Nothing; for love flowed in her, like a river,

Flooding the banks of wisdom; and her soul,

Losing its self-control,

Waved with a vague, uncertain, tremulous quiver,

And like a lily in the storm, at last

She sunk 'neath passion's blast.

Flowing the fragrance rose--as though each blossom

Breathed out its very life--swell over swell,

Like mist along the dell,

Wooing his wondering heart from out his bosom--

His heart, which like a lark seemed slowly winging

Its way toward heaven, singing.

Dian looked on; she saw her spells completing,

And sighing, bade the sweetest nightingale

That ever in Carian vale

Sang to her charms, rise, and with softest greeting

Woo from its mortal dreams and thoughts of clay

Endymion's soul away.

From the conclusion of the poem we take a few stanzas, describing the

struggle of Dian with her passion, when Endymion asserts his love for

Chromia:

The goddess gasped for breath, with bosom swelling:

Her lips unclosed, while her large, luminous eyes

Blazing like Stygian skies,

With passion, on the audacious youth were dwelling:

She raised her angry hand, that seemed to clasp

Jove's thunder in its grasp.

And then she stood in silence, fixed and breathless;

But presently the threatening arm slid down;

The fierce, destroying frown

Departed from her eyes, which took a deathless

Expression of despair, like Niobe's--

Her dead ones at her knees.

Slowly her agony passed, and an Elysian,

Majestic fervor lit her lofty eyes,

Now dwelling on the skies:

Meanwhile, Endymion stood, cheek, brow and vision,

Radiant with resignation, stern and cold,

In conscious virtue bold,

In conclusion, we cannot but congratulate Mr. Hirst on his success in

producing a poem conceived with so much force and refinement of

imagination, and finished with such consummate art, as the present. It

is a valuable addition to the permanent poetical literature of the

country.

_Memoir of William Ellery Channing. With Extracts from

His Correspondence and Manuscripts. Boston: Crosby &

Nichols. 3 vols. 12mo._

This long expected work has at last been published, and we think it

will realize the high expectations raised by its announcement two or

three years ago. It is mostly composed of extracts from the letters,

journals, and unpublished sermons of Dr. Channing, and is edited by

his nephew, Wm. H. Channing, who has also supplied a memoir. It

conveys a full view of Dr. Channing's interior life from childhood to

old age, and apart from its great value and interest, contains, in the

exhibition of the steps of his intellectual and spiritual growth, as

perfect a specimen of psychological autobiography as we have in

literature. Such a work subjects its author to the severest tests

which can be applied to a human mind in this life, and we have risen

from its perusal with a new idea of the humility, sincerity, and

saintliness of Dr. Channing's character. In him self-distrust was

admirably blended with a sublime conception of the capacity of man,

and a sublime confidence in human nature. He was not an egotist, as

passages in his writings may seem to indicate, for he was more severe

upon himself than upon others, and numberless remarks in the present

volumes show how sharp was the scrutiny to which he subjected the most

elusive appearances of pride and vanity. But with his high and living

sense of the source and destiny of every human mind, and his almost

morbid consciousness of the deformity of moral evil, he reverenced in

himself and in others the presence of a spirit which connected

humanity with its Maker, and by unfolding the greatness of the

spiritual capacities of men, he hoped to elevate them above the

degradation of sensuality and sin. He was not a teacher of spiritual

pride, conceit and self-worship, but of those vital principles of love

and reverence which elevate man only by directing his aspirations to

God.

The present volumes give a full length portrait of Dr. Channing in all

the relations of life, and some of the minor details regarding his

opinions and idiosyncrasies are among the most interesting portions of

the book. We are glad to perceive that he early appreciated

Wordsworth. The Excursion he eagerly read on its first appearance, and

while so many of the Pharisees of taste were scoffing at it, he

manfully expressed his sense of its excellence. This poem he recurred

to oftener than to any other, and next to Shakspeare, Wordsworth seems

to have been the poet he read with the most thoughtful delight. When

he went to Europe, in 1822, he had an interview with Wordsworth, and

of the impression he himself made on the poet there can be no more

pertinent illustration, than the fact that, twenty years afterward,

Wordsworth mentioned to an American gentleman that one observation of

Channing, respecting the connection of Christianity with progress, had

stamped itself ineffaceably upon his mind. Coleridge he appears to

have profoundly impressed. In a letter to Washington Allston,

Coleridge says of him--"His affection for the good as the good, and

his earnestness for the true as the true--with that harmonious

subordination of the latter to the former, without encroachment on the

absolute worth of either--present in him a character which in my

heart's heart I believe to be the very rarest on earth. . . . . Mr.

