishment so obnoxious.

Dr. Bass had, however, already examined this country with similar views,

especially the margin of the rivers. To him no spot on the eastern side

of the Derwent appeared to equal the neighbourhood of Risdon Creek,

around which he observed an expanding area of fertile land. He

delineated not less favorably the valley of the Tamar. This country he

considered preferable to New South Wales: with a greater proportion of

fertile soil, more amply supplied with water, and well adapted for

colonisation.[32]

FOOTNOTES:

[Footnote 24: _Introduction._ p. 120.]

[Footnote 25: _Literary Chronicle_, 1822.]

[Footnote 26: The incidents of the voyage are related by Captain Tench.]

[Footnote 27: _Edinburgh Review_, 1803.]

[Footnote 28: _Quarterly Review_, 1814.]

[Footnote 29: On this medal an author, quoted in _Phillip's Voyages_,

ventured a poetical prophecy, which has at least the merit of

truthfulness:--

VISIT OF HOPE TO SYDNEY COVE.

_Written by the author of the Botanic Garden_, 1791.

Where Sydney Cove her lucid bosom swells,

Courts her young navies, and the storm repels;

High on a rock, amid the troubled air,

HOPE stood sublime, and wav'd her golden hair.

"Hear me," she cried, "ye rising realms record

Time's opening scenes, and Truth's unerring word:

There shall broad streets their stately walls extend,

The circus widen, and the crescent bend;

There, ray'd from cities o'er the cultur'd land,

Shall bright canals and solid roads expand.

Embellish'd villas crown the landscape scene,

Farms wave with gold, and orchards blush between;

While with each breeze approaching vessels glide,

And northern treasures dance on every tide!"

Then ceas'd the nymph: tumultuous echoes roar,

And Joy's loud voice was heard from shore to shore.

Her graceful stops descending press'd the plain,

And Peace, and Art, and Labor, joined the train.

_--Governor Phillip's Voyage to Botany Bay._]

[Footnote 30: Vol. i. p. 12.]

[Footnote 31: _Quarterly Review._]

[Footnote 32: _Collins's New South Wales_, vol. i. p. 180.]

HISTORY OF TASMANIA.

FROM 1803 TO 1824.

FROM 1803 TO 1824.

SECTION I.

The establishment of a settlement in Van Diemen's Land, perhaps thus

hastened by the jealousy of a rival power, was at first chiefly intended

to relieve Port Jackson. Fifteen years had elapsed since its foundation,

and from six to seven thousand prisoners had been transported thither:

dispersion became necessary to security--to repress alike the vices of

the convicts, and the growing malversation of their taskmasters. The

want of prisons, or places of punishment, and the indolence and

intemperance of emancipist settlers, endangered authority.

In 1800, the transportation of the _defenders_ from Ireland, appears to

have created continual anxiety: a committee of officers was formed to

examine persons suspected, when Harold, a priest, was arrested, and

accused his fellow prisoners. His testimony was insidious, and

discredited; but the alarm led to the formation of a volunteer company

of a hundred persons, who armed for the suppression of rebellion. The

more distrusted of the Irish prisoners were conveyed to Norfolk Island;

there, some months after, a conspiracy was detected to massacre the

officers, and seize the island. On the night fixed for action, the plot

was discovered. An Irish servant, muttering words of compassion, was

overheard by his master: he was induced to explain, and was immediately

taken to Major Foveaux, the officer in command. The danger was imminent:

the warmth of the season (December) had tempted the soldiers to slumber

with open doors, and it was said that the sentinels were implicated who

that night kept watch. These being changed, and other precautions

adopted, the plotters postponed their design; and next day were marched

to church without suspicion. The door was beset with soldiers: the

leaders were arrested; one executed--and on the following day, the

blacksmith, charged with fabricating arms, was also hung. The necessity

for dispensing with the forms of law was not made out, and these summary

punishments were censured. That the danger was not imaginary, may,

however, be inferred from the after attempts at Port Jackson.

The military force of New South Wales, drawn together by a love of

adventure, or the hope of gain, when their own status was assailed, were

often exacting and severe: but they slightly sustained the moral

strength of the government. To select mistresses from the female

prisoners was one of their earliest and most valued prerogatives, who,

standing in this equivocal relation, became their agents and sold their

rum.

The Governor, after struggling to abate the abuses around him, yielded

to a pressure which seemed irresistible. He endeavoured to mollify by

his liberality, those he could not govern by restraint: he multiplied

licenses for the sale of rum, and emancipists aspired to commercial

rivalry with the suttlers in commission. The chief constable was himself

a publican, and the chief gaoler shared in the lucrative calling, and

sold spirits opposite the prison.

The moral laxity which prevailed, produced its natural

consequences--violations of discipline, which led to great crimes. The

offenders, to escape immediate punishments, retreated to the remote

districts; occasionally sheltered by the emancipist cotters. The feeble

resistance offered to their depredations, inspired, and almost justified

the prisoners in the hope, that the common bondage might be broken. A

large agricultural establishment, belonging to the government, at

Castle-hill, Parramatta, employed many Irishmen implicated in the recent

disorders of their country. These prompted the rest to attempt to

recover their liberty, but they were subdued by the military under Major

Johnstone: some were shot, and several executed.

In this unsatisfactory condition was the colony of Port Jackson, when

Van Diemen's Land was occupied. Its remote distance, its comparatively

small extent and insular form, fitted it for the purposes of penal

restraint--a place where the most turbulent and rapacious could find no

scope for their passions. Its ports closed against commerce, afforded

few means of escape. In New Holland, labor and produce were redundant:

overwhelming harvests reduced the price of grain so low, that it was

rejected by the merchants; goods could not be obtained in exchange;[33]

and the convicts at the disposal of government were a burden on its

hands--almost in a condition to defy its authority. Thus, Van Diemen's

Land was colonised; first, as a place of exile for the more felonious of

felons--the Botany Bay of Botany Bay--

"And in the lowest deep, a lower deep!"

Lieutenant Bowen, in the _Lady Nelson_, set sail from Sydney, and in

August, 1803, landed at Risdon, on the east bank of the Derwent: his

party included a few soldiers and prisoners, and Dr. Mountgarrat, the

surgeon. A far more important immigration soon followed.

Port Phillip, on the east coast of New Holland, first discovered by

Captain Murray in the _Lady Nelson_, 1799, was surveyed by Flinders in

1802, and in 1803 by Grimes, the surveyor-general. They reported the

country to be lightly timbered, to abound in herbage, and gentle slopes

suitable to the plough. The port offered an asylum against both war and

tempests, sufficient for the fleets of all nations.[34]

The establishment of a settlement at Port Phillip being determined on by

the ministry of Great Britain, an expedition was forwarded, which

consisted of the _Calcutta_, 50 guns, Captain Woodriff, and the _Ocean_,

a transport of 500 tons. In addition to the convicts, there were forty

marines, four hundred male prisoners, twelve free settlers and their

families, six unmarried women, six the wives of prisoners, and six

children. It is scarcely necessary to remark, that the morals of the

officers, or of the women, were not superior either to the service or to

the times. The events of the voyage, worthy of remembrance, were not

numerous; it was disturbed by rumours of plots and conspiracies;

punishments were not infrequent, and one woman was flogged for stealing

the cap of a companion.

The _Calcutta_ did not convey the settlers to the Derwent. On her return

to Great Britain, Lieutenant Tuckey published an account of the voyage to

Port Phillip, which he surveyed. In the year following (1805), the

_Calcutta_ was convoy to St. Helena, and encountered the Rochefort

squadron. Captain Woodriff determined to engage the whole division: the

merchantmen escaped; but the _Calcutta_, in the unequal contest, became

unmanageable, and struck her colors. Captain Woodriff was soon

exchanged, but Lieutenant Tuckey remained in captivity until the allied

armies entered France.

Promoted to the rank of commander, he received charge of the expedition

in 1816, sent to explore the Zaire; but with most of his people fell a

martyr to the spirit of African discovery. He is said to have been

handsome in person, and generous in hand. "He knew nothing of the value

of money, except as it enabled him to gratify the feelings of a

benevolent heart."[35]

The spot selected at Port Phillip, was ill-chosen as the site of a town,

and they found great difficulty in obtaining pure water. These

circumstances, represented by Collins to the Governor-in-chief, were

thought sufficient to justify a removal to Van Diemen's Land, and long

postponed the occupation of a country, inferior to few in this

hemisphere; a measure lamented by several of the settlers. A lady,

writing to her friends from the banks of the Derwent, censured, in terms

of great contempt, the relinquishment of Port Phillip, which she

described in glowing language: she seemed alone capable of estimating

its future importance; but she pronounced Van Diemen's Land a dreary and

desert region, destined never to prosper--thus she forfeited the credit

of prophecy.[36]

Several prisoners attempted to escape; in one instance, with a singular

result. Buckley, a man of gigantic stature, and two others, set off, it

was said, for China! They rambled for some distance together, and

suffered great misery: at last, they parted. Of his companions, Buckley

saw no more, and when he returned to the settlement all was deserted.

After months of solitary wandering, he found a tribe of natives, by whom

he was adopted: he remained among them for three-and-thirty years,

conforming to their barbarous customs, and forgetting his own language.

Once only he saw the faces of white men; a boat's crew landed to bury a

seaman: he endeavoured to arrest their attention; they looked at him

earnestly, but took him for a savage--he was dressed in a rug of

kangaroo skin, and was armed with spears. This man still survives: he

contributed to the friendly reception of his countrymen; but during his

long sojourn, he had imparted no ideas of civilisation.

The _Lady Nelson_ and the _Ocean_ conveyed the party from Port Phillip

to the Derwent. The situation of the camp at Risdon had been found

undesirable, they therefore landed at Sullivan's Cove. They arrived in

two divisions, on the 30th January and 16th February, 1804. The names of

the principal persons are as follows:--Lieutenant-Governor Collins; Rev.

R. Knopwood, chaplain; E. Bromley, surgeon superintendent; W. Anson,

colonial surgeon; M. Boden, W. Hopley, assistant surgeons; P. H.

Humphrey, mineralogist; Lieutenant Fosbrook, deputy-commissary-general;

G. P. Harris, deputy-surveyor; John Clarke and William Patterson,

superintendents of convicts; Lieutenants W. Sladen, J. M. Johnson, and

Edward Lord; 39 marines, 3 sergeants, 1 drummer, 1 fifer; and 367 male

prisoners.

Meantime, the _Lady Nelson_ was dispatched to Port Dalrymple, and

surveyed the entrance of the Tamar: the report being favorable, a small

party of prisoners were sent from Port Jackson, under Colonel Paterson,

to form a settlement, who landed in October, 1804, and for some time

held little intercourse with the settlement on the Derwent. Such were

the pioneers of this important colony; and to so many casual but

concurring incidents, we owe its existence.

The first annals of the settlement offer few events worthy of record.

The transactions of a community, which in 1810 did not comprehend more

than thirteen hundred and twenty-one persons,[37]--the greater part

subject to penal control--could not, unassociated with the present,

detain attention for a moment. The discipline which prevailed in Van

Diemen's Land, and the results which it produced, will be hereafter

related to illustrate transportation; for who would load the colonial

fame with details, from which the eyes of mankind turn with natural

disgust, or blend them with the fabric of Tasmanian history?

The first Governor-in-chief of Van Diemen's Land, the third of New South

Wales, was Philip Gidley King, son of Philip King, a draper, of

Launceston, Cornwall, England. At twelve years of age he entered the

royal navy: by Admiral Byron he was made lieutenant, and holding that

rank in the _Sirius_, he attended the expedition of Phillip in

1788.[38] He was employed to establish the settlement of Norfolk

Island, where his proceedings, recorded in his official journal, and

afterwards published in various forms, afforded great amusement and

satisfaction. There he united in his person, for some time, the priest

and the ruler: he experienced during his residence, most of the

anxieties and difficulties incident to such stations, and detailed them

with curious minuteness. As a cultivator he was energetic and

persevering; but the rats devoured his seed, or torrents washed it away:

or a tropical hurricane, which tore up huge trees, overthrew the frail

buildings he reared. His people conspired to seize his government; he

detected, and forgave them: yet he was not scrupulous in his methods of

punishment. A woman he repeatedly flogged, for stealing the provisions

of her neighbours. He, however, saw the little settlement gradually

improve: it became the favorite residence of the officers; and, as the

climate was better understood, the fertility of the soil yielded a

surpassing abundance.

King was not inattentive to his own interest, and became the owner of

considerable stock. Anecdotes of his humour circulate through the

colonies: being asked by a settler to find him a man to perform certain

work, he took him into his room and pointed him to a mirror. Again, when

a marine was the suitor for some favour, in rejecting his petition he

put him through his exercises, which ended in _quick march_. He had the

frankness of the sailor, and neither aspired to state nor exacted

homage.

David Collins, Esq., long judge advocate of New South Wales, was the

first Lieutenant-Governor of Van Diemen's Land. He was present with his

father, General Collins, at the battle at Bunker's Hill, and thus

witnessed an event accepted by exulting Europe as a signal that British

sway over that region was lost. It was the lot of Collins to proclaim

the dominion of Great Britain at the inauguration of Phillip, and thus

announced the first day of a second and not less valuable empire.

Such incidents teach us that a single life may embrace events beyond the

scope of imagination. We are reminded of the most brilliant passage in

the oratory of Burke, delivered while the authority of the crown was

trembling in the balance of fate. When illustrating how far the

realities of the future might exceed the visions of the present moment,

he stated that a venerable nobleman, Lord Bathurst, could remember when

American interests were a little speck, but which during his life had

grown to greater consequence than all the commercial achievements of

Great Britain in seventeen hundred years. "Fortunate man," he exclaimed,

"he has lived to see it: fortunate, indeed, if he lives to see nothing

which will vary the prospect, and cloud the setting of his day."[39]

Collins was favorably known to the public by his _Account of the English

Colony in New South Wales_: his work was distinguished by the reviewers,

amidst a crowd of publications, as superior to them all.[40] The

stateliness of his style, and the pomp with which he ushers trivial

events, were less apparent when the topics were new. In the last page

he, however, complains that he had spent nine years in the colonial

service, which intercepted the honors of his profession; a case of

hardship, he remarks, everywhere admitted, both by those who could

compensate, and those who could only condole.

In his dedication to Lord Hobart, the principal secretary of state, he

drops the tone of complaint and disappointment: he tells that nobleman

that his private virtues were rendered more conspicuous by the splendour

of his talents as a statesman, and that praise could not be interpreted

as flattery, when devoted to a name which commanded the veneration of

the world. Remonstrances so skilfully advanced could not be unnoticed:

Collins was at once raised to the rank of colonel, and the intelligence

with which he delineated the proper objects and agents of penal

government, exalted him still higher. He dated his dedication in 1802,

and embarked the following year as governor of the settlement it had

been resolved to form.

FOOTNOTES:

[Footnote 33: _Wentworth's New South Wales_, p. 210.]

[Footnote 34: _Flinders_, vol. i.]

[Footnote 35: _Narrative:_ published by authority of the Admiralty,

1818.]

[Footnote 36: "We arrived in October, 1803: my pen is not able to

describe half the beauties of that delightful spot: we were four months

there. Much to my mortification, as well as loss, we were obliged to

abandon the settlement, through the whim and caprice of the

Lieutenant-Governor: additional expense to government, and additional

loss to individuals, were incurred by removing to Van Diemen's Land,

which _can never be made to answer_. Port Phillip is my favorite, and

has my warmest wishes. During the time we were there, I never felt one

ache or pain, and I parted from it with more regret than I did from my

native land." The following is the endorsement of this letter:--"Dated

May 23rd, 1805; received October 10th, 1805--half a year! From an

officer's wife, Mrs. Hartley (quere Hopley?), to her sister."--_Collection

of Letters, for a History of New South Wales. By a Merchant._ London:

Valpy, 1812.]

[Footnote 37: Report of Commons on Transportation, 1812.]

[Footnote 38: _Phillip's Voyage_, p. 95.]

[Footnote 39: The reader will not be displeased to see the whole

passage. On the 22nd of March, 1775, upon moving his resolutions for

conciliation with America, Edmund Burke thus addressed the house:--

"Mr. Speaker,--I cannot prevail on myself to hurry over this great

consideration. It is good for us to be here. We stand where we have an

immense view of what is, and what is past. Clouds indeed, and darkness

rest upon the future. Let us, however, before we descend from the noble

eminence, reflect that this growth of our national prosperity has

happened within the short period of the life of man: it has happened

within sixty-eight years. There are those alive whose memory might touch

the two extremities. For instance, my Lord Bathurst might remember all

the stages of the progress. He was in 1704, of an age, at least, to be

made to comprehend such things. He was then old enough--_acta parentum

jam legere et quæ sit poterit cognoscere virtus_. Suppose, Sir, that the

angel of this auspicious youth, foreseeing the many virtues which made

him one of the most amiable, as he is one of the most fortunate men of

his age, had opened to him in vision, that when in the fourth generation

the third prince of the house of Brunswick had sat twelve years on the

throne of that nation, which (by the happy issue of moderate and healing

councils) was to be made Great Britain, he should see his son, Lord

Chancellor of England, turn back the current of hereditary dignity to

its fountain, and raise him to higher rank of peerage whilst he enriched

the family with a new one. If, amidst these bright and happy scenes of

domestic honor and prosperity, that angel should have drawn up the

curtain and unfolded the rising glories of his country, and whilst he

was gazing with admiration on the then commercial grandeur of England,

the genius should point out to him a little speck, scarce visible in the

mass of national interest--a small seminal principle rather than a

formed body--and should tell him: Young man, there is America, which at

this day serves for little more than to amuse you with stories of savage

men and uncouth manners; yet shall, before you taste death, show itself

equal to the whole of that commerce which now attracts the envy of the

world. Whatever England has been growing to by a progressive increase of

improvement, brought in by varieties of people, by succession of

civilising conquests, civilising settlements in a series of seventeen

hundred years, you shall see as much added to her by America in the

course of a single life! If this state of his country had been foretold

to him, would it not require all the fervid glow of enthusiasm to make

him believe it? Fortunate man, he has lived to see it: fortunate indeed,

if he lives to see nothing that shall vary the prospect, and cloud the

setting of his day."--_Parl. Hist._, vol. xviii. p. 487.]

[Footnote 40: _Edinburgh Review_, 1803.]

SECTION II.

When Collins determined to relinquish Risdon, after survey and

comparison of the places offered to his choice, he preferred the spot on

which stands Hobart Town, called after the name of his patron.

Imagination has traced in its natural outlines a resemblance to the

seven-hilled Roman capital, once the mistress of the world.[41] Its

chief recommendation was the stream which runs through the centre of the

city, whose margin was then beset with brushwood, and choked with

prostrate trees: these often obstructed its course, and threw over the

adjacent banks a flow of water, and thus formed marshes and pools.[42]

Hobart Town is built on the west side of the Derwent, a river named

after the Derwent in Cumberland, celebrated by Wordsworth, the laureate

of England, and the poet of the lakes, who thus associates with its

beauties the recollections of his childhood:--

"Among the mountains were we nursed, loved stream!

Thou near the eagle's nest,

Where thy deep voice could lull me."

"--------Glory of the vale!

Kept in perpetual verdure by the steam

Of thy soft breath."[43]

The county, including at first half the island, was called after the

same nobleman, who was then Lord Buckinghamshire.

The northern settlement, formed by Colonel Paterson,[44] was seated on

the Western Arm of the Tamar, and called York Town. In describing the

site, the difficulty of obtaining water is noticed by Flinders; but by

Dr. Bass, the adjacent land was represented as adapted for both

agriculture and pasture: he added, "If it should be ever proposed to

make a settlement, this part seems to merit particular attention." From

this spot the greater part of the new establishment was removed (1806)

to the country above the North and South Esk; where the colonists were

delighted to discover extensive plains equally suitable for tillage and

pasture, where not a tree obstructed the prospect.[45]

The Tamar was traced, and named by Paterson after a Cornish stream, and

the valley of Launceston, after a town in Cornwall, and both in honor of

Governor King. At Launceston he proposed to establish a sea port town,

for the northern section of the island. Port Dalrymple, as this

settlement was then called, was not under the government of Hobart Town

until 1812.[46]

The first communication between Hobart and Launceston was opened by

Lieutenant Laycock and his party, they were nine days in the journey,

and their unexpected appearance excited great astonishment at

Hobart.[47] A loaded cart was subsequently sent to Launceston, and

passed over the country without falling a single tree.[48]

The first Tasmanian house stood on land adjoining the Macquarie Hotel:

it was built by Lieutenant E. Lord, of wattle and dab--its windows, like

the port-holes of a vessel. That it was the first, constituted its chief

claim to distinction: it was considered as an achievement of

civilisation--a trophy gained upon the wilderness. All were not so well

lodged; yet such houses are soon reared. Posts, joined by wall plates,

fixed in the ground; woven with wattle rods, plastered with mingled

clay, sand, and wiry short grass, and whitened--a grass thatched roof; a

chimney of turf piled on stone, a door and a window: the cottage is

finished.

