FOURTH ARTICLE [III, Q. 49, Art. 4]

Whether We Were Reconciled to God Through Christ's Passion?

Objection 1: It would seem that we were not reconciled to God through

Christ's Passion. For there is no need of reconciliation between

friends. But God always loved us, according to Wis. 11:25: "Thou

lovest all the things that are, and hatest none of the things which

Thou hast made." Therefore Christ's Passion did not reconcile us to

God.

Obj. 2: Further, the same thing cannot be cause and effect: hence

grace, which is the cause of meriting, does not come under merit. But

God's love is the cause of Christ's Passion, according to John 3:16:

"God so loved the world, as to give His only-begotten Son." It does

not appear, then, that we were reconciled to God through Christ's

Passion, so that He began to love us anew.

Obj. 3: Further, Christ's Passion was completed by men slaying Him;

and thereby they offended God grievously. Therefore Christ's Passion

is rather the cause of wrath than of reconciliation to God.

_On the contrary,_ The Apostle says (Rom. 5:10): "We are reconciled

to God by the death of His Son."

_I answer that,_ Christ's Passion is in two ways the cause of our

reconciliation to God. In the first way, inasmuch as it takes away

sin by which men became God's enemies, according to Wis. 14:9: "To

God the wicked and his wickedness are hateful alike"; and Ps. 5:7:

"Thou hatest all the workers of iniquity." In another way, inasmuch

as it is a most acceptable sacrifice to God. Now it is the proper

effect of sacrifice to appease God: just as man likewise overlooks an

offense committed against him on account of some pleasing act of

homage shown him. Hence it is written (1 Kings 26:19): "If the Lord

stir thee up against me, let Him accept of sacrifice." And in like

fashion Christ's voluntary suffering was such a good act that,

because of its being found in human nature, God was appeased for

every offense of the human race with regard to those who are made one

with the crucified Christ in the aforesaid manner (A. 1, ad 4).

Reply Obj. 1: God loves all men as to their nature, which He Himself

made; yet He hates them with respect to the crimes they commit

against Him, according to Ecclus. 12:3: "The Highest hateth sinners."

Reply Obj. 2: Christ is not said to have reconciled us with God, as

if God had begun anew to love us, since it is written (Jer. 31:3): "I

have loved thee with an everlasting love"; but because the source of

hatred was taken away by Christ's Passion, both through sin being

washed away and through compensation being made in the shape of a

more pleasing offering.

Reply Obj. 3: As Christ's slayers were men, so also was the Christ

slain. Now the charity of the suffering Christ surpassed the

wickedness of His slayers. Accordingly Christ's Passion prevailed

more in reconciling God to the whole human race than in provoking Him

to wrath.

_______________________

Summa Theologica, Part III (Tertia Pars) From the Complete American Edition · 第 335 / 654 题