Channing is a philosopher in both the possible renderings of the word.

He has the love of wisdom and the wisdom of love. . . . . I am

confident that the few differences of opinion between him and myself

not only are, but would by him be found to be apparent, not real--the

same truth seen in different relations. Perhaps I have been more

absorbed in the depth of the mystery of the spiritual life, he more

engrossed by the loveliness of its manifestations."

In nothing is Dr. Channing's humility better seen than in his

relations to literature. He became an author almost unconsciously. All

his intellectual convictions were so indissolubly woven into the

texture of his life, so vitalized by his heart and imagination, that

writing with him was never an end but a means. Literary fame followed

him; he did not follow it. When, however, he found that his reputation

not only rung through his own country but was reverberated from

Europe, he appears to have feared that it might corrupt his motives

for composition. He studiously avoided reading all eulogistic notices

of his works or character, though they were interesting to him as

indications of the influence his cherished opinions were exerting. The

article in the Westminster Review, which exceeded all others in

praise, he never read. Dr. Dewey's criticism in the Christian Examiner

he only knew as far as related to its objections, and his only

disappointment was in finding them so few. Brougham's criticism on his

style provoked in him no retort. Hazlitt's coarse attack on him in the

Edinburgh Review he considered as an offset to the undue praise he had

received from other quarters. "The author of the article," he says, in

one of his letters, "is now dead; and as I did not feel a moment's

anger toward him during his life, I have no reproach for him now. He

was a man of fine powers, and wanted nothing but pure and fixed

principles to make him one of the lights of the age."

It would be impossible in our limits to convey an adequate impression

of the beauty, value, or interest of the present volumes. They are

full of matter. The letters are admirable specimens of epistolary

composition, considered as the spontaneous expression of a grave, high

and warm nature, to the friends of his heart and mind. They are

exceedingly original of their kind, and while they bear no resemblance

to those of Cowper, Burns, Byron, or Mackintosh, they are on that very

account a positive addition to the literature of epistolary

composition. Few biographies have been published within a century

calculated to make so deep an impression as this of Dr. Channing, and

few could have admitted the reader to so close a communion with the

subject, without sacrificing that delicacy in the treatment of

frailties due to the character of the departed.

_Napoleon and the Marshals of the Empire. Philadelphia:

Carey & Hart. 2 vols. 12mo._

The present work is to some extent an attempt "to head" Mr. Headley.

For our part, we profess to have as much patience as any of the

descendants of Job, but we must acknowledge that we have broken down

in every effort to master the merits of the quarrel between the

publishers of the present volumes and the Author of Napoleon and his

Marshals. Accordingly we can give no opinion on that matter. In

respect to the value of the volumes under consideration, as compared

with a similar work by Mr. Headley, there can be little hesitation of

judgment. It is idle to say, as some have said, that a work which has

run through fifteen editions, as Mr. Headley's has done, is a mere

humbug. On the contrary, it is a book evincing a mind as shrewd as it

is strong, aiming, it is true, rather at popularity than excellence,

but obtaining the former by possessing the sagacity to perceive that

accounts of battles, to be generally apprehended, must be addressed to

the eye and blood rather than to the understanding; and this power

of producing vivid pictures of events Mr. Headley has in large

measure. Hence the success of his book, in spite of its exaggerations

of statement, sentiment and language.

