FOURTH ARTICLE [III, Q. 13, Art. 4]

Whether the Soul of Christ Had Omnipotence As Regards the Execution

of His Will?

Objection 1: It would seem that the soul of Christ had not

omnipotence as regards the execution of His own will. For it is

written (Mk. 7:24) that "entering into a house, He would that no man

should know it, and He could not be hid." Therefore He could not

carry out the purpose of His will in all things.

Obj. 2: Further, a command is a sign of will, as was said in the

First Part (Q. 19, A. 12). But our Lord commanded certain things to

be done, and the contrary came to pass, for it is written (Matt.

9:30, 31) that Jesus strictly charged them whose eyes had been

opened, saying: "See that no man know this. But they going out spread

His fame abroad in all that country." Therefore He could not carry

out the purpose of His will in everything.

Obj. 3: Further, a man does not ask from another for what he can do

himself. But our Lord besought the Father, praying for what He wished

to be done, for it is written (Luke 6:12): "He went out into a

mountain to pray, and He passed the whole night in the prayer of

God." Therefore He could not carry out the purpose of His will in all

things.

_On the contrary,_ Augustine says (Qq. Nov. et Vet. Test., qu. 77):

"It is impossible for the will of the Saviour not to be fulfilled:

nor is it possible for Him to will what He knows ought not to come to

pass."

_I answer that,_ Christ's soul willed things in two ways. First, what

was to be brought about by Himself; and it must be said that He was

capable of whatever He willed thus, since it would not befit His

wisdom if He willed to do anything of Himself that was not subject to

His will. Secondly, He wished things to be brought about by the

Divine power, as the resurrection of His own body and such like

miraculous deeds, which He could not effect by His own power, except

as the instrument of the Godhead, as was said above (A. 2).

Reply Obj. 1: As Augustine says (Qq. Nov. et Vet. Test., qu. 77):

"What came to pass, this Christ must be said to have willed. For it

must be remarked that this happened in the country of the Gentiles,

to whom it was not yet time to preach. Yet it would have been

invidious not to welcome such as came spontaneously for the faith.

Hence He did not wish to be heralded by His own, and yet He wished to

be sought; and so it came to pass." Or it may be said that this will

of Christ was not with regard to what was to be carried out by it,

but with regard to what was to be done by others, which did not come

under His human will. Hence in the letter of Pope Agatho, which was

approved in the Sixth Council [*Third Council of Constantinople, Act.

iv], we read: "When He, the Creator and Redeemer of all, wished to be

hid and could not, must not this be referred only to His human will

which He deigned to assume in time?"

Reply Obj. 2: As Gregory says (Moral. xix), by the fact that

"Our Lord charged His mighty works to be kept secret, He gave an

example to His servants coming after Him that they should wish their

miracles to be hidden; and yet, that others may profit by their

example, they are made public against their will." And thus this

command signified His will to fly from human glory, according to John

8:50, "I seek not My own glory." Yet He wished absolutely, and

especially by His Divine will, that the miracle wrought should be

published for the good of others.

Reply Obj. 3: Christ prayed both for things that were to be

brought about by the Divine power, and for what He Himself was to do

by His human will, since the power and operation of Christ's soul

depended on God, "Who works in all [Vulg.: 'you'], both to will and to

accomplish" (Phil. 2:13).

_______________________

Summa Theologica, Part III (Tertia Pars) From the Complete American Edition · 第 106 / 654 题