The removal of the settlers from Norfolk Island, colonised in 1788, was

the next most important event. On his return to Great Britain, Collins

visited that place, in company with Hunter, the late governor-in-chief.

On the whole, he represented Norfolk Island as by no means promising to

repay the annual cost, and it was resolved to abandon it.

In 1803, directions were issued by Lord Buckinghamshire (Lord Hobart).

The opposition of the settlers, and the fear of famine, for some time

occasioned delay. In 1805, only four free settlers had removed. The

order was renewed in 1808 by Mr. Windham, then secretary of state, and

Captain Bligh directed Captain Piper to compel the colonists to evacuate

the island, and even to shoot any one who might retreat to the woods to

avoid embarkation.[49] They were conveyed to this island chiefly in the

_Estramina_, _City of Edinburgh_, and _Sydney_: 254 arrived on 15th

October, 1808.[50]

Norfolk Island, so celebrated for its genial climate and unusual

fruitfulness, is of volcanic origin, and contains about 14,000 acres. It

lies on the 29th parallel,[51] north of New Zealand: it is nine hundred

and ninety miles from Port Jackson, thirteen hundred miles from the

Derwent, and until seen by Captain Cook, was probably never visited by

man. Norfolk Island has twenty-eight miles of sea shore: its greatest

elevation is Mount Pitt: it is a succession of hills and valleys. Its

lofty cliffs, which breast the ocean, are crowned by the elegant white

wood and the gigantic pine. The wild jasmine and convolvuli, which reach

from tree to tree, form bowers and walks of exquisite beauty. Twice in

the year the settler gathered his harvest: the lemon, the orange, and

the pine, shed their fragrance in profusion, and yielded the richest

fruit. Though liable to occasional storms and destructive insects, the

husbandman could scarcely be said to toil. Gentle showers frequently

refresh the undulating soil, and pour down rivulets to the ocean. Sea

breezes cool the atmosphere, and the diseases often incident to such

latitudes, are unknown; but no ships can anchor: it is a land unsuited

to commerce.

Thus it presented no incitement to exertion: it gave the indolent

abundance without labor; it afforded a leisure, in which man is prone to

degenerate and sink into the savage. Distillation from the cane produced

spirits, more than usually deleterious: unacquainted with the process by

which saccharine is crystalised, the settlers were unable to prepare

sugar. They found the raw rum destructive, and attributed its fatal

effects solely to the leaden worms![52]

In 1800, the population of Norfolk Island comprehended 960 souls:[53]

3,521 acres of land were granted; divided into farms of from ten to

thirty acres each. A station, where rather more refractory offenders

were sent, its government varied with the character of each officer. Of

the moral condition of the island nothing good could be expected, and

little favorable is remembered.

Always a place of banishment, even when a colony, Norfolk Island seemed

destined to exhibit the extremes of natural beauty and moral deformity.

The language of Holt, the Irish rebel, who spent several months there,

might be better suited to a latter period, but expressed the intensity

of his abhorrence, not wholly unfounded--"That barbarous island, the

dwelling place of devils in human shape; the refuse of Botany Bay--the

doubly damned!"[54]

On the determination of the government being announced, the settlers

manifested great repugnance: the elder people declared they would not

quit the country; it was, however, the decree of an irresistible will.

The inhabitants were offered a settlement in Van Diemen's Land or New

South Wales; mostly, they chose this country. They received from the

government whatever would contribute towards reconciling them to the

change. Vessels were provided for their removal, their possession in

land was doubled, and it was freed from all conditions and reservations.

They received cattle on loan, and they were rationed as new settlers

from the public stores. That the change was beneficial to the rising

generation can hardly be doubted; but the effect on the parents was

generally painful. Time was required to equal the cultivation of the

spot they had left, compared with which even Van Diemen's Land seemed

blank and barren. Years after, they spoke of the change with regret and

sadness.

The settlers, divided into three classes, according to their origin or

wealth, were located part in the neighbourhood of Hobart Town, at

Pittwater, and New Norfolk, and part at Norfolk Plains. Thirty, forty,

or fifty acres was the ordinary grant, until a later period: a large

extent was neither possessed nor desired. Many valued nothing but the

immediate benefits to which their character as immigrant farmers then

entitled them. They drew their rations from the royal stores, and

bartered away their homesteads for a few bottles of spirit; and it was

no idle boast, that a keg of rum was then worth more than a common farm.

Their hopeless and dissipated state is remarked in every document of the

times: their frail dwellings soon exhibited all the signs of decay, and

their ground was exhausted by continual cropping. Thus the exhilarating

influences of youth and vigour, usual in the first steps of

colonisation, were here unknown, and a civilising agency rarely

counteracted the social evils which prevailed. The transactions of those

early days are scarcely colonial: charged with debauch and outrage, they

denote a time of social disorganisation--the dark ages found in the

history of every country, where men have been their own masters, and

remote from a public opinion, which cannot be corrupted or controlled.

There were, however, a few settlers from Norfolk Island, distinguished

from the rest by their enterprise and diligence, and who rose to wealth;

but in glancing down the list, a colonist observes how few have retained

their heritage.

During the administration of Colonel Collins, the progress of the colony

was barely perceptible. There were no roads in the interior; no public

buildings: the house of the governor was a mere cottage, too mean for

the accommodation of a modern mechanic.

The transfer commenced at the close of 1805. The _Sydney_, Captain

Forrest, was employed to convey to the Derwent a party of the settlers,

and the stock belonging to the governor-in-chief: this was purchased by

Mr. George Guest, who sold the sheep at £5 per head, and was repaid in

cattle. In the _Sydney_, Joseph Holt, now discharged from restraint,

visited Van Diemen's Land, and contributed to its welfare by his

agricultural and pastoral experience. He found Collins still living in

a tent. A few acres of land had been cultivated at New Town by convicts,

in charge of Clarke, the superintendent: cattle had arrived from Bengal,

and sheep from Port Jackson; but the progress of the settlement had

hitherto been slow.

In New South Wales,[55] gangs of men, stripped to the waist, labored

together, and were exposed to rigorous discipline, common to slaves.

These methods of tillage were introduced into Van Diemen's Land, where

as yet there were no fields prepared for the plough, nor beast of

draught to facilitate human toil. The chief overseers were not skilled

in cultivation: one had been a shoemaker, the other a tailor; and while

they were expecting large returns, they were ignorant that the full ears

which promised an abundant yield, were smut, not grain. This early

failure was attended with disastrous results.

On the arrival of the _Sydney_, Collins looked narrowly into the

probable resources at his disposal, and sent Joseph Holt to examine the

land on the Derwent, with a view to future location. He proceeded along

its shores, until a ledge of rocks obstructed the passage of his boat:

then ascending an eminence, not less in apparent height than the

Dromedary Mountain, "I sat down," he writes, "on its top, and saw the

finest country eyes ever beheld." This was that extensive district

which, from the previous residence of its occupiers, was named New

Norfolk. The spot whence he surveyed the subjacent land he called Mount

Casha.

Joseph Holt, general of the rebel army of Wexford in 1798, at one time

commanded 1,300 men. Memoirs, written by himself, were purchased by the

keeper of the Irish records, and were edited by Thomas Crofton Croker.

The result of that sanguinary struggle added considerable numbers to the

population of these colonies, but on various terms. Holt was an exile,

though often treated as a convict. As a commander he displayed great

natural talents, courage, and fidelity. He ascribed his position as a

rebel, solely to necessity of choosing between immediate death or

insurrection. A neighbour wrecked his property, and denounced him a

traitor in revenge: then loyal men were privileged to condemn without

trial, and slaughter on the spot. In New South Wales, Holt was often

suspected of sedition: he was imprisoned, and was forwarded to Norfolk

Island without trial; on returning to Port Jackson, he visited the

Derwent. Of Collins, Holt speaks with great enthusiasm, as the most

lenient of the governors, and the finest of gentlemen: when he entered

the forests, absconders would fall down on their knees before him, and

obtain his forgiveness.[56]

Holt's notices of this place are scanty, and of the people more so; but

he observes that the daughter of Mrs. Hayes was a "beautiful girl: the

prettiest violet I saw growing on the Derwent." Of such charms he was no

mean judge.[57] Collins was desirous that Holt should settle on the

Derwent, and wrote to Governor King for his consent: the knowledge he

possessed of the treatment of stock, it was thought, would have been

useful; but he resolved not to move farther from the port of

embarkation. He at length returned to Ireland, with £2,000--a step he

lived to deplore.

The settlement was early involved in great difficulties. The hoe, the

usual implement of husbandry, effected but a slow and discouraging

progress: supplies from Port Jackson were forwarded in small quantities,

and were soon altogether interrupted. In 1806 a disaster occurred, which

reduced the elder colony to severe privation. The tempting fertility of

of the land bordering on the Hawkesbury, the Nile of this hemisphere,

induced the petty farmers, whose homesteads dotted its margin, to

overlook its dangers. An inundation, remembered as the _great_ flood,

exceeded all former devastations: vast torrents, of which the origin was

unknown, descended from the mountains, and pouring down with prodigious

violence, suddenly filled and overflowed the channels of the river; and

rising to the height of sixty and eighty feet in a few hours, swept

away the stacks of corn, the live stock, and even the dwellings. A

vessel approaching the coast, saw fragments of the floating ruins many

miles distant from the shore. Thus, lately possessing a superabundant

store, the poor suffered extreme destitution, and the price of maize and

wheat rose to £5 and £6 per bushel.[58]

Unable to succour this colony, the government left it to its own

resources, and for several years the scarcity continued with various

intensity. The kangaroo hunters were the chief purveyors of food. The

officers allowed servants, sent them to the woods, and sold their spoil

to government. Considerable profits were made by the more successful:

the commissariat allowed 1_s._ 6_d._ per lb., and the foundation of some

fortunes were laid by persons whose servants were faithful and expert. A

marine, assisted by two convicts, delivered to the king's stores, 1000

lbs. of kangaroo per month, and continued in this occupation for several

years. A few coarse biscuits were distributed while they lasted, but the

substitute for bread was the dried and pounded flesh of kangaroo! The

government, unable to feed, could no longer task the prisoners: to

lessen the pressure, they were sometimes permitted to disperse in search

of subsistence, and thus laid the foundation of those lawless habits

which afterwards brought the colony to the verge of ruin.

The _Sydney_ had been chartered to India for wheat, but was lost, and

the colony disappointed of the expected relief. When this calamity

became known, a second effort was made: Colonel Paterson, while acting

Governor of New South Wales, contracted with Captain Bunker, of the

_Venus_, to bring a cargo of wheat from Bengal. It was not until 1810,

that she anchored in the Derwent: the dread of famine was removed, and

wheat was now valued at 12s. a bushel. The change of seed enabled the

farmers to clear their ground of that mixed and inferior grain which had

disappointed all attempts at agricultural independence.[59]

When at Bengal, the captain of the _Venus_ received from the governor

two prisoners, supposed to be cast-aways from a vessel seized at Port

Jackson. Stewart, formerly a lieutenant in the navy, secretly contrived

a plan to take the _Harrington_, a vessel richly laden, and provisioned

for a long voyage. The wind blew fair as she lay in Sydney harbour, a

tempting prize: embracing the favorable moment, Stewart called together

several companions whom he could trust, and submitted his project, at

the instant proper for its execution--the first successfully attempted

by prisoners. Thus, before suspicion was awakened, he had seized a

boat, hurried on board, mastered the crew, and was scudding before the

breeze. But at sea his good fortune forsook him: the _Harrington_ was

recaptured by the _Greyhound_, and both vessels were lost on the coast

of Luconia.[60]

These pirates were permitted to land at the Derwent, and were left

behind by the _Venus_. They were found at the house of Garth, a settler,

by soldiers sent to seize spirits secretly landed from the vessel.

Mistaking the errand of the soldiers, one of these men called on his

comrade to resist them; and being enraged by a refusal, he fired, and

inflicted a mortal wound.[61] Such complicated crime was not

extraordinary; but the kind of force necessary in the civil government,

and the shelter afforded to outlaws, were symptoms of social disorder,

which soon after assumed an alarming character.

It was the misfortune of Collins to be involved with the parties

responsible in the deposition of Governor Bligh. This remarkable

deviation from the ordinary conduct of British soldiers, has been

attributed partly to the composition of the military force raised for

that colony, and partly to the temper of Bligh. The officers merged the

military character in the mercantile spirit, and were accustomed to

enjoy privileges in virtue of their commissions, which they converted

into a monopoly of trade. The distance of New South Wales from the

centre of commerce, induced the crown to provide for the settlers the

miscellaneous articles which are usually kept only by the shopkeepers.

At Port Jackson, there were public magazines stored with every requisite

for domestic use, such as potters' ware, utensils for the kitchen, and

the implements of farming.[62] These were issued at stated prices,

rather less than such commodities cost in Europe; but to prevent them

becoming the objects of speculation, an official order for every issue,

specifying the article, was necessary. Such methods of distribution

gave, notwithstanding, ample room for partiality and corruption. On the

arrival of Bligh, he found the improvident settlers, discontented and

poor, completely in the hands of the martial dealers. Perhaps, from a

love of justice, he attempted to rescue them from the grasp of these

intermediate agents, who bought their produce at a narrow price, and

gave them in exchange goods bearing an enormous per centage.[63] Bligh

permitted the farmers to draw from the public magazine whatever was

necessary for private use, and took their engagement to deliver their

grain to the stores at the close of the harvest. This interruption to

the customary dealings of the officers, naturally provoked them: Bligh

reciprocated their aversion, and resented their disrespect. It is,

indeed, stated by Wentworth, that this unfortunate officer renewed in

New South Wales, the same tyranny which it is alleged had driven seamen

of the _Bounty_ to mutiny: that his disposition was brutal, and that he

refined on the modes of inflicting torture.[64]

Bligh was arrested on the 26th January, 1808. A complicated quarrel with

Mr. Macarthur, formerly paymaster of the New South Wales corps, arising

out of mercantile transactions, was the occasion of the military

insurrection. Having refused to attend a summons, Macarthur was

apprehended on a warrant, and committed for trial: he was charged with

an intention to stir up the people of the colony to hatred of the

governor and of government--words of ominous import, when read in the

light of colonial history.[65] Except the president of the court, the

officers were more favorable to the accused than to the governor, and

regarded him as the victim of a common cause. In his address to the

court, Mr. Macarthur objected to the judge advocate, as a person

disreputable in character, and actuated by feelings of hostility against

himself. That functionary then threatened to commit Macarthur for

contempt: Captain Anthony Fenn Kemp interposed, with a threat "to

commit the judge advocate himself;" who, seeing among the spectators

many soldiers wearing side-arms, and fearing for his personal safety,

left the bench. Macarthur again appealled to his military brethren to

preserve him from the ruffian constabulary: they immediately ordered the

soldiers present to protect him against the peace officers. This

interference was represented as an illegal rescue; Macarthur, however,

surrendered to the provost marshal, and was lodged in gaol.

The governor resolved to bring to trial the six officers who had

repelled the judge advocate, for treasonable practices; and, as a

preliminary step, ordered that they should appear before the bench of

magistrates, of whom Colonel Johnston, their commander, was one. It was

now supposed, that Bligh intended to constitute a novel court of

criminal jurisdiction, and that he had resolved to carry to the last

extremes the hostility he had declared. Colonel Johnston, as a measure

of self defence, was induced to march his regiment to government house,

and place his Excellency under arrest--demanding his sword, and his

commission as governor.[66]

This transaction throughout, caused a very strong sensation, both in the

colony and at home. Opinions widely differ respecting its origin and its

necessity. That it was illegal, it may be presumed, no one will deny:

that it was wanton, is not so indisputable. The unfortunate termination

of Bligh's first expedition to Tahiti, the imputations of harshness and

cruelty for ever fastened to his name, and the disreputable agents he

sometimes employed in his service, made the position of the officers

extremely anxious, if not insecure. Bligh had become popular with the

expiree settlers, who reckoned a long arrear of vengeance to their

military taskmasters; and who, with the law on their side, or

encouragement from the governor, might have been expected to shew no

mercy. Had Bligh escaped to the interior, the personal safety of the

officers might have been perilled. The settlers, led on by the undoubted

representative of the crown, would have been able to justify any step

necessary for the recovery of his authority, and at whatever sacrifice

of life.

Bligh was permitted to embark on board the _Porpoise_[67], to proceed

forthwith to Great Britain, engaging not to communicate with any

intermediate British colony. He bound himself upon his honor as an

officer and a gentlemen to attempt nothing to the disturbance of the

existing government, pending the reference to Downing-street. This

agreement he made with Colonel Paterson, who had no part in the revolt.

When upon the quarter-deck of the _Porpoise_, he repudiated these

engagements, and ordered Lieutenant Kent, then in command, to batter

down Sydney, and to restore his authority by force;--a task he declined.

He, however, sailed for the Derwent, where his vessel was still lying,

when unknown to him Macquarie arrived in New South Wales. Bligh had

dispatched information of the insurrection at the earliest opportunity,

and the ministers lost no time in forwarding new troops. The ships

approached the harbour, prepared to pour in a broadside, but the

government was instantly delivered up to the newly appointed head, by

Colonel Paterson, the officer in command. The greater part of his

official acts were prudently confirmed by Governor Macquarie, although

the gifts and appointments of the interim government were declared null

and void.

When Bligh arrived at Hobart Town, he was received by Collins with the

respect due to his station; he was, however, soon followed by

despatches, which informed the lieutenant-governor of the movements at

Sydney. Collins, Bligh stated, intended to arrest him; at all events he

re-embarked, and the settlers were interdicted from holding

communication. A free man, Mr. Belbin, was flogged for the infraction of

this order, but afterwards received a grant from the crown in reward for

his loyalty. Mr. George Guest espoused the same side: the vessel was

ill-provisioned, and he secretly drove down his cattle to the beach,

where some were slaughtered for the use of the _Porpoise_.

In extenuation of the conduct of Collins, it will be remembered that

Bligh was already deposed, when he appeared in the Derwent; and that his

attempted resumption of office was a breach of his parole. The

impression prevailed that Bligh, if restored, would exact sanguinary

vengeance. The union of the officers was requisite to preserve order,

even in the most quiet times: when deprived of military authority, it

was the moral duty of Bligh to await the interference of the supreme

government, and not needlessly expose those whom he was unable to

protect, to the double danger of disloyalty and faction.

Bligh returned to Port Jackson: though the time for his honorary

restitution was passed, he was received with respectful formality. A

proclamation had already been issued, prohibiting suits of law for

injuries suffered from the usurping government, and giving indemnity and

protection to all who had acted under its authority; but Bligh was

empowered to carry home all who might be able to throw light on his

deposition. This order must have terminated the government of Collins,

had he survived. Colonel Johnstone was tried and cashiered (but

permitted to sell his commission), and the mildness of his sentence was

attributed by the crown to the extraordinary circumstance of the

case.[68]

This was the last important occurrence in the eventful life of Collins:

he died on the 24th March, 1810, in the fifty-sixth year of his age,

having held the administration six years and thirty-six days. His death

was sudden: except a slight cold, there was little warning of its

approach. He died whilst sitting in his chair, and conversing with his

attendant. His funeral was celebrated with all the pomp the colony could

command, and 600 persons were present.[69] The share he accepted in the

responsibility of the deposition of Bligh, disturbed his tranquillity,

and it was thought hastened his end.

