PREFATORY REMARKS.

The art of Pyrotechny has, like almost every other art in these days of

experiment and research, undergone many processes of change and

improvement. In fact, that part of the art which relates especially to

the preparation of coloured fires may be regarded as entirely new; for

not only has the danger which arose from the spontaneously-combustible

nature of some of the old compositions for this purpose been obviated

and removed, but many new colours have also been introduced (principally

by the foreign artists), and the pyrotechnist is thus enabled to produce

new combinations and contrasts, which twenty years ago were altogether

unknown.

But, notwithstanding all this improvement and progress, it is a

remarkable fact that no work has been published in England upon this

subject since the year 1830. We have not even kept pace with

neighbouring nations in this respect, for an excellent work has appeared

through the French press, entitled, “M. Chertier sur les Feux

d’Artifice” (the book, however, is now out of print, I believe), and

there is also a very capital manual of the art in German, “Martin

Websky’s Lustfeuerwerkerei.”

It is true that articles have appeared from time to time in

encyclopædias and books of that class, but these for the most part have

been copied out of one into another, and of all that I have been able to

see the best are so condensed as to be to those uninitiated in the art

simply unintelligible and useless, and to the initiated often very

confusing. Moreover, the professional pyrotechnists have thrown no small

mystery over their work, and have done a great deal to further the idea

that the awful Promethean rites to which they have been admitted are not

to be thrown open to ordinary mortals, and I cannot help thinking that

they have thus thwarted the very interests which it was to their

advantage to forward. Let any one only enquire of professional

photographers whether the practice of their art by amateurs has injured

their business, and has not rather increased the demand upon them; and I

see no reason why the same should not be the case with Pyrotechny,

though not, of course, to the same extent, because its study is never

likely to become so popular.

The fact, then, that no work in English upon this subject has appeared

during the last thirty years will, I trust, be regarded as a sufficient

apology for the present publication. From its perusal, however, there

will be derived nothing new to those who have already acquired a

proficiency in the practice of firework-making, and, for aught I know,

the professional pyrotechnist may even be puzzled by the absence of

technical terms. But, on the other hand, I would have it understood that

I am not writing with the purpose of describing for the benefit of

little boys the mode of making squibs and crackers, nor am I going to

tire my readers’ patience, nor to consume my own time, by drawing up an

historical account of the pyrotechnic art in its successive stages; nor

is it my intention to enter into abstract and abstruse discussions upon

the mathematical proportions proper for the artist’s tools and

apparatus; nor to trace, as has been so frequently done, the true and

lineal pedigree of gunpowder. My object is simply this:—to furnish, for

those who are unacquainted with the subject, such information as shall

put them in the way of providing at any time for family parties, or

school treats, an exhibition of fireworks, capable of affording an

hour’s real amusement to any number of people. I say to any number of

people, because it costs no more to exhibit such a display to one

hundred than to ten, and because I believe that it is difficult to find

the person who would rather not see a good exhibition of fireworks, or

who would stigmatise the hour spent in looking at them as “slow.” It is

evident that the public demand for exhibitions of this kind is greater

and more widely spread than it was, and is still on the increase; and

the only wonder is that, under these circumstances, no more practical

system of Pyrotechny should have appeared through the press. I am not

saying that this work will supply the want that many have experienced,

for it will be entirely elementary; but I hope at some future time to

bring out a more advanced and extensive work, should I discover that

anything worth calling an interest in my subject is abroad. This work,

however, will be thoroughly practical, and that with the special object

of showing how exhibitions may be provided at a little cost.

Now, there are three things which have been generally alleged and

admitted as sufficient reasons against the practice of Pyrotechny; these

are, danger, dirt, and expense. Upon each of these three subjects I will

state what experience has taught me to be the truth.

First, as to danger. The explosion of firework factories from time to

time has given a high colour to the risk which the public considers

inseparable from any such manufacture. Some time ago I had the curiosity

to inquire as far as I could into the cause of these large explosions,

and in no one instance could I discover that the accident arose from

anything but carelessness on the part of workmen or some wilful and

unwarrantable defiance of danger; and I am quite convinced that danger

depends far more upon the operator himself than upon the materials used

in his work. A barrel of gunpowder is not the thing one would choose for

a seat while smoking a cigar or toasting a muffin; but be it remembered

that there is no more danger to be apprehended from this barrel of

gunpowder, when properly handled, than from a barrel of beer. And then,

gunpowder is a material which the amateur will need only in very small

quantities, being used far less than is generally supposed, and being

only employed to give projective force or to make reports. Meal-powder,

which is gunpowder in the state of dust and not in grains, is

extensively used, but is in itself perfectly safe. Of course one can set

fire to the one as easily as to the other, but why need it be dangerous

on this account? There is nothing easier than to make the practice of

Pyrotechny dangerous, but, at the same time, it is not only possible,

but very easy, to manufacture fireworks without danger.

Now, as to the dirtiness of the work. It is generally believed that the

making of fireworks renders cleanliness in the operator impossible, and

is destructive of clothes on that account. Now, I maintain that

cleanliness and dirt, as well as safety and danger, are mainly dependent

upon the person, and not upon his work. He can fairly be called dirty

only if he is never clean, or if he makes himself unnecessarily dirty.

