NINTH ARTICLE [III, Q. 7, Art. 9]

Whether in Christ There Was the Fulness of Grace?

Objection 1: It would seem that in Christ there was not the fulness

of grace. For the virtues flow from grace, as was said above (I-II,

Q. 110, A. 4). But in Christ there were not all the virtues; for

there was neither faith nor hope in Him, as was shown above (AA. 3,

4). Therefore in Christ there was not the fulness of grace.

Obj. 2: Further, as is plain from what was said above (I-II, Q. 111,

A. 2), grace is divided into operating and cooperating. Now operating

grace signifies that whereby the ungodly is justified, which has no

place in Christ, Who never lay under any sin. Therefore in Christ

there was not the fulness of grace.

Obj. 3: Further, it is written (James 1:17): "Every best gift and

every perfect gift is from above, coming down from the Father of

lights." But what comes thus is possessed partially, and not fully.

Therefore no creature, not even the soul of Christ, can have the

fulness of the gifts of grace.

_On the contrary,_ It is written (John 1:14): "We saw Him [Vulg.:

'His glory'] full of grace and truth."

_I answer that,_ To have fully is to have wholly and perfectly. Now

totality and perfection can be taken in two ways: First as regards

their _intensive_ quantity; for instance, I may say that some man has

whiteness fully, because he has as much of it as can naturally be in

him; secondly, _as regards power_; for instance, if anyone be said to

have life fully, inasmuch as he has it in all the effects or works of

life; and thus man has life fully, but senseless animals or plants

have not. Now in both these ways Christ has the fulness of grace.

First, since He has grace in its highest degree, in the most perfect

way it can be had. And this appears, first, from the nearness of

Christ's soul to the cause of grace. For it was said above (A. 1)

that the nearer a recipient is to the inflowing cause, the more it

receives. And hence the soul of Christ, which is more closely united

to God than all other rational creatures, receives the greatest

outpouring of His grace. Secondly, in His relation to the effect. For

the soul of Christ so received grace, that, in a manner, it is poured

out from it upon others. And hence it behooved Him to have the

greatest grace; as fire which is the cause of heat in other hot

things, is of all things the hottest.

Likewise, as regards the _virtue_ of grace, He had grace fully, since

He had it for all the operations and effects of grace; and this,

because grace was bestowed on Him, as upon a universal principle in

the genus of such as have grace. Now the virtue of the first

principle of a genus universally extends itself to all the effects of

that genus; thus the force of the sun, which is the universal cause

of generation, as Dionysius says (Div. Nom. i), extends to all things

that come under generation. Hence the second fulness of grace is seen

in Christ inasmuch as His grace extends to all the effects of grace,

which are the virtues, gifts, and the like.

Reply Obj. 1: Faith and hope signify effects of grace with certain

defects on the part of the recipient of grace, inasmuch as faith is

of the unseen, and hope of what is not yet possessed. Hence it was

not necessary that in Christ, Who is the author of grace, there

should be any defects such as faith and hope imply; but whatever

perfection is in faith and hope was in Christ most perfectly; as in

fire there are not all the modes of heat which are defective by the

subject's defect, but whatever belongs to the perfection of heat.

Reply Obj. 2: It pertains essentially to operating grace to justify;

but that it makes the ungodly to be just is accidental to it on the

part of the subject, in which sin is found. Therefore the soul of

Christ was justified by operating grace, inasmuch as it was rendered

just and holy by it from the beginning of His conception; not that it

was until then sinful, or even not just.

Reply Obj. 3: The fulness of grace is attributed to the soul of

Christ according to the capacity of the creature and not by

comparison with the infinite fulness of the Divine goodness.

_______________________

Summa Theologica, Part III (Tertia Pars) From the Complete American Edition · 第 66 / 654 题