In 1810, Collins attempted to establish a newspaper--_The Derwent Star,

and Van Diemen's Land Intelligencer_.[70] Though but a quarto leaf, with

broad margin, and all the contrivances which dilate the substance of a

journal, it was much too large for the settlement--where often there was

nothing to sell; where a birth or marriage was published sooner than a

paragraph could be printed; where a taste for general literature had no

existence, and politics were excluded. The chief contents were droll

anecdotes and odd exploits. The second number contains a rather pompous

account of Governor Macquarie's inauguration at Sydney. The next issue,

beside a government order or two, describes the feat of Barclay, the

pedestrian--a thousand miles in a thousand hours; the wonderful

longevity of Joseph Ram, a black of Jamaica, who died in his 140th year;

then the greatness of Lambert, whose body weighed 52 lbs. fourteen times

told; and who was sent by an inclined plane into his grave. Then follow

an eulogy on the governor's profession, one trial, one ship, two births,

and one marriage. The notice of a wedding is characteristic and

unique--the first published by the Tasmanian press:--"On Monday, 26th

ult., R. C. Burrows to Elizabeth Tucker, both late of Norfolk Island.

They had cohabited together fourteen years, verifying at last the old

adage--_better late than never_."[71] Such were the topics of this

ephemeral journal, which, however, survived the governor himself. In the

number published a few days before his decease, are the following

lines:--

"And thou, dear Cobham, with thy latest breath

Shall feel thy ruling passion strong in death:

Such in that moment, as in all the past:

'O, save my country, heaven!' shall be thy last."

Collins was the son of General Arthur Tooker Collins and Harriet Fraser,

of Pack, in King's County, Ireland: he was the grandson of Arthur

Collins, author of the _Peerage of England_.[72] At fourteen years of

age he was lieutenant of marines; two years after, he commanded the

military guard which attended Matilda, Queen of Denmark, to her

brother's Hanoverian dominions, and had the honor of kissing her hand.

It is said that, three years subsequent, he distinguished himself in

that fatal conflict already noticed--the battle of Bunker's Hill. In

1774, he was captain of marines in the _Courageux_, of 74 guns,

commanded by Lord Mulgrave, and was present with Lord Howe, at the

relief of Gibraltar. At the peace of 1782, he retired to Rochester, in

Kent, with his lady, an American, who survived him. The despatch,

announcing his decease, was filled with lamentations: "I am sure," said

the writer, "when I speak the feelings of my heart on this melancholy

occasion, that it is not my single voice, but that of every department

whatsoever in the settlement, who with the most heartfelt regret

acknowledge him to have been the father and the friend of all," His

person was remarkably handsome, and his manners prepossessing: to a

cultivated understanding, and an early fondness for literature, he

joined a most cheerful and social disposition.

Colonel Collins was buried in the church-yard of St. David's, Hobart

Town. To provide a temporary place for public worship, a small wooden

church was erected on the spot, and its altar was reared over his grave.

This building was blown down in a tempest, and its materials being

carried off, left the resting place of Collins long exposed to the

careless tread of the stranger. Sir John Franklin, always generous to

the memory of official worth, reared a monument, bearing this

inscription:--

Sacred

to the Memory of

DAVID COLLINS, ESQ.,

Lieutenant Governor of this Colony,

and Lieutenant Colonel of the Royal Marine Forces.

On the first establishment of the colony of

New South Wales he was employed as Judge Advocate,

And in the year 1803

he was entrusted by his Majesty's government

with the command of an expedition,

destined to form a settlement at Port Phillip,

on the south coast of New Holland;

but which was subsequently removed to

Van Diemen's Land.

* * * * *

Under his direction as Lieutenant Governor,

the site of this town was chosen,

and the foundation of its first building

laid in 1804.

He died here on the 28th of March, 1810,[73]

aged 56 years.

And this monument long projected

was erected to his memory in 1838,

by direction of His Excellency

SIR JOHN FRANKLIN, K.C.H., K.R.

FOOTNOTES:

[Footnote 41: _Ross's Almanack_, 1829.]

[Footnote 42: Ibid, 1835.]

[Footnote 43: _Wordsworth's Sonnet to the Derwent._]

[Footnote 44: Colonel Paterson had been distinguished by his researches

in Africa, and had gained considerable reputation as a botanist. This

spirit of enterprise and intelligence he always preserved: he directed

the government botanical establishment at Parramatta, and the French

delineated his attainments with more than their usual enthusiasm. He

superintended the exotic plantation provided for the colonies, and the

repository of native shrubs intended for the gardens at Kew. His name

not unfrequently occurs as an adjunct to the scientific descriptions of

the botanist. Formerly acting governor and commander of the military

corps of New South Wales, he was not unsuitable for the more direct

duties of his office. It is, however, as a naturalist that he is

remembered. _He planted trees_: some are still growing amidst the

desolation of York Town. He was the first who attempted to improve the

grass of the country. He was the author of a volume of travels,

published in 1789, entitled, _Narrative of Four Journies into the

Country of the Hottentots and Caffraria, in the years_ 1777-8, _and_ 9.]

[Footnote 45: _Sydney Gazette_, 1806.]

[Footnote 46: Ibid, May, 1812.]

[Footnote 47: Ibid, May, 1807.]

[Footnote 48: Lieut. Lord's Evidence, Par. Pap., 1812.]

[Footnote 49: Johnstone's Trial, p. 337.]

[Footnote 50: _Sydney Gazette_, 1808.]

[Footnote 51: "After numerous observations, we found it--Lat. 29° 4'

40". Long. 161° 12' East Greenwich."--_Hunter's Historical Journal._]

[Footnote 52: _Backhouse's Journal._]

[Footnote 53: Collins.]

[Footnote 54: Holt gives the following curious anecdote:--"The Rev.

Henry Fulton was reading the commandments, when Tony Chandler sung

out--'turn out, you d----d villians, and launch the boat!' As I was

going out, I said to Mr. Fulton, 'I perceive Tony Chandler's word has

more power here than the word of God.' Fulton smiled, and shook his

head."--_Memoirs_, vol. ii. p. 232.]

[Footnote 55: "At a distance, I saw about fifty men at work, as I

thought dressed in nankeen jackets, but on nearer approach I found them

naked, except trousers: they had each a kind of large hoe, about nine

inches deep and eight wide, and the handle as thick as a shovel, with

which they turned up the ground."-_Holt's Memoirs_, vol. ii. p. 79.]

[Footnote 56: The work is written with considerable strength of

delineation; although his accounts are not quite safe authority for the

character of his enemies. His words he spelled after a provincial

pronunciation: thus, describing the crew of the _Sydney_, he writes,

instead of Sepoys and Lascars, "Saypies and Glascars."]

[Footnote 57: Of the women at Rio, he says--"Their skin is equal in

clearness to the skin of a new laid egg: their eyes black as sloes;

their hair like polished jet; their teeth as even as rows of printing,

and as white as pearls; their eye-brows like those of a doll: their feet

and legs, as if they were modelled in wax-work. They are the most

complete patterns of the neatest form of a woman!"]

[Footnote 58: Wentworth.]

[Footnote 59: _Derwent Star, January_, 1810.]

[Footnote 60: _Cunningham's Two Years in New South Wales_, p. 201.]

[Footnote 61: _Derwent Star, February_, 1810.]

[Footnote 62: _Peron's Voyage._]

[Footnote 63: "It was, we must confess, very provoking to see the

officers draw goods from the public store, to traffic in them for their

own private gain, which goods were sent out for the advantage of the

settlers, who were compelled to deal with those huckster officers for

such articles as they might require; giving them from 50 to 500 per

cent. profit, and paying them in grain."--_Memoirs of Holt_, vol. ii. p.

296.]

[Footnote 64: The instance given by Mr. Wentworth (p. 202), of a man who

was sent by Bligh with a note to the constable, who was directed to flog

him, without informing him of its purport, however it might read in

London, will not seem enormous to a colonist, who could produce many

parallel cases; it was a practice too common.]

[Footnote 65: In 1702, Colonel Bayard was tried in New York, charged

with having used divers indirect practices and endeavours to procure

mutiny and desertion among the soldiers in the fort, &c. For sending a

petition to the home government, which received a few military

signatures, against the governor and the ruling faction, he was

condemned to death--in the horrid terms included in the penalty of high

treason. Before the sentence was executed, Lord Cornbury arrived: the

chief justice _fled to England_; Lord Cornbury, however, it is said;

destroyed the factions of New York, by oppressing them both: "and the

contest soon began, which ended in the establishment of a free and

independent nation."--_Chandler's American Trials._ Boston: vol. i. p.

294.]

[Footnote 66: _Lang's History of New South Wales_, vol. i. p. 110.]

[Footnote 67: Dr. Lang states, that "he was obliged to sign an agreement

to quit the colony forthwith; but instead of proceeding to England,

Governor Bligh landed at the Derwent."--(vol. i. p. 121). And seems

rather to extenuate this breach of faith. Were no agreement of this

class binding the rigours of captivity and civil strife could never be

mitigated. The following is Bligh's own statement:--"I took the

_Porpoise_ on the terms they proposed to me, and the moment I got the

command of the _Porpoise_, I took care to keep it, and would not suffer

any of these terms, or any thing which they said to have the least

influence on my mind."--Johnstone's trial, p. 33.]

[Footnote 68: Horse Guards. July 1811.]

[Footnote 69: _New South Wales Gazette_, 1810.]

[Footnote 70: Printed by J. Barnes and T. Clark, at the Government

Press, Hobart Town.]

[Footnote 71: _Derwent Star, March 6th_, 1810.]

[Footnote 72: _Collins's Peerage_: of venerable authority.--_Quarterly

Review_, 1820.]

SECTION III.

On the demise of Colonel Collins, the government devolved on Lieutenant

Edward Lord, until the arrival of Captain Murray, of the 73rd regiment.

The governor-in-chief visited Van Diemen's Land during Captain Murray's

administration. This auspicious event was the subject of great

exultation. Macquarie was received with all possible formality and

tokens of gladness: a salute from a battery of no great power; an

illumination in the small windows of the scattered cottages; and

addresses delivered by delegates, not bound to declare the number of

their constituents.[74]

Nothing remarkable is remembered of this visit, except that Macquarie

traced the future city. He complained of the utter neglect of right

lines in the erection of dwellings, which advanced or retreated

according to the whim of the builder. The centre of the projected town

he called St. George's Square: in this he intended to rear a church and

town hall, and the quarters of the main guard: the open space he

designed for a market. The streets which intersect each other he called

by the names which still distinguish them: Liverpool-street after the

minister of that name; Macquarie-street after himself; Elizabeth-street

in honor of his lady; Argyle-street, of their native country; and

Murray-street in compliment to the officer in command. The plan sketched

by Macquarie has not been absolutely followed, nor has it been improved.

He ordered the erection of a signal staff on Mount Nelson, named after

the vessel which brought him to port, and conveyed him safely to Port

Jackson. The settlers on the Derwent expressed a fervent admiration of

his devotedness in thus venturing to face the dangers of the visit;

especially accompanied by his consort--so they distinguished Mrs.

Macquarie. The governor merited their gratitude, for his hand was

liberal.[75]

In February, 1812, Colonel Geils became acting Lieutenant-Governor, and

remained until the arrival of Colonel Davey. Colonel Geils devoted great

attention to agricultural pursuits, and first formed at Risdon a

considerable farming establishment. Ordered to India with the troops

under his command, he forwarded his youthful sons to the Cape of Good

Hope, thence to be conveyed to England. The colonists heard soon after

with deep commiseration, that the vessel in which they re-embarked was

lost.

Colonel Davey, the second Governor of Van Diemen's Land, arrived on the

4th February, 1813. His manner of entrance indicated the peculiarity of

his character, for the weather being warm he carried his coat on his

arm, and announced himself at the house where he sought temporary

accommodations: nor did his subsequent administration differ from its

unceremonious beginning. He took pleasure in practical jokes and rough

humour: his countenance was strongly marked, and, by a peculiar motion

of the scalp, he delighted to throw his forehead into comical

contortions. He shared in common a taste for spirituous liquors, and was

not unwilling to participate wherever he was welcome as a guest. On what

principle he was selected to conduct the affairs of a remote and

reformatory settlement, it would be useless to conjecture. As a marine,

he had been present in many important actions; among the rest, at the

battle of Trafalgar. His intended departure from England he concealed

from his family, by whom it was discovered accidentally: they reached

the vessel by extraordinary exertions, and in neglect of all the usual

preparations for the voyage. The ship which conveyed his luggage was

taken by the Americans, during the war--for him a fortunate loss:

indemnified by the largest grant ever conferred in this island (3,000

acres); for it was not pretended that the captors could have made an

extensive prize.

Mrs. Davey, a lady of a meek and uncomplaining spirit, is spoken of with

respect, and the governor himself with kindness; for under a rough

exterior was concealed a generous disposition.

During Davey's government, two hundred female prisoners were brought

down from Sydney, in the brig _Kangaroo_: proclamation was made, and the

settlers were invited to receive them. There was little delicacy of

choice: they landed, and vanished; and some carried into the bush,

changed their destination before they reached their homes. Yet such is

the power of social affections, several of these unions yielded all the

ordinary consolations of domestic life!

The conveniences of civilisation were not wholly neglected. The ports

were opened for general commerce (June, 1813): houses of trade were

established, and Messrs. Kemp and Gatehouse, Messrs. E. Lord and J. H.

Reibey, supplied the colony with English goods: the most necessary

articles had often been wanting. The settlers purchased even the

clothing of the prisoners, as preferable to the skins of animals by

which they were often clad.

The resources of the colony were developed: Mr. Birch, an enterprising

merchant, fitted out a vessel to survey the western coasts (1816), and

Captain Kelly discovered Macquarie Harbour and Port Davey: Captain

Florence found a new species of pine, very highly valued by artificers.

Mr. Birch was rewarded with one year's monopoly of the trade he had

opened.

The whale fishery was considerably enlarged: corn was exported; the

plough introduced, and gradually superseded the hoe; a mill erected; and

(February, 1817) the foundation of St. David's Church was laid. Passage

boats connected the banks of the Derwent; a civil court for the recovery

of debts, not exceeding £50, was established. A newspaper--a second time

attempted in 1814 without success, when the commercial strength of the

community was indicated by two or three advertisements--was at length

published under better auspices. On the 1st June, 1816, Mr. Andrew Bent

issued the first number of the _Hobart Town Gazette and Southern

Reporter_, and thus brought into permanent action an agency which has

promoted as well as recorded the advancement of the community. Nor can

it be recollected without regret, that he, an undoubted benefactor of

the colony, is left to an indigent old age, cut off from the prosperity

to which his early labors contributed.

The welfare of Van Diemen's Land was greatly retarded by the number,

daring, and prolonged depredations of the bushrangers. In some

districts, the inhabitants offered a sanctuary to criminals, and, as

their scouts, gave notice of the approach of danger; while in others the

settlers were driven before them. To check their ravages, Colonel Davey

declared the whole colony under martial law: he punished with flogging

persons, whether free or bond, who quitted their houses by night.

Several offenders were captured, and suffered death.[76] The

inhabitants, to the number of six hundred, expressed their approval of

this stretch of power, but it was promptly disallowed by the

governor-in-chief. On many previous occasions the same course had been

pursued. To constitutional law, the lieutenant-governor was both

indifferent and a stranger.

Colonel Davey, when he relinquished his office, remained for some time

as a settler; he was not, however, successful. He returned to England,

where he died on the 2nd May, 1823. His contemporaries speak of his

character in terms of eulogy. The modern colonist will remember, that

the tastes of society have since that period been modified, even in

Great Britain; and that character can never be fairly judged when

separated from the circumstances in which it is developed. Then, the

town was a mere camp: the etiquette of office, necessary when a

community is advanced, would be folly in its infancy.

FOOTNOTES:

[Footnote 73: Collins, according to most authorities, died on the 24th

March, 1810.]

[Footnote 74:

"_To his Excellency_ LACHLAN MACQUARIE, ESQ., _Captain-General

and Commander-in-chief of his Majesty's Territory of New South

Wales and its Dependencies, &c. &c. &c._

"We, the inhabitants, settlers, and freeholders of his Majesty's

settlement established at the Derwent, Van Diemen's Land, impressed with

the most fervent zeal for his Majesty's government, and the most

profound respect, esteem, and veneration for your Excellency, most

dutifully congratulate you on your arrival at Hobart Town.

"When men, whose characteristic is industry, consider themselves

governed by an Officer in whom his Majesty has reposed merited

confidence, who in order to promote agriculture, encourage morality,

efface dissension, and patronise the industrious and deserving part of

our community, leaves his seat of government, and exposes himself and

his worthy Consort, under many privations, in a small vessel, to the

dangers of a coasting voyage on these seas, a natural emulation must

necessarily arise in the breasts of the inhabitants to merit, by an

inviolable attachment to the laws, and an adherence to the regulations

of the colony, the patronage, favour, and protection of such an

unequalled Governor.

"We humbly presume to hope that the favorable impressions which our

industrious exertions have made on your Excellency's mind on your seeing

Hobart Town and its vicinity, will become much increased on your return

from that tour through the different settlements which your Excellency's

intuitive mind may induce you to make.

"Independent of the high consideration in which we hold your Excellency

as the Representative of our Most Gracious Sovereign, we presume to

solicit your acceptance of our most unqualified respect for your

Excellency's person, and with duty, in the name and on the behalf of the

inhabitants in general, subscribe ourselves your Excellency's most

devoted servants,

"R. W. LOANE, J. INGLE,

"T. W. BIRCH, A. WHITEHEAD."

"_Hobart Town, Van Diemen's Land, November 26_, 1811.

"GENTLEMEN,--The address which I have this day the satisfaction to

receive from you has been gratifying to me, and I beg you to believe

that the inconveniences I have experienced in my voyage to Van Diemen's

Land, have been amply compensated in the pleasure I feel on seeing one

of the finest countries in the world in a state of rapid improvement by

the exertions of his Majesty's loyal subjects settled here, in whose

welfare I shall at all times feel a warm interest; and sincerely hope

that the industry so happily begun will be persevered in with success.

"I return you many thanks for the sentiments of regard you have been

pleased to express towards me.--I have the honor to be, Gentlemen, your

most obedient and most humble servant,

"(Signed) LACHLAN MACQUARIE.

"To Messrs. R. W. Loane, J. Ingle, T. W. Birch, and

A. Whitehead, the Committee who presented the

Address from the inhabitants of the Settlement at

Hobart Town, in Van Diemen's Land."]

[Footnote 75: The complimentary style in which the settlers addressed

the Macquarie family was not without reason. It is said that Mrs. Kate

Kearney, when the high price of her butter was complained of by the

governor, stopped the supply. Mrs. Macquarie, curious to see this

independent milk-seller, paid her a visit: when she entered, the old

lady received her very graciously, and asked after the health of the

Governor, and added, "how is the young Prince?" The story goes, that she

received a valuable grant of land for this well-timed compliment. A

bullock driver, who attended Mrs. Macquarie during one of these visits,

annoyed her by swearing at the cattle: she promised to obtain him his

free pardon, if he would only treat the animals with more civility. A

hundred such stories are current; but he who has been accustomed to sift

them, may take them for their worth.]

[Footnote 76: See vol. ii, p. 129, of this History, for an account of

bushranging.]

SECTION IV.

In planting the colony of New South Wales, it was requisite to provide a

form of government adapted for a community without precedent. That

instituted was equally alien from established usage. It conferred powers

on the governor beyond the dreams of ordinary princes, and violated all

the constitutional guarantees which support the rights of subjects. The

American colonies derived their constitutions, some from the

prerogatives of the crown, others from parliament, under acts

prescribing their structure and limiting their jurisdiction. In some

cases the British legislature authorised the crown to convey the powers

of government at its own discretion, and its own agents. In the reign of

George III.[77] the parliament passed the Quebec Act, which defined the

powers of Canadian legislation and judicature, and thus established a

course that has never since been abandoned.

The immediate design and composition of the Australian colony precluded

the forms of constitutional freedom: the object of the laws and

regulations were but remotely connected with the ordinary interests of

British citizens. Having obtained, therefore, the authority to institute

a government, the crown put into commission the powers it received, but

left to the local authorities to interpret and apply them.[78]

The court of criminal jurisdiction was composed of seven officers, of

whom the judge advocate was one. It could only assemble on the summons

of the governor: his precept determined who, or whether any should sit,

and thus regulated the jury: as their commander his influence was

great--greater, as the dispenser of royal patronage.

The powers of the grand jury devolved on the judge advocate, who framed

the indictment, and determined beforehand the probability of guilt: he

thus sat in a cause which he had judged already. The prosecutor

conducted his own case: witnesses were examined in open court, and the

accused was unassisted by counsel. Nor was unanimity required: yet five

in seven were necessary in capital cases, to authorise an immediate

execution. The judge advocate deliberated with his co-jurors in secret,

and the court was re-opened only when they had agreed upon their

verdict, and determined the sentence. Thus in ordinary cases the weight

of authority in deciding guilt, as well as apportioning punishment,

usually rested with an officer officially connected with the government.

