I was standing erect, gazing at him, angrily.

"If you are joking, Tom," I exclaimed, having lost all patience, "I

think you are displaying most wretched taste. If you are really in

earnest, I am very sorry for you. I'm going to bed. I hope I'll find

you fully recovered at breakfast."

He did not seem to be at all impressed by my exhibition of temper.

"Wait just a moment, Winifred," he suggested, his eyes fixed on his

book. "Here it is about George Sand--their first meeting, you know.

Wait! I'll read it to you."

"I shall not wait, Tom Remsen," I cried. "Chopin's love affairs are

nothing to me--and they should be nothing to you. Good night. This is

my last word. Good night."

As I reached the door, I glanced over my shoulder. Tom seemed to have

forgotten my existence. He had plunged again into the dust-heap of an

old scandal that seemed to fascinate him--Tom Remsen, who had hitherto

always deprecated and avoided that kind of research.

*CHAPTER IV.*

*SIGNORINA MOLATTI.*

And thou, too--when on me fell thine eye,

What disclos'd thy cheek's deep-purple dye?

SCHILLER.

Two days went by, and while I still pondered the great mystery and kept

a close watch on Tom, I had begun to hope that the exactions of his

profession had led him to abandon his effort to explain what he had

called his "seizure." He had been busy of late with the technicalities

involved in the formation of a new trust, and his mind seemed to be

wholly engrossed by this gigantic task. By tacit consent we had both

avoided all reference to my recent musical and its weird and

inexplicable outcome. At times, I was almost inclined to believe that

Tom had forgotten Chopin and all his works.

As for myself, I could not recover a normal state of mind. For the

first time in my life, I felt an admiration for the very characteristics

of my husband's make-up that hitherto had annoyed and wearied me. His

ability to rebound at once from the shock that he had sustained filled

me with both envy and amazement. I had begun to realize that the mental

poise of an unimpressionable, unimaginative man is a very desirable and

praise-worthy possession.

I regretted at times that I could not throw myself into some despotic

occupation that should demand all my physical and mental energies. As

yet, I had not found the courage to face the world and its questionings.

For two days, I had denied myself to even my most intimate friends, not

excepting Mrs. Jack Van Corlear, who had hurried to me on the day

succeeding my musical. I knew that my callers were actuated by a not

unnatural curiosity, and I lacked the nervous energy to face people who

would politely claim the right to know why Tom had always concealed his

genius as a pianist. I think I fully understand the set in which I

move. We dearly love a new sensation. Without leaving my house or

receiving a single visitor, I could readily grasp the fact that the

leading topic of conversation in society at the moment revolved around

Tom Remsen as a masterly interpreter of Chopin.

Chopin! I had begun to hate the name. But I had not been able to

resist the temptation to spend many hours in the library poring over the

books that dealt, directly or indirectly, with his personality and

achievements. The temporary enthusiasm that Tom had displayed for

research into the life of Frederic Chopin bade fair to become a

permanent passion in my case. I devoted whole afternoons to playing, in

my amateurish way, his waltzes, mazurkas, nocturnes and ballads. One of

the latter, his Opus 47, I had not the audacity to attempt. Somehow,

Tom's recent rendition of the piece seemed to stand as a barrier that it

would be sacrilege for me to cross. Nevertheless, I longed to hear the

ballad again, and was almost tempted to ask Tom to play it to me alone.

That he was wholly incapable of repeating his recent performance, my

mind refused to believe. I had returned, almost unconsciously, to my

first conviction, that my husband had wilfully deceived me for years

regarding his musical ability.

I sat poring over an English criticism of Chopin's posthumous works late

one afternoon when a card was brought to me in the library that tempted

me to come out of my self-imposed retreat. It bore the name:

Perkins, the Fakeer: A Travesty on Reincarnation His wonderful workings in the cases of "When Reginald was Caroline", "How Chopin came to Remsen", and "Clarissa's troublesome baby" · 第 12 / 25 题