SEVENTH ARTICLE [III, Q. 31, Art. 7]

Whether Christ's Flesh in the Patriarchs Was Infected by Sin?

Objection 1: It would seem that Christ's flesh was not infected by

sin in the patriarchs. For it is written (Wis. 7:25) that "no defiled

thing cometh into" Divine Wisdom. But Christ is the Wisdom of God

according to 1 Cor. 1:24. Therefore Christ's flesh was never defiled

by sin.

Obj. 2: Further, Damascene says (De Fide Orth. iii) that Christ

"assumed the first-fruits of our nature." But in the primitive state

human flesh was not infected by sin. Therefore Christ's flesh was not

infected either in Adam or in the other patriarchs.

Obj. 3: Further, Augustine says (Gen. ad lit. x) that "human nature

ever had, together with the wound, the balm with which to heal it."

But that which is infected cannot heal a wound; rather does it need

to be healed itself. Therefore in human nature there was ever

something preserved from infection, from which afterwards Christ's

body was formed.

_On the contrary,_ Christ's body is not related to Adam and the other

patriarchs, save through the medium of the Blessed Virgin's body, of

whom He took flesh. But the body of the Blessed Virgin was wholly

conceived in original sin, as stated above (Q. 14, A. 3, ad 1), and

thus, as far as it was in the patriarchs, it was subject to sin.

Therefore the flesh of Christ, as far as it was in the patriarchs,

was subject to sin.

_I answer that,_ When we say that Christ or His flesh was in Adam and

the other patriarchs, we compare Him, or His flesh, to Adam and the

other patriarchs. Now, it is manifest that the condition of the

patriarchs differed from that of Christ: for the patriarchs were

subject to sin, whereas Christ was absolutely free from sin.

Consequently a twofold error may occur on this point. First, by

attributing to Christ, or to His flesh, that condition which was in

the patriarchs; by saying, for instance, that Christ sinned in Adam,

since after some fashion He was in him. But this is false; because

Christ was not in Adam in such a way that Adam's sin belonged to

Christ: forasmuch as He is not descended from him according to the

law of concupiscence, or according to seminal virtue; as stated above

(A. 1, ad 3, A. 6, ad 1; Q. 15, A. 1, ad 2).

Secondly, error may occur by attributing the condition of Christ or

of His flesh to that which was actually in the patriarchs: by saying,

for instance, that, because Christ's flesh, as existing in Christ,

was not subject to sin, therefore in Adam also and in the patriarchs

there was some part of his body that was not subject to sin, and from

which afterwards Christ's body was formed; as some indeed held. For

this is quite impossible. First, because Christ's flesh was not in

Adam and in the other patriarchs, according to something signate,

distinguishable from the rest of his flesh, as pure from impure; as

already stated (A. 6). Secondly, because since human flesh is

infected by sin, through being conceived in lust, just as the entire

flesh of a man is conceived through lust, so also is it entirely

defiled by sin. Consequently we must say that the entire flesh of the

patriarchs was subjected to sin, nor was there anything in them that

was free from sin, and from which afterwards Christ's body could be

formed.

Reply Obj. 1: Christ did not assume the flesh of the human race

subject to sin, but cleansed from all infection of sin. Thus it is

that "no defiled thing cometh into the Wisdom of God."

Reply Obj. 2: Christ is said to have assumed the first-fruits of our

nature, as to the likeness of condition; forasmuch as He assumed

flesh not infected by sin, like unto the flesh of man before sin. But

this is not to be understood to imply a continuation of that

primitive purity, as though the flesh of innocent man was preserved

in its freedom from sin until the formation of Christ's body.

Reply Obj. 3: Before Christ, there was actually in human nature a

wound, i.e. the infection of original sin. But the balm to heal the

wound was not there actually, but only by a certain virtue of origin,

forasmuch as from those patriarchs the flesh of Christ was to be

propagated.

_______________________

Summa Theologica, Part III (Tertia Pars) From the Complete American Edition · 第 218 / 654 题