SECOND ARTICLE [III, Q. 88, Art. 2]

Whether Sins That Have Been Forgiven, Return Through Ingratitude

Which Is Shown Especially in Four Kinds of Sin?

Objection 1: It would seem that sins do not return through

ingratitude, which is shown especially in four kinds of sin, viz.,

hatred of one's neighbor, apostasy from faith, contempt of confession

and regret for past repentance, and which have been expressed in the

following verse:

"Fratres odit, apostata fit, spernitque, fateri,

Poenituisse piget, pristina culpa redit."

For the more grievous the sin committed against God after one has

received the grace of pardon, the greater the ingratitude. But there

are sins more grievous than these, such as blasphemy against God, and

the sin against the Holy Ghost. Therefore it seems that sins already

pardoned do not return through ingratitude as manifested in these

sins, any more than as shown in other sins.

Obj. 2: Further, Rabanus says: "God delivered the wicked servant to

the torturers, until he should pay the whole debt, because a man will

be deemed punishable not only for the sins he commits after Baptism,

but also for original sin which was taken away when he was baptized."

Now venial sins are reckoned among our debts, since we pray in their

regard: "Forgive us our trespasses (_debita_)." Therefore they too

return through ingratitude; and, in like manner seemingly, sins

already pardoned return through venial sins, and not only through

those sins mentioned above.

Obj. 3: Further, ingratitude is all the greater, according as one

sins after receiving a greater favor. Now innocence whereby one

avoids sin is a Divine favor, for Augustine says (Confess. ii):

"Whatever sins I have avoided committing, I owe it to Thy grace." Now

innocence is a greater gift, than even the forgiveness of all sins.

Therefore the first sin committed after innocence is no less an

ingratitude to God, than a sin committed after repentance, so that

seemingly ingratitude in respect of the aforesaid sins is not the

chief cause of sins returning.

_On the contrary,_ Gregory says (Moral. xviii [*Cf. Dial. iv]): "It

is evident from the words of the Gospel that if we do not forgive

from our hearts the offenses committed against us, we become once

more accountable for what we rejoiced in as forgiven through

Penance": so that ingratitude implied in the hatred of one's brother

is a special cause of the return of sins already forgiven: and the

same seems to apply to the others.

_I answer that,_ As stated above (A. 1), sins pardoned through

Penance are said to return, in so far as their debt of punishment, by

reason of ingratitude, is virtually contained in the subsequent sin.

Now one may be guilty of ingratitude in two ways: first by doing

something against the favor received, and, in this way, man is

ungrateful to God in every mortal sin whereby he offends God Who

forgave his sins, so that by every subsequent mortal sin, the sins

previously pardoned return, on account of the ingratitude. Secondly,

one is guilty of ingratitude, by doing something not only against the

favor itself, but also against the form of the favor received. If

this form be considered on the part of the benefactor, it is the

remission of something due to him; wherefore he who does not forgive

his brother when he asks pardon, and persists in his hatred, acts

against this form. If, however, this form be taken in regard to the

penitent who receives this favor, we find on his part a twofold

movement of the free-will. The first is the movement of the free-will

towards God, and is an act of faith quickened by charity; and against

this a man acts by apostatizing from the faith. The second is a

movement of the free-will against sin, and is the act of penance.

This act consists first, as we have stated above (Q. 85, AA. 2, 5) in

man's detestation of his past sins; and against this a man acts when

he regrets having done penance. Secondly, the act of penance consists

in the penitent purposing to subject himself to the keys of the

Church by confession, according to Ps. 31:5: "I said: I will confess

against myself my injustice to the Lord: and Thou hast forgiven the

wickedness of my sin": and against this a man acts when he scorns to

confess as he had purposed to do.

Accordingly it is said that the ingratitude of sinners is a special

cause of the return of sins previously forgiven.

Reply Obj. 1: This is not said of these sins as though they were more

grievous than others, but because they are more directly opposed to

the favor of the forgiveness of sin.

Reply Obj. 2: Even venial sins and original sin return in the way

explained above, just as mortal sins do, in so far as the favor

conferred by God in forgiving those sins is despised. A man does not,

however, incur ingratitude by committing a venial sin, because by

sinning venially man does not act against God, but apart from Him,

wherefore venial sins nowise cause the return of sins already

forgiven.

Reply Obj. 3: A favor can be weighed in two ways. First by the

quantity of the favor itself, and in this way innocence is a greater

favor from God than penance, which is called the second plank after

shipwreck (cf. Q. 84, A. 6). Secondly, a favor may be weighed with

regard to the recipient, who is less worthy, wherefore a greater

favor is bestowed on him, so that he is the more ungrateful if he

scorns it. In this way the favor of the pardon of sins is greater

when bestowed on one who is altogether unworthy, so that the

ingratitude which follows is all the greater.

_______________________

Summa Theologica, Part III (Tertia Pars) From the Complete American Edition · 第 640 / 654 题