EIGHTH ARTICLE [III, Q. 80, Art. 8]

Whether Food or Drink Taken Beforehand Hinders the Receiving of This

Sacrament?

Objection 1: It seems that food or drink taken beforehand does not

hinder the receiving of this sacrament. For this sacrament was

instituted by our Lord at the supper. But when the supper was ended

our Lord gave the sacrament to His disciples, as is evident from Luke

22:20, and from 1 Cor. 11:25. Therefore it seems that we ought to

take this sacrament after receiving other food.

Obj. 2: Further, it is written (1 Cor. 11:33): "When you come

together to eat," namely, the Lord's body, "wait for one another; if

any man be hungry, let him eat at home": and thus it seems that after

eating at home a man may eat Christ's body in the Church.

Obj. 3: Further, we read in the (3rd) Council of Carthage (Can.

xxix): "Let the sacraments of the altar be celebrated only by men who

are fasting, with the exception of the anniversary day on which the

Lord's Supper is celebrated." Therefore, at least on that day, one

may receive the body of Christ after partaking of other food.

Obj. 4: Further, the taking of water or medicine, or of any other

food or drink in very slight quantity, or of the remains of food

continuing in the mouth, neither breaks the Church's fast, nor takes

away the sobriety required for reverently receiving this sacrament.

Consequently, one is not prevented by the above things from receiving

this sacrament.

Obj. 5: Further, some eat and drink late at night, and possibly after

passing a sleepless night receive the sacred mysteries in the morning

when the food is not digested. But it would savor more of moderation

if a man were to eat a little in the morning and afterwards receive

this sacrament about the ninth hour, since also there is occasionally

a longer interval of time. Consequently, it seems that such taking of

food beforehand does not keep one from this sacrament.

Obj. 6: Further, there is no less reverence due to this sacrament

after receiving it, than before. But one may take food and drink

after receiving the sacrament. Therefore one may do so before

receiving it.

_On the contrary,_ Augustine says (Resp. ad Januar., Ep. liv): "It

has pleased the Holy Ghost that, out of honor for this great

sacrament, the Lord's body should enter the mouth of a Christian

before other foods."

_I answer that,_ A thing may prevent the receiving of this sacrament

in two ways: first of all in itself, like mortal sin, which is

repugnant to what is signified by this sacrament, as stated above (A.

4): secondly, on account of the Church's prohibition; and thus a man

is prevented from taking this sacrament after receiving food or

drink, for three reasons. First, as Augustine says (Resp. ad Januar.,

Ep. liv), "out of respect for this sacrament," so that it may enter

into a mouth not yet contaminated by any food or drink. Secondly,

because of its signification, i.e. to give us to understand that

Christ, Who is the reality of this sacrament, and His charity, ought

to be first of all established in our hearts, according to Matt.

6:33: "Seek first the kingdom of God." Thirdly, on account of the

danger of vomiting and intemperance, which sometimes arise from

over-indulging in food, as the Apostle says (1 Cor. 11:21): "One,

indeed, is hungry, and another is drunk."

Nevertheless the sick are exempted from this general rule, for they

should be given Communion at once, even after food, should there be

any doubt as to their danger, lest they die without Communion,

because necessity has no law. Hence it is said in the Canon de

Consecratione: "Let the priest at once take Communion to the sick

person, lest he die without Communion."

Reply Obj. 1: As Augustine says in the same book, "the fact that our

Lord gave this sacrament after taking food is no reason why the

brethren should assemble after dinner or supper in order to partake

of it, or receive it at meal-time, as did those whom the Apostle

reproves and corrects. For our Saviour, in order the more strongly to

commend the depth of this mystery, wished to fix it closely in the

hearts and memories of the disciples; and on that account He gave no

command for it to be received in that order, leaving this to the

apostles, to whom He was about to entrust the government of the

churches."

Reply Obj. 2: The text quoted is thus paraphrased by the gloss: "If

any man be hungry and loath to await the rest, let him partake of his

food at home, that is, let him fill himself with earthly bread,

without partaking of the Eucharist afterwards."

Reply Obj. 3: The wording of this decree is in accordance with the

former custom observed by some of receiving the body of Christ on

that day after breaking their fast, so as to represent the Lord's

supper. But this is now abrogated, because as Augustine says (Resp.

ad Januar., Ep. liv), it is customary throughout the whole world for

Christ's body to be received before breaking the fast.

Reply Obj. 4: As stated in the Second Part (II-II, Q. 147, A. 6, ad

2), there are two kinds of fast. First, there is the natural fast,

which implies privation of everything taken before-hand by way of

food or drink: and such fast is required for this sacrament for the

reasons given above. And therefore it is never lawful to take this

sacrament after taking water, or other food or drink, or even

medicine, no matter how small the quantity be. Nor does it matter

whether it nourishes or not, whether it be taken by itself or with

other things, provided it be taken by way of food or drink. But the

remains of food left in the mouth, if swallowed accidentally, do not

hinder receiving this sacrament, because they are swallowed not by

way of food but by way of saliva. The same holds good of the

unavoidable remains of the water or wine wherewith the mouth is

rinsed, provided they be not swallowed in great quantity, but mixed

with saliva.

Secondly, there is the fast of the Church, instituted for afflicting

the body: and this fast is not hindered by the things mentioned (in

the objection), because they do not give much nourishment, but are

taken rather as an alterative.

Reply Obj. 5: That this sacrament ought to enter into the mouth of a

Christian before any other food must not be understood absolutely of

all time, otherwise he who had once eaten or drunk could never

afterwards take this sacrament: but it must be understood of the same

day; and although the beginning of the day varies according to

different systems of reckoning (for some begin their day at noon,

some at sunset, others at midnight, and others at sunrise), the Roman

Church begins it at midnight. Consequently, if any person takes

anything by way of food or drink after midnight, he may not receive

this sacrament on that day; but he can do so if the food was taken

before midnight. Nor does it matter, so far as the precept is

concerned, whether he has slept after taking food or drink, or

whether he has digested it; but it does matter as to the mental

disturbance which one suffers from want of sleep or from indigestion,

for, if the mind be much disturbed, one becomes unfit for receiving

this sacrament.

Reply Obj. 6: The greatest devotion is called for at the moment of

receiving this sacrament, because it is then that the effect of the

sacrament is bestowed, and such devotion is hindered more by what

goes before it than by what comes after it. And therefore it was

ordained that men should fast before receiving the sacrament rather

than after. Nevertheless there ought to be some interval between

receiving this sacrament and taking other food. Consequently, both

the Postcommunion prayer of thanksgiving is said in the Mass, and the

communicants say their own private prayers.

However, according to the ancient Canons, the following ordination was

made by Pope Clement I, (Ep. ii), "If the Lord's portion be eaten in

the morning, the ministers who have taken it shall fast until the

sixth hour, and if they take it at the third or fourth hour, they

shall fast until evening." For in olden times, the priest celebrated

Mass less frequently, and with greater preparation: but now, because

the sacred mysteries have to be celebrated oftener, the same could not

be easily observed, and so it has been abrogated by contrary custom.

_______________________

Summa Theologica, Part III (Tertia Pars) From the Complete American Edition · 第 580 / 654 题