Then let the Master be welcome to the household. We cannot do without him.

We need him to keep us in God and with one another. Let the atmosphere of

the home have the fragrance of his heavenly spirit. It was one of the

trials of the early Christians, that they could not live in pagan

households without being constantly pained by symbols and usages hostile

to their faith. The Greek or Roman wife, if converted to the Gospel, was

scandalized by the idols on the hearth-stone, and often brought to death

for refusing to join in the idolatry; whilst in the camp and court,

paganism was constantly thrusting its pageants upon the follower of the

cross. Our modern life is not much troubled with many such tests of faith,

and most of our more showy households are utterly innocent of any signs

either of Christian or Pagan import in their furniture. From what is seen

in some parlors, whether in books or periodicals, or in pictures or

statues, we might infer the fondness of the dwellers, now for the battle

or the chase; now for the shows of fashion, or the haunts of dissipation;

now for the wonders of science and art; now for the shipping interest and

the stock market. But too rarely does the household have a true and

expressive representation of the ideas most precious to a Christian mind.

An ostentatious vulgarity is too much the rule in constructing and

adorning the dwelling, and a Christian taste is the exception. How many of

our showy dwellings, instead of impressing a cultivated foreigner with a

sense of the owner's refinement or spirituality, would only make it clear

that the owner had money in plenty to spend, and knew not how to spend it

wisely. Let these things be looked to. Let the economy of the household be

of itself a confession of faith. Let there he something to show that they

who dwell here are God's children, and live within his kingdom. Let not

gold be lavished upon unmeaning articles that show rather the capacity of

expense than the capacity of meditation, or which, like the mirrors that

are the chief ornament of so many houses, favor no reflection beyond that

of the vanity which they multiply. If we care for art, let Christian art

be not slighted, and with the landscape that portrays the beauty or

grandeur of creation, let there be some expressive token that the Father

has watched over men by his Providence, and blessed their homes by his

Word. We are changing people, almost a nomad race. One of the oldest

inhabitants of this metropolis lately remarked, that within his knowledge,

not one man now keeps house in the dwelling occupied by his father. Of

this fact I know nothing, yet sure it is, that we need in the frequent

change of abodes, to build more deeply and securely the spiritual home,

and live more among the memorials of things eternal. In the absence of

ancestral homesteads with their hallowed scenes and memorials, we should

seek to transmit some lasting tokens of our mind, and not make our

households as evanescent in their array as the fickle breath of this

world's fashions. In some way surely our best thoughts and labor should

live for those who come after us, and with goods few or many, as may be,

there should go some witness of truth eternal. Alike from our common

nature and our peculiar vicissitudes, we need to be deeply grounded in the

love of Him who came to open heavenly mansions into our earthly

habitations, and to make Him our abiding guest.

Looking into the ancient books of devotion, I find this date associated

with a household name, and sacred to the memory of a Christian woman,

Monica, the mother of Augustine. Such thoughts of home and its best

influences are well, coming to us, as they do, so fragrant with the

friendly and pious affections of ages. Monica lived long enough to see her

wayward boy a firm disciple at last, and after all his wanderings of

thought, devoted to Christ with all the enthusiasm of his nature. How

touching is that passage of his confessions in which he speaks of laying

her body in the grave, and returning to his lonely home to bless her for

her faithful care, and lament his blindness to her gentle pleadings. How

comforting the hymn of Ambrose that rose to his mind, as if by some

angel's whisper, and lifted his thoughts to the realm whither mother and

son had trusted to meet in a companionship beyond parting and beyond

tears. Bless this and all like remembrances in former times, or in our own

experience. Praise God for all the peace and power, the loveliness and

wisdom, that have entered the homes where Christ has been welcomed. Let

praise continue in prayer, and live in watching and good works.

_First of May._

The Orphan.

THE ORPHAN.

The genial air of May comes to us all laden with the sweet breath of

opening blossoms, and has a balm for the spirits as well as for the

health. It stirs within us a sentiment deeper than we know how to define,

revives our chilled or buried ideals, and makes every heart young again.

It cannot but give something of its own tone to our thought, and we find

that in all nations this month has been a continued festival in the

calendar, and associated with the loveliest imagery of earth and heaven.

