THIRD ARTICLE [III, Q. 52, Art. 3]

Whether the Whole Christ Was in Hell?

Objection 1: It would seem that the whole Christ was not in hell. For

Christ's body is one of His parts. But His body was not in hell.

Therefore, the whole Christ was not in hell.

Obj. 2: Further, nothing can be termed whole when its parts are

severed. But the soul and body, which are the parts of human nature,

were separated at His death, as stated above (Q. 50, AA. 3, 4), and

it was after death that He descended into hell. Therefore the whole

(Christ) could not be in hell.

Obj. 3: Further, the whole of a thing is said to be in a place when

no part of it is outside such place. But there were parts of Christ

outside hell; for instance, His body was in the grave, and His

Godhead everywhere. Therefore the whole Christ was not in hell.

_On the contrary,_ Augustine says (De Symbolo iii): "The whole Son is

with the Father, the whole Son in heaven, on earth, in the Virgin's

womb, on the Cross, in hell, in paradise, into which He brought the

robber."

_I answer that,_ It is evident from what was said in the First Part

(Q. 31, A. 2, ad 4), the masculine gender is referred to the

hypostasis or person, while the neuter belongs to the nature. Now in

the death of Christ, although the soul was separated from the body,

yet neither was separated from the Person of the Son of God, as

stated above (Q. 50, A. 2). Consequently, it must be affirmed that

during the three days of Christ's death the whole Christ was in the

tomb, because the whole Person was there through the body united with

Him, and likewise He was entirely in hell, because the whole Person

of Christ was there by reason of the soul united with Him, and the

whole Christ was then everywhere by reason of the Divine Nature.

Reply Obj. 1: The body which was then in the grave is not a part of

the uncreated Person, but of the assumed nature. Consequently, the

fact of Christ's body not being in hell does not prevent the whole

Christ from being there: but proves that not everything appertaining

to human nature was there.

Reply Obj. 2: The whole human nature is made up of the united soul

and body; not so the Divine Person. Consequently when death severed

the union of the soul with the body, the whole Christ remained, but

His whole human nature did not remain.

Reply Obj. 3: Christ's Person is whole in each single place, but not

wholly, because it is not circumscribed by any place: indeed, all

places put together could not comprise His immensity; rather is it

His immensity that embraces all things. But it happens in those

things which are in a place corporeally and circumscriptively, that

if a whole be in some place, then no part of it is outside that

place. But this is not the case with God. Hence Augustine says (De

Symbolo iii): "It is not according to times or places that we say

that the whole Christ is everywhere, as if He were at one time whole

in one place, at another time whole in another: but as being whole

always and everywhere."

_______________________

Summa Theologica, Part III (Tertia Pars) From the Complete American Edition · 第 354 / 654 题