FIRST ARTICLE [III, Q. 56, Art. 1]

Whether Christ's Resurrection Is the Cause of the Resurrection of Our

Bodies?

Objection 1: It would seem that Christ's Resurrection is not the

cause of the resurrection of our bodies, because, given a sufficient

cause, the effect must follow of necessity. If, then, Christ's

Resurrection be the sufficient cause of the resurrection of our

bodies, then all the dead should have risen again as soon as He rose.

Obj. 2: Further, Divine justice is the cause of the resurrection of

the dead, so that the body may be rewarded or punished together with

the soul, since they shared in merit or sin, as Dionysius says

(Eccles. Hier. vii) and Damascene (De Fide Orth. iv). But God's

justice must necessarily be accomplished, even if Christ had not

risen. Therefore the dead would rise again even though Christ did

not. Consequently Christ's Resurrection is not the cause of the

resurrection of our bodies.

Obj. 3: Further, if Christ's Resurrection be the cause of the

resurrection of our bodies, it would be either the exemplar, or the

efficient, or the meritorious cause. Now it is not the exemplar

cause; because it is God who will bring about the resurrection of our

bodies, according to John 5:21: "The Father raiseth up the dead": and

God has no need to look at any exemplar cause outside Himself. In

like manner it is not the efficient cause; because an efficient cause

acts only through contact, whether spiritual or corporeal. Now it is

evident that Christ's Resurrection has no corporeal contact with the

dead who shall rise again, owing to distance of time and place; and

similarly it has no spiritual contact, which is through faith and

charity, because even unbelievers and sinners shall rise again. Nor

again is it the meritorious cause, because when Christ rose He was no

longer a wayfarer, and consequently not in a state of merit.

Therefore, Christ's Resurrection does not appear to be in any way the

cause of ours.

Obj. 4: Further, since death is the privation of life, then to

destroy death seems to be nothing else than to bring life back again;

and this is resurrection. But "by dying, Christ destroyed our death"

[*Preface of Mass in Paschal Time]. Consequently, Christ's death, not

His Resurrection, is the cause of our resurrection.

_On the contrary,_ on 1 Cor. 15:12: "Now if Christ be preached, that

He rose again from the dead," the gloss says: "Who is the efficient

cause of our resurrection."

_I answer that,_ As stated in 2 Metaphysics, text 4: "Whatever is

first in any order, is the cause of all that come after it." But

Christ's Resurrection was the first in the order of our resurrection,

as is evident from what was said above (Q. 53, A. 3). Hence Christ's

Resurrection must be the cause of ours: and this is what the Apostle

says (1 Cor. 15:20, 21): "Christ is risen from the dead, the

first-fruits of them that sleep; for by a man came death, and by a

man the resurrection of the dead."

And this is reasonable. Because the principle of human life-giving is

the Word of God, of whom it is said (Ps. 35:10): "With Thee is the

fountain of life": hence He Himself says (John 5:21): "As the Father

raiseth up the dead, and giveth life; so the Son also giveth life to

whom He will." Now the divinely established natural order is that

every cause operates first upon what is nearest to it, and through it

upon others which are more remote; just as fire first heats the

nearest air, and through it it heats bodies that are further off: and

God Himself first enlightens those substances which are closer to

Him, and through them others that are more remote, as Dionysius says

(Coel. Hier. xiii). Consequently, the Word of God first bestows

immortal life upon that body which is naturally united with Himself,

and through it works the resurrection in all other bodies.

Reply Obj. 1: As was stated above, Christ's Resurrection is the cause

of ours through the power of the united Word, who operates according

to His will. And consequently, it is not necessary for the effect to

follow at once, but according as the Word of God disposes, namely,

that first of all we be conformed to the suffering and dying Christ

in this suffering and mortal life; and afterwards may come to share

in the likeness of His Resurrection.

Reply Obj. 2: God's justice is the first cause of our resurrection,

whereas Christ's Resurrection is the secondary, and as it were the

instrumental cause. But although the power of the principal cause is

not restricted to one instrument determinately, nevertheless since it

works through this instrument, such instrument causes the effect. So,

then, the Divine justice in itself is not tied down to Christ's

Resurrection as a means of bringing about our resurrection: because

God could deliver us in some other way than through Christ's Passion

and Resurrection, as already stated (Q. 46, A. 2). But having once

decreed to deliver us in this way, it is evident that Christ's

Resurrection is the cause of ours.

Reply Obj. 3: Properly speaking, Christ's Resurrection is not the

meritorious cause, but the efficient and exemplar cause of our

resurrection. It is the efficient cause, inasmuch as Christ's

humanity, according to which He rose again, is as it were the

instrument of His Godhead, and works by Its power, as stated above

(Q. 13, AA. 2, 3). And therefore, just as all other things which

Christ did and endured in His humanity are profitable to our

salvation through the power of the Godhead, as already stated (Q. 48,

A. 6), so also is Christ's Resurrection the efficient cause of ours,

through the Divine power whose office it is to quicken the dead; and

this power by its presence is in touch with all places and times; and

such virtual contact suffices for its efficiency. And since, as was

stated above (ad 2), the primary cause of human resurrection is the

Divine justice, from which Christ has "the power of passing judgment,

because He is the Son of Man" (John 5:27); the efficient power of His

Resurrection extends to the good and wicked alike, who are subject to

His judgment.

But just as the Resurrection of Christ's body, through its personal

union with the Word, is first in point of time, so also is it first

in dignity and perfection; as the gloss says on 1 Cor. 15:20, 23. But

whatever is most perfect is always the exemplar, which the less

perfect copies according to its mode; consequently Christ's

Resurrection is the exemplar of ours. And this is necessary, not on

the part of Him who rose again, who needs no exemplar, but on the

part of them who are raised up, who must be likened to that

Resurrection, according to Phil. 3:21: "He will reform the body of

our lowness, made like to the body of His glory." Now although the

efficiency of Christ's Resurrection extends to the resurrection of

the good and wicked alike, still its exemplarity extends properly

only to the just, who are made conformable with His Sonship,

according to Rom. 8:29.

Reply Obj. 4: Considered on the part of their efficiency, which is

dependent on the Divine power, both Christ's death and His

Resurrection are the cause both of the destruction of death and of

the renewal of life: but considered as exemplar causes, Christ's

death--by which He withdrew from mortal life--is the cause of the

destruction of our death; while His Resurrection, whereby He

inaugurated immortal life, is the cause of the repairing of our life.

But Christ's Passion is furthermore a meritorious cause, as stated

above (Q. 48, A. 1).

_______________________

Summa Theologica, Part III (Tertia Pars) From the Complete American Edition · 第 378 / 654 题