FOURTH ARTICLE [III, Q. 35, Art. 4]

Whether the Blessed Virgin should be called the Mother of God?

Objection 1: It would seem that the Blessed Virgin should not be

called the Mother of God. For in the Divine mysteries we should not

make any assertion that is not taken from Holy Scripture. But we read

nowhere in Holy Scripture that she is the mother or parent of God,

but that she is the "mother of Christ" or of "the Child," as may be

seen from Matt. 1:18. Therefore we should not say that the Blessed

Virgin is the Mother of God.

Obj. 2: Further, Christ is called God in respect of His Divine

Nature. But the Divine Nature did not first originate from the

Virgin. Therefore the Blessed Virgin should not be called the Mother

of God.

Obj. 3: Further, the word "God" is predicated in common of Father,

Son, and Holy Ghost. If, therefore, the Blessed Virgin is Mother of

God it seems to follow that she was the Mother of Father, Son, and

Holy Ghost, which cannot be allowed. Therefore the Blessed Virgin

should not be called Mother of God.

_On the contrary,_ In the chapters of Cyril, approved in the Council

of Ephesus (P. 1, Cap. xxvi), we read: "If anyone confess not that

the Emmanuel is truly God, and that for this reason the Holy Virgin

is the Mother of God, since she begot of her flesh the Word of God

made flesh, let him be anathema."

_I answer that,_ As stated above (Q. 16, A. 1), every word that

signifies a nature in the concrete can stand for any hypostasis of

that nature. Now, since the union of the Incarnation took place in

the hypostasis, as above stated (Q. 2, A. 3), it is manifest that

this word "God" can stand for the hypostasis, having a human and a

Divine nature. Therefore whatever belongs to the Divine and to the

human nature can be attributed to that Person: both when a word is

employed to stand for it, signifying the Divine Nature, and when a

word is used signifying the human nature. Now, conception and birth

are attributed to the person and hypostasis in respect of that nature

in which it is conceived and born. Since, therefore, the human nature

was taken by the Divine Person in the very beginning of the

conception, as stated above (Q. 33, A. 3), it follows that it can be

truly said that God was conceived and born of the Virgin. Now from

this is a woman called a man's mother, that she conceived him and

gave birth to him. Therefore the Blessed Virgin is truly called the

Mother of God. For the only way in which it could be denied that the

Blessed Virgin is the Mother of God would be either if the humanity

were first subject to conception and birth, before this man were the

Son of God, as Photinus said; or if the humanity were not assumed

unto unity of the Person or hypostasis of the Word of God, as

Nestorius maintained. But both of these are erroneous. Therefore it

is heretical to deny that the Blessed Virgin is the Mother of God.

Reply Obj. 1: This was an argument of Nestorius, and it is solved by

saying that, although we do not find it said expressly in Scripture

that the Blessed Virgin is the Mother of God, yet we do find it

expressly said in Scripture that "Jesus Christ is true God," as may

be seen 1 John 5:20, and that the Blessed Virgin is the "Mother of

Jesus Christ," which is clearly expressed Matt. 1:18. Therefore, from

the words of Scripture it follows of necessity that she is the Mother

of God.

Again, it is written (Rom. 9:5) that Christ is of the Jews "according

to the flesh, who is over all things, God blessed for ever." But He

is not of the Jews except through the Blessed Virgin. Therefore He

who is "above all things, God blessed for ever," is truly born of the

Blessed Virgin as of His Mother.

Reply Obj. 2: This was an argument of Nestorius. But Cyril, in a

letter against Nestorius [*Cf. Acta Conc. Ephes., p. 1, cap. ii],

answers it thus: "Just as when a man's soul is born with its body,

they are considered as one being: and if anyone wish to say that the

mother of the flesh is not the mother of the soul, he says too much.

Something like this may be perceived in the generation of Christ. For

the Word of God was born of the substance of God the Father: but

because He took flesh, we must of necessity confess that in the flesh

He was born of a woman." Consequently we must say that the Blessed

Virgin is called the Mother of God, not as though she were the Mother

of the Godhead, but because she is the mother, according to His human

nature, of the Person who has both the divine and the human nature.

Reply Obj. 3: Although the name "God" is common to the three Persons,

yet sometimes it stands for the Person of the Father alone, sometimes

only for the Person of the Son or of the Holy Ghost, as stated above

(Q. 16, A. 1; First Part, Q. 39, A. 4). So that when we say, "The

Blessed Virgin is the Mother of God," this word "God" stands only for

the incarnate Person of the Son.

_______________________

Summa Theologica, Part III (Tertia Pars) From the Complete American Edition · 第 239 / 654 题