THIRD ARTICLE [III, Q. 63, Art. 3]

Whether the Sacramental Character Is the Character of Christ?

Objection 1: It seems that the sacramental character is not the

character of Christ. For it is written (Eph. 4:30): "Grieve not the

Holy Spirit of God, whereby you are sealed." But a character consists

essentially in something that seals. Therefore the sacramental

character should be attributed to the Holy Ghost rather than to

Christ.

Obj. 2: Further, a character has the nature of a sign. And it is a

sign of the grace that is conferred by the sacrament. Now grace is

poured forth into the soul by the whole Trinity; wherefore it is

written (Ps. 83:12): "The Lord will give grace and glory." Therefore

it seems that the sacramental character should not be attributed

specially to Christ.

Obj. 3: Further, a man is marked with a character that he may be

distinguishable from others. But the saints are distinguishable from

others by charity, which, as Augustine says (De Trin. xv), "alone

separates the children of the Kingdom from the children of

perdition": wherefore also the children of perdition are said to have

"the character of the beast" (Apoc. 13:16, 17). But charity is not

attributed to Christ, but rather to the Holy Ghost according to Rom.

5:5: "The charity of God is poured forth in our hearts, by the Holy

Ghost, Who is given to us"; or even to the Father, according to 2

Cor. 13:13: "The grace of our Lord Jesus Christ and the charity of

God." Therefore it seems that the sacramental character should not be

attributed to Christ.

_On the contrary,_ Some define character thus: "A character is a

distinctive mark printed in a man's rational soul by the eternal

Character, whereby the created trinity is sealed with the likeness of

the creating and re-creating Trinity, and distinguishing him from

those who are not so enlikened, according to the state of faith." But

the eternal Character is Christ Himself, according to Heb. 1:3: "Who

being the brightness of His glory and the figure," or character, "of

His substance." It seems, therefore, that the character should

properly be attributed to Christ.

_I answer that,_ As has been made clear above (A. 1), a character is

properly a kind of seal, whereby something is marked, as being

ordained to some particular end: thus a coin is marked for use in

exchange of goods, and soldiers are marked with a character as being

deputed to military service. Now the faithful are deputed to a

twofold end. First and principally to the enjoyment of glory. And for

this purpose they are marked with the seal of grace according to

Ezech. 9:4: "Mark Thou upon the foreheads of the men that sigh and

mourn"; and Apoc. 7:3: "Hurt not the earth, nor the sea, nor the

trees, till we sign the servants of our God in their foreheads."

Secondly, each of the faithful is deputed to receive, or to bestow on

others, things pertaining to the worship of God. And this, properly

speaking, is the purpose of the sacramental character. Now the whole

rite of the Christian religion is derived from Christ's priesthood.

Consequently, it is clear that the sacramental character is specially

the character of Christ, to Whose character the faithful are likened

by reason of the sacramental characters, which are nothing else than

certain participations of Christ's Priesthood, flowing from Christ

Himself.

Reply Obj. 1: The Apostle speaks there of that sealing by which a man

is assigned to future glory, and which is effected by grace. Now

grace is attributed to the Holy Ghost, inasmuch as it is through love

that God gives us something gratis, which is the very nature of

grace: while the Holy Ghost is love. Wherefore it is written (1 Cor.

12:4): "There are diversities of graces, but the same Spirit."

Reply Obj. 2: The sacramental character is a thing as regards the

exterior sacrament, and a sacrament in regard to the ultimate effect.

Consequently, something can be attributed to a character in two ways.

First, if the character be considered as a sacrament: and thus it is

a sign of the invisible grace which is conferred in the sacrament.

Secondly, if it be considered as a character. And thus it is a sign

conferring on a man a likeness to some principal person in whom is

vested the authority over that to which he is assigned: thus soldiers

who are assigned to military service, are marked with their leader's

sign, by which they are, in a fashion, likened to him. And in this

way those who are deputed to the Christian worship, of which Christ

is the author, receive a character by which they are likened to

Christ. Consequently, properly speaking, this is Christ's character.

Reply Obj. 3: A character distinguishes one from another, in relation

to some particular end, to which he, who receives the character is

ordained: as has been stated concerning the military character (A. 1)

by which a soldier of the king is distinguished from the enemy's

soldier in relation to the battle. In like manner the character of

the faithful is that by which the faithful of Christ are

distinguished from the servants of the devil, either in relation to

eternal life, or in relation to the worship of the Church that now

is. Of these the former is the result of charity and grace, as the

objection runs; while the latter results from the sacramental

character. Wherefore the "character of the beast" may be understood

by opposition, to mean either the obstinate malice for which some are

assigned to eternal punishment, or the profession of an unlawful form

of worship.

_______________________

Summa Theologica, Part III (Tertia Pars) From the Complete American Edition · 第 424 / 654 题