The present work evinces a merit of another kind. It is a keen,

accurate, well-written production, devoid of all tumult in its style

and all exaggeration in its matter, and giving close and consistent

expositions of the characters, and a clear narrative of the lives, of

Napoleon and his Marshals. It is evidently the work of a person who

understands military operations, and conveys a large amount of

knowledge which we have seen in no other single production on the

subject of the wars springing out of the French Revolution. The

portraits of fifteen of the marshals, in military costume, are very

well executed.

The portion of the work devoted to Napoleon, about one third of the

whole, is very able. Its defect consists in the leniency of its

judgment on that gigantic public criminal. Napoleon was a grand

example of a great man, who demonstrated, on a wide theatre of action,

what can be done in this world by a colossal intellect and an iron

will without any moral sense. In his disregard of humanity, and his

reliance on falsehood and force, he was the architect at once of his

fortune and his ruin. No man can be greatly and wisely politic who is

incapable of grasping those universal sentiments which underlie all

superficial selfishness in mankind, and of discerning the action of

the moral laws of the universe. Without this, events cannot be read in

their principles. The only defect in Napoleon's mind was a lack of

moral insight, the quality of perceiving the moral character and

relations of objects, and, wanting this, he must necessarily have been

in the long run unsuccessful. It is curious that of all the great men

which the Revolution called forth, Lafayette was almost the only one

who never violated his conscience, and the only one who came out well

in the end. Intellectually he was below a hundred of his

contemporaries, but his instinctive sense of right pushed him blindly

in the right direction, when all the sagacity and insight of the

masters in intrigue and comprehensive falsehood signally failed.

_Romance of the History of Louisiana. A Series of

Lectures. By Charles Gayarre. New York: D. Appleton &

Co. 1 vol. 12mo._

The romantic element in historical events is that which takes the

strongest hold upon the imagination and sensibility; and it puts a

certain degree of life into the fleshless forms of even the

commonplace historian. The incidents of a nation's annals cannot be

narrated in a style sufficiently dry and prosaic to prevent the soul

of poetry from finding some expression, however short of the truth. It

seems to us that there is much error in the common notions regarding

matters of fact. Starting from the unquestionable axiom that

historians should deal with facts and principles, not with fictions

and sentimentalities, most people have illogically concluded that

those histories are the worthiest of belief which address the

understanding alone, and studiously avoid all the arts of

representation. Now this is false in two respects--such histories not

only giving imperfect and partial views of facts, but disabling the

memory from retaining even them. Facts and events, whether we regard

them singly or in their relations, can be perceived and remembered

only as they are presented to the whole nature. They must be realized

as well as generalized. The sensibility and imagination, as well as

the understanding are to be addressed. As far as possible they should

be made as real to the mind as any event which experience has stamped

on the memory. History thus written, is written close to the truth of

things, and conveys real knowledge. Far from departing from facts, or

exaggerating them, it is the only kind of history which thoroughly

comprehends them. We should never forget that the events which have

occurred in the world, are expressions of the nature of man under a

variety of circumstances and conditions, and that these events must be

interpreted in the light of that common humanity which binds all men

together. History, therefore, differs from true poetry, not so much in

intensity and fullness of representation; not so much in the force,

vividness and distinctness with which things are brought home to the

heart and brain, as in difference of object. The historian and the

poet are both bound to deal with human nature, but one gives us its

actual development, the other its possible; one shows us what man has

done, the other what man can do. The annalist who does not enable us

to see mankind in real events, is as unnatural as the poetaster who

substitutes monstrosities for men in fictitious events.