The heathen nations, who gave the month its present name, called it so

after the fairest of their goddesses, and Christians following a similar

sentiment, and desirous also of enlisting every natural feeling in the

service of a purer faith, transferred the honors of Maia to Mary, and in

every land white flowers deck the shrines of the Madonna, and the "Hail

Mary" is the burden of the matin and vesper hymn. Some of the hymns and

aspirations connected with the season convey thoughts with which an

earnest Protestant may sympathize, and grateful for the maternal love that

has made our lives so blessed, we cannot ridicule, although we cannot

imitate the Italian devotee, who salutes the Holy Mother as the

representative of God's tender mercy to man through her sex, in words of

such fervor:--

"Joy of my heart! O let me pay

To thee thine own sweet month of May.

Mother! be love of thee a ray

From Heaven to show the heavenward way.

Sweet Day-Star! let thy beauty be

A light to draw my soul to thee."

May we not once more speak the name of Mary, the Blessed Mother, not to

adore her as a divinity, but to win from her an illustration of our common

humanity in one of its great sorrows and consolations? Cheerfully as under

the returning smile of heaven, solemnly as in presence of much grief, our

meditation now turns upon orphanage of the affections, as one of the facts

of our homes, and upon the secondary relations which may be its solace.

* * * * *

Consider, first of all, the fact as one of the events of every life,

sooner or later. Mary at the Cross is a representation of our common

humanity in its bereavements. Every mother and every parent in some way

enters into her anguish, as she saw the life of her Divine Son ebbing from

those cruel wounds. She was indeed doubly bereaved,--at once childless and

fatherless for the victim upon the Cross had been at once the son of her

travail and the father of her faith, born of her into the world that she

might be born of Him into the spiritual kingdom. His own pains did not

make Him insensible to her anguish, nor indifferent to the fact common to

our nature, which feels itself always so void and desolate, when the being

of all most loved is suddenly taken away. Tenderly He provided for her the

consolation that she needed, by commending her to the disciple, whose ever

present kindness would be so great a solace in itself, and so powerful a

remembrance of the departed by its associations. The disciple took to his

house from that hour the mother of Him upon whose bosom he had leaned.

Life is full of cases that illustrate the same principles, although not

connected with facts so peculiar. It may be said indeed, that some kind of

orphanage is the lot of every person, whose years are not early cut off,

and whose heart is not utterly hardened against home affections. The order

of nature is that children should survive their parents, and very many of

us in tender childhood have learned the worth of kind and judicious

parents, by being called to face the trials and cares of life without

their counsel and comfort. When the case is reversed, and the parent is

mourner for the child, the desolation of the heart is quite as great, and

the affections, deprived of their wonted object, are, perhaps, more deeply

wounded than the child's can be, even when losing the only protector in

losing the parent; so strongly do the affections press downward, and so

mightily does the love that sacrifices so much for offspring grow by its

own exercise. Every day this bereavement strikes somewhere, and since my

last word to you, it has stricken parents whose oldest child was last

Sunday present at church, and to-day is in his grave;--on Sunday I spoke

to that bright boy pleasantly at our school, and on Friday said the

funeral service over his coffin. Never can such a bereavement come without

leaving a feeling of double orphanage, for parents in losing their

offspring lose at once an instructor as well as a pupil; and surely the

eldest born of a family, however young, is spiritually father or mother of

much that is best in the parent's heart. Survey life in its whole compass,

enlarge our own experience by observation, and we need no argument to

interpret Mary's desolation at the Cross, or to learn that some form of

orphanage is the common lot; nay, that before life ceases, some portion of

our life is severed, when those in whose companionship we had lived are

taken away. The world is full of such desolation, and there are many to

whom existence is a burden, because its light has thus gone out.

* * * * *

But God has always some providential alleviations in store for such

bereavement, and let us turn from the fact to its solace. In some form the

mercy of that voice from the Cross may always be heard, "Woman, behold thy

son! Disciple, behold thy mother!" The Christian church itself never

practically unmerciful to its people, even in its sternest days, has

always rejoiced to comfort orphanage by the solace of secondary relations;

providing new proteges for the childless, new guardians for the

fatherless, and new homes for the homeless. There are few families of

large experience and just feeling, where something of this same office has

not been performed; and where, although other gifts may not be needed, the

solace of sympathy is never withheld.

