THE AUSTRALIAN CASSOWARY.

The AUSTRALIAN CASSOWARY (_Casuarius Australis_). This bird stands about

five feet high; the head is without feathers, but covered with a blue

skin. Like the Emu, it is almost wingless, its wings being mere rudiments.

The body is thickly enveloped in dark brown wiry feathers; on the head is

a large prominence, or helmet, of bright red colour, and to the neck are

attached, like so many bells, six or eight round fleshy balls, of bright

blue and scarlet, which give the bird a very beautiful appearance.

This Cassowary has never been brought to Europe, only one specimen having

been until recently obtained, which unluckily was lost shortly after its

capture. A communication from P. A. Eagle, Esq., with which we have been

kindly favoured, will best explain the importance attached by scientific

men to the discovery of this Australian species.

"Compared with Asia," says Mr. Eagle, "Australia presents the greatest

contrast in its natural productions to be found between any two zoological

regions of the earth; and yet the line which separates these two great

provinces actually passes between two of the islands forming part of

the great volcanic chain running from Sumatra to Timor, namely, the

island of Bali on the west, and Lombock on the east, separated from each

other by no more than fifteen miles; so that within a two hours' sail,

without losing sight of land, you pass from Bali, full of Fruit Thrushes,

Woodpeckers, and the general ornithology of Asia, to Lombock, where

the Cockatoos, Honey-eaters, Brush Turkeys, and other members of the

Australian fauna, appear suddenly in full force. The forests of Australia

are destroyed by myriads of timber-boring larvæ of various insects; but

on the whole area there is not to be found a single Woodpecker, or any

bird to do its office; yet, in the same latitudes, in any other part of

the world, Woodpeckers occur in special kinds for each great district in

abundance, wherever forest trees grow, their function being to pick out

those timber-eating larvæ from the wood. The entire absence of the whole

family of True Pheasants and Vultures, found in numbers in any other

great region of the earth, is also a striking negative character of the

ornithology of Australia; whilst its innumerable Honey-eaters, Cockatoos,

and Brush-tongued Lories, found in no other region, give to it an equally

marked positive character.

"The very deep sea surrounding Ceram, and other islands which constitute

the appendages, as it were, of Asia on one side and Australia on the

other, suggests a curious problem to the naturalist as to how they got

their inhabitants. Great interest, therefore, attaches to the recent

discovery of a Cassowary in Australia, as yet only imperfectly known,

and so nearly related to the Cassowary of Ceram that doubts have been

expressed as to their distinctness. They are both incapable of flight,

the wings being represented by five or six bare, cylindrical, pointed

quills, like those of a porcupine, and, consequently, the bird could not

fly nor pass from one island to another. The _Casuarius Australis_ was

first indicated by Mr. Wall, the naturalist to Kennedy's expedition, who

shot a specimen in a gully at Cape York, and a notice of it appeared in

1854 in a Sydney paper; but, as the specimen was lost, much doubt existed

as to the species. A bunch of feathers taken from a native hut on the

Upper Burdekin, and sent to Dr. Sclater in 1866, again drew attention

to the probability of a species of Cassowary inhabiting Australia, but

still there was no evidence of the species. In June, 1868, a specimen

reached the Zoological Society of London; and Dr. Sclater states that

although he had not compared it with the Cassowary of Ceram, it seemed

to differ--first, in the form of the crest; secondly, in having thicker

tarsi, and the long straight claw of the inner toe more developed;

thirdly, by the cobalt-blue colour of the naked skin of the neck and

throat. Very recently, however, a young specimen, about two feet long, has

been presented to the National Museum of Melbourne, which establishes the

fact that it is truly distinct as a species from the so-called Indian

Cassowary, and "apparently peculiar to Australia, or at any rate affords

no support to the theory of the former union of Australia with the

northern islands."

[Illustration: THE KIVI-KIVI (_Apteryx Australis_).]

There is fortunately a young specimen of the Ceram Cassowary nearly of

the same size as this young Australian one, and they are both of the same

light, rusty brown colour, the _Casuarius Australis_ being rather redder

on the head and slightly blacker on the back than the _C. galeatus_. In

neither specimen is the helmet developed. On comparing the two specimens,

the tarsi of the Ceram species were found to be rather stronger than those

of the _C. Australis_, and the left inner claw of the Ceram specimen half

an inch shorter than the right one, one side agreeing with the Australian

species. The little feathers on the two caruncles on the throat are

nearly black in _C. Australis_, but much lighter in _C. galeatus_. Two

distinctive characters are, however, shown by these specimens, not noticed

before. The bill of the Australian Cassowary is much more slender than

that of the Ceram bird; both mandibles, taken together vertically, being

one-third deeper in the Indian species than in the Australian one, while

the plumage of the latter is much looser than the former, from having the

lateral barbs much fewer or further apart.

There can now be no doubt of the distinctness of the Queensland species,

although very closely allied to that with which it has been compared, and

also to the Mooruk of New Britain.

According to a correspondent in the _Sydney Herald_, those who obtained

the adult bird state that they saw it running about in companies of seven

or eight, in deep valleys at the foot of high hills. The flesh was eaten

and found to be excellent--a single leg affording more food than several

hungry men could dispose of at a meal. The whole build of this Cassowary

is stronger and heavier than that of the Emu; it makes use of its powerful

legs in the same manner as that bird. It is described as very wary, but

its presence may be at once detected by its utterance of a peculiarly

loud note, which is taken up and echoed along the gullies it principally

frequents.

* * * * *

The KIVIS (_Apteryges_) bear but little resemblance to any of the members

of their order as yet described. They are distinguishable by their compact

body, short thick neck, comparatively short and four-toed foot, the

entire absence of the tail, and the merely rudimentary development of the

wings. Their plumage consists of long, lancet-shaped, flowing, and glossy

feathers, which increase in size from the neck downwards, and have a

somewhat loose web. The bill is very long, covered at the base with a long

cere, and rather depressed, with the tip of the upper mandible overhanging

the lower portion; the small nostrils are situated at the extremity of the

beak. The legs are strong and short; the anterior toes long, powerful, and

armed with formidable claws; the thick, short, hinder toe does not touch

the ground, and is furnished with a still stronger claw resembling the

spur of a Barn-door Cock. The tarsi and feet are covered with scales of

various sizes.

These birds are strictly a New Zealand family. The first Apteryx seen in

England was presented to Dr. Shaw in 1812, and after his death passed into

the possession of the Earl of Derby. No other specimen was seen in Europe

for more than twenty years, and its existence was therefore doubted by

naturalists until 1833, when Mr. Yarrell read a most interesting paper

on the subject before the Zoological Society, and established the family

among accredited species. These strange birds, which at the first glance

somewhat resemble a quadruped in appearance, are, it is said, wholly

nocturnal in their habits, searching for food during the night, and moving

actively, but with a most uncouth gait (see Plate), from place to place.

Cassell's book of birds; vol. 3 · 第 367 / 380 题