FIRST ARTICLE [III, Q. 80, Art. 1]

Whether There Are Two Ways to Be Distinguished of Eating Christ's

Body?

Objection 1: It seems that two ways ought not to be distinguished of

eating Christ's body, namely, sacramentally and spiritually. For, as

Baptism is spiritual regeneration, according to John 3:5: "Unless a

man be born again of water and the Holy Ghost," etc., so also this

sacrament is spiritual food: hence our Lord, speaking of this

sacrament, says (John 6:64): "The words that I have spoken to you are

spirit and life." But there are no two distinct ways of receiving

Baptism, namely, sacramentally and spiritually. Therefore neither

ought this distinction to be made regarding this sacrament.

Obj. 2: Further, when two things are so related that one is on

account of the other, they should not be put in contradistinction to

one another, because the one derives its species from the other. But

sacramental eating is ordained for spiritual eating as its end.

Therefore sacramental eating ought not to be divided in contrast with

spiritual eating.

Obj. 3: Further, things which cannot exist without one another ought

not to be divided in contrast with each other. But it seems that no

one can eat spiritually without eating sacramentally; otherwise the

fathers of old would have eaten this sacrament spiritually. Moreover,

sacramental eating would be to no purpose, if the spiritual eating

could be had without it. Therefore it is not right to distinguish a

twofold eating, namely, sacramental and spiritual.

_On the contrary,_ The gloss says on 1 Cor. 11:29: "He that eateth

and drinketh unworthily," etc.: "We hold that there are two ways of

eating, the one sacramental, and the other spiritual."

_I answer that,_ There are two things to be considered in the

receiving of this sacrament, namely, the sacrament itself, and its

fruits, and we have already spoken of both (QQ. 73, 79). The perfect

way, then, of receiving this sacrament is when one takes it so as to

partake of its effect. Now, as was stated above (Q. 79, AA. 3, 8), it

sometimes happens that a man is hindered from receiving the effect of

this sacrament; and such receiving of this sacrament is an imperfect

one. Therefore, as the perfect is divided against the imperfect, so

sacramental eating, whereby the sacrament only is received without

its effect, is divided against spiritual eating, by which one

receives the effect of this sacrament, whereby a man is spiritually

united with Christ through faith and charity.

Reply Obj. 1: The same distinction is made regarding Baptism and the

other sacraments: for, some receive the sacrament only, while others

receive the sacrament and the reality of the sacrament. However,

there is a difference, because, since the other sacraments are

accomplished in the use of the matter, the receiving of the sacrament

is the actual perfection of the sacrament; whereas this sacrament is

accomplished in the consecration of the matter: and consequently both

uses follow the sacrament. On the other hand, in Baptism and in the

other sacraments that imprint a character, they who receive the

sacrament receive some spiritual effect, that is, the character.

which is not the case in this sacrament. And therefore, in this

sacrament, rather than in Baptism, the sacramental use is

distinguished from the spiritual use.

Reply Obj. 2: That sacramental eating which is also a spiritual

eating is not divided in contrast with spiritual eating, but is

included under it; but that sacramental eating which does not secure

the effect, is divided in contrast with spiritual eating; just as the

imperfect, which does not attain the perfection of its species, is

divided in contrast with the perfect.

Reply Obj. 3: As stated above (Q. 73, A. 3), the effect of the

sacrament can be secured by every man if he receive it in desire,

though not in reality. Consequently, just as some are baptized with

the Baptism of desire, through their desire of baptism, before being

baptized in the Baptism of water; so likewise some eat this sacrament

spiritually ere they receive it sacramentally. Now this happens in

two ways. First of all, from desire of receiving the sacrament

itself, and thus are said to be baptized, and to eat spiritually, and

not sacramentally, they who desire to receive these sacraments since

they have been instituted. Secondly, by a figure: thus the Apostle

says (1 Cor. 10:2), that the fathers of old were "baptized in the

cloud and in the sea," and that "they did eat . . . spiritual food,

and . . . drank . . . spiritual drink." Nevertheless sacramental

eating is not without avail, because the actual receiving of the

sacrament produces more fully the effect of the sacrament than does

the desire thereof, as stated above of Baptism (Q. 69, A. 4, ad 2).

_______________________

Summa Theologica, Part III (Tertia Pars) From the Complete American Edition · 第 573 / 654 题