It becomes an important practical question with many, how those secondary

relations shall be formed, which may in some measure take the place of the

ties severed by death. Here may be children without father, or mother, or

both. Here are homes that are childless either through death or by the

absence of the blessing, whose absence is of itself to our nature as a

bereavement. It is not well to leave the heart void, and God himself,

whose Spirit moved our Saviour to commend his mother to his disciple, has

provided alleviations. They who need them for themselves or seek them for

others must use their best judgment and principle in the choice. There may

be gross wrong or frivolous error in the selection, for there are some so

desperate as to drown grief in dissipation, and others so light-minded as

to lavish upon a parrot, or a dog, or a horse, the affections that belong

to immortal creatures.

There are three most obvious modes of selection. The orphan finds a

protector by some natural relationship, or by attracting some guardian

friend, or by being placed under the care of one, who occupies by marriage

the position of the parent taken away. Each of these secondary relations

has been full of blessing, as also of danger and trial. Many are the cases

in which a desolate child has been abused by a relative, swindled by a

friend, and oppressed by a stepfather or stepmother. But not judging

through plays and romances, but through life as we see it from a perhaps

favored position, we have cause of much satisfaction in view of the

secondary relations spoken of. How many a lonely child finds counsellors

and helpers among kindred and friends, who keep alive in his heart the

parent's memory by their kindness, and deepen the first relation by the

second! How many desolate parents comfort themselves by comforting others;

and how much grief is soothed, like Mary's, by distilling healing balm for

others from its own wounds! Among the ministers of mercy, that cheer this

too benighted world, none is more powerful than that which carries comfort

to the suffering in the name of some departed child; and who shall number

the countenances that contemplate the little ones, whose angels behold the

face of our Father in Heaven, to copy their tenderness, and throw their

light upon the path of the disconsolate?

Of one class of secondary relations, I cannot but say a word in justice to

the subject, and in a different tone from that which usually prevails. The

word stepmother has become a proverb in the language, and persons who

should know better, sometimes idly speak, so as to add to its odious

significance. But may not this relation be assumed in so true and devoted

a spirit, and its offices be so performed, as to be great mercy to the

orphan? No wonder indeed, that wretchedness comes from the misalliances

that sometimes introduce a giddy trifler without ideas, or a selfish

worldling without conscience, into the place that has been made sacred by

a true Christian mother now no more in the world,--when, in fact, some

greedy hawk creeps into the nest of the dove, or the wanton butterfly

invades the cell of the ant, or the provoking wasp steals the sweets of

the honey-bee's hive. No wonder that trouble comes, when natural rivalries

and jealousies are embittered by one, who is mother in name but not in

feeling, one whose first joy is personal vanity, and whose least wish is

to sacrifice any whim for the welfare of those now entrusted to her care.

Well may the curse of Heaven rest upon such connections. Let not a shallow

fancy or reckless impulse, never excusable, but least excusable in mature

years, dictate a choice so sacred as that which replaces the natural

parent by another. Let the choice be guided by words as sacred as those

which came from the Cross, and let him, who commends his children to

another's care, use his best thought and principle, as if called in this

way to say, "Woman, behold thy son! Son, behold thy mother!"

Whatever may be the form of the secondary relation, whether the virtual

adoption be from natural relationship, from friendliness or by marriage,

two obvious principles should preside over the choice, as in the example

of the Cross. The secondary relation should be such as not to shame the

first; and such also as to be a mutual blessing, a blessing to the

orphaned and the protector. When Jesus commended his mother to his most

loved disciple's care, he carried out the spirit of his own entire life,

and placed her in the charge of one whose companionship would be a

constant remembrance of himself. The lessons of the former years were

deepened by those that followed--the disciple was ever nearer his Master

by the mother's presence and the mother was nearer to her Son by the

disciple's ministry. Happy are they whose existence, however saddened by

bereavement, is not broken into incongruous or antagonistic

fragments,--happy are the orphan hearts who, like that adopted mother and

son, cherish throughout life the same high allegiance, and mature their

first vows in their secondary obligations.

This cannot well be, unless the second principle named be observed, and

due congeniality be found between the orphaned and the protector. Some

choice may generally be used, and the choice should turn on the fitness of

the one to guide and the other to be guided. No statement is given of the

process in our Saviour's mind, that led him to make the bequest of the

Cross, that legacy of love. But He knew what was in man, and knew well how

much the mother and disciple were fitted for that filial companionship;

the one by his deep intuitive mind fitted to enlighten her faith, and the

other by her boundless affection fitted to inflame his piety and charity,

to kindle his meditative wisdom into seraphic love. Let not the example be

lost upon those who shrink from claiming equal sanctity. Are any of us to

choose for an orphan or a half-orphan a protector, whether a guardian or

an adopted parent, remember the legacy of the Cross, and in Christ's name

minister to the desolate.

