FOURTH ARTICLE [III, Q. 34, Art. 4]

Whether Christ Was a Perfect Comprehensor in the First Instant of His

Conception?

Objection 1: It would seem that Christ was not a perfect comprehensor

in the first instant of His conception. For merit precedes reward, as

fault precedes punishment. But Christ merited in the first instant of

His conception, as stated above (A. 3). Since, therefore, the state

of comprehension is the principal reward, it seems that Christ was

not a comprehensor in the first instant of His conception.

Obj. 2: Further, our Lord said (Luke 24:26): "Ought not Christ to

have suffered these things, and so to enter into His glory?" But

glory belongs to the state of comprehension. Therefore Christ was not

in the state of comprehension in the first instant of His conception,

when as yet He had not suffered.

Obj. 3: Further, what befits neither man nor angel seems proper to

God; and therefore is not becoming to Christ as man. But to be always

in the state of beatitude befits neither man nor angel: for if they

had been created in beatitude, they would not have sinned afterwards.

Therefore Christ, as man, was not in the state of beatitude in the

first instant of His conception.

_On the contrary,_ It is written (Ps. 64:5): "Blessed is he whom Thou

hast chosen, and taken to Thee"; which words, according to the gloss,

refer to Christ's human nature, which "was taken by the Word of God

unto the unity of Person." But human nature was taken by the Word of

God in the first instant of His conception. Therefore, in the first

instant of His conception, Christ, as man, was in the state of

beatitude; which is to be a comprehensor.

_I answer that,_ As appears from what was said above (A. 3), it was

unbecoming that in His conception Christ should receive merely

habitual grace without the act. Now, He received grace "not by

measure" (John 3:34), as stated above (Q. 7, A. 11). But the grace of

the "wayfarer," being short of that of the "comprehensor," is in less

measure than that of the comprehensor. Wherefore it is manifest that

in the first instant of His conception Christ received not only as

much grace as comprehensors have, but also greater than that which

they all have. And because that grace was not without its act, it

follows that He was a comprehensor in act, seeing God in His Essence

more clearly than other creatures.

Reply Obj. 1: As stated above (Q. 19, A. 3), Christ did not merit the

glory of the soul, in respect of which He is said to have been a

comprehensor, but the glory of the body, to which He came through His

Passion.

Wherefore the reply to the Second Objection is clear.

Reply Obj. 3: Since Christ was both God and man, He had, even in His

humanity, something more than other creatures--namely, that He was in

the state of beatitude from the very beginning.

_______________________

Summa Theologica, Part III (Tertia Pars) From the Complete American Edition · 第 234 / 654 题