We accordingly welcome with peculiar heartiness all attempts at

realizing history, by evolving its romantic element, and thus

demonstrating to the languid and lazy readers of ninepenny nonsense,

that the actual heroes and heroines of the world have surpassed in

romantic daring the fictitious ones who swell and swagger in most

novels and poems. Mr. Gayarre's work is more interesting, both as

regards its characters and incidents, than Jane Eyre or James's

"last," for, in truth, it requires a mind of large scope to imagine as

great things as many men, in every country, have really performed. The

History of Louisiana affords a rich field to the poet and romancer,

who is content simply to reproduce in their original life some of its

actual scenes and characters; and Mr. Gayarre has, to a considerable

extent, succeeded in this difficult and delicate task. The work

evinces a mind full of the subject; and if defective at all, the

defect is rather in style than matter. The author evidently had two

temptations to hasty composition--a copious vocabulary and complete

familiarity with his subject. There is an occasional impetuosity and

recklessness in his manner, and a general habit of tossing off his

sentences with an air of disdainful indifference, which characterizes

a large class of amateur southern writers. Such a style is often rapid

from heedlessness rather than force, and animated from caprice rather

than fire. The timid correctness of an elegant diction is not more

remote from beauty than the defiant carelessness of a reckless one is

from power; and to avoid Mr. Prettyman, it is by no means necessary to

"fraternize" with Sir Forcible Feeble. Mr. Gayarre has produced so

pleasant a book, and gives evidence of an ability to do so much toward

familiarizing American history to the hearts and imaginations of the

people, that we trust he will not only give us more books, but subject

their style to a more scrupulous examination than he has the present.

_Universal and Critical Dictionary of the English

Language. By Joseph E. Worcester. Boston: Wilkins,

Carter, & Co. 1 vol. 8vo._

The present century has been distinguished above all others in the

history of English lexicography, for the number and excellence of its

dictionaries. It is a matter of pride to Americans that so far the

United States are in advance of England, in regard to the sagacity and

labor devoted to the English language. Of those who have done most in

this department, the pre-eminence belongs to Dr. Webster and Dr.

Worcester. Each has published a Dictionary of great value; and that of

the latter is now before us. It bears on every page marks of the most

gigantic labor, and must have been the result of many long years of

thought and investigation. Its arrangement is admirable, and its

definitions clear, concise, critical, and ever to the purpose. The

introduction, devoted to the principles of pronunciation, orthography,

English Grammar, the origin, formation, and etymology of the English

language; and the History of English Lexicography is laden with

important information, drawn from a wide variety of sources. Dr.

Worcester has also, in the appendix, enlarged and improved Walker's

Key to the Classical Pronunciation of Greek, Latin, and Scripture

Names, and added the pronunciation of modern geographical names. Taken

as a whole, we think the dictionary one which not even the warmest

admirers of Dr. Webster can speak of without respect. The advantage

which Dr. Worcester's dictionary holds over Dr. Webster's may be

compressed in one word--objectiveness. The English language, as a

whole, is seen through a more transparent medium in the former than in

the latter. Dr. Webster, with all his great merits as a lexicographer,

loved to meddle with the language too much. Dr. Worcester is content

to take it as it is, without any intrusion of his own idiosyncracies.

We think that both dictionaries are honorable to the country, and that

each has its peculiar excellencies. Perhaps the student of

lexicography could spare neither.

_The History of Don Quixote de la Mancha. From the

Spanish of Cervantes. With Illustrations by Schoff.

Boston: Charles H. Peirce. 1 vol. 12mo._

This is a very handsome edition of one of the most wonderful creations

of the human intellect, elegantly illustrated with appropriate

engravings. It is to a certain extent a family edition, omitting only

those portions of the original which would shock the modesty of modern

times. We know that there is a great opposition among men of letters

to the practice of meddling with a work of genius, and suppressing any

portion of it. To a considerable extent we sympathize with this

feeling. But when the question lies between a purified edition and the

withdrawal of the book from popular circulation, we go for the former.

Don Quixote is a pertinent instance. It is not now a book generally

read by many classes of people, especially young women, and the

younger branches of a family. The reason consists in the coarseness of

particular passages and sentences. Strike these out, and there remains

a body of humor, pathos, wisdom, humanity, expressed in characters and

incidents of engrossing interest, which none can read without benefit

and pleasure. The present volume, which might be read by the fireside

of any family, is so rich in all the treasures of its author's

beautiful and beneficent genius, that we heartily wish it an extensive

circulation. It is got up with great care by one who evidently

understands Cervantes; and the unity of the work, with all its

beautiful episodes, is not broken by the omissions.

