FOURTH ARTICLE [III, Q. 44, Art. 4]

Whether Christ Worked Miracles Fittingly on Irrational Creatures?

Objection 1: It would seem that Christ worked miracles unfittingly on

irrational creatures. For brute animals are more noble than plants.

But Christ worked a miracle on plants as when the fig-tree withered

away at His command (Matt. 21:19). Therefore Christ should have

worked miracles also on brute animals.

Obj. 2: Further, punishment is not justly inflicted save for fault.

But it was not the fault of the fig-tree that Christ found no fruit

on it, when fruit was not in season (Mk. 11:13). Therefore it seems

unfitting that He withered it up.

Obj. 3: Further, air and water are between heaven and earth. But

Christ worked some miracles in the heavens, as stated above (A. 2),

and likewise in the earth, when it quaked at the time of His Passion

(Matt. 27:51). Therefore it seems that He should also have worked

miracles in the air and water, such as to divide the sea, as did

Moses (Ex. 14:21); or a river, as did Josue (Josh. 3:16) and Elias (4

Kings 2:8); and to cause thunder to be heard in the air, as occurred

on Mount Sinai when the Law was given (Ex. 19:16), and like to what

Elias did (3 Kings 18:45).

Obj. 4: Further, miraculous works pertain to the work of Divine

providence in governing the world. But this work presupposes

creation. It seems, therefore, unfitting that in His miracles Christ

made use of creation: when, to wit, He multiplied the loaves.

Therefore His miracles in regard to irrational creatures seem to have

been unfitting.

_On the contrary,_ Christ is "the wisdom of God" (1 Cor. 1:24), of

whom it is said (Wis. 8:1) that "she ordereth all things sweetly."

_I answer that,_ As stated above, Christ's miracles were ordained to

the end that He should be recognized as having Divine power, unto the

salvation of mankind. Now it belongs to the Divine power that every

creature be subject thereto. Consequently it behooved Him to work

miracles on every kind of creature, not only on man, but also on

irrational creatures.

Reply Obj. 1: Brute animals are akin generically to man, wherefore

they were created on the same day as man. And since He had worked

many miracles on the bodies of men, there was no need for Him to work

miracles on the bodies of brute animals. And so much the less that,

as to their sensible and corporeal nature, the same reason applies to

both men and animals, especially terrestrial. But fish, from living

in water, are more alien from human nature; wherefore they were made

on another day. On them Christ worked a miracle in the plentiful

draught of fishes, related Luke 5 and John 21; and, again, in the

fish caught by Peter, who found a stater in it (Matt. 17:26). As to

the swine who were cast headlong into the sea, this was not the

effect of a Divine miracle, but of the action of the demons, God

permitting.

Reply Obj. 2: As Chrysostom says on Matt. 21:19: "When our Lord does

any such like thing" on plants or brute animals, "ask not how it was

just to wither up the fig-tree, since it was not the fruit season; to

ask such a question is foolish in the extreme," because such things

cannot commit a fault or be punished: "but look at the miracle, and

wonder at the worker." Nor does the Creator "inflict" any hurt on the

owner, if He choose to make use of His own creature for the salvation

of others; rather, as Hilary says on Matt. 21:19, "we should see in

this a proof of God's goodness, for when He wished to afford an

example of salvation as being procured by Him, He exercised His

mighty power on the human body: but when He wished to picture to them

His severity towards those who wilfully disobey Him, He foreshadows

their doom by His sentence on the tree." This is the more noteworthy

in a fig-tree which, as Chrysostom observes (on Matt. 21:19), "being

full of moisture, makes the miracle all the more remarkable."

Reply Obj. 3: Christ also worked miracles befitting to Himself in the

air and water: when, to wit, as related Matt. 8:26, "He commanded the

winds, and the sea, and there came a great calm." But it was not

befitting that He who came to restore all things to a state of peace

and calm should cause either a disturbance in the atmosphere or a

division of waters. Hence the Apostle says (Heb. 12:18): "You are not

come to a fire that may be touched and approached [Vulg.: 'a mountain

that might be touched, and a burning fire'], and a whirlwind, and

darkness, and storm."

At the time of His Passion, however, the "veil was rent," to signify

the unfolding of the mysteries of the Law; "the graves were opened,"

to signify that His death gave life to the dead; "the earth quaked

and the rocks were rent," to signify that man's stony heart would be

softened, and the whole world changed for the better by the virtue of

His Passion.

Reply Obj. 4: The multiplication of the loaves was not effected by

way of creation, but by an addition of extraneous matter transformed

into loaves; hence Augustine says on John 6:1-14: "Whence He

multiplieth a few grains into harvests, thence in His hands He

multiplied the five loaves": and it is clearly by a process of

transformation that grains are multiplied into harvests.

_______________________

Summa Theologica, Part III (Tertia Pars) From the Complete American Edition · 第 298 / 654 题