FIFTH ARTICLE [III, Q. 82, Art. 5]

Whether a Wicked Priest Can Consecrate the Eucharist?

Objection 1: It seems that a wicked priest cannot consecrate the

Eucharist. For Jerome, commenting on Sophon. iii, 4, says: "The

priests who perform the Eucharist, and who distribute our Lord's

blood to the people, act wickedly against Christ's law, in deeming

that the Eucharist is consecrated by a prayer rather than by a good

life; and that only the solemn prayer is requisite, and not the

priest's merits: of whom it is said: 'Let not the priest, in whatever

defilement he may be, approach to offer oblations to the Lord'" (Lev.

21:21, Septuagint). But the sinful priest, being defiled, has neither

the life nor the merits befitting this sacrament. Therefore a sinful

priest cannot consecrate the Eucharist.

Obj. 2: Further, Damascene says (De Fide Orth. iv) that "the bread

and wine are changed supernaturally into the body and blood of our

Lord, by the coming of the Holy Ghost." But Pope Gelasius I says (Ep.

ad Elphid., cf. Decret. i, q. 1): "How shall the Holy Spirit, when

invoked, come for the consecration of the Divine Mystery, if the

priest invoking him be proved full of guilty deeds?" Consequently,

the Eucharist cannot be consecrated by a wicked priest.

Obj. 3: Further, this sacrament is consecrated by the priest's

blessing. But a sinful priest's blessing is not efficacious for

consecrating this sacrament, since it is written (Malachi 2:2): "I

will curse your blessings." Again, Dionysius says in his Epistle

(viii) to the monk Demophilus: "He who is not enlightened has

completely fallen away from the priestly order; and I wonder that

such a man dare to employ his hands in priestly actions, and in the

person of Christ to utter, over the Divine symbols, his unclean

infamies, for I will not call them prayers."

_On the contrary,_ Augustine (Paschasius) says (De Corp. Dom. xii):

"Within the Catholic Church, in the mystery of the Lord's body and

blood, nothing greater is done by a good priest, nothing less by an

evil priest, because it is not by the merits of the consecrator that

the sacrament is accomplished, but by the Creator's word, and by the

power of the Holy Spirit."

_I answer that,_ As was said above (AA. 1, 3), the priest consecrates

this sacrament not by his own power, but as the minister of Christ,

in Whose person he consecrates this sacrament. But from the fact of

being wicked he does not cease to be Christ's minister; because our

Lord has good and wicked ministers or servants. Hence (Matt. 24:45)

our Lord says: "Who, thinkest thou, is a faithful and wise servant?"

and afterwards He adds: "But if that evil servant shall say in his

heart," etc. And the Apostle (1 Cor. 4:1) says: "Let a man so account

of us as of the ministers of Christ"; and afterwards he adds: "I am

not conscious to myself of anything; yet am I not hereby justified."

He was therefore certain that he was Christ's minister; yet he was

not certain that he was a just man. Consequently, a man can be

Christ's minister even though he be not one of the just. And this

belongs to Christ's excellence, Whom, as the true God, things both

good and evil serve, since they are ordained by His providence for

His glory. Hence it is evident that priests, even though they be not

godly, but sinners, can consecrate the Eucharist.

Reply Obj. 1: In those words Jerome is condemning the error of

priests who believed they could consecrate the Eucharist worthily,

from the mere fact of being priests, even though they were sinners;

and Jerome condemns this from the fact that persons defiled are

forbidden to approach the altar; but this does not prevent the

sacrifice, which they offer, from being a true sacrifice, if they do

approach.

Reply Obj. 2: Previous to the words quoted, Pope Gelasius expresses

himself as follows: "That most holy rite, which contains the Catholic

discipline, claims for itself such reverence that no one may dare to

approach it except with clean conscience." From this it is evident

that his meaning is that the priest who is a sinner ought not to

approach this sacrament. Hence when he resumes, "How shall the Holy

Spirit come when summoned," it must be understood that He comes, not

through the priest's merits, but through the power of Christ, Whose

words the priest utters.

Reply Obj. 3: As the same action can be evil, inasmuch as it is done

with a bad intention of the servant; and good from the good intention

of the master; so the blessing of a sinful priest, inasmuch as he

acts unworthily is deserving of a curse, and is reputed an infamy and

a blasphemy, and not a prayer; whereas, inasmuch as it is pronounced

in the person of Christ, it is holy and efficacious. Hence it is said

with significance: "I will curse your blessings."

_______________________

Summa Theologica, Part III (Tertia Pars) From the Complete American Edition · 第 595 / 654 题