SEVENTH ARTICLE [III, Q. 66, Art. 7]

Whether Immersion in Water Is Necessary for Baptism?

Objection 1: It seems that immersion in water is necessary for

Baptism. Because it is written (Eph. 4:5): "One faith, one baptism."

But in many parts of the world the ordinary way of baptizing is by

immersion. Therefore it seems that there can be no Baptism without

immersion.

Obj. 2: Further, the Apostle says (Rom. 6:3, 4): "All we who are

baptized in Christ Jesus, are baptized in His death: for we are

buried together with Him, by Baptism into death." But this is done by

immersion: for Chrysostom says on John 3:5: "Unless a man be born

again of water and the Holy Ghost," etc.: "When we dip our heads

under the water as in a kind of tomb, our old man is buried, and

being submerged, is hidden below, and thence he rises again renewed."

Therefore it seems that immersion is essential to Baptism.

Obj. 3: Further, if Baptism is valid without total immersion of the

body, it would follow that it would be equally sufficient to pour

water over any part of the body. But this seems unreasonable; since

original sin, to remedy which is the principal purpose of Baptism, is

not in only one part of the body. Therefore it seems that immersion

is necessary for Baptism, and that mere sprinkling is not enough.

_On the contrary,_ It is written (Heb. 10:22): "Let us draw near with

a true heart in fulness of faith, having our hearts sprinkled from an

evil conscience, and our bodies washed with clean water."

_I answer that,_ In the sacrament of Baptism water is put to the use

of a washing of the body, whereby to signify the inward washing away

of sins. Now washing may be done with water not only by immersion,

but also by sprinkling or pouring. And, therefore, although it is

safer to baptize by immersion, because this is the more ordinary

fashion, yet Baptism can be conferred by sprinkling or also by

pouring, according to Ezech. 36:25: "I will pour upon you clean

water," as also the Blessed Lawrence is related to have baptized. And

this especially in cases of urgency: either because there is a great

number to be baptized, as was clearly the case in Acts 2 and 4, where

we read that on one day three thousand believed, and on another five

thousand: or through there being but a small supply of water, or

through feebleness of the minister, who cannot hold up the candidate

for Baptism; or through feebleness of the candidate, whose life might

be endangered by immersion. We must therefore conclude that immersion

is not necessary for Baptism.

Reply Obj. 1: What is accidental to a thing does not diversify its

essence. Now bodily washing with water is essential to Baptism:

wherefore Baptism is called a "laver," according to Eph. 5:26:

"Cleansing it by the laver of water in the word of life." But that

the washing be done this or that way, is accidental to Baptism. And

consequently such diversity does not destroy the oneness of Baptism.

Reply Obj. 2: Christ's burial is more clearly represented by

immersion: wherefore this manner of baptizing is more frequently in

use and more commendable. Yet in the other ways of baptizing it is

represented after a fashion, albeit not so clearly; for no matter how

the washing is done, the body of a man, or some part thereof, is put

under water, just as Christ's body was put under the earth.

Reply Obj. 3: The principal part of the body, especially in relation

to the exterior members, is the head, wherein all the senses, both

interior and exterior, flourish. And therefore, if the whole body

cannot be covered with water, because of the scarcity of water, or

because of some other reason, it is necessary to pour water over the

head, in which the principle of animal life is made manifest.

And although original sin is transmitted through the members that

serve for procreation, yet those members are not to be sprinkled in

preference to the head, because by Baptism the transmission of

original sin to the offspring by the act of procreation is not

deleted, but the soul is freed from the stain and debt of sin which

it has contracted. Consequently that part of the body should be

washed in preference, in which the works of the soul are made

manifest.

Nevertheless in the Old Law the remedy against original sin was

affixed to the member of procreation; because He through Whom

original sin was to be removed, was yet to be born of the seed of

Abraham, whose faith was signified by circumcision according to Rom.

4:11.

_______________________

Summa Theologica, Part III (Tertia Pars) From the Complete American Edition · 第 451 / 654 题