FOURTH ARTICLE [III, Q. 90, Art. 4]

Whether Penance Is Fittingly Divided into Penance Before Baptism,

Penance for Mortal Sins, and Penance for Venial Sins?

Objection 1: It would seem that penance is unfittingly divided into

penance before Baptism, penance for mortal, and penance for venial

sins. For Penance is the second plank after shipwreck, as stated

above (Q. 84, A. 6), while Baptism is the first. Therefore that which

precedes Baptism should not be called a species of penance.

Obj. 2: Further, that which can destroy the greater, can destroy the

lesser. Now mortal sin is greater than venial; and penance which

regards mortal sins regards also venial sins. Therefore they should

not be considered as different species of penance.

Obj. 3: Further, just as after Baptism man commits venial and mortal

sins, so does he before Baptism. If therefore penance for venial sins

is distinct from penance for mortal sins after Baptism, in like

manner they should be distinguished before Baptism. Therefore penance

is not fittingly divided into these species.

_On the contrary,_ Augustine says in _De Poenitentia_ [*Cf. Hom. 30

inter 1] that these three are species of Penance.

_I answer that,_ This is a division of penance as a virtue. Now it

must be observed that every virtue acts in accordance with the time

being, as also in keeping with other due circumstances, wherefore the

virtue of penance has its act at this time, according to the

requirements of the New Law.

Now it belongs to penance to detest one's past sins, and to purpose,

at the same time, to change one's life for the better, which is the

end, so to speak, of penance. And since moral matters take their

species from the end, as stated in the Second Part (I-II, Q. 1, A. 3;

Q. 18, AA. 4, 6), it is reasonable to distinguish various species of

penance, according to the various changes intended by the penitent.

Accordingly there is a threefold change intended by the penitent. The

first is by regeneration unto a new life, and this belongs to that

penance which precedes Baptism. The second is by reforming one's past

life after it has been already destroyed, and this belongs to penance

for mortal sins committed after Baptism. The third is by changing to

a more perfect operation of life, and this belongs to penance for

venial sins, which are remitted through a fervent act of charity, as

stated above (Q. 87, AA. 2, 3).

Reply Obj. 1: The penance which precedes Baptism is not a sacrament,

but an act of virtue disposing one to that sacrament.

Reply Obj. 2: The penance which washes away mortal sins, washes away

venial sins also, but the converse does not hold. Wherefore these two

species of penance are related to one another as perfect and

imperfect.

Reply Obj. 3: Before Baptism there are no venial sins without mortal

sins. And since a venial sin cannot be remitted without mortal sin,

as stated above (Q. 87, A. 4), before Baptism, penance for mortal

sins is not distinct from penance for venial sins.

Summa Theologica, Part III (Tertia Pars) From the Complete American Edition · 第 654 / 654 题