The operation of this court was liable to serious constitutional

objections. It was in the power of the governor to exclude the subject

from the protection of the law, by shutting up the court, and by the

arbitrary selection of its members to anticipate its decision.

In conducting the business of the court, its members dispensed with the

niceties of law, and gave their verdict upon what appeared to be the

substantial merits of the case. From the age of fourteen, the first

judge advocate had been employed in the royal marine service, and

whatever intelligence his writings display, they exhibit utter disregard

of rights recognised by the British constitution. His successors in

office, for two-and-twenty years, until the appointment of Mr. Ellis

Bent, were gentlemen connected with the military profession, who were

unassisted, except by such lawyers as the lottery of transportation

threw in their way: thus, while they were limited by parliament to a

jurisdiction according to the laws of the realm,[79] they were more than

usually unacquainted with their nature, and indifferent to their

observance.

Such were the inherent defects of this form of judicature, from the

large influence possessed by the executive; which could determine the

time of sitting and the members of the court; which denied the right of

challenge, and accepted the concurrence of five voices only in cases of

life and death--and those of persons subject to the influence of the

governor and unaccustomed to weigh evidence, or to defer to the maxims

of civil tribunals. But if the constitution of the court was a subject

of just complaint, the creation of new offences by unauthorised

legislation, was still less acceptable to English statists.

The court proceeded smoothly, so long as none but convicts or persons of

trivial influence were in question; but the dispute with Governor Bligh

disclosed the dangers with which it was fraught: the sympathy of the

jurors with the accused frustrated his prosecution, and overthrew the

executive.

The _esprit du corps_ of the jurors occasionally appeared in their

verdict: the decision of a cause in which an officer was the aggressor,

or one which interested the passions, did not command the confidence of

the people.

The jeopardy of justice was illustrated by a dispute, in which the Rev.

Mr. Marsden was complainant, and the secretary of the governor the

defendant. Mr. Campbell was the censor of the New South Wales press: he

admitted an article, which imputed to Mr. Marsden (1817) the abuse of

his office as agent for the missionary societies, and of using muskets

and gunpowder as articles of traffic with the natives of the Pacific.

The judge advocate in this instance was said to attempt to shelter the

offender by the influence of his three-fold office--as the law adviser

of the governor, the public prosecutor, and member of the court of

criminal jurisdiction. His reluctance to admit the evidence, and to take

the preliminary steps in the prosecution, and his direction to deliver

an inoperative verdict, were held fatal evidences that impartiality

could not be secured by uniting functions so inconsistent with each

other.

The jurors were not unfrequently interested: in some instances the

prosecutor sat as witness and judge, giving the principal evidence in

the case in which he was both to decide the guilt and apportion the

punishment.[80]

The establishment of a court of criminal jurisdiction was alone

authorised by the parliament: the necessity for supplemental laws was

not foreseen, but was soon perceived. The governors assumed the

legislative authority, under the disguise of orders and regulations,

often contrary to the principles of English law, and sustained by

penalties unknown in Great Britain. These were not collated until a late

period: their provisions were imperfectly promulgated. In enforcing

them, the governors relied on the impotence of resistance, and

justified their enactment on the ground of expediency.

Had the parliament conveyed a legislative power, the ordinary

precautions and limitations would have been embodied for that purpose:

thus the free subjects of the king would have known the extent of their

liabilities, both to prohibitions and penalties. An unfettered despotism

drew no distinction, but rejected all questions of legality as

contumacious.

Among the subordinate officers, were some high in rank, natives of

France, who had emigrated during the revolution, or had by incurring the

hatred of its government deserved the patronage of our own. Profoundly

indifferent to the rights of freedom, and ignorant of the forms or

proper subjects of judicial investigation, an "order" was far more

sacred in their eyes, than the volumes of Blackstone. English gentlemen

might have recalled the solemn warnings of history which check

aggressions on private liberty, but an exiled adherent of Bourbon

princes was not likely to be embarrassed by educational prejudices. Not

that British officers were really more scrupulous, or offered by their

habits a better guarantee for the legality of their administration.[81]

The minor offences of prisoners passed under the summary adjudication of

magistrates. They often indulged in the lowest humour or furious

passion: they applied torture to extract confessions, and repeated

flagellation until it became dangerous to life.

The long delay of legislative remedies, when omissions and defects were

discovered, is a proof of ministerial indifference. The crown provided a

court of criminal jurisdiction for Port Phillip: the jurisdiction was

strictly local, and the judge advocate ceased to act when Van Diemen's

Land was occupied; but twenty years elapsed before the deficiency was

supplied. Again, the criminal court of New South Wales was limited to

islands adjacent to the _eastern coast_.[82] The discovery of Bass's

Strait proved that Van Diemen's Land was not included in this

geographical definition, and the scrupulous or idle judges for a long

time evaded the holding of courts in this island, which was thus

surrendered to disorder. In the absence of a legal court, the

magistrates set up a jurisdiction of their own. Criminal trials were

dispatched by the simplest process, and the mixed penalties of a

military and civil court inflicted on the assumed offender.[83] Thus,

the negligent provision for the administration of justice secured

impunity to crime, or seemed to require an arbitrary tribunal.

The proclamation of martial law, was to relieve the government from the

restraints of forms. The facility with which justice could be

administered by it, was illustrated at the Castle Hill insurrection: no

life being lost on the government side, the victorious troops arranged

that every third man convicted should be hanged. They drew the names of

the sufferers by lot, and were proceeding with great vigour, when the

appearance of the governor suspended the execution.[84] The dangerous

usurpation in both Norfolk Island and Van Diemen's Land, led to the

hasty sacrifice of life.

The scarcity of corn was once deemed a sufficient justification, when

there was no appearance of sedition: at these times the government

seized boats, or whatever was deemed useful for the public service, and

imitated the most irregular actions of the Stuarts.

The subordinate authorities were supposed to partake the license of

their superiors. One commandant, Colonel Geils, fixed a spiked collar on

the neck of a free woman; another flogged a female through Hobart Town

for abusive language; and another tied up a free man on the spot, for

placarding a grievance, when as yet there was no press.[85] Davey,

having ordered a person to the triangles, answered his remonstrances

with a pleasant jest: the sufferer reminded him that he could not flog

him; the governor answered that "he would try," and the flagellator soon

determined the problem in favor of authority. Indignant exclamations of

free men were deemed preposterous by a body of officials, who regarded

the diffidence of civil government as absurd, and considered power as

the standard of right.

The administration of justice is described by a work of the times:--"I

have known," wrote a contemporary witness, "men, without trial,

sentenced to transportation by a single magistrate at his own door: free

men, after being acquitted by a court of criminal judicature, banished

to another of the dependant settlements. I have heard a magistrate tell

a prisoner (then being examined for a capital offence, and who had some

goods, supposed to be stolen, for which he would not account), that were

he not going to be hanged so soon, he (the magistrate) would make him

say whence he got them. I have known depositions destroyed by the

magistrate."[86]

The courts were limited by the laws in force within the _realm_, but the

realm was not defined;[87] and thus what portion of the law was

applicable, was left in thirty years' doubt, until the commissioner

royal stated that the omission had prevented several executions.[88] The

same number of years were required to ascertain whether laws passed in

Great Britain subsequent to the era of colonisation were the laws of the

colony.

Law officers of the crown were permitted to define authoritatively the

import of acts of parliament, and on their official decisions the

colonial judge convicted, and the governor executed a criminal.[89]

The persons commissioned as justices constituted a court in avowed

conformity with such tribunals in England, but they adjudicated on the

orders of the governor, and inflicted the penalties he appointed; though

the supreme court, sitting concurrently with these "benches," rejected

the legislation of the governor as invalid, when the basis of an action:

one judge supported them by his moral countenance, although he knew

them to be without legal authority.[90] Judge Advocate Wylde, however,

declared the legislative authority of the governor equally binding with

acts of parliament--a doctrine never surpassed by the most subservient

advocates of an unlimited monarchy.[91]

The crown authorised the governor to grant remissions, but while he

omitted the formalities requisite to perfect those pardons, the minister

neglected to require them. For thirty years the error was undetected,

and until a fraudulent creditor evaded a bill due to an emancipist; but

several years were allowed to pass, even when the mistake was

discovered, before it was fully corrected.

The ministers authorised the governors to grant land to settlers. For

forty-six years these delegates divided the domain of their sovereign,

as if it were his personal property, and without the consent of

parliament, when a court of this colony decided that all such titles

were void in law, whether acquired by purchase or under the old

quit-rent tenure.[92]

Above two hundred thousand pounds had been levied by successive

governors since the illegality of taxation was first submitted to the

notice of the cabinet. In gathering this money, not only had property

been seized, destroyed, and confiscated, but many persons had been

imprisoned, and suffered all the miseries of felon bonds: yet when

arrears, which the indulgence of the government had permitted to

accumulate, were made a subject of legal procedure, the whole fabric of

taxation and legislation by the governor's will, fell down.[93]

The judge of the supreme court could not be insensible to the serious

personal responsibility of longer supporting illegal taxation: he

privately admonished the governor, who withdrew his actions. An act of

indemnity released the ministers who advised, and the governors who

enforced their demands, from the punishment of usurpation; and granted

them power to do by law, what in defiance of law they had done so

long.[94]

Ingenious aggravations were made to the common penalties of a crime:

Collins relates that a witness convicted of perjury, was condemned to

the pillory: his ears nailed to the post as an additional

punishment.[95]

The courts of those times confounded everything together, and deciding

the perjury of a witness, often tried two parties at the same moment.

Flogging witnesses was an ordinary result of investigations, when they

did not end in convictions: so late as 1823, Judge Wylde ordered a

witness to be taken outside, and receive _instanter_ one hundred

lashes.[96]

The long privation of this colony of judicial protection, not only

hindered the due administration of justice, but encouraged imprudence

and fraud. In the year 1814, when the crown erected a supreme court at

Sydney for the decision of civil causes, Major Abbot, a member of the

New South Wales corps, was commissioned as deputy judge advocate in Van

Diemen's Land. He adjudicated in petty session as a magistrate, and by

the accommodation of law to the circumstances of the colony, dealt in a

summary manner with capital offences where prisoners were concerned.

Thus sheep stealing and crimes against the person, committed by

prisoners, were punished by flogging, and removal to a more penal

station; and thus, while a prisoner of the crown might escape with a

milder sentence, free persons for similar offences were placed in

jeopardy of their lives.

"The experiment of a reformatory penal colony," said Sir James

Mackintosh, "is the grandest ever tried; but New South Wales is governed

on principles of political economy more barbarous than those which

prevailed under Queen Bess."[97] This great statesman, who declared no

provincial sphere seemed to him so worthy a noble ambition, as to

become the legislator for these colonies, never failed to denounce the

accumulation of illegality and folly.

At this stage of our inquiry, it may be proper to scan this singular

government. The legislators who authorised its establishment, prescribed

as little as possible: all beyond the repression of crime was hidden

from their eyes. They saw that punishments must be necessary, and

provided for their infliction; but the complicated arrangements which

grew out of the colonisation, were left to the adjustment of chance, or

the discrimination of ministers, and ultimately to the caprice of naval

and military governors.

The extemporary character of their contrivance and expedients, is

sufficiently apparent. Nothing was expected: nothing was dreaded: no

checks were opposed to abuses. Thus acts of tyranny were perpetrated

beyond the ordinary excesses of arbitrary governments, and all classes

were confounded in one regimen of despotism. The commencing measures

manifested their indifference to personal rights. Intending to banish

men for life, the ministers selected for the first fleet chiefly persons

whose crimes only forfeited their freedom for a few years. By

withholding, or neglecting to forward lists of their names, their

crimes, or their sentences, they consigned them not only to perpetual

exile but protracted and illegal bondage. Imitating the ministers of the

crown, the governor imposed compulsory labor on free men, or detained

them when their liberation was notoriously due.

Thus again, law had conveyed power to the king to deliver prisoners by

assignment to shippers, but jealous of trusting the executive, the

actual transportation could only be carried out as the result of a

covenant with private persons. Regardless of these well-advised

precautions, the ministers delivered prisoners to ships of war, in

custody of captains in the royal navy, bound to obey the orders of the

crown; and when loud remonstrances induced them to obtain a legislative

sanction to the innovation, they were silent in reference to the past,

and trusted in their party influence to protect their own agents from

legal penalties.[98] No wonder, with such examples before them, the

governors detained or released at their pleasure.

Bentham was the first to protest against this illegal and violent system

of government, as opposed to every principle made sacred by the

Revolution, by judicial decisions, or by the oaths of sovereigns. He

asserted that the movers and ministers of these despotic proceedings

were liable, one and all, to the visitations of the most penal laws.[99]

They had legislated without warrant, had detained free persons in

bondage, levied illegal duties and imposed unconstitutional

restrictions, and had inflicted cruel punishments for crimes invented by

themselves. The apology for usurpation, was its obvious importance and

general utility; but no one will dissent from the strong indignation

expressed by the philosopher, at wanton violations of British law,

neglect of personal rights and parliamentary privileges.

Governor King, it is believed, first established customs.[100] Hunter

had assessed the property of the colonists, upon obtaining the consent

of several, for the erection of a gaol.[101] The poorer inhabitants

refused to comply with the levy, and were threatened with vengeance:

they knew that however useful, such taxes were illegal though otherwise

just. Thus, although legislation was not shadowed by the parliamentary

act, the governors assumed it in its amplest form. Among the earliest

were orders respecting the production and sale of spirits: to this, the

oriental penalty was attached--"his still shall be destroyed, and his

house pulled down." Infraction of this law was subsequently punished by

imprisonment and transportation.

Of torture, to extort confession, we have ample proof, both written and

traditional: of one Collins observes, "when he trifled he was punished

again; he then declared that the plunder was buried. He went to the

spot, but could not find it; he was then taken to the hospital." Another

was tortured in the same form; but, adds the judge, "the constancy of

the wretched man was astonishing:"[102] he was in consequence acquitted!

This practice continued for twenty years, and in 1825 a prosecution was

instituted against a magistrate for attempting to extract confession by

torture.

The tendency of undefined power to run into tyranny, is illustrated by

Macquarie himself. He had prohibited the entrance of strangers within

the government grounds, and to detect the offenders stationed constables

on the spot, who lay in ambush: three men and two servant girls were

captured and committed. The next morning, the men each received

twenty-five lashes, by the written order of the governor: the women were

detained in the cells for forty-eight hours. There was no appeal to law;

and the sole actors were the governor and the gaoler. A process so

simple was no longer to be tolerated: the public were alarmed.[103] The

assumption of magisterial powers was not compatible with the office of

the governor; but to authorise the flagellation of free men without

trial, for a perhaps innocent trespass, was both dangerous and unjust.

This was, perhaps, the last instance of such extravagant despotism, and

it exposed Macquarie to much inquietude during his life. That a person

so humane in his general character should forget the precautions due in

equity and in law, and punish arbitrarily for imaginary offences, proved

that no power is safely bestowed, unless its objects and extent are

minutely defined.

The civil, called the "Governor's Court," was instituted by George III.

in virtue of his prerogative. It consisted of the judge advocate, and

two inhabitants chosen by the governor: it was empowered to decide in a

summary manner all pleas in relation to property and contracts, and it

granted probates of wills.

When convicts contracted pecuniary obligations, the governor specially

withdrew them from liability to arrest; and told the creditors that in

trusting these debtors their opinion of their honesty must be their sole

guarantee: government could not spare "the servants of the public" from

their toils to answer the plaints of suitors.[104]

From its decisions, a cause could be carried to the governor; and in

sums exceeding £300, to the king in council.

Though unsanctioned by an act of parliament, this court departed widely

from the practice of England. Its authority was keenly disputed by

Bentham; and Commissioner Bigge, in stating its origin and operation,

hints a similar doubt.[105]

Undisturbed by objections the crown, by the patents and commissions of

1814, separated the criminal jurisdiction from the civil, and created a

supreme court, which adopted the English practice. By the new patent, an

appeal was permitted from the supreme court to the "High Court of

Appeals," consisting of the governor and the judge advocate; and, except

when £3,000 were in issue, his judgment was final![106] To both these

tribunals the Tasmanians were amenable; but in civil cases the

appointment (1814) of a local court under the deputy judge advocate,

terminated the absolute dependence on Port Jackson for judicial relief.

Plaints for debts not exceeding £50 were entertained by this court, and

creditors contrived to bring their claims within its jurisdiction, by

dividing the amount into bills of £50. This evasion of the law, although

it defeated the intention of a superior court and lessened its business,

was useful to both parties; it decreased the difficulty and expenses of

suits. It was more equitable in its operation than the supreme court:

the owner of a vessel could carry up his own witnesses to Sydney, and at

the termination of a trial convey them home without delay; but the less

opulent debtor or creditor found himself practically excluded from

redress.

Mr. Judge Abbot was, however, not eager to assume his office, and it was

not until 1816 that he commenced operations. The accumulation of debts

must have been great, for at his first session fourteen hundred plaints

were entered: nor did he exhaust the suitors by delay, for eleven

hundred were disposed of during that year. Two inhabitants, chosen by

the governor sat as assessors; and being known, and knowing all parties,

they often discussed in private beforehand the causes awaiting their

verdict![107]

The deputy judge advocate held in contempt the net-work of the law, by

which equitable rights are sometimes entangled: his was a court of

request without appeal, and he took pleasure in asserting its finality.

For the convenience of suitors he allowed agents to practice in his

court: these gentlemen had somewhat more legal knowledge than the judge,

and often exasperated his antipathies by its ostentation. They would

dwell on the dignity of his court: his decision was irrevocable; even

the lord chancellor of England, they would say, was subject to the

revision of a still higher court than his own, but the deputy judge

advocate decided the cause for ever. Trusted with such resistless

jurisdiction--such onerous responsibility, how great must be his care to

avoid an error beyond correction--an injustice that could not be undone

but by an act of parliament! Such were their addresses: occasionally

heard with complacency--and, it is said, not always unsuccessful. The

most famous of these practitioners were Messrs. R. L. Murray and Evan

Henry Thomas. The last gentleman was an emigrant, and issued a

rhetorical advertisement for employment as a preceptor; but renouncing

that calling, he provided himself with a blue bag, the sole

qualification essential, and paraded the vicinity of the court: here

some suitor found him. What he wanted in experience he made up by

industry; and thus carrying his cause, established his reputation as a

pleader.

Abbott was a lover of fair play: when one of these gentlemen stated a

cause, he expressed a wish that the other side could be placed in as

clear a light. Willing to show how well he comprehended the case, the

agent for the plaintiff set before the court what the defendant might

allege; and Abbott, admitting its force, determined in his favor! The

equitable judge decided that the plaintiff should pay the defendant the

unsought balance of his bill.

On such a primitive plan were minor rights protected. Although the

decisions were often grounded on imperfect proof, the substantial equity

of Abbott's adjudications was rarely questioned. In cases under £5 the

court received no fee, but in higher causes a small sum was paid. The

agents obtained what they could, as the recompense of their professional

toils.

Major Abbott continued to preside as deputy judge advocate, until his

office was abolished. After visiting England he returned to Launceston

with the appointment of civil commandant. He died in 1832: the

inhabitants spontaneously honored his funeral. He was esteemed as a

person of a generous nature and upright intentions. Major Abbott entered

the army at the age of thirteen: he was in the service of the crown

fifty-three years, forty-three of which were spent in the colonies.

FOOTNOTES:

[Footnote 77: 14 Geo. iii. c. 83.]

[Footnote 78: "Whereas it may be found necessary that a colony and a

civil government should be established, and that a court of criminal

jurisdiction should also be established, with authority to proceed in a

more summary way than is used within this realm, according to the known

and established laws thereof." The court, described as above, is then

authorised, to try "outrages and misbehaviours, as if committed in this

realm would be treason or misprision thereof, felony or

misdemeanour."--27 Geo. iii. Nothing is said of legislative power.]

[Footnote 79: _Collins_, vol. i. p. 32.]

[Footnote 80: _Bigge's Jud. Report_, p. 34.]