* * * * *

We have illustrated first, the fact of orphanage, and secondly, the

secondary relations that may be its alleviation. May we not add, that

where the principles recommended are adopted, great blessing results to

both parties concerned, the protector, and the protected. If, as the poet

says,

"An orphan's curse would drag to hell

A spirit from on high!"

an orphan's blessing can lift to the mercy-seat of God a frail spirit of

the earth. Many a time has this blessing been granted, and they who have

befriended the lonely, have found a friend in God's own Providence. Is it

not remarkably the case, that orphan children when judiciously and kindly

counselled and cautioned, well repay all solicitude, and well appreciate,

as a gratuitous offering from their protector, the care which, if from a

parent, they might regard as a matter of course, hardly claiming any

grateful recognition? A relation of peculiar beauty sometimes springs up,

at once filial and friendly, blending in itself the affections both of

companion and child. The remark applies to step-children as well as to

those who are wards by adoption or guardianship. "Hence," says that gifted

and fervent writer, Henry Zchokke, "not rare instances in which

step-children manifest more cordial sympathy, more touching attachment

towards their foster parents, than their own children. For what the latter

are apt to take as matter of obligation, the former look upon as token of

disinterested love and genuine goodness; and a grateful mind brings before

them all the kindness and fidelity which they received from step-parents

in the years of minority. As children, they may not understand what you

have given, although they may see how you gave it. But when grown up, they

understand what you have done for them."

* * * * *

When under this form of adoption or the others specified, there is surely

enough to interpret such secondary relations cheerfully, and history is

full of passages, that illustrate the blessing of the legacy of the Cross.

In our own experience we must in some way interpret that legacy, and find

its joy or its rebuke. Do not leave the subject without touching its

practical point. If such and so general is the fact of orphanage, such are

the secondary relations which are providentially offered, and such is

their solace when properly employed, there is a lesson from the subject,

which no person can escape, a lesson as to our duty to our own children

and to others. First of all, bear in mind the lonely, and strive to be

comforter, and to find comforters for them. Think tenderly of the

orphaned, who are in any way near your own sphere, whether from

relationship, friendship, or any other association. It may not be, it is

not generally money, that is most needed, but kindness, counsel,

encouragement. Many an orphan boy is saved by a judicious word and timely

hand from a friend of his lost father or mother, and many a lonely girl

finds the path of peace and usefulness smoothed for her by those who

remember the parent's image in the daughter's face. The story of Moses,

the foundling of the Nile, and of Joseph, the exile from Jacob's house,

is often repeated in the lives of youths, like them in loneliness, and not

wholly unlike them in subsequent energy and honor. Think of this in your

homes, and make them pleasant and instructive and elevating to some guests

sought by you, because you can make them happy, and who will repay your

blessing better than guests of idleness or vanity, sometimes too eagerly

sought, who may besot and befool your children by folly and excess. Think

of it in your places of business, and seek openings of usefulness for the

unprotected. Then you may hear, nay, have you not heard other voices than

those of hard traffic there? then you may see, have you not seen, springs

of living water gushing from the dusty pavements which you tread? Think of

the orphan. For his own sake, do it, and for our own and our children's

sake. The probability is, that what others ask of us we shall need for

ourselves. We must expect that our children will be in want of the very

sympathy which we are to show; for who can be sure of leaving his

offspring mature enough in years and wisdom to demand no guardian care in

place of the parental? It becomes, therefore, an imperious duty to educate

our children in such a manner, as to secure them trusty friends; to give

them habits of self-reliance, that shall save them from annoying others by

burdensome dependence; to train them to conciliating manners, attractive

conversation, elevated ideas, that shall win for them the companionship

and protection of the wise and good, keep them in right paths, and mature

in their new homes all the worthy seeds of old scenes and affections.

Then when the hour of our parting comes, we can think not wholly with

sorrow of the legacy of the Cross; believing that they who have trusted in

us, may trust in each other, or in friends divinely given, and that future

years will deepen the former communion.

