“USAGES OF WAR ON LAND”: THE OFFICIAL GERMAN MANUAL
CRIMES IN BELGIUM EXPLAINED BY INSTRUCTIONS TO GERMAN OFFICERS --
UNLIMITED DESTRUCTION THE END OF WAR -- RULES OF CIVILIZED WARFARE
CLEARLY STATED -- OTHER EXCELLENT RULES.
The black crime of Louvain, the world-lamented destruction of the
cathedral of Rheims, the denudation of the fair land of Belgium, with
all its horrible attendant crimes, is explained, in part at least, by
“Usages of War on Land,” the official manual of instructions to military
officers compiled by the general staff of the German army. It is an
authoritative exposition of the rules of war as practiced by the
Germans.
Two general principles bearing directly on the question of the invasion
of Belgium are clearly stated in this guide:
“A war conducted with energy cannot be directed merely against the
combatants of the enemy state and the positions they occupy, but it will
and must in like manner seek to destroy the total intellectual and
material resources of the latter. Humanitarian claims, such as the
protection of men and their goods, can only be taken into consideration
in so far as the nature and object of the war permit.
“The fact that such limitations of the unrestricted and reckless
application of all the available means for the conduct of war, and
thereby the humanization of the customary methods of pursuing war,
really exist, and are actually observed by the armies of all civilized
states, has in the course of the nineteenth century often led to
attempts to develop, to extend, and thus to make universally binding
these pre-existing usages of war; to elevate them to the level of laws
binding nations and armies; in other words, to create a law of war. All
these attempts have hitherto, with some few exceptions to be mentioned
later, completely failed. If, therefore, in the following work the
expression ‘the law of war’ is used, it must be understood that by it is
meant not a written law introduced by the international agreements, but
only a reciprocity of mutual agreement--a limitation of arbitrary
behavior, which custom and conventionality, human friendliness and a
calculating egotism have erected, but for the observance of which there
exists no express sanction, but only ‘the fear of reprisals’ decides.”
UNLIMITED DESTRUCTION THE END OF WAR
Put in plain language, these passages mean that there is no law of war
which may not be broken at the dictates of interest. Unlimited
destruction is the end, and only fear of reprisals need limit the means.
The sentimental humanitarianism and flabby emotion which prevail
elsewhere have no place in the bright lexicon of the German officer. “By
steeping himself in military history,” the manual clearly states, “an
officer will be able to guard himself against excessive humanitarian
notions” and learn that “certain severities are indispensable in war,”
and that “the only true humanity often lies in a ruthless application of
them.” Then there is laid down this comprehensive general rule:
“All means of warfare may be used without which the purpose of war
cannot be achieved. On the other hand, every act of violence and
destruction which is not demanded by the purpose of war must be
condemned.”
Interpreted by other passages in the volume, this implies that the end
justifies the means. Barbarities may be forgiven if only they are
useful. Thus “international law is in no way opposed to the exploitation
of the crimes of third parties--assassination, incendiarism, robbery and
the like--to the prejudice of the enemy.”
RULES OF CIVILIZED WARFARE CLEARLY STATED
It must not be assumed, of course, that the German war manual is a
defense of unlimited rapine. The rules of civilized warfare are usually
stated clearly enough. But there are so many exceptions to the
application of them that a zealous officer might well be pardoned if he
regarded them as not binding whenever it was to his interest to ignore
them. Thus, after a careful statement of the right of the inhabitants of
an invaded country to organize for its defense, the advantages of
“terrorism” are candidly set forth as outweighing these considerations
in many instances. That policy has been illustrated in Belgium very
significantly. The difference between precept and practice is also seen
in the prohibition of the bombardment of churches and unfortified towns.
Regarding the latter the manual says:
“A prohibition by international law of the bombardment of open towns and
villages which are not occupied by the enemy or defended was, indeed,
put into words by The Hague regulations, but appears superfluous, since
modern military history knows of hardly any such case.”
Military history has been made since then, particularly by the German
air raids on English seashore resorts.
OTHER EXCELLENT RULES
Several other excellent rules in the manual may be contrasted with
German practice in the present war.
“No damage, not even the smallest, must be done unless it is done for
military reasons.
“Contributions of war are sums of money which are levied by force from
the people of an occupied country. They differ in character from
requisitions in kind because they do not serve an immediate requirement
of the army. Hence, requisitions in cash are only in the rarest cases
justified by the necessities of war.
“The military government by the army of occupation carries with it only
a temporary right to enjoy the property of others. It must, therefore,
avoid every purposeless injury, it has no right to sell or dispose of
the property.”
“Usages of War on Land” makes interesting reading throughout, though
the conclusions that the impartial reader will draw from it will not be
in every case those which the German military authorities would have him
draw.