[Footnote 81: Holt has left a graphic picture of a justice, which must

be received, perhaps, with some reservation;--"I was walking with

Barrington, the most accomplished pickpocket: he was arm-in-arm with

Richard Atkins, Esq. I wished to have some conversation with them. A

bottle of rum was produced, and some pleasant conversation about Ireland

passed. At length I wished to retire, and Mr. A. said he never allowed

any bottle off his table till he saw it emptied. We finished the half

gallon bottle, and of course were not a little elevated. Mr. A. acted as

a kind of deputy, when Judge Dore was not able, which not unfrequently

happened: when spirits were plenty in the colony, he was generally

indisposed." Mr. Croker adds, that "Atkins was appointed as a substitute

to Collins in 1796, by the secretary of state, until the arrival of Mr.

Dore in 1797."]

[Footnote 82: _Bigge's Jud. Report_, p. 2.

At Norfolk Island a court of criminal jurisdiction departed still

further from the precedents of civil justice. An act authorised the

government to convene a court of four military or naval officers, to

decide on questions of life and death, even when free men were

implicated.]

[Footnote 83: "Yesterday, the bench assembled, when a free man, formerly

belonging to Fort Dalrymple, was found guilty of stealing a silver watch

from George Guest, jun., his property, and sentenced to labor for the

government for the term of five years, and moreover to receive 500

lashes."--_Derwent Star, Feb. 6th_, 1810.]

[Footnote 84: _Holt's Memoirs_, vol. ii. p. 202.]

[Footnote 85: Such punishments were not always unmerited, but they were

capricious. A magistrate tied a carter to the wheel of his waggon, and

inflicted 300 lashes for cruelty to his bullocks; but Dr. Montgarret

ordered the blacksmith to be flogged, for presenting his bill!]

[Footnote 86: _Mann's Picture of New South Wales_, 1811.]

[Footnote 87: _Bentham's Plea._]

[Footnote 88: _Bigge's Jud. Report_, p. 17.]

[Footnote 89: Ibid.]

[Footnote 90: _Bigge's Jud. Report_, p. 6. _Wentworth_, p. 43. edit. of

1820.]

[Footnote 91: _Bigge's Report_, p. 48.]

[Footnote 92: _Macarthur's New South Wales: its present state and future

prospects_, 1837.]

[Footnote 93: _Bigge's Report._]

[Footnote 94: 59 Geo. iii. 1819.]

[Footnote 95: "This sentence was put in execution before the provision

store, when the mob, either to display their aversion to the crime, or

what might be more probable, to catch anything that wore the form of

amusement, pelted him with rotten eggs and dirt."--_Collins_, vol. ii.

p. 54.]

[Footnote 96: _Gazette_, 1823.]

[Footnote 97: Maconochie, in his supplement to _Australiana_, extracts

the following passages from one of Sir James Mackintosh's private

letters, published in his _Memoirs_, p. 342-3:--"Even out of England

there are many places which I should prefer to this (Bombay). You will

smile at the mention of Botany Bay; but I am most serious, and I assure

you that next to a parliamentary situation, to which either nature or

early ambition has constantly directed my views, I should prefer,

without much regarding pecuniary advantages, that of being the lawgiver

of Botany Bay.... England, in rearing such a community, is preparing not

only conquerors of India, but enemies to herself and to all mankind.

While on the one side the experiment of a reforming penal colony is,

perhaps, the grandest ever tried in morals, it is one which is perfectly

safe; for the settlement never can be worse than it is now, when no

attempt towards reformation is dreamed of, and when it is governed on

principles of political economy more barbarous than those which

prevailed under Queen Bess. Every day the difficulties of the experiment

grow with the increase of the (criminal) population.... I have heard,

read, and thought so much about this extraordinary colony, that I am

very confident in my general opinions; and I confess, between ourselves,

that I am a piece of an enthusiast in my reforming projects," &c.]

[Footnote 98: 43 Geo. iii.]

[Footnote 99: "Not a governor, not a magistrate, that has acted thus,

but has exposed himself to prosecutions upon prosecutions, to actions

upon actions, from which not even the crown can save him."--_Bentham's

Plea for the Constitution_, 1804.]

[Footnote 100: _Wentworth_, p. 389. 1820.]

[Footnote 101: _Collins_, vol. ii. p. 214.]

[Footnote 102: _Collins_, vol. i. p. 268.]

[Footnote 103: _Bigge's Jud. Report_, p. 76.]

[Footnote 104: Collins.]

[Footnote 105: _Bigge's Jud. Report._]

[Footnote 106: Ibid.]

[Footnote 107: Ibid.]

SECTION V.

William Sorell, Esq., third Lieutenant-governor, landed 8th April, 1817.

To restore safety to the colony was the first duty of the governor: on

his assumption of office he called the inhabitants together, and enabled

by their subscriptions he offered large rewards, and thus inspirited

both the soldiers and the constables. In less than three months the

greater portion of the bushrangers were destroyed or captured. During

Sorell's administration the colony suffered no serious disturbance from

outlaws. This display of rigour was followed by judicious precautions:

he ascertained more frequently the distribution and employment of the

prisoners of the crown, and removed many temptations to disorder and

crime.

It was the practice, established first a few months after his arrival,

to muster the whole population annually. Notice was sent through the

districts, requiring the attendance of the several classes, who

accounted for their families and their stock: the name, the residence,

and civil condition of every inhabitant became known. Sorell thus

ascertained the increase of cultivation and cattle, and whatever

indicated progress.

The landing of settlers direct from Great Britain was an important

event: their efforts were experiments, and their achievements were

prophetic. The political philosopher may trace in their errors, trials,

and successes, the lessons afforded by experience for the instruction of

nations. The rapid advance of modern colonisation tends to underrate the

first efforts of our predecessors. The first colonial boat-builder

founded a great commercial navy; the first shepherd held in his slender

flock a treasure of unimaginable worth.

The arrival of many emigrants led to the exploration of the country. The

hunters were usually the pioneers, but beyond the general features of

the scenery, they afforded little information: wild cattle were the

better guides. To provide a settlement for strangers, Sorell explored

the region lying between the Shannon and the Clyde to its junction with

the Derwent; free from timber, and within twenty miles of navigable

waters. At this district were located several distinguished settlers.

The narrow grants and wretched homesteads of the emancipist cotters, the

sole farmers at the time of this immigration, presented but little to

please. The settler, whose imagination pictured the rustic beauties and

quiet order of an English farm, saw unfenced fields of grain, deformed

with blackened stumps: a low cottage of the meanest structure,[108]

surrounded by heaps of wool, bones, and sheepskins; harrows and water

carts amidst firewood; mutton and kangaroo strung on the branches of

trees; idle and uncleanly men, of different civil condition but of one

class; tribes of dogs and natives. No green hedges or flowery meadows,

or notes of the thrush or nightingale; but yet there was the park-like

lands, the brilliant skies, the pure river; and, above all, the

untainted breath of the morning.

In 1820, there were only two estates, those of Mr. E. Lord and Colonel

Davey, on which fences were erected; and the destructive incursions of

cattle were subjects of many complaints: yet in that year £20,000 had

been obtained for wheat exported to Sydney. The first crops were

prolific: the early settlers chose the more fertile and open plains; and

many selected sites for their dwellings on natural lawns of surpassing

beauty.

The dispatch of vessels direct from England rapidly increased the

population: in one year (1822) six hundred settlers entered the port,

and by the capital which they invested, and the habits of decency and

enterprise they exhibited, gave a new tone to the colony. A succession

of publications drew attention at home to the capabilities of Van

Diemen's Land. It was described in the _Quarterly Review_ (May, 1820) by

a friendly pen, which stated that during three years, a detachment of

one hundred men had not lost three, and that Hobart Town had been

sixteen months without a funeral.

The work of Lieutenant Jeffries, who spent several months in a passage

from Sydney to Van Diemen's Land, and who wrote much in praise of the

native women, and the pleasures of a bush life, drew a pleasing picture.

The more sober sketch of Captain Dixon, and the copious delineations of

Mr. Wentworth, directed the public curiosity to Tasmania. For several

successive years new books were published, describing the fertility of

the soil and the beauty of the climate. These generally contained a

theory of pastoral increase--a geometrical progression towards wealth.

The increase was, indeed, rapid beyond oriental precedent. Between 1810

and 1820, it was estimated at fifty fold.[109] The adaptation of these

colonies for the growth of wool first drew the attention of several

gentlemen of Hamburgh, whose importations afterwards promoted the

improvement of our flocks.

The position of Van Diemen's Land favored its settlement. Vessels bound

to Port Jackson often touched at the Derwent to discharge portions of

their cargo; and weary with the length of the voyage, emigrants listened

to the persuasions of the colonists, and the hints of the

lieutenant-governor himself.

The advantages offered to settlers, so late as 1818, included not only

grants of land, but loans of stock and seed; and a price for wheat, long

standing at 10s. per bushel, and for meat 6d. per lb. The settlers were

entitled to rations for themselves and their convict servants for six

months. It was stipulated that the stock should be replaced by the

increase, and the wheat repaid at the harvest. Such engagements were,

however, rarely fulfilled. No suits could be prosecuted by the crown in

the local court, and vague threats of disfavor were the only means of

recovery: these were understood as formalities. The crown, by the

prohibition of distillation, prevented a consumption of grain, and until

a fixed price was given corn had been sometimes of no value whatever. A

partial market was assured, to prevent the total neglect of agriculture.

The patronage, of course, led to official corruption: many officers

received wheat from their servants in commutation of labor, and some of

more than usual inferiority was thus admitted by a Launceston

commandant, a refugee Frenchman, who threatened to transport the

storekeeper for calling in question its quality. The Commissioner Bigge

recommended the bounty should be entirely abolished, distillation

permitted, and supplies purchased by tender. A deficiency could be no

longer apprehended. There were 7,400 inhabitants, at the close of 1821,

who possessed 15,000 cultivated acres, 35,000 horned cattle, 170,000

sheep, 550 horses, and 5,000 swine. With such resources, the danger of

famine finally disappeared.

The herds were composed chiefly of Bengal cattle, imported at an early

period; but the emigrants introduced the most valued of the English

breeds, which have entirely supplanted the early stock. The herbage and

the climate are equally favorable to the increase of cattle.

The interior of the country being quiet, tickets of occupation were

granted to settlers, who were enabled to establish large herds and

flocks on the lands of the crown. The scarcity of provision in New South

Wales soon created a considerable demand for the produce of this

country, and in 1820 meat, to the value of £10,000, was purchased by the

crown for exportation.[110]

Macquarie, when his administration was drawing to a close, came on a

tour of inspection to Van Diemen's Land. He arrived in the _Midas_. The

squally weather, which prevented his immediate landing, gave time to

prepare for his reception. He disembarked on the 24th April, 1821,

saluted from the battery, and by the military, who lined the road to the

government house. At his former visit in 1810, the population did not

exceed 1,500. A few scattered and miserable huts, separated by

thoroughfares but half recovered from the forests, then constituted the

capital, which had now acquired something of an English aspect: there

were 426 houses, and 2,700 souls.

Few scenes are more pleasing than those which, assisted by memory,

display the growth and triumph of industry. The gratification of all

parties was visible, and a general illumination closed the day. It was a

day of pardons and bounty: when the prisoner received his liberty and

the settler his heritage: every inhabitant who had no plaint to prefer,

had yet thanks to pay. The _bachelors_ of Hobart Town gave a public ball

to the governor: one hundred and fifty sat down to supper, and the

gentlemen danced together until the morning.

On the 29th June, Macquarie sailed in the _Caroline_: he was accompanied

to the water's edge by a large concourse of people, and carried with him

applauses which his amiable vanity prized, and which his beneficence

deserved.

Macquarie inserted in the _Sydney Gazette_ the details of his progress,

and observations. Whatever he described, he lauded: the architectural

taste of the private buildings; the handsome church; the commodious

military barracks; the strong gaol; the well constructed hospital. The

enterprise and industry of the people; their spacious harbour; their

battery, signal post and pier--are all distinguished with the minuteness

of an auctioneer's catalogue, and nearly in its phrases.

During his progress he gave names, among which many remain memorials of

his love of country: Staffa Ulra, and Olmaig; Perth, Campbell Town,

Oatlands, Strathallen Creek, Roseneath. The townships of Sorell,

Brighton and Elizabeth, were designated by him: the last in honor of his

wife. His own name is found everywhere.

FOOTNOTES:

[Footnote 108: There is nothing new under the sun. The following

description of a New England cottage, on the Penka-tang River, in 1704,

is given in the journal of Madame Knight:--"It was supported with shores

(posts), inclosed with clapboards laid on lengthways, and so much

asunder that the light came thro every where; the doore tyed on with a

cord in ye place of hinges; the floor the bare earth. No windows but

such as the thin covering afforded, nor any furniture but a bedd with a

glass bottle hanging at ye head on't. An earthen cupp, a small pewter

bason, a bord with sticks to stand on instead of a table, and a block or

too in ye corners insted of chairs."]

[Footnote 109: _Wentworth_, vol. ii. p. 93.]

[Footnote 110: The following is a list of exports from Van Diemen's Land

to Sydney in six years:--

_Wheat valued at 10s., and Meat at 6d._

Year. Bushels Wheat. lbs. of Salt Meat. £

1815 1,770 -- 885

1816 13,135 10,000 6,817

1817 15,240 8,000 7,820

1818 7,990 64,640 5,611

1819 24,768 346,800 21,054

1820 47,131 386,000 33,225

_Wentworth_, vol. ii. p. 32.

Lands granted from 1818 to 1821, from 25,000 to 273,000 acres;

population from 3,557 to 7,360; in cultivation, from 5,080 to 15,005

acres.]

SECTION VI.

The Australian colonies owe their pastoral wealth originally to Captain

John Macarthur, of the 102nd regiment: he was assisted by the enterprise

of Captain Waterhouse, of the royal navy, who, though a sailor and

confessedly ignorant of pastoral affairs, conveyed to the colony the

stock which laid the foundation of its fortunes. The sheep brought by

the first fleet to New South Wales, were sacrificed to the necessities

of the time: the cattle strayed, and were discovered long after grazing

on the Nepean, increased to many hundreds. Several efforts were made by

the New South Wales Corps to introduce a stock, chiefly for the knife;

but the transmission was attended with considerable difficulty, and the

greater portion died.

The basis of the New South Wales flocks was the Bengal: these, bearing

hair, were mixed with sheep originally from Holland, and imported from

the Cape. Mr. Macarthur having obtained some sheep from Ireland,[111]

remarked the great, though accidental improvement in the fleece, which

exhibited a mixture of wool, and gave the first hint of a great possible

improvement. He then requested Captain Kent to procure sheep from the

merino flocks of Colonel Gordon, at the Cape. These were forwarded by

Captain Waterhouse (1797), who delivered to Macarthur three rams and

five ewes, and retained a proportion himself.

The results surpassed expectation. The flocks of Bengal yielded to three

or four crossings, and produced the finest wool. Thus the heaviest

fleece, in 1801, was 3-1/2 lbs.: the next season it improved to 5 lbs.

The ewe produced wool worth 9d., her lamb's wool was valued at 3s.; and

even the merino improved by the exchange of climate: its wool produced

at the Cape being worth 4s. 6d., and at New South Wales 6s. The rate of

increase was not less encouraging: the produce of fifty ewes, in seven

years, was two thousand.

In 1803, Captain Macarthur visited England, and presented a memorial to

the lords of the committee of the privy council on the pastoral

capabilities of New South Wales. He requested the crown to grant the use

of public lands and servants, and offered to supply the commissariat at

a given price, and to sustain the entire risk or loss of his experiment.

The statement of increase was doubted: the testimony respecting the

quality of wool could not be disputed, as Macarthur had procured the

certificates of eminent manufacturers. It was, however, asserted that

the natural pasture would be unable to subsist flocks, and it was

necessary to combat this objection. Macarthur proposed to sell his flock

at their value to a company, and on credit; on condition that the

company procured a grant from the crown for pasture. This was declined;

but Lord Camden was requested by their lordships to encourage Macarthur,

and he received in consequence permission to occupy the cow pastures,

where natural fences prevented the intermixture of his flocks. A grant

of 5,000 acres--ultimately of an additional 5,000--was made to him.

Never was a reward more justly due, or given with less sacrifice.[112]

Mr. Macarthur procured from the royal flock at Kew, one ewe and nine

rams:[113] with these he raised his flock to 6,000 (1818), and

frequently sold pure merino rams at from £14 to £28 per head.

The merino stock of George III., from which the Australian stocks were

partly drawn, was sent to that monarch by the Spanish cortes. The king's

love of rural pleasures was thus instrumental in adding immense wealth

to his empire.

It was not until 1820, that settlers of Van Diemen's Land entered the

career of improvement. The original stock were introduced by Colonel

Paterson: a mixture of Teeswater, Leicester, and Bengal breeds. The

lieutenant-governor was anxious to improve the quality by an importation

of merino lambs. By an engagement with Macarthur, three hundred were

shipped at Sydney;[114] but more than one-third died: the rest were

distributed to the settlers by lot, who gave the engagements to repay at

the stipulated sum, and who received facilities for the experiment in

suitable tickets of occupation. Macarthur received, at 7s. 6d. per acre,

4,368 acres of land for the 300 lambs, valued to the crown at £5 per

head.[115] From this date the wool of the Tasmanian flocks became known

to commerce.

Van Diemen's Land wool was not an article of export until 1819. Only

71,000 pounds had been sent to London from New South Wales, but some had

realised even 7s. 6d. per lb.; in one instance 10s., it is said, by a

friendly competition: a sum three times greater than the English price

of the finest continental wool. A specimen had been manufactured for

George IV., and which so pleased him that he directed Sir J. Bloomfield

to enquire if more could be obtained in England. There seemed now no

hesitation in giving credit to Macarthur's prediction, that the

boundless pastures of New South Wales would relieve the manufacturers of

dependence on Spain.

That great encouragement had not been afforded, and greater progress

accomplished, may be considered surprising. The wool of commerce was

still inconsiderable; although the flocks of both colonies amounted to

200,000. Before the merino was first introduced, the fleece was

considered worthless. The operation of shearing was often delayed until

the sheep were injured: it was a deduction from the profit. The wool was

burned, or thrown into the stock-yards as manure.

In 1819, the captain of the _Regalia_ accepted a proportion of Van

Diemen's Land wool, in exchange for merchandise: it had no market price,

its expenses were considerable, and a duty of 3d. was levied at London.

A sample was seen by Mr. Hopkins lying in the docks in the worst

possible condition: the speculation was a failure. The colonial

government bought several tons a few months after at 3d. per lb. for

mattresses, a sum that scarcely paid for its conveyance from the

interior. The duty, formerly 3d., was reduced, on the recommendation of

the commissioner, to 1d. per lb.

To Mr. Henry Hopkins the public are indebted for the first appreciation

of Tasmanian wool. In September, 1821, he offered by advertisement a

price in money, and bought at 4d. per lb. Twelve bales sold in London,

the entire wool export of the colony, for 7d. per lb., or £88: the

expenses were nearly half that sum. The merchants, however, continued to

purchase, and the settlers to improve their flocks. In 1823, five

hundred and fifty bales were exported in the _Deveron_, and an equal

quantity in other vessels; and the wool of Clarendon rivalled the flocks

at Port Jackson.

FOOTNOTES:

[Footnote 111: _Bigge's Report._]

[Footnote 112: _Par. Pap._]

[Footnote 113: _Bigge's Report._]

[Footnote 114: _Bigge's Report._]

[Footnote 115: _Par. Pap._]

SECTION VII.

The _Britannia_, a vessel the property of Messrs. Enderby and Sons,

first discovered the whale fishery.[116] On doubling the south-west cape

of Van Diemen's Land the crew saw sperm whales: in their progress to

Port Jackson they fell in with prodigious shoals, as far as could be

seen from the mast head. On arriving at Port Jackson the captain

secretly informed the governor, who facilitated his preparation for a

cruise. The sailors, however, did not conceal their observation, and two

other vessels, the _Mary Ann_ and _Matilda_, sailed one day before the

_Britannia_ and the _Salamander_, on the 1st November, 1791. On their

departure they encountered bad weather, but saw whales in great plenty.

The attempt was, for the moment, unsuccessful. Great expectations were

formed by the colonists, who anticipated that this port would be a

rendezvous of fishermen. This fishery, pursued since with so much

vigour, was of little immediate value to Van Diemen's Land.

The duties payable on exports from the colonies were both excessive and

unequal; especially in oil, the difference amounting to almost absolute

prohibition; being twenty times greater than by London ships. The

settlers could only procure for their own consumption or the Indian

market. The whalers often carried on their operations in sight of the

towns, and heaps of bone at that period lay on the eastern shore. Of the

first whale taken in the Derwent, Jorgen Jorgenson declared himself the

captor.