The great security, that this shall be so, is found where Christ placed

it, in the Father. "I will not leave you comfortless,"--or orphaned, as

the word is literally to be translated,--"I will come to you. Ye shall

know that I am in my Father, and ye in me, and I in you." They that learn

to live in the Father's love, are saved from the worst bereavement, and

the orphanage of the earth opens to them the parentage of heaven. The

first and secondary relationships of earth are both commended and

consecrated by the relation prior to them both and primal of all, however

late it may be understood; for in spiritual as well as earthly ties, it

requires time and thought to know our truest friend; and the playmates of

an hour win the child of mortality's ear more readily than the far-seeing

parent, or than the Ancient of Days, the Father of all. Remember that

whatever paternal wisdom or maternal tenderness we have ever known here,

has its source and archetype on high. There dwells the Godhead that spoke

and wrought through the victim of the Cross; there shines the wisdom that

opened that disciple's vision; there burns the love that glowed in the

mother's faithful heart. From the unseen, comes all the glory that is

seen; and if any of us have an orphaned heart, as in some respects we all

may have, let us find its solace in God, and whatever is God's. Let the

sweet breath of May, that whispers to devotees of Mary's holy maternity,

fill our hearts with more than vernal promise, ideals of more than human

loveliness,--call us away from all wintry chills to the light and love of

the Parent above all parents--to the home that unites all homes in one.

_May._

The Young Prodigal.

THE YOUNG PRODIGAL.

How marked and how various has been the response of men to the Parable of

the Prodigal Son since it first came from the lips of Him whose life so

exemplified its mercy. Through all those changing centuries, the home has

kept its place in the affections of mankind, and that pathetic domestic

picture has never failed to waken regrets and compassion. The happiest

household is not without some errors that cry for forgiveness, and not

many are the families whose peace is not troubled by some prodigal. The

parable presents at once an example of earthly experience and a lesson of

heavenly mercy. Not forgetting the heavenly lesson, we dwell now more upon

the earthly example, as we speak of the prodigal in the family, especially

of his fall and his recovery.

* * * * *

The prodigal in the family! Far more frequently than the world knows,

might this epithet in truth be spoken, for it is not by any means from

notorious spendthrifts and open profligates, that wicked waste scatters

the goods of a household. If a certain man who had two sons, found in one

of them a prodigal under the simple manners of a rustic age, what may the

father of a large family anticipate in a state of society which makes

extravagance almost a necessity, and in a great city which brings the

vices and follies of every far country on earth to his very door. Never

perhaps since Jesus spoke, have His words found more ample illustration

than in this great city, that calls thousands and tens of thousands of

young men from rural homes to the fierce scramble for gold, and the

feverish chase for pleasure, and which in so many ways offers to drown in

dissipation the anguish of remorse.

It is not by any means always the worst boy of the family who takes the

road to ruin. It may be base passion or reckless selfishness that leads

him astray, but it is quite as likely to be too cordial impulses, exposing

him to enticing companions, or too sanguine hopes, entailing upon him

disappointment and despair. Of the many prodigals whom we have known in

our own lifetime, not a few surely have been generous natures, whom it was

impossible not to pity, and not hard to love. Sometimes the very

temperament that makes a youth amiable, and that should make him noble,

wins to him the most alluring of tempters, and he falls before some Satan

who comes to him as an angel of light.

The very tenderness shown to him at home may add to his besetting

weakness, by encouraging habits of self-indulgence. In fact, the parable

itself allows room for the surmise, that the younger son, from having

less care put upon him than the elder, was less schooled in self-reliance,

and because every thing was done for him as the pet of the family, he was

in danger of doing too little for himself. Certainly indulgence may be as

dangerous an extreme as sternness, and as many youths are spoiled by over

fondness as are made desperate by unkindness. Sometimes both extremes

unite in the same fitful temper, and children, now petted and now cursed,

learn indolence and rebellion in the same perverse domestic school. Rare

is the wisdom that can adjust the discipline to each temperament, and

encourage without over-indulgence, and correct without harshness. Not

always, however, is the fault of the child to be traced to error in the

parent, for every child has powers and responsibilities of his own, and

besides his own perverse will, there is a third party that frequently

comes in to make mischief.

The Hearth-Stone: Thoughts Upon Home-Life in Our Cities · 第 9 / 14 段