THIRD ARTICLE [III, Q. 10, Art. 3]

Whether the Soul of Christ Can Know the Infinite in the Word?

Objection 1: It would seem that the soul of Christ cannot know the

infinite in the Word. For that the infinite should be known is

repugnant to the definition of the infinite which (Phys. iii, 63) is

said to be that "from which, however much we may take, there always

remains something to be taken." But it is impossible for the

definition to be separated from the thing defined, since this would

mean that contradictories exist together. Therefore it is impossible

that the soul of Christ knows the infinite.

Obj. 2: Further, the knowledge of the infinite is infinite. But the

knowledge of the soul of Christ cannot be infinite, because its

capacity is finite, since it is created. Therefore the soul of Christ

cannot know the infinite.

Obj. 3: Further, there can be nothing greater than the infinite. But

more is contained in the Divine knowledge, absolutely speaking, than

in the knowledge of Christ's soul, as stated above (A. 2). Therefore

the soul of Christ does not know the infinite.

_On the contrary,_ The soul of Christ knows all its power and all it

can do. Now it can cleanse infinite sins, according to 1 John 2:2:

"He is the propitiation for our sins, and not for ours only, but also

for those of the whole world." Therefore the soul of Christ knows the

infinite.

_I answer that,_ Knowledge regards only being, since being and truth

are convertible. Now a thing is said to be a being in two ways:

First, simply, i.e. whatever is a being in act; secondly, relatively,

i.e. whatever is a being in potentiality. And because, as is said

_Metaph._ ix, 20, everything is known as it is in act, and not as it

is in potentiality, knowledge primarily and essentially regards being

in act, and secondarily regards being in potentiality, which is not

knowable of itself, but inasmuch as that in whose power it exists is

known. Hence, with regard to the first mode of knowledge, the soul of

Christ does not know the infinite. Because there is not an infinite

number in act, even though we were to reckon all that are in act at

any time whatsoever, since the state of generation and corruption

will not last for ever: consequently there is a certain number not

only of things lacking generation and corruption, but also of things

capable of generation and corruption. But with regard to the other

mode of knowing, the soul of Christ knows infinite things in the

Word, for it knows, as stated above (A. 2), all that is in the power

of the creature. Hence, since in the power of the creature there is

an infinite number of things, it knows the infinite, as it were, by a

certain knowledge of simple intelligence, and not by a knowledge of

vision.

Reply Obj. 1: As we said in the First Part (Q. 8, A. 1), the infinite

is taken in two ways. First, on the part of a form, and thus we have

the negatively infinite, i.e. a form or act not limited by being

received into matter or a subject; and this infinite of itself is

most knowable on account of the perfection of the act, although it is

not comprehensible by the finite power of the creature; for thus God

is said to be infinite. And this infinite the soul of Christ knows,

yet does not comprehend. Secondly, there is the infinite as regards

matter, which is taken privatively, i.e. inasmuch as it has not the

form it ought naturally to have, and in this way we have infinite in

quantity. Now such an infinite of itself, is unknown: inasmuch as it

is, as it were, matter with privation of form as is said _Phys._ iii,

65. But all knowledge is by form or act. Therefore if this infinite

is to be known according to its mode of being, it cannot be known.

For its mode is that part be taken after part, as is said _Phys._

iii, 62, 63. And in this way it is true that, if we take something

from it, i.e. taking part after part, there always remains something

to be taken. But as material things can be received by the intellect

immaterially, and many things unitedly, so can infinite things be

received by the intellect, not after the manner of infinite, but

finitely; and thus what are in themselves infinite are, in the

intellect of the knower, finite. And in this way the soul of Christ

knows an infinite number of things, inasmuch as it knows them not by

discoursing from one to another, but in a certain unity, i.e. in any

creature in whose potentiality infinite things exist, and principally

in the Word Himself.

Reply Obj. 2: There is nothing to hinder a thing from being infinite

in one way and finite in another, as when in quantities we imagine a

surface infinite in length and finite in breadth. Hence, if there

were an infinite number of men, they would have a relative infinity,

i.e. in multitude; but, as regards the essence, they would be finite,

since the essence of all would be limited to one specific nature. But

what is simply infinite in its essence is God, as was said in the

First Part (Q. 7, A. 2). Now the proper object of the intellect is

"what a thing is," as is said _De Anima_ iii, 26, to which pertains

the notion of the species. And thus the soul of Christ, since it has

a finite capacity, attains to, but does not comprehend, what is

simply infinite in essence, as stated above (A. 1). But the infinite

in potentiality which is in creatures can be comprehended by the soul

of Christ, since it is compared to that soul according to its

essence, in which respect it is not infinite. For even our intellect

understands a universal--for example, the nature of a genus or

species, which in a manner has infinity, inasmuch as it can be

predicated of an infinite number.

Reply Obj. 3: That which is infinite in every way can be but one.

Hence the Philosopher says (De Coel. i, 2, 3) that, since bodies have

dimensions in every part, there cannot be several infinite bodies.

Yet if anything were infinite in one way only, nothing would hinder

the existence of several such infinite things; as if we were to

suppose several lines of infinite length drawn on a surface of finite

breadth. Hence, because infinitude is not a substance, but is

accidental to things that are said to be infinite, as the Philosopher

says (Phys. iii, 37, 38); as the infinite is multiplied by different

subjects, so, too, a property of the infinite must be multiplied, in

such a way that it belongs to each of them according to that

particular subject. Now it is a property of the infinite that nothing

is greater than it. Hence, if we take one infinite line, there is

nothing greater in it than the infinite; so, too, if we take any one

of other infinite lines, it is plain that each has infinite parts.

Therefore of necessity in this particular line there is nothing

greater than all these infinite parts; yet in another or a third line

there will be more infinite parts besides these. We observe this in

numbers also, for the species of even numbers are infinite, and

likewise the species of odd numbers are infinite; yet there are more

even and odd numbers than even. And thus it must be said that nothing

is greater than the simply and in every way infinite; but than the

infinite which is limited in some respect, nothing is greater in that

order; yet we may suppose something greater outside that order. In

this way, therefore, there are infinite things in the potentiality of

the creature, and yet there are more in the power of God than in the

potentiality of the creature. So, too, the soul of Christ knows

infinite things by the knowledge of simple intelligence; yet God

knows more by this manner of knowledge or understanding.

_______________________

Summa Theologica, Part III (Tertia Pars) From the Complete American Edition · 第 88 / 654 题