The trading pursuits of the inhabitants were fettered by the privilege

of the East India Company. The act of parliament authorising its

charter, prohibited the employment of vessels less than 350 tons between

England and New South Wales; the small coasting trade was, therefore,

solely eligible to the people of these colonies except in vessels

unsuitable to the extent of their commerce. Thus, even the Mauritius was

closed against the corn and meat of this country. This law was repealed

in 1819, and thus vessels of any tonnage could be employed in the

colonial trade.

In the islands of the straits sealing was pursued with such vigour, that

it was comparatively exhausted at an early date: small vessels were

employed in the dangerous navigation, and not unfrequently lost.

Few instances of nautical disaster and personal misfortune have

surpassed the case of Captain Howard, in 1819. He was robbed of an iron

chest containing money and jewels to a large amount. Next, the

_Lachlan_, his property, was stolen by convicts. He freighted the

_Daphne_ for India, and sailed with two women and a boy, beside the

crew. They anchored at Kent's Group, and Howard landed. The brig, some

hours after, was observed to drift: the wind blowing hard on the shore,

her destruction was inevitable. The long boat was laden, and leaving

behind the passengers and some seamen, Howard after great efforts

reached the Derwent. Under his direction, the _Governor Sorell_ sloop

was dispatched to receive the people left on the island. Meanwhile the

_John Palmer_ entered the group, took off the women and the boy, and a

bag of 400 dollars left in their charge; and was lost with the whole of

her cargo. Nor was the _Governor Sorell_ more fortunate: the seamen of

the _Daphne_, who left the island in a boat, saw on the north-east coast

of Cape Barren, the binnacle and other fragments of that vessel, in

which Howard perished.

The same fate seemed to attend his property after his death. He had

freighted the _Frederick_ and the _Wellington_ with sheep and cattle for

the Isle of France, a market which then offered large gains. After some

delay they reached the Northumberland Islands, off which the stock all

died, from want of room and the influence of climate. Unwilling to

proceed without cargo, the captain detained the vessels for spars. Here

the _Frederick_ was wrecked, and twenty-two of the crew were drowned;

but the chief officer, one woman, and a boy, reached the _Wellington_.

They then proceeded to Timor, constrained on the passage to subsist on

the preserved hides of the cattle. From Timor they proceeded to Batavia:

the captain died, and the crew dispersed; and the vessel was taken under

charge by the Orphan Chamber, her register being lost, and her owners

unknown!

A calamity still more singular, may be worth record.[117] The _Surrey_,

Captain Raine, left the Derwent in 1820. Having heard that men were

detained at Ducie's Island, he went there in search of them. The men

came to the beach, but could scarcely articulate from exhaustion: they

had belonged to the _Essex_, a whaler. One day, a whale of the largest

class struck the vessel, and broke off part of her false keel: she then

went a-head of them a quarter of a mile, and turning back met the vessel

with such tremendous velocity that she was driven back at the rate of

several knots: the sea rushed in at the cabin windows; every man on deck

was knocked down, and the bows were completely stove in. The sailors

were obliged to abandon the vessel, and after visiting several islands

were found by the _Surrey_ as described.

The strong inclination to trade, common to emigrants, was in these

colonies a passion, while the settlers were of the lower class. The want

of coin induced the government to pay the debts it incurred in rum,

which, commonly valued at £1 per bottle, passed from hand to hand. The

commissariat receipts were, however, the chief medium of exchange: they

were acknowledgements of the delivery of goods for the use of the crown.

They were paid by the settlers to the merchants, who on the appointed

days presented them for consolidation, and received in return bills on

the lords of the treasury. Every trader issued his notes. The islands of

Scotland possessed a small paper currency, and to that origin were we

probably indebted for our own. Dr. Johnson found such trifling bills in

circulation during his celebrated tour. In Hobart Town they were issued

in great profusion.[118] Often of the lowest value, both in amount and

in credit, they kept afloat by the risk which their refusal involved.

When presented in small quantities they were usually paid. A trader

rejecting his neighbour's bills would be harrassed by his revenge: this

was, however, done in some instances. A large issuer of notes in

Launceston was staggered by a sudden demand for payment: to maintain his

credit he borrowed dollars, and gave additional notes as security. A few

days after they returned, and the same dollars were again borrowed by

the unfortunate financier. The run was devised by his clerk, who managed

by such manoeuvres to obtain a large bonus for negociating a loan of

coin. The credit of these notes depended greatly on the Naval officer, a

sort of collector: if admitted in payment of duties, they were current

everywhere. The criminal courts continually exhibited frauds, consequent

on these small issues. The issuers, however, had many chances in their

favor: they did not always know their own notes; but great numbers were

destroyed by persons intoxicated, or lost or worn out. The meaning of

payment in currency, they interpreted, as giving one note for another,

or four shillings for five shillings.

The colonial dollars were mutilated to prevent their exportation. In

1810, dollars were imported from Bengal. To make a smaller coin the

centre was struck out, and valued at 1s. 3d.; the ring retaining its

full current value. The crown payed the dollar as five shillings, and

received it as four shillings; thus gaining 20 per cent. in exchange for

bills, and in the settlement of accounts: an injustice so shameful was

the subject of parliamentary reprobation, and ultimately suppressed. In

1824, the _Samarang_ imported £10,000 of British silver, and the lords

of the treasury directed that British coin should be paid to the troops,

and taken in exchange for treasury bills.

The establishment of the Van Diemen's Land Bank (1823) was the most

effectual remedy of many financial difficulties. The traders obtained a

charter from Sir Thomas Brisbane: the capital was divided into shares of

200 dollars, and its direction was committed to a local board.[119]

The issues of individuals were finally suppressed by act of council. The

detection of many frauds enabled the dishonest, with a show of right, to

dispute payment. They were sometimes recovered in the court of request.

Justice was once secured by Mr. Hone, in the following manner:--The

defendant was requested to select the notes he admitted to be genuine,

and then to hand both parcels to the bench: these being marked were

dropped purposely, and the defendant unsuccessfully attempting the same

division once more, showed that his repudiation was fraudulent, and lost

the cause.

It was the custom to load a cart with goods, and send it through the

country: the peddling merchant exchanged his commodities--a cask of rum,

a basket of tobacco, a chest of tea, a bale of slop clothing--for sheep

and cattle. The profits were often enormous: on his return to head

quarters he would appear with a flock worth five times the original cost

of his merchandise.[120]

The manners of a people are seen in the courts. A series of trials,

arising from the same transaction, included a considerable portion of

the settlers, and illustrated the trading habits which prevailed. Mr.

Gunning being indebted to Mr. Loane, a merchant, agreed to pay him in

cattle: this arrangement was superseded. Fearing, notwithstanding, that

his claim would be damaged by a general insolvency, Loane took with him

seven men, and swept from Gunning's premises a herd of various

ownership. For this he was called in question by the police as a felon:

in retaliation, he instituted actions for malicious prosecution.

Crossley, an emancipist lawyer, issued summonses, and instructed the

officer to arrest, contrary to standing orders; but Timms, the provost

marshal, to exhibit a spectacle, captured the police magistrate

proceeding to government house. The whole settlement was involved in

actions arising out of the debt, rescue, and criminal charge, either as

parties or witnesses. The provost marshal was dismissed for "drunken

ignorance." These trials occurred in 1821, during the circuit of the

judge, Barron Field, who was induced, by the representations of

Commissioner Bigge, to hold a session in this colony.

FOOTNOTES:

[Footnote 116: _Hunter's Historical Journal._]

[Footnote 117: _Methodist Magazine_, 1821.]

[Footnote 118:

"No. 20. _Hobart, 1st May, 1823._

SIXPENCE. I promise to pay the bearer on demand the sum

of Sixpence, for value received.

A. B."]

[Footnote 119: Names of first directors and officers:--E. F. Bromley, A.

Bethune, F. Champion, G. C. Clarke, A. F. Kemp, A. Macleod, and D. Lord;

R. Lewis, cashier.]

[Footnote 120: _Curr's Account_, p. 44.]

SECTION VIII.

The ecclesiastical notices contained in this work, will relate chiefly

to external and material interests. The eye of a stranger cannot be

expected to survey with impartiality the peculiarities of systems. It

will be attempted to supply a few general facts acceptable to the

community at large.

During the first years of this colony the duty of providing religious

instruction, was both admitted and neglected by the state. The clergy

were limited to the towns, who with the clerical functions united the

business of agriculture and the administration of punishments. The

church of England was then regarded by statesmen as the religion of the

empire, and to clergymen of the episcopal persuasion the spiritual

interests of the settlements were confided.

The first clergyman of New South Wales was the Rev. Richard Johnson: his

labors were prosecuted under many discouragements. The priest of a

Spanish vessel raised his hand with astonishment when he found (1793) no

sacred edifice had been provided, and that the clergyman sought some

shady spot to evade the burning sun in the performance of his ministry.

He remarked, that the first house his own countrymen would erect, would

be a house for God.[121] The habits of the officers discouraged a moral

reformation. Earl St. Vincent had prohibited the marine officers taking

their wives. A lady, who followed her husband in the disguise of a

sailor, was sent home by Governor Phillip, when half her voyage had been

completed.[122]

Four years having elapsed, in vain expectation of official help, Mr.

Johnson erected, at his own cost, a wooden building: strong posts were

driven into the ground, the walls consisted of wattle and plaster, and

the roof was thatched: thus the first Christian temple in this

hemisphere was raised by a voluntary effort. This building was

maliciously destroyed. After a long season of slumber, the governor

resolved to enforce the observance of the Sabbath, which had been

commonly spent in "abominable dissipation." The prisoners were compelled

to attend on public worship, and their officers enjoined to accompany

them: a few weeks after, the church was in flames. The governor,

irritated, threatened to employ the workmen on Sunday to erect another

church; but a large stone store being available, it was fitted up for

the purposes of devotion, and the weekly penance exacted in another form

more suitable to the day (1778). Mr. Johnson returned to Great Britain:

he was the first who reared orange groves, from which he realised

considerable wealth.[123]

Before Mr. Johnson's removal, the Rev. Samuel Marsden arrived: a man of

great intellectual and physical energy, who while he accomplished much

for his family, effected more as a clergyman. Mr. Marsden was a graduate

of St. John's, when he received his appointment, which was pressed upon

him. His mission excited great interest. He was about to address a large

assembly at Hull, when the vessel fired a signal to weigh anchor: the

service was suddenly stopped, and Mr. Marsden proceeded with his bride

to the boat, followed by the whole congregation, who covered the young

adventurers with benedictions.

Mr. Marsden resided at Parramatta, where his agricultural success was

conspicuous. Perón exclaimed--"The whole of this spot was covered with

immense and useless forests. With what interest have I trodden over

these new meadows, through the midst of which this respectable pastor

conducted me himself with the most affectionate kindness. Who could have

believed it! This residence is seven or eight miles from Parramatta, in

the midst of woods; and it was over a very excellent road in a very

elegant chaise that Mr. Marsden drove me. What exertions must have been

taken to open such communications: these pastures, these fields, these

harvests, these orchards, these flocks, are the work of eight years!" In

his spiritual husbandry Mr. Marsden was not at first equally successful.

He returned to England in 1808, and the colony was left for some time

without any clerical instructor. The Rev. Mr. Fulton, a protestant

clergyman of Waterford, transported for sedition, was stationed at

Norfolk Island, and Father Harold, an exile, a catholic priest, had

returned home. "There was," says Holt, "no clergyman to visit the sick,

baptise the infant, or church the women. So we were reduced to the same

state as the heathen natives who had none of these ceremonies." At this

period, however, many missionaries, driven from Tahiti, took refuge at

Port Jackson. Some were employed as preachers, and others as

schoolmasters, and several rose to considerable station and wealth,

while others resumed their mission under more favorable auspices.

Mr. Marsden succeeded in arousing the attention of the ministry:

additional clergymen were procured, and schools were established. The

country-born children displayed an aptitude for instruction which

kindled the most pleasing hopes. They exhibited a feeling, approaching

to contempt, for the vices of the convicts, even when manifested in the

persons of their parents.[124] "These feelings," said Sidney Smith,

"convey to the mother country the first proof that the foundations of a

mighty empire are laid."[125]

It is scarcely possible to imagine a condition more unfavorable to the

rising race; and yet the aptitude for instruction, and the self-respect

observable in the Australian youth, have been remarked by every visitor

from the earliest times, not without astonishment. It is not uncommon to

see children of the most elegant form, and with an open countenance,

attended by parents of a different aspect, as if a new region restored

the physical and mental vigour of the race.

A pleasing instance of the love of knowledge occurred during the early

ministry of the Rev. Mr. Cartwright, which he related to Governor

Macquarie. The river which separated them from his dwelling was swollen,

and knowing the ford was impassable, he saw with great amazement his

young pupils approach his Sunday school: they had tied their clothing on

their heads, and swam across the stream.[126] It is asserted, that

without any other instruction than a casual lesson, some learned both to

read and write.

The Rev. Robert Knopwood, who arrived with the first settlers, was long

the sole chaplain of Van Diemen's Land. In addition to his clerical

functions he regularly sat as a magistrate. He had not much time to care

for the spiritual interests of his flock, and of his success in their

reformation nothing is recorded: his convivial friends are the chief

eulogists of his character. His little white pony was not less

celebrated. Mr. Knopwood received a pension, and was subsequently

appointed chaplain to a country district: he died in 1838. The gaiety of

his disposition made him a pleasant companion and a general favorite;

and conciliated whatever esteem may be due to a non-professional

reputation.[127] Mr. Knopwood was not, however, unwilling to tolerate

the assistance of a sect whose zeal wore a different aspect from his

own. The wesleyan ministers found a kindly welcome and an open field.

In the absence of clergymen, it was customary for the magistrates to

conduct public worship, or where that was not possible, to assemble the

prisoners and accompany the inspection with a few words of advice.[128]

The attention of the London committee of the wesleyan mission was

aroused by their agents stationed at Port Jackson, who referred to this

colony as "a settlement called the Derwent, two weeks' sail distant."

The Rev. B. Carvosso, on his passage to New South Wales, touched at

Hobart Town, in the month of May, 1820. He embraced the opportunity thus

offered. He was introduced by the Rev. Mr. Knopwood to the governor, who

authorised and protected his teaching. Mr. Carvosso stood on the steps

of a dwelling-house; his congregation partly within and partly without:

his wife conducted the psalmody. The text which initiated the wesleyan

ministry was characteristic of its style and results: "Awake thou that

sleepest!" The colony required such addresses. Mr. Carvosso's

description of the inhabitants may be imagined: they were kindly, but

dissolute. At New Norfolk and at Pittwater, with a population of several

hundreds, no religious service had been performed. A seriously-minded

soldier, by diligent inquiry, found out a settler said to be religious.

To converse with this person, he took a journey of fifteen miles, and

found him swearing!

Shortly after Mr. Carvosso's departure, several soldiers of the 58th

regiment, who at Sydney adopted the sentiments of methodism, were

quartered in the island. They prompted a Mr. Noakes to obtain a room for

worship: eight persons met on the 29th October, 1820, at a house in

Collins-street, Hobart Town. They next removed to the residence of a Mr.

Wallis: the soldiers and their coadjutor filled up the hour with

singing, exhortation, and alternate prayer. Corporal Waddy appears to

have been the leader of the band. They were assailed with great, though

transient fury: their devotion was stifled by hostile noises. The

governor, however, interfered, and the disturbers were intimidated.

But the landlord of the house growing weary of their company, they

sought a place of refuge. Donne, a carpenter, whose skilling formed a

workshop, was entreated to arrange it for worship. At first, he gave a

hesitating consent: his wife, a woman of vigorous temper and "a

Romanist," violently interdicted the project; "but," says the

chronicler, "that night there was a dreadful storm; the house rocked:

she awoke in terror, exclaiming, 'the methodists shall have the room!'"

The building became too small: it was enlarged to accommodate three

hundred persons: a society of fourteen members was constituted. On the

13th May, 1821, a Sunday school was established; the first in Van

Diemen's Land. All this was done in the absence of a minister. Waddy,

who was made a sergeant, went to India, where he soon died. He was

mentioned with admiration by his brethren. Donne had been a prisoner: he

lived to acquire the respect and confidence of his neighbours. His

proper name was Cranmer: he was descended from the family of the

illustrious archbishop.[129] He remained in membership until his

decease. Mr. Noakes, the organiser of these wesleyan victories, became

dissatisfied with their results: the _Gazette_, of 1823, announced that

he had withdrawn from their fellowship. To him, however, belongs the

honor of gathering the first school for gratuitous instruction.

In the year following, September 21st, 1821, the Rev. Mr. Horton

arrived. His labors were fatiguing and minute: he read the scriptures to

"four persons in one place, and addressed twelve in another; chiefly old

people and young children." He describes the social state of the

country: "The wretchedness of Launceston is past description:" "of the

deaths at New Norfolk, all except two are attributed to accident or

drunkenness."

Mr. David Lord gave Mr. Horton a plot of ground, and he resolved to

build. He was indefatigable in his collections; and by contributions,

then thought liberal, obtained £400.; but chapels are not built by

cautious men. Having raised the walls his money was gone; and they

remained long uncovered: a reproach to his calculation, but not to his

faith. The Rev. R. Mansfield, two years after, obtained timber and labor

from the government: gifts and loans were provided by the society in

England, and the building was completed.[130]

In 1822, a considerable religious immigration took place. Carvosso

transmitted accounts of the material and moral prospects of the colony,

which determined several of that class to settle in this island. They

embarked in the _Hope_, and encountered great dangers in the British

channel. On their complaints the vessel was seized, under an act for the

protection of passengers; and the _Heroine_ being chartered for the

purpose, they were transmitted at the expense of the government. The

owners successfully appealed against the seizure, and accused the

passengers of conspiracy; who, however, themselves suffered considerable

detention and loss.[131] Many still survive, having largely contributed

in their various spheres towards the social improvement of the country.

Mr. Knopwood was superseded, as principal chaplain, by the Rev. William

Bedford. This gentleman received his appointment by the recommendation

of persons who had been impressed by his zealous attendance on criminals

awaiting execution in the metropolitan gaols.

The presbyterian church was founded the same year by the Rev. Archibald

Macarthur. He was cordially received as a representative both of his

country and his religion: though not himself of the national church,

most Scottish names are appended to the first subscription for his

stipend.

The co-operation of the various bodies was not prevented by their

differences. Of the first annual meeting of the wesleyan mission, Mr.

Bedford was president, and the whole community joined in the support of

a bible society, the first religious institution of the colony.

The missionaries who fled from Tahiti a second time, formed at Sydney a

bible society, under the patronage of Macquarie, and transmitted a

considerable supply to the care of Mr. Knopwood. In return for the

liberal gift, an auxiliary was formed, of which Messrs. Birch and Dry

were the lay officers. The meeting held in May, 1819, contributed £100

on the spot: £300 during the year. This munificence was avowedly for the

credit of the settlement. Not only did the institution unite all sects,

but it was the first instance of friendly co-operation between the

emigrant and emancipist classes.[132] Among the contributors were twelve

who, giving 5s. each, designated themselves the "members of the free and

accepted masons of St. John's Lodge, Hobart Town." An early general

meeting of the society was an example of dispatch: the governor took the

chair, the report was read, the resolutions passed, and the meeting

dispersed within ten minutes. With such celerity were pious labors

finished in those days.

The erection of the archdeaconry in favour of the Rev. W. Scott, in

1824, was the result of his visit to the colonies, as secretary to

Commissioner Bigge, whose reports were attributed to his pen. His

alleged hostility to the emancipists excited resentment, and detracted

from his usefulness. When delivering his charge at Hobart Town, the

governor required the attendance of all officially connected with the

government, whatever their faith. New South Wales was within the diocese

of Calcutta, but the relation was nominal; yet the newspapers did not

think a visit from Bishop Wilson improbable.

The Rev. John Youl, formerly a missionary at Tahiti, was the chaplain of

Port Dalrymple. His labors were divided between George Town and

Launceston, and until his arrival no clergyman had ever visited the

northern districts of the island.[133] In 1819, he made a tour, and

baptised sixty-seven children, and married forty-one couple; many of

whom were recognised as such before his interposition.[134] He was

accustomed to call his congregation together by the sound of an iron

barrel, which was swung to a post, and struck by a mallet; or he

announced his arrival by walking through the settlement in his canonical

dress.

Launceston was destitute of a clerical resident until 1824, when Mr.

