WHAT THE SUPREME COURT STANDS FOR.

The Members of Our Highest Tribunal

Have to Be Not Only Jurists but

Constructive Statesmen.

Justice Brown, of the Supreme Court of the United States, has retired from

active service. Before he laid aside the robes of his office a dinner was

given in his honor by the bar of the District of Columbia, and on this

occasion short speeches were delivered by several prominent men, including

President Roosevelt, who said:

In all the world--and I think, gentlemen, you will acquit me

of any disposition to needless flattery--there is no body of

men of equal numbers that possesses the dignity and power

combined that inhere in that court over which, Mr. Chief

Justice, you preside. Owing to the peculiar construction of

our government, the man who does his full duty on that court

must of necessity be not only a great jurist, but a great

constructive statesman.

The Men and the Tradition.

It has been our supreme good fortune as a nation that we

have had on that court, from the beginning to the present

day, men who have been able to carry on in worthy fashion

the tradition which has thus made it incumbent upon the

members of the court to combine in such fashion the

qualities of the great jurist and of the constructive

statesman.

Mr. Justice, we Americans are sometimes accused of paying

too much heed to mere material success, the success which is

measured only by the acquisition of wealth. I do not think

that the accusation is well founded.

A great deal of notoriety attaches, and must attach, to any

man who acquires a great fortune. If he acquires it well and

uses it well, he is entitled to and should receive the same

meed of credit that attaches to any other man who uses his

talents for the public good.

The Nation Sound at Bottom.

But if you will turn to see those whom in the past the

nation has delighted to honor, and those in the present whom

it delights to honor, I think that you will all agree that

this nation is sound at bottom in the bestowal of its

admiration in the relative estimate it puts upon the

different qualities of the men who achieve prominence by

rendering service to the public.

The names that stand out in our history in the past are the

names of the men who have done good work for the body

politic, and in the present the names of those whom this

people really hold in highest honor are the names of the men

who have done all that was in them in the best and most

worthy fashion.

In no way is it possible to deserve better of the republic

than by rendering sane, honest, clear-sighted service on the

bench, and, above all, on the highest bench of this

country.

Men who fear for our democratic institutions too often forget the Supreme

Court. Macaulay evidently forgot it when he described our Constitution as

"all sail and no anchor."

The Scrap Book, Volume 1, No. 6 August 1906 · 第 5 / 113 题