LETTER IV.

Every reader of your discourses, must be surprised at the extent to

which you have carried the practice of allegorising the Scriptures: you

declare your assent to them, and yet in practice, you seem to consider

each part as a fable from which you can draw a moral to suit the purpose

of the moment; and the belief which you profess in their divine origin,

does not restrain you from indulging in all the licentiousness of

fiction. "Sacred History, (says an eminent writer,) has always been read

with submissive reverence, and an imagination over-awed and controlled.

We have been accustomed to acquiesce in the nakedness and simplicity of

the authentic narrative, and to repose on its veracity with such humble

confidence, as suppresses curiosity. We go with the historian as he

goes, and stop with him when he stops. All amplification is frivolous

and vain; all addition to that which is already sufficient for the

purposes of religion, seems not only useless, but is in some degree

profane. Such events as were produced by the visible interposition of

divine power, are above the power of human genius to dignify. The

miracle of Creation, however it may teem with images, is best described

with little diffusion of language: _He spake the word and they were

made._"[12]

Footnote 12:

Life of Cowley.

That an argument may sometimes be illustrated by a moral drawn from the

events recorded in Scripture, I do not deny; but I think a pious mind

must always indulge in the practice with great caution, and be careful

not to make an allegory of the fact itself. Nor do I think that the

passage of Scripture "the letter killeth, but the spirit giveth

life"[13] which you so often quote, is at variance with this view of the

subject, or can furnish any argument in excuse for the spirit of

mysticism by which you involve every part of them in obscurity. It is

true that this passage is in the figurative language generally used in

the East, but the meaning appears so plain, that only those can mistake

it, whose minds have been perverted by the habit of speculating in the

airy regions of the imagination. The New Testament is a code of moral

law and spiritual instruction, teaching man his duty to his neighbour,

and the true way in which he can render acceptable worship to God. For

the outward order of this worship, and the government of religious

society, certain rules and ordinances must be necessary, and were found

to be so, even in the days of the apostles; but as under the old

covenant many had been led to consider the outward observance of the law

as their _only_ duty, and that "if they paid their tithe of mint and

anise and cummin, they might omit the weightier matters of the law,

judgment, mercy and faith; although _both_ ought to have been

observed;"[14] so this exhortation is intended to caution the flock, not

against the observance of the rules of discipline which had been

established, but that they might not sink down into the belief that such

observance was all that was required; and that they ought always to

remember that "God is a Spirit;" and they that "worship him, must

worship _him_ in spirit and in truth."

Footnote 13:

Observations on the Sermons of Elias Hicks In Several Letters to Him; With Some Introductory Remarks, Addressed to the Junior Members of the Society of Friends. · 第 17 / 33 题