Youl returned with the establishment from George Town. The people were

sometimes weeks without a service, and three years without a clergyman.

Shortly after, during a visit of the governor, the church was crowded;

an event said to be unparalleled in the history of Launceston. The

church was a wooden building of small dimensions: sometimes occupied as

a court, sometimes as a temporary sleeping place for prisoners;

sometimes as a stable.[135]

The disposition of Mr. Youl was amiable, and his professional reputation

unblemished: placed in a station of little promise, he cultivated the

minds and affections of the young, and discountenanced vices he could

not extirpate.

The first Roman catholic priest established at Hobart Town, was the Rev.

Peter Connolly. Less polished than his protestant friend, Mr. Knopwood,

he was not less genial in his temper: the pastor of a people drawn

chiefly from the Irish peasantry, he well understood their character. He

received a grant from the crown, and erected a humble chapel and

dwelling-house; which he ascribed partly to the charity, and partly the

penance of his flock. He used a common brush to sprinkle them with holy

water, and spoke of their faults without much softness or reserve.

Occasionally an execution required his services at Launceston, otherwise

a place long overlooked by the priesthood.[136]

The return of the Sabbath was unattended in the country with a religious

welcome. Many employed their time in hunting: the more scrupulous in

visits, and the profane in labor or intemperance. A gentleman, now

distinguished among the wesleyans, was found by his neighbour ploughing

by the road side on Sunday morning: both himself and his men had

forgotten the day. Yet at the houses of all, a minister of religion, of

any name, met a cheerful entertainment and a willing audience. Whether

that the presence of an intelligent stranger is itself a grateful

interruption to rural solitude, or that the miseries resulting from sin

were too apparent for dispute, the utility of religion was never openly

questioned; and it is certain, that few people were less inclined to

reject the instructions, or to affront the ministers of religion.

FOOTNOTES:

[Footnote 121: _Collins_, vol. i. p. 498.]

[Footnote 122: _Life of John Mason Good._]

[Footnote 123: _Holt_, vol. ii. p. 97.]

[Footnote 124: _Bigge's Report_, p. 104.]

[Footnote 125: _Works_, vol. ii. p. 44.]

[Footnote 126: _Reid's Voyages_, p. 312.]

[Footnote 127: He is thus described by a companion, in the _Hermit in

Van Diemen's Land_: "The good old gentleman at length warmed with the

subject, and said in an under tone--'You must come and see Bob at the

cottage. Yeoix, yeoix: tantivy, tantivy;' to which friendly invitation I

immediately assented."]

[Footnote 128: The following is a discourse delivered by Captain Nairn,

and by its constant repetition was impressed upon the memory of the

relator. Captain Nairn would stand and thus address the prisoners on a

Sunday morning:--"Now, my men, listen to me. I want you all to get on. I

was once a poor man like you; but I used to work perseveringly, and do

things diligently and as such got taken notice of, until I became a

captain of the 46th. Now, I want you to work perseveringly; do things

diligently, and that will make you comfortable; and I will assist you,

that you may have houses for yourselves, and rise up to be equal to me."

It may be questioned if many sermons of greater pretensions, have not

been less humane and effectual; and this was often the sole substitute

for public worship.]

[Footnote 129: These statements are taken from the official papers of

the mission.]

[Footnote 130: The Rev. Mr. Mansfield continued until 1825. Under his

care the institutions peculiar to the wesleyans were fully established:

their _love feasts_, in which they relate the rise and progress of their

religious experience; their _watch nights_, when they wait in silent

prayer for the first moment of the new year; their _covenant_, in which

standing up together they pledge themselves to the service of the

Almighty.]

[Footnote 131: _Godwin's Guide to Van Diemen's Land._]

[Footnote 132: _Bigge's Report._]

[Footnote 133: Ibid.]

[Footnote 134: _Gazette_, February, 1819.]

[Footnote 135: Eye-witness.]

[Footnote 136: Mr. Fitzgerald, a respectable settler, speared by the

natives (1831), was carried to his grave by his neighbours; but was

indebted to a prisoner, sought out for the purpose, for the religious

rites usual at funerals.]

SECTION IX.

On the 19th July, 1823, the British legislature enacted a law for the

"better administration of justice in New South Wales and Van Diemen's

Land, and for the better government thereof;" to expire at the close of

the session of parliament, 1827. The old courts with their military

functionaries were superseded,[137] and a supreme court erected; whose

jurisdiction extended to causes, criminal, civil, and ecclesiastical.

The judges were entitled to the powers and jurisdiction enjoyed by the

courts of King's Bench, Common Pleas, and Exchequer of England; and to

enquire into and determine all treasons or other crimes committed within

the Indian or Pacific Oceans. The military jury of seven officers on

full pay, were retained; but the court proceeded according to the forms

of civil tribunals. The trial of civil issues was confided to the judge,

and two justices of the peace chosen by the governor; the right being

given to either party to apply to the court for a jury of twelve

freeholders. The king was authorised to extend trial by jury at

pleasure. Causes of more than £500, or a less sum with consent of the

judge, were subject to appeal to the governor of New South Wales; and

appeals in certain cases were allowed to the king in council. The rules

of court were authorised by the king. Courts of quarter session, and of

request for sums under £10, were established. The governor, with the

advice of a council of five or seven, or the major part of them, was

empowered to enact ordinances not repugnant to the laws of England. The

duties levied under former acts were made perpetual, but the council

were inhibited from imposing a tax, except for local purposes. The

governor, with one member assenting, could pass any law: or, for the

suppression of a rebellion, although all might dissent: and the king was

empowered to enact an ordinance which the council might reject.

It was provided also, that the king might erect Van Diemen's Land into a

separate colony: confer on the acting-governor, in the absence of the

governor-in-chief, the various powers conveyed by the act; and, in that

case, terminate the dependence of the supreme court on the court of New

South Wales. On these extensive powers the checks provided were the

requisite preliminary certificate of the chief justice, that the

ordinances proposed were consistent with the laws of England, or the

circumstances of the colony; the exposure of these acts on the table of

the House of Commons; the obligation of the governor to show cause for

the act passed in defiance of his council; the prohibition of direct

taxation, except for local purposes: guarantees of little value at the

time of their adoption, but rendered of greater importance by the growth

of freedom in the empire at large.

The act of parliament did not pass without animadversion and discontent.

Sir James Mackintosh moved that a jury of twelve should be substituted

for the clause constituting a military jury--the most obnoxious portion

of the bill. In this he was seconded by Mr. Wilberforce, but the

proposition was defeated by a majority of eleven. Mr. Canning

recommended a compromise between the friends and opponents of the bill,

by limiting its duration to five years, and to this the minister

assented.

The capacity of the colonies to furnish jurors was long a subject of

debate, Mr. Justice Bent stated, that after full consideration he

recommended a grand and a common jury, in conformity to the English law,

and the trial of convicts by the police;[138] but Commissioner Bigge

pronounced against the scheme, and was confirmed in his opinion by the

leading colonists of the time. The whole state of society opposed

serious objections to its adoption, and it was scarcely practicable in

Van Diemen's Land.

The settlers were generally desirous that Van Diemen's Land should be

erected into a separate colony. To this, Sorell was opposed. He thought

the measure premature: tending to augment the expenses of government; to

deprive the people of the advantages of an appeal to the elder colony,

and of participation in that more liberal system of government a larger

community could demand. A public meeting was, however, summoned, and a

petition adopted by acclamation. The sole dissentient present, Mr.

Murray, was roughly treated by the petitioners.

The nearer inspection of a chief authority, and the more ample means

possessed for good, were its advantages; but it occasioned a more rigid

separation in social life, multiplied offices which might have been long

confined to the elder colony, and removed too far the governor and

courts from effectual oversight and appeal. The colony was not

sufficiently consolidated to oppose a force of public opinion to the

despotic tendencies of the new constitution.

This petition was forwarded to the king through Mr. Edward Barnard, the

colonial agent, who owed his appointment to the suggestion of Mr. Bigge,

and the nomination of Lord Bathurst. His office was not, however,

political. He was authorised to purchase stores for the local

government; to give drafts on the colonial funds in exchange for cash;

and otherwise to assist persons designing to emigrate to this country.

He received 8 per cent. commission, and a salary until 1839, when it was

withdrawn. He bore no resemblance to those bold political agents, such

as Franklin, sent by the American colonists to watch their interests in

Great Britain.

* * * * *

In the early journals the name of Sorell occurs frequently, to

illustrate the qualities which adorn a ruler, and to point a satire on

his successor. On his departure a banquet was given him, where, said the

reporter, "the cup was often replenished, and the flow of reason never

ebbed." It was observed, that the return freight for merino wool, which

the colony owed to his care and foresight, anchored beside the

_Guildford_, that was to carry him home.

Towards the close of Sorell's government, the commerce of the colony was

assisted by the enterprise of some British merchants. A company was

formed at Leith, with a capital of £100,000, professing to promote the

welfare of the colonies, by taking their produce in exchange for

merchandise. A succession of vessels were dispatched: the first was the

_Greenock_; among the rest, the _Triton_, Captain Crear. These vessels

introduced many families from Scotland, whose moral worth and successful

enterprise have established their families among the chief of the land.

The shipments provoked the anger, and broke up the monopoly of the local

merchants.

The administration of Sorell was successful in colonial estimation: his

habits were familiar without rudeness, and his fine countenance

attracted the confidence of the stranger. He was accustomed to linger

about the gate of government house, chatting with the passers by, and a

slight excuse entitled the humblest ranks to prefer their solicitations.

The admiration expressed by the settlers for his character, was partly

the result of their relative positions. He was a dispenser of crown

favors, and when compelled to refuse an immoderate suitor, he could

refer his request to the governor-in-chief. The rigour of king's

commissioner was softened by his official worth: nor is it necessary to

search for a censure, amidst such concurrence of praise. The settlers,

to express their regard, agreed to offer Sorell a testimonial of £750

value. They deprecated his recall by petition[139]--a rare instance of

popular favor: there was but one dissentient. A request so unusual

might, perhaps, have been successful, had it not come too late.

On his return to England, he received a pension, which commencing in

1825, continued until his death--twenty-four years, and amounted to

£11,500: more than the official salary he received during his government

twice told. This pension was authorised by the crown, and charged on the

colonial revenue. Sorell was colonel of the 48th regiment: he died on

the 4th June, 1848, in the seventy-fourth year of his age.

The aspect of the country at this time was not inviting to strangers;

but the current of colonisation was set in, and its ultimate

superiority, compared with all others, became an article of Tasmanian

faith. On this subject the agricultural societies maintained a war of

papers. Baron Field, the chief justice of New South Wales, was the

champion of that country, and dwelt on its vast forests, its wool, its

boundless pastures and rivers. The president of the Tasmanian

agriculturists urged all in the defence of Van Diemen's Land, which

became his position. At that time, protective laws had not furnished

them with more formidable weapons.

The trials and disappointments of the colonist pioneer, will have been

long since forgotten. The modern emigrant to Australia can know them

only in part. He is carried to his destination by a public conveyance,

at a cost determined by extensive competition. He can have the

mechanical labor he may need: he can buy the stock, descended from

European flocks and herds, lower than in their native regions. The

choice fruit trees, flowers, and plants, which multitudes have combined

to collect, he can obtain often at a gift. The costly experiments of his

predecessors have established the rules which preserve his crops from

destruction, or his folds from disease. There is a market for his

produce, and a bank for his money; and a school for his children.

A poet, of some celebrity, predicted the fortunes of Tasmania. The

picture he drew, is no unpleasing prospect for posterity:--

"Now, on my soul the rising vision warms,

But mingled in a thousand lovely forms!

Methinks I see Australian landscapes still,

But softer beauty sits on every hill:

I see bright meadows, decked in livelier green,

The yellow corn-field, and the blossomed bean:

A hundred flocks o'er smiling pastures roam,

And hark! the music of the harvest home!

Methinks I hear the hammer's busy sound,

The cheerful hum of human voices round;

The laughter and the song that lightens toil,

Sung in the language of my native isle!

The vision leads me on by many a stream;

And spreading cities crowd upon my dream,

Where turrets darkly frown, and lofty spires

Point to the stars and sparkle in their fires!

Here Sydney gazes, from the mountain side,

Narcissus-like upon the glassy tide!

O'er rising towns Notasian commerce reigns,

And temples crowd Tasmania's lovely plains!

The prospect varies in an endless range;

Villas and lawns go by, in ceaseless change:

And wafted on the gale from many a dell,

Methinks I hear the village Sabbath bell!

Faith upward mounts, upon devotion's wings,

And, like the lark, at heaven's pure portal sings;

From myriad tongues the song of praise is poured,

And o'er them floats 'the spirit of the Lord!'"[140]

FOOTNOTES:

[Footnote 137: Mr. Samuel Bate, after exercising the functions of judge

at Port Phillip (1803), returned home, and received the appointment,

many years after, of inspector of excise, at Port Jackson.]

[Footnote 138: _Par. Pap._ 1812.]

[Footnote 139: The following may be considered almost unparalleled in

the history of modern colonies, and in this has never been repeated. The

government of Sorell was rather patriarchal than despotic; and compared

with the mass of newly arrived emigrants he was the old inhabitant. Many

who had never seen official men, but at an awful distance, were charmed

with the affability and kindness of the governor, and his recall seemed

the withdrawal of a liberal patron:--

"AT A PUBLIC MEETING of the Landholders, Merchants, and Free Inhabitants

of Van Diemen's Land, by public advertisement assembled, at the Court

House, in Hobart Town, the 30th day of October, 1823, JOHN BEAMONT,

Esq., Provost Marshal of Van Diemen's Land, in the chair;

"Resolved--(Moved by Edward Abbott, Esq. junior, seconded by James

Gordon, Esq.)--That in the present state of this colony, that union of

wisdom and experience, which his Honor Lieutenant Governor Sorell has on

every occasion so strikingly exhibited, is most essential to our general

and individual interests. It becomes therefore of the very utmost

importance to us, that in any contemplated changes, as to this colony,

Lieutenant Governor Sorell may not be removed from his present

government; inasmuch as no successor, whom it may be the pleasure of his

Majesty to appoint, can be possibly expected to bestow all that general

and individual attention to our wants and wishes, and to be able,

satisfactorily and advantageously, to encounter any difficulties which

may occur, without a considerable lapse of time, and much probable

encreased inconvenience; while from the steady, calm, decided, and

experienced judgment of his Honor Lieutenant Governor Sorell, we have

every reason to hope for the most prosperous continuation of his present

successful administration.

"2nd. Resolved--(Moved by A. F. Kemp, Esq., seconded by F. Dawes,

Esq.)--That a most dutiful Address be presented to his Majesty, grounded

upon the preceding resolution; and that a committee of fifteen gentlemen

be appointed to prepare the same, and to carry into effect the object of

the present meeting, in such manner as shall appear most proper and

expedient.

"3rd. Resolved--(Moved by T. G. Gregson, Esq., seconded by W. A.

Bethune, Esq.)--That the Address, when signed, be forwarded with the

least possible delay to Edward Barnard, Esq., our colonial agent in

London, requesting that gentleman to adopt the necessary measures for

forthwith submitting it to his Majesty's most gracious consideration,

and to use his utmost endeavours to obtain the object of the same.

"4th. Resolved--(Moved by R. L. Murray, Esq., seconded by J. Gordon,

Esq.)--That a subscription be forthwith entered into, to defray the

expenses which may arise from carrying into effect the present

resolutions, and for the purpose of presenting to his Honor Lieutenant

Governor Sorell a Piece of Plate, in token of our affectionate

remembrance of the great obligations we owe him, and that such

subscription be limited to the sum of two dollars, individually.

"5th. Resolved--(Moved by A. F. Kemp, Esq., seconded by J. Archer,

Esq.)--That H. J. Emmett, Esq. and P. A. Mulgrave, Esq. be requested to

undertake the offices of treasurers of the subscription, for the

counties of Buckingham and Cornwall, respectively.

"6th. Resolved--(Moved by T. G. Gregson, Esq., seconded by T. Anstey,

Esq.)--That a copy of these Resolutions, and of the Address to his

Majesty, be transmitted to his Honor Lieutenant Governor Sorell, in such

manner as by the Committee shall be considered most respectful to the

Lieutenant Governor, and suitable to the occasion.

"7th. Resolved--(Moved by R. Espie, Esq., seconded by J. Gordon,

Esq.)--That the following fifteen gentlemen do form the committee for

the purposes before resolved:--

E. Abbott, Esq. jun.

T. Anstey, Esq.

J. Archer, Esq.

W. A. Bethune, Esq.

F. Dawes, Esq.

H. J. Emmett, Esq.

J. Gordon, Esq.

T. G. Gregson, Esq.

S. Hood, Esq.

A. W. H. Humphrey, Esq.

A. F. Kemp, Esq.

R. L. Murray, Esq.

H. Ross, Esq.

G. F. Read, Esq.

J. Scott, Esq.

"8th. Resolved--(Moved by J. Archer, Esq., seconded by T. Anstey,

Esq.)--That these Resolutions, and a copy of the Address to his Majesty,

be inserted three times in the _Hobart Town_ and _Sydney Gazettes_; and

in the _Times_, _New Times_, _Morning Chronicle_, and _Courier_, London

newspapers.

"JOHN BEAMONT, _Provost Marshal, Chairman_.

"The Provost Marshal having quitted the chair, and James Gordon, Esq.

having been requested to take the same;

"Resolved--(Moved by E. Abbott, Esq., junior, seconded by R. L. Murray,

Esq.)--That the thanks of this meeting be given to John Beamont, Esq.,

our worthy Provost Marshal, for the readiness with which he has convened

the present meeting, and for his able, upright, and impartial conduct in

the chair.

"JAMES GORDON, _Chairman_."]

[Footnote 140: _Australia; with other Poems._ By T. K. Hervey, London,

1824.]

HISTORY OF TASMANIA.

FROM 1824 TO 1836.

FROM 1824 TO 1836.

SECTION I.

George Arthur, Esq., fourth Lieutenant-governor of Van Diemen's Land,

arrived in the _Adrian_, on the 12th May, 1824. Formerly superintendent

of Honduras, he was extensively known as an officer of inflexible and

energetic disposition: his administration had occasioned considerable

debate, and was the subject of parliamentary and judicial enquiries.

Honduras, an establishment on the American coast, was occupied by

adventurers from Jamaica. At first interlopers, their presence was for a

time unnoticed by the Spanish crown. A hundred years were passed in

unavailing protests and opposition, when the court of Spain reluctantly

recognised the location of the cutters of logwood within its undoubted

territory.

In 1814, Arthur was appointed superintendent by the Duke of Manchester;

at the same time he received from General Fuller the government of the

troops in the following words: "I do hereby constitute and appoint you,

the said George Arthur, to command such of his Majesty's subjects as are

now armed, or may hereafter arm for the defence of the settlers at the

Bay of Honduras; you are, therefore, as commandant, to take upon you the

care and charge accordingly." In virtue of these appointments he claimed

both the military and civil command, until he quitted the settlement in

1822.

In 1820, Bradley, an officer stationed at Honduras, was promoted to the

rank of lieutenant-colonel on full pay, and knowing that the regiment of

which Arthur was colonel (the York Chasseurs) was disbanded, he

considered himself entitled to the military command, by the seniority of

rank, according to the rules of military service: he refused to

acknowledge longer the authority of Arthur, or to attend a council of

officers to which he was summoned. Arthur instantly caused Bradley to be

arrested, and his sword taken from him; and he was detained a prisoner

for seventy-three days.

An account of this transaction was transmitted to Jamaica, when General

Fuller, the superior officer, ordered the colonel's liberation; but

forwarded to the authorities in Great Britain a statement of the

dispute. The conduct of Colonel Bradley was deemed inconsistent with

military subordination: he was dismissed from the service without trial;

he was, however, allowed to dispose of his commission.

Colonel Bradley instituted an action against Arthur for false

imprisonment: his counsel was the present Lord Brougham: Arthur was

defended by the law officers of the crown. There were two questions to

decide: whether the arrest was legal, and then whether unnecessary

hardship had been endured by the plaintiff. The jury, considering that

Bradley's detention was unnecessarily prolonged, gave him damages to the

amount of £100. The appointment of Arthur to the government of this

country withdrew him from the effect of a legal process, and when

Bradley appealed against what he deemed the injustice of his evasion, he

was told that he could await his recall. Colonel Bradley next published

a statement, that General Fuller had antedated Arthur's commission as

commandant, thus to justify the measures he had taken: a charge

amounting to forgery. A criminal information was filed against Bradley:

he was found guilty, but was not brought up for judgment.