And so with the pyrotechnist. While handling such things as charcoal he

does not expect his hands to be white, but he need not handle charcoal

as if with the purpose of making his hands black. Every one must have

observed how some people, in whatever they are engaged, in whatever they

undertake, will do their work cleanly and neatly, while others can do

nothing without “making a mess.” I myself have made the principal part

of several exhibitions of fireworks, have mixed all the compositions,

have done everything, in fact, except the actual ramming of the

compositions into the cases, in my own sitting-room, which, I flatter

myself, is as clean and tidy a room as one need wish to live in; and

were it not for the presence of the boxes in which I keep my tools, &c.,

&c., no one, ten minutes after my work is over, would know what I had

been about. This, however, I have only done for want of accommodation,

for I would much prefer working in some outhouse or room given up to the

purpose where my apparatus would be less out of place as furniture, and

where, instead of having to get out all my things afresh every time, I

could resume my work exactly at the point where I had left it, for by

this means a great saving of time would be effected. I would also

strongly recommend to the beginner the use of an apron, and some holland

sleeves to fasten tightly round the wrist and extend above the elbow,

for many of the compositions employed are of a subtle and dusty nature,

and will penetrate the clothes until the operator becomes accustomed to

use them in such a way as shall not make them troublesome in this

respect. I know, however, on the best possible authority—viz., that of

experience—that fireworks can be made without detriment to clothes and

without violation of cleanliness.

Expense now, in the third place, remains to be considered. It is,

perhaps, not generally borne in mind that the reason why fireworks are

expensive to purchase is that they take time to manufacture. The brown

paper of which the cases are made, and the compositions with which they

are filled, are of little value as compared with the time of the workmen

employed. Now one supposes that if firework-making is adopted as an

amusement, there is sufficient spare time for its practice. But the

amateur must not suppose that he can become proficient without some

small outlay at the first; his tools and apparatus will cost him

something, but when once procured they will enable him to make twenty

exhibitions as well as one. And he will do well to bear in mind that if

he will purchase such things of the persons whom I am about to recommend

he will incur no unnecessary expense. He should also know what to order;

and he will find that if he confine himself, as far as possible, to the

manufacture of one useful size of each kind of firework, he will greatly

diminish the number of tools necessary for making and filling his cases.

Much expense will also be avoided by his purchasing the necessary

chemicals, not in the smallest quantities procurable, this being the

most uneconomical mode of purchase. I have avoided the employment of any

of those costly preparations which have of late become known to the

pyrotechnist, and are employed principally in the compositions for

producing coloured fires; not, however, from any wish to ignore their

excellence, but because I have been able to produce without them effects

with which I have always been satisfied.

I shall now append a list of those fireworks the manufacture of which it

is my intention to describe, and which in combination will be found to

produce all the effects that the amateur need desire:—

Rockets, with heads of brilliant, tailed, and coloured stars, and golden

rains.

Roman candles, with brilliant, blue, green, yellow, and red stars.

Gerbes and jets of brilliant, Chinese, and common fires.

Wheels of various devices, horizontal and vertical, plain and

illuminated.

Bengal white and coloured slow fires for illumination.

Lances, white and coloured, for making up devices, such as names,

crests, mottoes, wreaths, &c., &c.

Tourbillons, plain and brilliant.

Chinese flyers of different kinds.

Mines of serpents and crackers.

Brilliant suns, single and double, fixed and revolving.

Portfires for lighting exhibition pieces, &c.

The pieces which I have enumerated above will furnish all the necessary

elements of an excellent display. And I have no hesitation in saying

that by careful attention to my directions all these pieces may be

successfully made. I shall recommend nothing but what has been found to

succeed constantly in my hands, and may, I am sure, be made to answer in

the hands of others. I entirely disclaim, however, any attempt to

describe the modes of manufacture adopted by the professional

pyrotechnists. I know nothing of the secrets of their trade, nor have I

any desire to acquaint myself with them; I only know that my own system

of working never plays me false, however different it may be from

theirs.

There are, however, a few things which I strongly recommend the amateur

not to attempt to make, for the reason that their manufacture entails a

considerable amount of tedious and uninteresting work, and they may be

bought ready made of the professional pyrotechnists at a cost to which

no one need object. They are such things as quick-match, mine serpents,

and crackers, and pin wheels, if indeed these are necessary.

I will now proceed to give an idea of the relative numbers in which the

several pieces may be employed to form a good exhibition. This will, of

course, be but a mere sketch or outline, intended to show how things,

very simple in themselves, may be rendered very effective in

combination:—

10 rockets: 3 of these with heads of brilliant stars, 3 with tailed

stars, 2 with coloured stars, and 2 with golden rains.

10 Roman candles: 6 of these to throw brilliant stars, and 4 coloured

stars.

12 wheel-cases: 3 to make a single triangle wheel, 4 to turn an

illuminated vertical wheel, and 5 to turn a horizontal mine wheel.

Pyrotechny · 第 9 / 97 题