FIRST ARTICLE [III, Q. 23, Art. 1]

Whether It Is Fitting That God Should Adopt Sons?

Objection 1: It would seem that it is not fitting that God should

adopt sons. For, as jurists say, no one adopts anyone but a stranger

as his son. But no one is a stranger in relation to God, Who is the

Creator of all. Therefore it seems unfitting that God should adopt.

Obj. 2: Further, adoption seems to have been introduced in default of

natural sonship. But in God there is natural sonship, as set down in

the First Part (Q. 27, A. 2). Therefore it is unfitting that God

should adopt.

Obj. 3: Further, the purpose of adopting anyone is that he may

succeed, as heir, the person who adopts him. But it does not seem

possible for anyone to succeed God as heir, for He can never die.

Therefore it is unfitting that God should adopt.

_On the contrary,_ It is written (Eph. 1:5) that "He hath

predestinated us unto the adoption of children of God." But the

predestination of God is not ineffectual. Therefore God does adopt

some as His sons.

_I answer that,_ A man adopts someone as his son forasmuch as out of

goodness he admits him as heir to his estate. Now God is infinitely

good: for which reason He admits His creatures to a participation of

good things; especially rational creatures, who forasmuch as they are

made to the image of God, are capable of Divine beatitude. And this

consists in the enjoyment of God, by which also God Himself is happy

and rich in Himself--that is, in the enjoyment of Himself. Now a

man's inheritance is that which makes him rich. Wherefore, inasmuch

as God, of His goodness, admits men to the inheritance of beatitude,

He is said to adopt them. Moreover Divine exceeds human adoption,

forasmuch as God, by bestowing His grace, makes man whom He adopts

worthy to receive the heavenly inheritance; whereas man does not make

him worthy whom he adopts; but rather in adopting him he chooses one

who is already worthy.

Reply Obj. 1: Considered in his nature man is not a stranger in

respect to God, as to the natural gifts bestowed on him: but he is as

to the gifts of grace and glory; in regard to which he is adopted.

Reply Obj. 2: Man works in order to supply his wants: not so God, Who

works in order to communicate to others the abundance of His

perfection. Wherefore, as by the work of creation the Divine goodness

is communicated to all creatures in a certain likeness, so by the

work of adoption the likeness of natural sonship is communicated to

men, according to Rom. 8:29: "Whom He foreknew . . . to be made

conformable to the image of His Son."

Reply Obj. 3: Spiritual goods can be possessed by many at the same

time; not so material goods. Wherefore none can receive a material

inheritance except the successor of a deceased person: whereas all

receive the spiritual inheritance at the same time in its entirety

without detriment to the ever-living Father.

Yet it might be said that God ceases to be, according as He is in us

by faith, so as to begin to be in us by vision, as a gloss says on

Rom. 8:17: "If sons, heirs also."

_______________________

Summa Theologica, Part III (Tertia Pars) From the Complete American Edition · 第 168 / 654 题