It was decided by the judges that Bradley was mistaken, and that

Arthur's title to command was regular and valid. Bradley, however,

continued to maintain that he was the victim of a deep conspiracy, by

which Arthur was rescued from the consequences of usurpation. It is

certain that Bradley was ruined.

The judges, in pronouncing a decision on Bradley's appeal against the

verdict of justification which Arthur obtained, in reference to the

arrest, set aside the rules and regulations of the service. Their

judgment was built merely upon the absolute discretion of the crown in

the distribution of military command: they inferred that the approval of

Arthur's proceedings and the dismissal of Bradley, were sufficient

evidence of the royal will.[141]

This was not the only charge exhibited against Arthur. In Honduras,

slavery existed in its foulest forms.[142]

Colonel Arthur obtained the countenance of an important class of

politicians, by the compassion he expressed for the negro race, and his

exposure of the connivance of magistrates at the cruelty of masters. He

minutely described the sufferings of several women of color in his

despatches to the secretary of state; and especially denounced that

atrocious bench, which admitted a plea of ownership in justification of

the crime of maiming. The details given by Arthur fully justify his

interference, and the enmity of a people by whom they were tolerated

inflicted no disgrace. Thus a mistress, whose careless severity injured

the eye and severed the ear of a negro woman, pleaded the rights of

property, and the magistrate admitted the defence, although the

character of the sufferer was unimpeached. In flogging, the owners often

stripped off the lower clothing of the female slaves, threw them on the

ground, and fastened their limbs to stakes.[143]

Wilberforce and Stephen, the great advocates of slave liberation, who

possessed influence with the executive, considered Arthur a valuable

coadjutor in their glorious cause, and were supposed to pardon the

arbitrary spirit of his government for the sake of his philanthropy.

This evangelical alliance was a standing subject of reference and

criticism.

It may be proper to notice the moral state of this colony on Arthur's

assumption of office. The meeting which adopted a farewell address to

Sorell, authorised a similar compliment to Arthur on his accession. It

was couched in the language of cold respect: parting reluctantly with

their late governor, the people were less disposed to welcome his

successor. The reply of Arthur was not less formal and cold: he took

occasion to express his conviction that the moral example of the free

population was essential to the improvement of a class less favored; and

that while employing his authority for the general welfare, he was

resolved to maintain the rights of the crown. Such sentiments and

purposes were just; but scarcely likely at that moment to be heard with

pleasure. The good sense of Sorell discountenanced the excesses of vice,

but the moral standard of England he had not attempted to raise. The

domestic circumstances of Arthur were more favorable to his authority as

a censor; and happily for our ultimate welfare, he resolved to

discourage violations of social decorum. Many settlers, whose rank in

life made them unwilling to contract lawful marriages with prisoners or

their offspring, were surrounded by a numerous race. Their example

affected those in stations beneath them. To arrest this domestic evil,

was doubtless the duty of Arthur; but it was not always performed with

consideration. Many were unable to marry; but were unwilling to abandon

connexions sanctioned by the circumstances of the colony and the habits

around. They were placed under a ban: the favours of government were

denied them. Such as were in subordinate offices were dismissed; and

however lasting the utility of this rigour, its immediate consequence

was irritation, resistance, and contempt.

The state of the prisoner population, though considerably ameliorated by

Sorell, was far from satisfactory. Left much at their own disposal from

the hours of labor till their return, they were masters of that portion

of their time most suitable for dissipation and crime. The extent of

their depredations, and the deliberation with which they were performed,

indicated an extensive confederacy. The subordinate police, prone to

connive with offenders, was ill-regulated and insufficient. Goods were

carried off in masses: bags of sugar and chests of tea were abstracted

from the stores; cart loads of property were swept off at once. The

habits of the populace were daring, profane, and intemperate; and to

coerce such materials into order, required the utmost vigour and

discretion.[144]

The chief justice, John Lewes Pedder, Esq., brought from Great Britain

the charter of the supreme court, which was proclaimed in the

market-place on the 7th May, 1824. On the 24th of the same month, the

court opened for business, and Joseph Tice Gellibrand presented his

commission as attorney-general. In his opening speech he declared his

resolution to adopt the maxims of the illustrious Hale. He eulogised the

jurisprudence of his country, and especially trial by jury; but the

military uniform which appeared in court, if it did not lesson its

utility, deprived the institution of its grace.

The first person tried was named Tibbs, for killing a negro, who while

watching for thieves was himself taken for a robber. Though not a

constable, he found pleasure in detecting the crimes of others, and had

in some instances succeeded. He fell a victim to this singular passion:

he was haunting the premises of a settler, by whose servant he was

slain.

The first prosecution for libel was at the instance of Mr. R. L. Murray.

This gentleman, formerly a captain in the army, had been transported for

bigamy. At an early age, while stationed in Ireland, he became

acquainted with a presbyterian lady, and was married to her according to

the rites of her faith. Considering himself trepanned, he came to the

conclusion that the ceremony was void, and subsequently espoused

another. Twenty years after, he was prosecuted; but not at the instance

of the parties more immediately concerned. In an appeal to the British

nation, published at the time, he ascribed the charge to malice; and he

made several unsuccessful efforts to obtain the reversal of the

sentence. In the opinion of eminent counsel, the ceremony was invalid;

and many years after, the judges decided that the marriage of a

presbyterian and an episcopalian in Ireland, could only be celebrated by

a clergyman of the establishment. Sir Samuel Romilly and Mr. Whitbread

called the attention of the Commons to the extreme severity of the

sentence, and were resisted by the ministers with party warmth.[145]

Murray was educated at Westminster and Cambridge; and had spent twenty

years in the service when his commission, as captain in the Royal Waggon

Train, was declared forfeited. After residing some time in New South

Wales, he settled in this island: his extensive experience and literary

talents procured his admission to the limited society. Having adopted

the opinion that an independent colonial government would not add to the

freedom or prosperity of the colony, he opposed the petition. The

committee for its promotion set up a placard, which referred to the

history of the dissentient, and exposed themselves to a criminal

prosecution.

The establishment of a court seemed to be the signal for an outbreak of

disorder and violence. Many prisoners escaped from confinement, and for

a long period a succession of depredators alarmed and pillaged the

colony. The settlers promptly tendered their assistance to the

government, to garrison the towns or scour the bush. Their assistance

was chiefly valuable for the moral support it afforded, and its

influence on the minds of the labourer in bondage. The exploits of the

bushrangers properly belong to the history of transportation, and are

related in Vol. ii. p. 194. The terrors they spread retarded the

occupation of the country, and joined with the assaults of the natives

made the life of a Tasmanian farmer one of considerable danger. At this

time the remote estates were guarded by soldiers: loop-holes pierced the

walls; fierce dogs were stationed as sentinels; and the whole strength

of a district was sometimes employed in pursuit. Few settlers have

escaped assault and loss. Many families, who in Great Britain thought of

an armed robber only with feelings of terror, by long familiarity with

scenes of danger, acquired a cool courage, which would not dishonor a

soldier by profession. The unsparing sacrifice of the robbers captured,

gradually terminated the practice of bushranging, and the colony enjoyed

a long season of comparative repose.

The duties, levied first by the authority of the governor-in-chief, and

afterwards sanctioned by parliament, were collected by the Naval

officer, who received 5 per cent. on the amount: he also performed the

duties of treasurer. Dr. Bromley, the surgeon of the first fleet,

subsequently made seven voyages to the colonies, when he obtained the

appointment. The infrequent examination of the accounts, exposed the

treasury to undetected pilfering, and the colony to loss: in 1824, a

large defalcation was discovered, which, ascertained by a jury of

merchants, amounted to £8,269. They recommended the defaulter to the

lenient consideration of the government, as the victim of others. Dr.

Bromley had been subject to the daily peculation of servants, and robbed

of cash and plate, to the value of £500, at once. His integrity was not

impeached: the public business, however, had been conducted without

check. The per centage was abolished, and the offices of treasurer and

collector separated, and confided to Mr. Jocelyn Thomas and Mr.

Hamilton.

The admission of goods liable to customs had been lax. The new settler

landed his rum duty free, when intended for his own use; but smuggling

was carried on to a large extent, and the protection of the revenue

required a more severe supervision. The rigour was not always exercised

with courtesy; and the vallise of Mr. Edward Lord, formerly

acting-governor, was detained by the naval officer, with some

expressions of indignity.

The merchants were deeply offended by the imposition of a duty at Hobart

Town, higher than was fixed by Brisbane at Port Jackson, as injurious to

their trade; and that duties levied prior to landing, were sometimes

imposed on wines never actually delivered. They requested that the

charges might be equalised with the other port, and that the excess

already taken should be restored. In reply, Arthur not only refused to

entertain the petition, but vindicated with great ardour the conduct of

Hamilton, as a traduced and excellent public officer. Such was the

answer to the merchants who complained of excessive and unequal imposts.

Dissatisfied with the reply, they required the sheriff to call a public

meeting, to address the governor-in-chief, the colony being still a

dependency. This the sheriff, Mr. Dudley Fereday, declined, complaining

that his honor Colonel Arthur was not mentioned in the requisition, and

the object of the meeting not sufficiently defined. A meeting was

therefore called to reprobate the ignorance and presumption of the

sheriff; but the dispute ended without any other practical consequences

than a wide impression that the government was despotic and

contemptuous.

A more important variation between the colonies was displayed on the

question of trial by jury. The magistrates of New South Wales were

required to shew cause for the non-issue of a precept to the sheriff, to

summon a jury. The rule _nisi_ was made absolute. Chief Justice Forbes

decided that the magistrates derived their commission from the king, and

not the parliament; that their functions and obligations were settled by

common law; were not mentioned, and therefore not taken away by the act.

The petty session thus traced its existence to the royal commission: the

supreme court to the parliamentary law.

When the report of the determination by Judge Forbes reached this

colony, Mr., now Sir Alfred Stephen, brought the question before the

court in a similar manner. He argued that it was the duty of the court

to construe the act of parliament in a form the most favorable to the

subject. On the other side it was maintained, that the colony was too

small to furnish civil juries, and the parliament had superseded them.

The act itself which instituted the military jury for the supreme court,

and gave civil juries in civil cases, left the extension of the

practice to the royal discretion alone.

Judge Pedder, in giving judgment, stated that according to the practice

previously in the colonies no civil juries had been known, and the act

of parliament which conferred trial by jury did not give a common one,

but retained the military jury. On the whole he was of opinion that

parliament had overruled common law, and taken away trial by jury,

except as provided by the act, or extended by the king.

Thus, while Judge Pedder ruled that the petty juries were illegal, at

New South Wales they were sitting under the sanction of the then

superior authority. That the decision of our supreme court was a more

correct interpretation of the intentions of parliament, is scarcely to

be doubted; but the words of the act did not necessarily extinguish a

common law right, and the intention of legislators is not law. The

decision of Forbes was more agreeable to Englishmen, though scarcely

compatible with the condition of the country.

The treatment of Mr. Gellibrand, the attorney-general, who was dismissed

from his office by Arthur, for unprofessional conduct, excited great

interest in the legal circles of Great Britain. The disagreement sprang

chiefly from a trial, Laurie _v._ Griffiths, characteristic of the

times. The plaintiff sued for damages for the illegal capture of a

vessel of 12 tons, of which he was the owner and master. The vessel,

called the _Fame_, was found by the brig _Glory_ in Twofold Bay.

Griffiths, the owner of the _Glory_, invited Laurie on board, and made

him prisoner. He then boarded the _Fame_, deprived her of charts and

compass, and amidst the shouts of his seamen fastened her to the tail of

the _Glory_. In this condition she was carried triumphantly towards

Launceston; but a storm arising, the _Glory_ encumbered by the _Fame_,

cast her adrift, when she was exposed to great danger. The prize-master

ran her on shore, and the party wrecked, after fourteen days journey

through the woods, reached George Town. The justification pleaded was

that the plaintiff had conveyed prisoners from Port Jackson, and was

liable to forfeiture; that he had embarked in an unlawful voyage, and

intended to visit Launceston to circulate forged paper. No proof of

these assertions was offered, and the jury granted £460 damages; a

verdict which the government found no occasion to disturb.

Mr. Gellibrand, upon the close of the action, was called to account for

mal-practice. Mr. Dawes, an attorney, presented a statement to the

governor, which was forwarded to Judge Pedder, who returned it as not

within his province. Mr. Alfred Stephen, therefore, brought the

complaint formally before the court, and moved that Gellibrand should be

struck off the rolls. The main question was this: whether a barrister

holding a general retainer could, without license, advise the opposite

party, or whether he could draw pleas for both. It was maintained by Mr.

Stephen, that the practice was dishonorable and dangerous: in the early

stages of a cause facts might become known to a barrister, which would

make him a formidable antagonist to his former client. He asserted that

whether the practice were common in England or not, it was detestable;

and if allowed, would compel him to relinquish the profession, "or seek

an honorable pittance elsewhere."

In the case of Laurie _v._ Griffiths, Mr. Gellibrand had drawn the pleas

for the plaintiff, and afterwards acted officially against him; he,

however, transferred the fee he received to Mr. Stephen, when he was

compelled to relinquish the cause. The profession, almost unanimously,

asserted that the custom of the English bar warranted the practice of

Gellibrand. The judge stated that he was not concluded by the custom of

the English bar, and that the court might treat as a contempt a practice

tolerated at Westminster: he considered the custom pernicious, but

dismissed the case, and left the governor to act for himself.

The appeal of Mr. Gellibrand to the profession perfectly vindicated his

conduct. It was found that the first counsel in England often acted

against a retaining client, and sometimes drew pleas on both sides.

Thus, in a question of a right of way, the same counsel drew the

declaration, the plea, and the replication. However objectionable at

first sight, where legal technicalities are so fatal to even a right

cause, it would be no small hardship were an opulent person permitted to

engross the legal talents of an island, and exclude his antagonist from

the possibility of obtaining justice. The excitement occasioned by this

dispute was of long continuance, and motives were freely imputed.

Although the chief justice dismissed the motion of Mr. Stephen, the

governor determined to press the charge, and appointed a commission of

enquiry. Additional matter was urged: it was said that Gellibrand

advised a client to enter an action against a magistrate, whom his

office might oblige him to defend, and that his intimacy with Mr.

Murray did not become his relations with the government. Mr. Sergeant,

now Judge, Talfourd regretted that by quitting the commissioners

appointed by the governor, he had damaged his case. The crown had a

right to dismiss; but he was clearly of opinion that the proceeding of

the local officers was the effect of either "malice or mistake." The

charges of professional malversation he pronounced too absurd for

notice; that the practice was not only allowable but often imperative.

Mr. Stephen, on his passage to this colony was involved in a quarrel,

which ended in an assault. On his action he obtained £50 damages. His

bill of costs, twice that amount, was published, to contrast with the

professional scruples which inspired his opposition to Gellibrand. This

bill consisted of one hundred and twelve items, among which the

following: "to instructions for replication," "for brief," "retaining

fee." Many other such payments of self to self, passed the taxing of the

master. After paying actual expenses, Mr. Stephen, however, handed the

surplus to a chanty.

The master of the supreme court arrived in October, 1824. This gentleman

was the brother of the late William Hone, a party writer of great

celebrity, whose opinions in early life were extreme, both in reference

to politics and religion. For publishing parodies, which employed the

language of the _Common Prayer_ as a vehicle of political complaint, he

was tried by Lord Ellenborough. His fame was greatly increased by the

pertinacity and skill of a successful defence. He afterwards wrote the

_Day Book_, a work of ability and research; and in the last years of his

life he embraced the faith, and died with the reputation of an ardent

christian. Joseph Hone, Esq. succeeded Mr. Gellibrand. The uniform

gentleness of his character has been respected by the press: he is

mentioned only to be praised.

The arrival of General Darling was a time of festivity: he proclaimed

the independence of the colony on New South Wales, December 3, 1825.

While present, he was entitled to govern; but when he set sail, Arthur,

who had been addressed as "Your Honor," assumed the authority of

governor-in-chief, and, responsible only to the home-office, became "His

Excellency." The colonists were less delighted with the possession than

the prospect of a chief governor; although the spirit of General Darling

was not more favorable to the enlargement of their liberties.

The legislative and executive councils were appointed, consisting of

officers of the government: among them, it is said, a relative of

Spencer Perceval, the statesman. He had been nominated to an office in

this colony, but he never arrived; his name is, however, second on our

first list of legislators.

The division of the island into police districts, subject to a

stipendiary magistrate (1827), brought the prisoner population under the

more direct control of the government. It was a great improvement in the

internal discipline of the colony. Gentlemen, themselves masters, were

liable to the bias of a position full of vexation and disappointment,

and less favorable to a cool and impartial administration of justice.

The executive revised their sentences, and thus reflected on their

judgment. Nor were they willing always to spare the time required by a

patient investigation, or to distinguish between a frivolous and a

proper defence. Some curious examples of magisterial equity are often

told: one rose from the bench, when he heard his waggon in the street,

and delivered his sentence in his progress towards the door--"I can't

stop: give him fifty." A cattle stealer owed his life to the same

impatience of enquiry: before the charge was half investigated, the

magistrate said, "give him fifty"--an easy compromise with the hangman.

A reverend gentleman met a party of men brought up for disobedience: he

sent them back, with "ah, well, give them five-and-twenty all round." It

was common to send a note with the man whom it was intended to punish:

he was flogged, and sent back. A man, suspecting the contents of such a

missive, gave it to his fellow-servant, who was flogged in spite of his

protests. Another, who had been on a similar errand before, returned

next day to his master, complaining bitterly of his suffering; but he

had destroyed the note and eluded the triangles. Such eccentricities of

justice could not last beyond the rudest era.

The site of the capital narrowly escaped a second change. The

commissioner, Mr. Bigge, considered that the seat of government should

be fixed nearer to the source of the river Derwent. Brighton was

nominated the destined city, close to an extensive and fertile country,

and within easy access to the interior. Arthur was instructed to

determine this question. Its chief inducement was the removal of the

prisoners from the temptation of the port; but property was already

invested to a large amount. The merchants strongly opposed the transfer.

The division of the government from the chief population would have

destroyed its moral influence. Arthur did not press the project, and

during a conference with the merchants and other principal inhabitants,

discussed the question with courtesy. On the whole, the measure was

impolitic, and finally abandoned.

The uncertainty for some time obstructed the progress of the place.

Launceston was still more unfortunate. When York Town was abandoned as

the chief settlement, Paterson removed his head-quarters to Launceston;

but on the visit of Macquarie he determined to constitute George Town

the northern capital. The superior convenience of a spot at the head of

the river to one forty miles distant, gave Launceston the mercantile

preference. Macquarie maintained his project to the last; but the

opinion of Mr. Bigge determined the dispute in favor of Launceston, and

the head-quarters, in 1824, were removed finally from George Town.

A fatality has seemed to attend the selection of chief townships in the

colonies. Sydney is a second choice, Hobart Town a second, Launceston a

third, Melbourne a second. New Zealand has experienced the same vexation

and losses which proper surveys might easily avoid. The general

government can have no sinister interest in these changes, but those who

foresee and promote them may largely gain.

The principal objection to Launceston was the navigation of the river,

which was dreaded by vessels of tonnage; but its reputation was worse

than its dangers. Lighters, and even rafts, were employed to discharge

ships which would now approach the wharves. The _Aguilar_, Captain

Watson, spent several months at George Town, and charged the detention

on the river. This was resented by Arthur, who stated that the master

had dispatched the mate and seamen on a sealing voyage, and loitered for

the purpose of traffic; and sought to excuse the delay by defaming the

port.[146]

FOOTNOTES:

[Footnote 141: _Barnwell and Cresswell's Reports._]

[Footnote 142: An obscure publication appeared at Jamaica in 1824,

designated a _Defence of the Settlers of Honduras_: a work intended to

refute the imputations on which his anti-slavery policy had been

justified. Whether the book itself really existed, or the passages

professedly extracted from it deserve any credit, is questionable: the

authority being an opposition paper.]

[Footnote 143: Colonel Arthur's letter to Lord Bathurst, 1820.]

[Footnote 144: The disorders of this period will be found described in

vol. ii, of this History.]

[Footnote 145: _Appeal to the British Nation._ By R. L. Murray, Esq.:

London, 2nd edit.]

The History of Tasmania, Volume I · 第 1 / 20 章