_Wuthuring Heights. New York: Harper & Brothers. 1 vol. 12mo._

This novel is said to be by the author of Jane Eyre, and was eagerly

caught at by a famished public, on the strength of the report. It

afforded, however, but little nutriment, and has universally

disappointed expectation. There is an old saying that those who eat

toasted cheese at night will dream of Lucifer. The author of Wuthuring

Heights has evidently eat toasted cheese. How a human being could have

attempted such a book as the present without committing suicide before

he had finished a dozen chapters, is a mystery. It is a compound of

vulgar depravity and unnatural horrors, such as we might suppose a

person, inspired by a mixture of brandy and gunpowder, might write for

the edification of fifth-rate blackguards. Were Mr. Quilp alive we

should be inclined to believe that the work had been dictated by him

to Lawyer Brass, and published by the interesting sister of that legal

gentleman.

_A Discourse on the Life, Character, and Public

Services of James Kent, late Chancellor of the State of

New York. By John Duer. New York: D. Appleton & Co._

This discourse was originally delivered before the Judiciary and Bar

of the city and State of New York. In a style of unpretending

simplicity it gives a full length portrait of the great chancellor,

doing complete justice to his life and works, and avoiding all the

vague commendations and meaningless generalities of commonplace

eulogy. One charm of the discourse comes from its being the testimony

of a surviving friend to the intellectual and moral worth of a great

man, without being marred by the exaggeration of personal attachment.

Judge Kent's mind and character needed but justice, and could dispense

with charity, even when friendship was to indicate the grasp of the

one and the excellence of the other.

_Memorials of the Introduction of Methodism into the

Eastern States. By Rev. A. Stevens, A. M. Boston:

Charles H. Peirce. 1 vol. 12mo._

Mr. Stevens takes a high rank among the leading minds of his

denomination. The present work shows that he combines the power of

patient research with the ability to express its results in a lucid,

animated, and elegant style. His biographies of the Methodist

preachers have the interest of a story. Indeed, out of the Catholic

Church, there is no religious chivalry whose characters and actions

partake so much of heroism, and of that fine enthusiasm which almost

loses its own identity in the objects it contemplates, as the

Methodist priests.

_The Inundation; or Pardon and Peace. A Christmas

Story. By Mrs. Gore. With Illustrations by Geo.

Cruikshank. Boston: C. H. Peirce. 1 vol. 18mo._

This is a delightful little story, interesting from its incidents and

characters, and conveying excellent morality and humanity in a

pleasing dress. The illustrations are those of the London edition, and

are admirably graphic. Cruikshank's mode of making a face expressive

of character by caricaturing it, is well exhibited in his sketches in

the present volume.

_The Book of Visions, being a Transcript of the Record

of the Secret Thoughts of a Variety of Individuals

while attending Church._

The design of this little work is original and commendable. It is

written to do good, and we trust may answer the expectations of its

author. It enters the bosoms of members of the cabinet, members of

congress, bankers, lawyers, editors, &c

., and reports the secret

meditations of those who affect to be worshipers. It is published by

J. W. MOORE of this city.

DESCRIPTION OF THE FASHION PLATE.

TOILETTE DE VILLE.--Dress of Nankin silk, ornamented in the front of

the skirt with bias trimming of the same stuff, fastened by silk

buttons; corsage plain, with a rounded point, ornamented at the skirt;

sleeves half long, with bias trimming; under sleeves of puffed muslin;

capote of white crape, ornamented with two plumes falling upon the

side.

SUR LE COTE.--Dress of blue glace taffetas, trimmed with two puffs

alike, disposed (en tablier;) corsage plain, low in the neck, and

trimmed with puffs from the shoulder to the point, and down the side

seam; sleeves short, and puffed; stomacher of plaited muslin, (under

sleeves of puffed muslin;) cap of lace, lower part puffed, without

trimming, ornamented with two long lappets, fastened with some bows of

yellow ribbon.

Transcriber's Note:

Small errors in punctuation and obvious printer's errors have been

corrected silently. Minor irregularities in spelling have been

maintained as in the original.

Graham's Magazine Vol XXXIII No. 1 July 1848 · 第 13 / 13 段